The Portal Wiki

Jeffrey Epstein: Difference between revisions

Page Discussion

Jeffrey Epstein (edit)

Revision as of 19:33, 29 November 2025

14,710 bytes added ,  Saturday at 19:33
→‎2025
Line 5,886: Line 5,886:


=== 2025 ===
=== 2025 ===
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1894989802153595031
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Glad to see this promised. I am hoping not to be disappointed only to have the can kicked further down the road.
I have to admit that I have never known specifically what the much discussed "Epstein Client List" is. Is it his total investor pool? His pedophile network? His tax advice business customers? Funded Scientists? Everyone who has spent time on the island? All of them? Does that phrase have a specific or a general meaning?
The quoted phrase just seemed to take on a life of its own on social media. If it means something specific, is that is what is claimed to be the subject of the release tomorrow? Part of it?
Sorry to be obtuse. It's a phrase I don't think think I ever heard defined, so I never used it much as it seems like he was doing multiple different things with very different groups of people.
What does it mean specifically to the best of your understanding?
Thx in advance. 🙏
|timestamp=5:55 AM · Feb 27, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1899291997644497167
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=What is the hold up on JFK, UFO, Epstein and EcoHealth/Fauci/Collins/Daszak? Exactly?
I just don't understand. It's at risk of slipping away.
Yet again.
Does anyone get this?? Wasn't this supposed to be the easy part that got done *first*? That is what I was told.
I'm lost here.
|timestamp=2:51 AM · Mar 11, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1909242757962748208
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=Controversial Professor Jordan Peterson</br>
Disgraced Financier Jeffrey Epstein</br>
Panamanian Strongman Manuel Noriega</br>
Anti-Vaccine Activist Robert F Kennedy Jr.</br>
Dragon Believer Joe Rogan</br>
Far Right Crackpot Laura Loomer</br>
Fringe Epidemiology Professor Jay Bhattacharya</br>
It's their formula.
|quote={{Tweet
|image=Gad-Saad-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/GadSaad/status/1909240207590805518
|name=Gad Saad
|usernameurl=https://x.com/GadSaad
|username=GadSaad
|content=Dear @Newsweek, I have a name beyond "former Joe Rogan guest."
https://www.newsweek.com/sam-harris-joe-rogan-politics-podcast-social-media-2056158
|timestamp=6:41 AM · Apr 7, 2025
}}
|timestamp=6:52 AM · Apr 7, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1942984516165079361
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=I am not the guy to tell you what Epstein was. Or whether he killed himself. Or what the "Client list" was. Because, like you, I don't actually know about any of those things. And I have never claimed that I do.
I am going to tell you with 100% absolute certainty that Epstein is "Anti-Interesting" to our news desks. No one want to publish a story about how his multi-billion dollar currency trading hedge fund worked by interviewing a few of those many former eployees that it must have had.
Or by reviewing the fillings it must have made to the Government. Or its trading records. Or by talking to the sell-side coverage it must have had. Or by going through it's records.
Or that it didn't exist. And he wasn't a Multi-Billion financier. And that someone set him up as a construct at great expense.
The scandal is not investigating. Not publishing, Not doing journalism. Clearly the state has control of our news.
I don't care where this leads. I believe he was most likely constructed by a *tiny* number of tight lipped psychopaths who set him up to ruin the lives of children in the service of gathering information. And those people...whoever they are...would need to be brought to justice. Whatever the cost.
I would like to think there isn't a father alive (no matter how flawed) who disagrees with that. And that we need to put ourselves at risk as a group to protect our children from the State, The Press and The Evil co-conspirators. And I don't know who they are. It's terrifying.
I also thing that a number of people who had nothing to do with that but who had deaings with Epstein (e.g. scientists) need to be separated from that aspect of evil and fully exonerated. And those that participated in the Evil with Epstein need to face justice as well.
Pretending that there is nothing further to see here, and that no one wants this investigated remains preposterous.
This was over 5 years ago now. Where are the Dads?
{{#widget:YouTube|id=dJNjH4SP6vw}}
|timestamp=9:29 AM · Jul 9, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1943767408839114789
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=Never let go of “The Epstein Thing.”
We all need to stand up against rogue psychopaths within our ICs, and find the courage to speak up on behalf of those without the ability to speak for themselves.
How is this complicated?
As the oath says: All enemies, foreign & domestic.
|timestamp=1:20 PM · Jul 11, 2025
}}




