Editing CPI (section)

=== 2020 ===

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1220181087650906112
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=If you want to see this theory of [[The Distributed Idea Suppression Complex (The DISC)|Idea Suppression]] in action, retweet the first tweet in the thread with hashtag #SlipTheDISC. Hey, who knows...We might be able to change the game.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1220179670802395137
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Five days ago I released a podcast. It has been listened to by over 100,000 people. If you search twitter you will see that it generates an enormous amount of interest except from two groups: the news &amp; professors. They are not disinterested, but [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interested]]. Except for Greg.
{{Tweet
|image=greggutfeld-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/greggutfeld/status/1220169528761552897
|name=GregGutfeld
|usernameurl=https://x.com/greggutfeld
|username=greggutfeld
|content=if you haven't listened to this then you're in for a crazy, unhinged but brilliant ride.
|timestamp=1:20 AM · Jan 22, 2020
}}
|timestamp=3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1220179678842933248
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=What is [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interesting]]? Well [[Jeffrey Epstein|Jeffery Epstein]]’s wealth source is anti-interesting to media. Bernie in 2016 was anti-interesting to @nytimes. Income inequality was anti-interesting to economists until very recently. The Las Vegas shooter was anti-interesting. Building Seven too.
|timestamp=3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020
|media1=ERW-X-post-1220179678842933248-EO7y8xoUUAAphUb.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1220179684547149826
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=To @MSNBC, @AndrewYang is pathologically anti-interesting. Flight 800 is pretty anti-interesting as was the [[Boskin Commission|Boskin Commission’s]] attempt to transfer 1 Trillion Dollars by hacking the [[CPI]]. The H1-B visa history is [[Anti-Interesting|anti-interesting]]. As are broken laboratory mice with long telomeres.
|timestamp=3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020
|media1=ERW-X-post-1220179684547149826-EO7y9I5VAAAcl0i.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1220179687340572672
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=[[Anti-Interesting|Anti-interesting]], adj. 1) A subject is said to be anti-interesting if it is absolutely fascinating to the point where there is a strong market for it’s investigation but it threatens an institution capable of stifling  discussion inside the [[Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN)]].
|timestamp=3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1220179688171040768
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=But I find these things fascinating. As do we all. Do stay tuned to The Portal. 

More to come. Thanks @greggutfeld!

https://sec.gov/rules/proposed/s72103/s72103-9.pdf
|timestamp=3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020
}}
|timestamp=3:06 AM · Jan 23, 2020
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1273720830367690752
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Heather gets two shoutouts by accident. I was moving her name around to make room for an economist who I happen to collaborate with and be married to: @PiaMalaney who stood against '''CPI manipulation''', lying about trade, etc. apologies to both.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1273719095045701632
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=People like @skdh, @nntaleb, @BretWeinstein, @SamHarrisOrg, @DrDebraSoh, @jordanbpeterson, @peterwoit, @HeatherEHeying, @GadSaad, @matloff, @HeatherEHeying, @Nouriel, etc are all PhDs proven to be able to stand alone against a mob &amp; stare them down.

Simple: who has stood alone?
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=offshoreleague-profile-u3nY-OwT.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/offshoreleague/status/1273714469567213568
|name=Mark Readings
|usernameurl=https://x.com/offshoreleague
|username=offshoreleague
|content=Who leads this list, Eric? Who would be your starting 5?
|timestamp=8:29 PM · Jun 18, 2020
}}
|timestamp=8:47 PM · Jun 18, 2020
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1273720179357175809
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=The ability to stand alone against an obviously incorrect mob of fellow PhDs is:

A) Easy to spot as there are so few.

B) The actual Sin Qua Non of being a scientist.

C) The target of every HR department and weak scientist/Dept. claiming to care so very very deeply about STEM.
|timestamp=8:52 PM · Jun 18, 2020
}}
|timestamp=8:54 PM · Jun 18, 2020
}}