Editing Emmy Noether

[[File:ERW-X-post-1502346713687724033-FNloX71VkAAqnZI.jpg|thumb|Emmy Noether]]

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1174719950423937024
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@vgr That’s adorable. But no. Genius just is. You just kinda know it when you are getting your ass kicked. 

I have to deal with them professionally. They are often insufferable. Just like their male counterparts. And, just like their male counterparts, I thank god they are here.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1174715273124839426
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=Like how we all ignore the genius of [[Emmy Noether]], [[Lisa Randall]], [[Elizabeth Blackburn]], [[Marie Curie]], [[Karen Uhlenbeck]], [[Lise Meitner]] and [[Madame Wu|Madame Shien-Chiung Wu]]?

If you want equality as I do, let me say what I would say to any man who made this argument: No. No way. Not even close.
|timestamp=4:02 PM · Sep 19, 2019
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1174716823628992512
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=There are many female geniuses. They‘ve fought harder than men to have it recognized. This is an injustice to them to slight what they have done for our species. No one has earned the right to advance the activism of others over their achievements:

https://t.co/SPUiJM8gzU
|timestamp=4:08 PM · Sep 19, 2019
}}
|timestamp=4:20 PM · Sep 19, 2019
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1502697206767185923
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@CreatedInTheD The atom moves through space. But as a wave. If a wave moves through a small oil slick, the oil slick doesn’t move with the wave. It briefly rises &amp; falls in place when excited. The medium doesn’t move. The thing that moves is the atom. The thing that stays is the Vector bundle.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1502338981056237568
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=In essence this is happening every time “you” move. When you see spectators doing “The Wave” the spectators are the medium. They don’t move with the wave.

You are a wave. You excite a totally different portion of the medium wherever you go. That medium is called a vector bundle.
|timestamp=5:41 PM · Mar 11, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1502344982874574849
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=I don’t think this Ship of Theseus thought experiment is doing what it sets out to do. In some sense a new atom in the same location &amp; state *is* the same atom. It is re-exciting the same medium to the same excited state. Planks &amp; joints on a ship have mildly different character.
|timestamp=6:05 PM · Mar 11, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1502344985831567362
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=But you could imagine a physics in which there were failures of conservation laws and you would have splitting events. I may hold an MP4 of you on video, but if I copy it, you have the logical equivalent. Well, this gets into multiverse territory. Are we splitting like the video?
|timestamp=6:05 PM · Mar 11, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1502344984745316354
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=What makes you “you”? Well, state, conservation laws, continuity, uniqueness. State means you have your memories &amp; neural connections. But the others are sort of like a double-spend problem. When you transfer a Bitcoin. Is it the same one? I’d say it continues the earlier token.
|timestamp=6:05 PM · Mar 11, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1502346713687724033
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=So conservation laws ensure that anything too complex to construct is a unique continuation of its earlier selves until it dissolves into entropy. And what generates conservation laws? Symmetry. In a way, we all have Prof. [[Emmy Noether]] to thank for identity.

But for another day.
|media=ERW-X-post-1502346713687724033-FNloX71VkAAqnZI.jpg
|timestamp=6:12 PM · Mar 11, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1502364785693773827
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=@TomkowTerrance Sigh. So sad, so sad.
|timestamp=7:24 PM · Mar 11, 2022
}}
|timestamp=5:25 PM · Mar 12, 2022
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1682982386936565762
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=So you have my list. It is incomplete and idiosyncratic. I’d love to have your corrections and additions. 