Line 5,937: Line 6,047:
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1943767408839114789
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1964015565141688487
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=He should try talking plainly about Inflation.
 
Or String Theory and Quantum Gravity.
 
Or Immigration. Terror. Ukraine. Peer Review
 
Or Mortgage Backed Securities. Epstein.
 
Furin Cleavage Sites. Selection. Econ 101.
 
It’s all so much fun.
|timestamp=5:19 PM · Sep 5, 2025
}}
 
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1977086909324374411
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=We make anyone pointing at the real problem lose everything within the system. We expell them. We impugn them. That is the problem.
 
@sapinker you are one of the most courageous voices inside the system. I appreciate that.
 
Those more courageous than you are not there anymore and many are every bit as good as you. Look around. Where did they go? Where is Jim Watson? Who replaced Serge Lang? What did they do to Larry when he spoke in the program I co-Founded with Richard??
 
You are a professor. Invite those who stood up back and call for the firing of Claudine.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1977081891963686958
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Plenty of 1st rate scientists over the last 50 years have raised their voices to say “Our leadership, grant making groups, and journals are lying about X.”
 
How many of them have a 2nd home. A 1st home? A grant? A professorship? An invited talk? Even an affiliation?
 
Come on man.
|timestamp=6:40 PM · Oct 11, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1977085103437496360
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=We cut off the academic oxygen to anyone who challenges the leadership.
 
Invite me back to Harvard as the co-founder of the Science and Engineering Workforce Project in the @HarvardEcon department and I will give a talk on how this really works. You don’t have to pay me a cent if you video it.
 
I’ll cover:
 
The need to fire Claudine Gay.</br>
The need to end activist studies depts.</br>
University Bioweapon research </br>
String Theory </br>
CPI Cost of Living</br>
Evolutionary theory applied to Humans</br>
Low Dimensional Geometry</br>
NSF STEM Shortage Panics </br>
DEI hiring against merit </br>
Epstein and Science </br>
Cognitive abilities expectations in Geographicly widely separated populations.
 
We can do it in Memorial Hall to overflow crowds or one of the ground floor Science Center halls.
 
It can’t happen. You aren’t serious about this. You are looking for a little truth. Not a return to actual white knuckle science.
 
Or am I wrong in this? I have the credentials having done this work *AT* Harvard. Let me know.
|timestamp=6:53 PM · Oct 11, 2025
}}
|timestamp=7:00 PM · Oct 11, 2025
}}
 
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1979214783279960504
|name=Eric Weinstein
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=Never let go of “The Epstein Thing.”
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Thought Experiment. What would it look like if this obvious insanity wasn’t isolated? If we systematically didn’t invite the @elonmusk disruptor figure in any field?
 
Like if it was absolutely everywhere. Society wide.
 
Say the leading journalists weren’t invited to publish stories on Epstein?
 
Dissenting leading epidemiologists were reclassified as “Fringe Epidemiologists.”
 
The people who talked about the danger of Mortgage Backed Securities before 2008 were not allowed in the room where the people who caused the Great Recession worked out the Great Bailout.
 
The most promising physics theories weren’t funded to prop up the sense that the most failed theory in history is the “only game in town.”
 
The people who tried to estimate the probability that random mutation alone would result in functional proteins (and came up wildly short) were not welcomed to contribute to modern evolutionary theory.
 
