Editing Adjective, Occupation, Name Formula
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The "Adj.-Profession-Name" Formula, Disagreeables, & the "No-Living-Heroes" thy. Consider adjectives: | |||
Embattled | |||
Controversial | |||
Divisive | |||
Reclusive | |||
Provocative | |||
Struggling | |||
Right-Wing | |||
Eccentric | |||
Self-styled | |||
Far-Left | |||
Recovering | |||
Disgraced | |||
Self-Promoting | |||
Free-thinking | |||
Volatile | |||
etc. | |||
These adjectives are really reserved terms and the 'tells' of mainstream media letting you know who is off-narrative and who they have marked for reputation neutralization through FUD (Fear-Uncertainty and Doubt) campaigns. | These adjectives are really reserved terms and the 'tells' of mainstream media letting you know who is off-narrative and who they have marked for reputation neutralization through FUD (Fear-Uncertainty and Doubt) campaigns. | ||
So what's wrong with calling a professor who is controversial, a "controversial professor" you may fairly ask? The problem is that MSM builds clientside architecture in your own mind that you don't notice. Proof? Check the | So what's wrong with calling a professor who is controversial, a "controversial professor" you may fairly ask? The problem is that MSM builds clientside architecture in your own mind that you don't notice. Proof? Check the graphic attached. | ||
Apparently in the entire history of the internet, this tweet is the first to ever use the phrase "controversial professor Paul Krugman" to describe @paulkrugman even though he is famous for being a controversial professor. | Apparently in the entire history of the internet, this tweet is the first to ever use the phrase "controversial professor Paul Krugman" to describe @paulkrugman even though he is famous for being a controversial professor. | ||
Line 27: | Line 35: | ||
So...how can that be? | So...how can that be? | ||
Let’s first dig a bit to look for positive framings of my colleague “controversial professor” @jordanbpeterson. Consider | Let’s first dig a bit to look for positive framings of my colleague “controversial professor” @jordanbpeterson. Consider these attachments for a man whose fame is largely due to being a noble inspirational heroic maverick. | ||
The point is that real humans don’t talk like this. | The point is that real humans don’t talk like this. | ||
Line 59: | Line 67: | ||
C) The institutions seat some of the disagreeables. | C) The institutions seat some of the disagreeables. | ||
My prediction is that the Gated Institutional Narrative will fail. Exotic measures will be tried to get rid of the strong voices as was done to Jean Seberg. And then, at long bloody last, the institutions will seat the disagreeables. Here’s to Harvard Professor Nassim Taleb. | My prediction is that the Gated Institutional Narrative will fail. Exotic measures will be tried to get rid of the strong voices as was done to Jean Seberg. And then, at long bloody last, the institutions will seat the disagreeables. Here’s to Harvard Professor Nassim Taleb. [https://twitter.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955117591378329606 Source] | ||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=955117591378329606}} | {{#widget:Tweet|id=955117591378329606}} |