Editing Anti-Interesting (section)

=== 2020 ===

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1220181087650906112
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=If you want to see this theory of Idea Suppression in action, retweet the first tweet in the thread with hashtag #SlipTheDISC. Hey, who knows...We might be able to change the game.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1220179670802395137
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Five days ago I released a podcast. It has been listened to by over 100,000 people. If you search twitter you will see that it generates an enormous amount of interest except from two groups: the news &amp; professors. They are not disinterested, but [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interested]]. Except for Greg.
{{Tweet
|image=greggutfeld-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/greggutfeld/status/1220169528761552897
|name=GregGutfeld
|usernameurl=https://x.com/greggutfeld
|username=greggutfeld
|content=if you haven't listened to this then you're in for a crazy, unhinged but brilliant ride.
|timestamp=1:20 AM · Jan 22, 2020
}}
|timestamp=3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1220179678842933248
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=What is [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interesting]]? Well Jeffery Epstein’s wealth source is [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interesting]] to media. Bernie in 2016 was [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interesting]] to @nytimes. Income inequality was [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interesting]] to economists until very recently. The Las Vegas shooter was [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interesting]]. Building Seven too.
|timestamp=3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020
|media1=ERW-X-post-1220179678842933248-EO7y8xoUUAAphUb.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1220179684547149826
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=To @MSNBC, @AndrewYang is pathologically [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interesting]]. Flight 800 is pretty [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interesting]] as was the [[Boskin Commission|Boskin Commission’s]] attempt to transfer 1 Trillion Dollars by hacking the [[CPI]]. The [[H-1B Visa|H1-B visa]] history is [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interesting]]. As are broken laboratory mice with long telomeres.
|timestamp=3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020
|media1=ERW-X-post-1220179684547149826-EO7y9I5VAAAcl0i.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1220179687340572672
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=[[Anti-Interesting|Anti-interesting]], adj. 1) A subject is said to be anti-interesting if it is absolutely fascinating to the point where there is a strong market for it’s investigation but it threatens an institution capable of stifling  discussion inside the [[Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN)]].
|timestamp=3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1220179688171040768
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=But I find these things fascinating. As do we all. Do stay tuned to The Portal. 

More to come. Thanks @greggutfeld!

https://sec.gov/rules/proposed/s72103/s72103-9.pdf
|timestamp=3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020
}}
|timestamp=3:06 AM · Jan 23, 2020
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1233422752352100354
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=It is an entire concept that has disappeared: institutional accountability with institutions going after institutions rather than institutions going after those individuals who are the only ones who are still really raising questions.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1233421386590220288
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Where are we on State-Sponsored pedophilia honey-pots?

Let’s try the following: How can we be sure that China, Russia or Iran wasn’t behind Epstein if we can’t ask the question of Epstein’s ties to intelligence? So either we KNOW his tie, or we are leaving a giant security hole.
|timestamp=3:59 PM · Feb 28, 2020
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1233421390029606912
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Why is that '''anti-interesting'''? Wouldn’t we want to be sure that Epstein’s fortune didn’t come from China, Russia, etc.? Thus we either *know* that it didn’t and aren’t reporting what we know, or we have left the door open to the states that we are certain are trying to control us.
|timestamp=3:59 PM · Feb 28, 2020
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1233421391669497856
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Pursue this even further: if news desks aren’t asking these questions, aren’t they under suspicion of being under control of foreign or domestic intelligence? That is can we essentially back out that some intelligence has captured legacy media if they aren’t willing to *ask* Qs?
|timestamp=3:59 PM · Feb 28, 2020
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1233422750229745666
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Let me say as someone old enough to remember Watergate & the Church Committee, as recently as 40-50 years ago journalists would pursue stories about dirty tricks and Intelligence excesses. The phrase “No Comment” is familiar to anyone my age from this time.

Where is that phrase?
|timestamp=4:04 PM · Feb 28, 2020
}}
|timestamp=4:04 PM · Feb 28, 2020
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1257067241914298369
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Ghislaine Maxwell is the most '''anti-interesting''' person on earth. She remained not worth locating, questioning or investigating during all of April.
|timestamp=9:59 PM · May 3, 2020
|media1=ERW-X-post-1257067241914298369-EXH__kHU0AUEEBC.jpg
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1274770155185176576
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Why is Ghislaine Maxwell so '''anti-interesting''' to our media? To our FBI? To our CIA? I mean these folks do *not* want to find her or talk to her in a HUGE way. 

Let’s find out.
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=Margoandhow-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/Margoandhow/status/1274519130012614656
|name=Margo Howard
|usernameurl=https://x.com/Margoandhow
|username=Margoandhow
|content=How hard can this be - unless the US (read Trump & Friends) has asked Interpol NOT to find her?

https://www.the-sun.com/news/1014441/jeffrey-epstein-ghislaine-maxwell-hiding-paris-flat/
|timestamp=1:46 AM · Jun 21, 2020
}}
|timestamp=6:24 PM · Jun 21, 2020
}}