So….Where is yours? Thanks again.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1682977588484947969
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=It is an interesting question as to who inspires us in physics. Here is a list of 20th century giants whose work inspired me that might work as protagonists with interesting stories that deserve to be considered along with the best known Einstein/Hawking/Oppenheimer/Etc.:

[[CN Yang]] (with Lee and Simons)</br>
[[Paul Dirac]]</br>
Ernst Stueckelberg</br>
[[Madame Wu]]</br>
David Bohm</br>
Abdus Salam</br>
[[Ken Wilson]]</br>
[[Emmy Noether]]</br>
Ettore Majorana</br>
Carlo Rubio</br>
Shin'ichirō Tomonaga</br>
[[Lev Landau]]</br>
Simon Van der Meer</br>
Freeman Dyson</br>
Julian Schwinger</br>
Paul Ehrenfest</br>
John VonNeumann</br>
Feza Gursey</br>
Wolfgang Pauli</br>
Louis and [[Ed Witten|Edward Witten]]</br>
Hans Bethe</br>
George Sudarshan</br> 
Vera Rubin</br>
Gerard 't Hooft 

Not all of those stories are…uh…simple.

Would be curious to hear names from others.
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=sama-profile-k43GMz63.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/sama/status/1682809958734131200
|name=Sam Altman
|usernameurl=https://x.com/sama
|username=sama
|content=i was hoping that the oppenheimer movie would inspire a generation of kids to be physicists but it really missed the mark on that.

let's get that movie made!

(i think the social network managed to do this for startup founders.)
|timestamp=5:48 PM · Jul 22, 2023
}}
|timestamp=4:54 AM · Jul 23, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1682977591836196866
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=But let’s face facts: inspiration is not the issue. Fundamental Physics needs to be a good life. What is holding us back is:

A) Terrible Pay. 

B) Worse Odds of Survival

C) Decoupling of Success at Physics from Success in Physics

D) The Matthew Effect.

E) Math and Physics Pricks

F) Tyranny of large programs over individuals.

G) Multi Decade Stagnation

H) Un Scientific And even Anti-scientific behavior.

I) The Matilde Effect

J) The Sudarshan Effect

K) Ethics Collapse

L) Needlessly long pedagogical sequence (e.g. intro physics -> Classical Mechanics -> Grad Classical Mechanics -> Symplectic Geometry)  driven by history.

M) Socializing physics into a team sport in areas dominated by individuals and iconoclasts.

N) Tolerance for Program level failure (e.g. *obsessive* use of toy model physics to evade a reckoning).

O) Intolerance for individual error and failure by those in programs.

P) Failure to reward early contributions (e.g. *Abelian* Chern Simons QFT).

Q) Atrocious MSM journalism distorting the public understanding.

R) Relentless discussion of woo physics in public and 3-5 real topics (e.g. somebodies cat).

S) Learned Helplessness coming from over-learning Ken Wilson.

T) Inability to support motherhood of female physicists.

U) Inability to keep physics marriages easily together with jobs.

V) DEI loyalty oaths and loss of autonomy.

W) Flooding of markets with disposable labor and abuse apprenticeship as labor.

X) Kicking up on attribution.

Y) Overpaying for cherry topping.

Z) Fetishizing the quantum when innovation in classical field theory remains the heart of QFT.
|timestamp=4:55 AM · Jul 23, 2023
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1682977595321720832
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein
|username=ericweinstein
|content=But lastly, if outsiders want to fund and fix movies, you will find that going to the “Leading physicists” won’t work. [[Peer Review|Peer review]] can’t work when the leadership *is* the problem. You get more failure. 

You need to hold meetings where you get disagreement. So choose the leaders and iconoclasts with great care. Patrick Collison isn’t terrible at this. B+. Best I have ever seen. Start there. Good luck. 🙏
|timestamp=4:55 AM · Jul 23, 2023
}}
|timestamp=5:14 AM · Jul 23, 2023
}}

{{stub}}

== Related Pages ==

* [[Albert Einstein]]
* [[Elizabeth Blackburn]]
* [[Isadore Singer]]
* [[Lisa Randall]]
* [[Lise Meitner]]
* [[Karen Uhlenbeck]]
* [[Marie Curie]]
* [[Paul Dirac]]
* [[Raoul Bott]]
* [[Read]]

[[Category:Mathematics]]
[[Category:People]]
[[Category:Portal Topics]]
[[Category:Physics]]