The leading Geriatric Neurologists were not interviewed on camera about Biden during his presidency.
 
Etc.
 
——
 
Q: How would this world of systematic snubbing where we would essentially ALWAYS do this to control narrative look any different from our world?
|timestamp=3:55 PM · Oct 17, 2025
}}
 


We all need to stand up against rogue psychopaths within our ICs, and find the courage to speak up on behalf of those without the ability to speak for themselves.
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1984198906859885042
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@grok Back to sleep. Thanks for that.
Appreciated.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1984192170094739868
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=The position of most news organizations explaining their low interest in Epstein has been that this is mostly a non story. An Internet-meme spun out of control.


How is this complicated?
I’ve maintained for ~20 yrs that this was about a lot more than sex. This was a major operation of some kind.
|timestamp=9:34 AM · Oct 31, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1984192172284158461
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=The stripping of Former Prince Andrew’s titles shows to our news organizations that this story is real: mere internet meme’s don’t bring down princes.


As the oath says: All enemies, foreign & domestic.
We are going to find a collection of different major sub-operations. And one of them is going to be about gravitational physics.
|timestamp=1:20 PM · Jul 11, 2025
|timestamp=9:34 AM · Oct 31, 2025
}}
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1984192174192578884
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=At some point this story is going to stop being principally about sex.


And it is going to stop being principally about Jeffrey Epstein.


It’s going to be about “sources &amp; methods” of an extremely large transnational covert operations hub protected by “State Secrets Privilege”.
|timestamp=9:34 AM · Oct 31, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1942984516165079361
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1984192176839135578
|name=Eric Weinstein
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=I am not the guy to tell you what Epstein was. Or whether he killed himself. Or what the "Client list" was. Because, like you, I don't actually know about any of those things. And I have never claimed that I do.
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Do I know this for sure? No.
 
Am I idly speculating? No. I’m lodging a crisp prediction with high conviction.
 
The story appears to be moving backward from deniability rather than forward from evidence.
 
It would be too easy to break this story. The participation of editors at all leading news organizations is way too high.  


I am going to tell you with 100% absolute certainty that Epstein is "Anti-Interesting" to our news desks. No one want to publish a story about how his multi-billion dollar currency trading hedge fund worked by interviewing a few of those many former eployees that it must have had.
Too many reporters have started reporting on this story, only to be shut down *quite* late in their investigations. Trust me on this.


Or by reviewing the fillings it must have made to the Government. Or its trading records. Or by talking to the sell-side coverage it must have had. Or by going through it's records.  
The level of personal credibility being lost in pretending “nobody cares” cannot be explained without an even larger incentive to play dumb.


Or that it didn't exist. And he wasn't a Multi-Billion financier. And that someone set him up as a construct at great expense.
This is going to be partially about state interest in Gravity/Physics/Science and National Security. And for the life of me I can’t figure out the specifics.


The scandal is not investigating. Not publishing, Not doing journalism. Clearly the state has control of our news.  
If I had to guess…and this is much lower conviction than the preceding …the US government will eventually at some point be forced to switch strategies and pivot to openly invoking SSP to stop the bleeding. Ghislaine will be pardoned. There will be some vague mentions of internal closed door hearings and  investigations. There might be an executive order that minors can never be used in covert operations.


I don't care where this leads. I believe he was most likely constructed by a *tiny* number of tight lipped psychopaths who set him up to ruin the lives of children in the service of gathering information. And those people...whoever they are...would need to be brought to justice. Whatever the cost.
But the absurdity of:


I would like to think there isn't a father alive (no matter how flawed) who disagrees with that. And that we need to put ourselves at risk as a group to protect our children from the State, The Press and The Evil co-conspirators. And I don't know who they are. It's terrifying.
1) Trafficking girls to no one.


I also thing that a number of people who had nothing to do with that but who had deaings with Epstein (e.g. scientists) need to be separated from that aspect of evil and fully exonerated. And those that participated in the Evil with Epstein need to face justice as well.  
2) A non-story that brings down princes.


