Editing Richard Feynman (section)

=== 2009 ===

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3256969116
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Why am I brought up on the names Einstein, Dirac, Heisenberg, [[Richard Feynman|Feynman]], Weinberg, etc ....and not flippin' Yang??? Yang=Da Man.
|timestamp=1:59 AM · Aug 12, 2009
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3486388504
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Recommendation: If you must compare "[[Kung Fu Panda]]" to "Godfather I" or "War and Peace" do it on a Saturday in late August. #mytwocents
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3473300684
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=New topic: the importance of "Kung Fu Panda".
|timestamp=3:34 PM · Aug 22, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3473366852
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=To begin with, like a Beethoven symphony, [[Kung Fu Panda]] is meant to be accessed on multiple levels with "Believe in yourself" as the lowest.
|timestamp=3:38 PM · Aug 22, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3473609846
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=The voice performances (w/ exception of Jolie) are all strong. Dustin Hoffman is fantastic. Jack Black solid, McShane and Duk Kim brilliant.
|timestamp=3:53 PM · Aug 22, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3473878202
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=But what makes Kung Fu Panda the film of the decade (ergo century, ergo millenium) is that it alone tackles a central issue of science.
|timestamp=4:10 PM · Aug 22, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3474148493
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Driving Kung Fu Panda is the tension between dual modes of learning: Knowledge Transfer and Discovery. As innovator, Oogway is heirless.
|timestamp=4:26 PM · Aug 22, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3474196824
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=But Oogway who has a star mentee is not content with the fate of [[Paul Dirac|Dirac]], [[Albert Einstein|Einstein]], [[Richard Feynman|Feynman]], etc... in not leaving an innovator-successor.
|timestamp=4:29 PM · Aug 22, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3474224837
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=[I know taking Kung Fu Panda seriously will lose followers....but I don't care about those eyeballs as the issue and film are too important]
|timestamp=4:31 PM · Aug 22, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3474306064
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=So while Oogway is master to Shifu who is/was master to both Tai Lung and Tigress he chooses to elevate the ostensibly inexplicable Panda.
|timestamp=4:36 PM · Aug 22, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3474348662
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=In fact, Panda has demonstrated two features in strapping himself to a firework propelled chair: a willingness to innovate and break rules.
|timestamp=4:38 PM · Aug 22, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3474382580
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=The film then shows the presumed successor (Tigress) as willing to break rules but previously shows this liniage to be prestige focused.
|timestamp=4:40 PM · Aug 22, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3478589295
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Think of the Panda as having a major & minor advisor. The major advisor (Oogway) he meets only twice. To the minor advisor falls training.
|timestamp=8:44 PM · Aug 22, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3478839119
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=So university based PhD advising is based on the failed Shifu-Tigress model. But great science seeks the added Oogway-Panda dimension.
|timestamp=9:00 PM · Aug 22, 2009
}}
|timestamp=4:45 AM · Aug 23, 2009
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3704496800
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Imagine before [[Jim Watson|Watson]]-[[Francis Crick|Crick]] I asked you: "Go nuts. What could possibly make [[Erwin Chargaff|Chargaff's]] Equimolar rules gorgeous, motivated and canonical?"
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3703002903
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Ever heard an organized religion complain that G-d would never slap some butt ugly quartic potential on the world to give it mass?
|timestamp=2:33 AM · Sep 2, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3704214643
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=To Dave Bacon: "Butt ugly" referred to the present motivation for the Higgs terms as intellectual spackle. Soft mass won't likely stay ugly
|timestamp=3:39 AM · Sep 2, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3704373990
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Higgs mass is akin to the once poorly motivated "neutral currents" rejected by [[Richard Feynman|Feynman]] as merely invoked for renormalizabilty. Now: not so.
|timestamp=3:49 AM · Sep 2, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3704435018
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Challenge to my physics followers: what could possibly make the Mexican Hat quartic gorgeous, natural and canonical? #daretodream
|timestamp=3:53 AM · Sep 2, 2009
}}
|timestamp=3:56 AM · Sep 2, 2009
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3779359863
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Fascinated by [[Richard Feynman|Feynman]] fans who don't realize he would have humiliated them just to steal their wives at the end of the seminar.
|timestamp=2:32 PM · Sep 5, 2009
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4309514559
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Q: Was [[Richard Feynman|Feynman]] initially incapable of explaining his theory at a technical or a sociological level? (e.g. w/ Bohr, Oppenheimer)
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4309282320
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Here's something I never got. Why did [[Richard Feynman|Feynman]] need Dyson to explain his theory? Did he? Or did he just need a non-Feynman?
|timestamp=5:39 AM · Sep 23, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4309327773
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=I understand the Dyson added value by tying together Schwinger with [[Richard Feynman|Feynman]]. But it seems like [[Richard Feynman|RF]] couldn't get past the resistance.
|timestamp=5:43 AM · Sep 23, 2009
}}
|timestamp=5:56 AM · Sep 23, 2009
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4409695457
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Q1: Why did [[Richard Feynman|Feynman]] ask to be removed from the National Academy of Sciences? 
Q2: How common is that?
|timestamp=3:59 AM · Sep 27, 2009
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5632000667
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Debating whether to remind actual physicists of the role of experimenters in the Tau-Theta circus. [[Richard Feynman|Feynman's]] take: http://www.gorgorat.com/
|timestamp=10:52 PM · Nov 11, 2009
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/6241378525
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Oppenheimer's famous repeating of Wigner's calling [[Richard Feynman|Feynman]] 'a second Dirac' somehow managed to do no service to any of these heros. #nofecta
|timestamp=5:37 PM · Dec 1, 2009
}}