5,994
edits
Physics got NERPhed: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary  |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Well, there might be deep classical reasons for that improbable outcome that escape the quantum supremacists. I meanâŠitâs just possible. | Well, there might be deep classical reasons for that improbable outcome that escape the quantum supremacists. I meanâŠitâs just possible. | ||
MORAL: Not everyone is an ignorant idiot just because they think your community is 40+ years stalled groupthinking this exact way. I donât think you are ignorant or stupid. I donât think you are pseudoscientists. Or grifters. Or any of that. I just think you are wrong in your total approach. Thatâs just science. The quantum gravity crowd has demanded a victory parade for 40+ years over all other approaches while it fails to launch year after year after year. That is not science. Iâm sorry. I donât make that rule. | [[Morals|MORAL]]: Not everyone is an ignorant idiot just because they think your community is 40+ years stalled groupthinking this exact way. I donât think you are ignorant or stupid. I donât think you are pseudoscientists. Or grifters. Or any of that. I just think you are wrong in your total approach. Thatâs just science. The quantum gravity crowd has demanded a victory parade for 40+ years over all other approaches while it fails to launch year after year after year. That is not science. Iâm sorry. I donât make that rule. | ||
MORAL II: You might want to bring up polarization independence and the difficulty of proving (projective) flatness in the polarization discussion, if you want to be even more condescending. You might also laugh to yourselves that the classical hadron and lepton sectors donât even separately quantize! I donât know why this doesnât occur to you. And finally, you might want to assert that I am ignorant of Groenewoldâvan Hove and have a chuckle about that too. Just a suggestion. Â | [[Morals|MORAL II]]: You might want to bring up polarization independence and the difficulty of proving (projective) flatness in the polarization discussion, if you want to be even more condescending. You might also laugh to yourselves that the classical hadron and lepton sectors donât even separately quantize! I donât know why this doesnât occur to you. And finally, you might want to assert that I am ignorant of Groenewoldâvan Hove and have a chuckle about that too. Just a suggestion. Â | ||
Have fun. And good day, gentlemen. Keep up the high standards and good work. | Have fun. And good day, gentlemen. Keep up the high standards and good work. | ||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
Like itâs almost a miracle that it works at all: | Like itâs almost a miracle that it works at all: | ||
|media1=ERW-X-post-1964351563553526194-G0LHVjDa0AAZgcS.jpg | |||
|timestamp=3:34 PM · Sep 6, 2025 | |timestamp=3:34 PM · Sep 6, 2025 | ||
}} | }} | ||