Pretending that there is nothing further to see here, and that no one wants this investigated remains preposterous.  
3) Near zero news interest in a story that obsesses an entire planet with claims of “no one cares, we all moved on.”


This was over 5 years ago now. Where are the Dads?
4) Claims that we have mountains of evidence that somehow also don’t exist.


{{#widget:YouTube|id=dJNjH4SP6vw}}
This is going to collapse under self contradiction. The credibility loss alone is already unfathomable.
|timestamp=9:29 AM · Jul 9, 2025
|timestamp=9:34 AM · Oct 31, 2025
}}
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1984196331959972282
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Lastly, this was just a bad operation.


It caught ordinary people in its web. I believe Epstein’s masters wanted to fund me. But using a bank to funnel a mathematician into a bizarre alternate reality to indirectly fund him via book deals or hedge fund allocations is f*****g stupid.


Epstein didn’t know low dimensional gauge theory. I promise you that. But someone in this operation did. And whoever that was knew that “Self-Dual Yang-Mills theory” was, despite the name, a LOT closer to General Relativity and gravity than it is to Yang-Mills Theory and the Standard Model. That was *exceedingly* rare knowledge to have for a dilettante. Still is. Even for an expert. A *huge* clue.
This isn’t principally about sex or Epstein. It’s about a large bad covert operation hub that may have been well built for secrecy but couldn’t survive the modern internet age.
And, I believe, it is about state interest in *Gravity* among many other things.
|timestamp=9:50 AM · Oct 31, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1984196598973485130
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Any thoughts @grok? Care to explain SSP, Covert vs Clandestine, and SDYM?
|timestamp=9:51 AM · Oct 31, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1909242757962748208
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1984198514495422503
|name=Eric Weinstein
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=Controversial Professor Jordan Peterson</br>
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
Disgraced Financier Jeffrey Epstein</br>
|username=EricRWeinstein
Panamanian Strongman Manuel Noriega</br>
|content=Thanks @grok.
Anti-Vaccine Activist Robert F Kennedy Jr.</br>
 
Dragon Believer Joe Rogan</br>
Would you agree that in 2005, most all experts would have seen Euclidean signature SDYM as much closer to the Standard model than GR?
Far Right Crackpot Laura Loomer</br>
 
Fringe Epidemiology Professor Jay Bhattacharya</br>
Or do I have that wrong?


It's their formula.
Be honest. I have my own impression and will not take offense if you have another that disagrees.  
|quote={{Tweet
|image=Gad-Saad-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/GadSaad/status/1909240207590805518
|name=Gad Saad
|usernameurl=https://x.com/GadSaad
|username=GadSaad
|content=Dear @Newsweek, I have a name beyond "former Joe Rogan guest."


https://www.newsweek.com/sam-harris-joe-rogan-politics-podcast-social-media-2056158
Take your time. This is a rather important and pivotal clue as I see it.
|timestamp=6:41 AM · Apr 7, 2025
|timestamp=9:59 AM · Oct 31, 2025
}}
|timestamp=10:00 AM · Oct 31, 2025
}}
}}
|timestamp=6:52 AM · Apr 7, 2025
 
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1989025670903791749
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Remember how I told you about how Jeffrey Epstein is actually “anti-interesting” to our News organizations.
 
They try to “anti-break” this story. The story repeatedly “unhappens” at places like the NYT.
 
You’re looking at a massive covert operations hub. This includes your News: https://t.co/2ju3cA3SlF
|timestamp=5:40 PM · Nov 13, 2025
|media1=G5pwTjuaoAASTN3.jpg
}}
}}


Line 6,009: Line 6,303:
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1899291997644497167
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1989346953826910693
|name=Eric Weinstein
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=What is the hold up on JFK, UFO, Epstein and EcoHealth/Fauci/Collins/Daszak? Exactly?
|content=The abuse of our bipartisan need to understand the Epstein operation(s), used and manipulated as a mere partisan football, is repellent.
|timestamp=2:57 PM · Nov 14, 2025
}}


I just don't understand. It's at risk of slipping away.
Yet again.


Does anyone get this?? Wasn't this supposed to be the easy part that got done *first*? That is what I was told.
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1990201081645969735
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@MAGATHEIST I’ve been on the Epstein story for like…[checks watch]…21 years.


I'm lost here.
Let it go a bit. It is gonna get crazy.
|timestamp=2:51 AM · Mar 11, 2025
|timestamp=11:31 PM · Nov 16, 2025
}}
}}


Line 6,027: Line 6,327:
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1894989802153595031
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1990534949397803328
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=So to sum it up: he is not wrong.
 
I think what I said to him is that after the 1950s, inflation became a modern tool/weapon rather than a measurement starting with the Stigler Commisson. I explained my view that the @BLS_gov is a quiet version of the @federalreserve. An insanely powerful “Statistics” organization where economists actually implement policy by simply chosing how to compute economic numbers.
 
Numbers that just so happen to automatically transfer trillions and touch every aspect of our lives.
 
He already knew a lot of the Boskin/GaugeTheory story from Harvard. Less about Stigler if I remember correctly.
 
I’d love to ask Larry about all this now.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1990530011191992536
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I believe Epstein is referring implicitly to the “Stigler Commission” of 1959-1961.
 
This comes from a phone conversation around 2004.
|timestamp=9:18 PM · Nov 17, 2025
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1990530014107107416
|name=Eric Weinstein
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Glad to see this promised. I am hoping not to be disappointed only to have the can kicked further down the road.  
|content=In a telephone conversation around 2004, he somehow was already well aware of the 1996 Boskin Commission and Harvard Economics department burying our work on Gauge Theory in economics called “Geometric Marginalism”. That seemed pretty weird at the time.  
 
With the benefit of hindsight and scrutiny, I now understand that he was connected to AT LEAST two of my colleagues from my time as an Economist in the @HarvardEcon department and @nber. To say nothing of the fact that he was connected to AT LEAST two more of colleagues from my time as an math graduate student in the @HarvardMath department. He was evidently in the background of *everywhere* I was over three and a half decades from 1985-2019. It’s astounding.


I have to admit that I have never known specifically what the much discussed "Epstein Client List" is. Is it his total investor pool? His pedophile network? His tax advice business customers? Funded Scientists? Everyone who has spent time on the island? All of them? Does that phrase have a specific or a general meaning?
I believe from memory what he means is the following:


The quoted phrase just seemed to take on a life of its own on social media. If it means something specific, is that is what is claimed to be the subject of the release tomorrow? Part of it?
In the 1950s inflation was not yet the tool of policy that it became after the “Price Statistics Review Committee” around 1960, and the indexing of Social Security to CPI in the mid 1970s. It was a simple gauge.


Sorry to be obtuse. It's a phrase I don't think think I ever heard defined, so I never used it much as it seems like he was doing multiple different things with very different groups of people.  
After that time, it became a quiet tool. And a weapon. You could use it to transfer not billions…but trillions. Why? Because a GIANT amount of all U.S. Federal receipts are indexed.  


What does it mean specifically to the best of your understanding?
He thought it was funny that we expected our work to be heard given that trillions were being stolen.


Thx in advance. 🙏
I hope that there is a transcript of this conversation as well as the gravity phone calls about GU. If so, it will likely point back to Litauer and Rosovsky, Jorgenson and Summers.
|timestamp=5:55 AM · Feb 27, 2025
|timestamp=9:18 PM · Nov 17, 2025
}}
|timestamp=9:38 PM · Nov 17, 2025
}}
}}


Retrieved from "https://theportal.wiki/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/24369"