Seberging
Well, I am of the belief that destroying people is considered fair play in elections by the insiders who view these contests as their own private blood sport, to which ordinary dissenting Americans are viewed as interlopers, and thus prey. And, increasingly, very few of us outsiders seem to believe in democracy anymore, as we increasingly believe that our side must always win against the implacable foe by any means necessary, to quote brother Malcolm. When this sport of personal reputational destruction is coordinated by members of the complex formed by institutional media, the intelligence community, the political parties, political consultants, finance, tech and the academy I call it Seberging to remind us of just how real the threat is to all who have idiosyncratic politics but who have done nothing legally wrong.
-Eric Weinstein on The Portal Episode 41
On X
2010
New Topic: "US targeted neutralization of US citizens" or "If you think this begins/ends w/ Anwar al-Awlaki you've no idea of our history."
April is the 40th anniversary of the US Governent neutralization of Jean Seberg. If you don't know the story, it is not really believable.
Jean Seberg, iconic blonde & star of "Breathless", joined NAACP at 14 in Iowa & later the Black Panther Party (like biologist Bob Trivers).
The LA TImes & Newsweek then ran the FBI planted story that blonde Seberg was carrying a Black Panther child. The black baby meme is strong.
So long story short, Seberg has a breakdown while pregnant, loses baby Nina, & displays the child's white body to the press. No, seriously.
I bring this up as a proxy to the killing of Fred Hampton, the originator of the 'Rainbow Coalition'. The Seberg documentation is better.
"Jean Seberg has been a financial supporter of the BPP and should be Neutralized." -US Government Internal Memo 5/6/1970
Tweet this story but tell it in your own voice. This will begin with actual US traitors & terrorists. But the machinery will not stop there.
2017
1/ US Deep-State use of "Fake News" in Main Stream Media to Destroy Inconvenient US Citizens: A tweetstorm in honor of Black America & MLK.
Redacted 11/20/64 US Government letter attempting to induce Martin Luther King Jr to kill himself: http://bit.ly/dYNrtO. #COINTELPRO #MLKday
2/ The only time we have tried "draining the swamp" of the US DeepState in memory was around the so-called Church Committee in the mid '70s.
3/ One of the most disturbing findings from that era was the extent of manipulation of MSM journalism by the CIA in "Operation Mockingbird."
4/ I'd however like to focus on a single well documented case of how the US Deep-State destroyed a civil rights activist w/ MSM "Fake News."
5/ Jean Seberg was a beautiful blonde US movie star w/ an interest in Black activism, who the Hoover FBI privately decided to destroy w MSM.
6/ In this memo the FBI requests permission to have a pregnant movie star 'Neurtalized' using a "fake news" story waiting for her baby bump.
7/ Next to "Cheapen her image" & "cause her embarrassment" the Deep-State fabricates a Slut-shaming story that she's carrying a black child.
8/ The FBI selects the mainstream media & therefore wants unusual precaution so the story is untraceable: "The dear girl is getting around!"
9/ The FBI has the 5/19/70 @latimes run the story that Jean Seberg is pregnant by cuckolding her white husband with a Black Panther's baby.
10/ In case any of you believe there's no connection between the Deep State, MSM, Journalism & Fake News, here is the full @latimes article.
11/ The FBI 'Kompromat' against a lawful US celebrity gets amplified by @newsweek and other echoing publications in & out of the mainstream.
12/ Jean Seberg is destroyed mentally & miscarries a white child in response. She holds an open casket press conference disproving the lies.
13/ Seberg divorces, becomes deranged & repeatedly tries suicide every year on the anniversary of her baby's death. In 1979, she succeeds.
14/ Eventually we drain the Deep-State swamp enough to learn it was all a deadly mainstream media/FBI hoax & @latimes admits to "Fake News":
15/ We know our MSM news is sullying by reputation nearly everyone w a hope of bringing radical change. We don't know who is being targeted.
/END This is the single cleanest end-to-end example I have of what we may be up against. Now it is yours. Thank you MLK. & Jean so so much.
2018
1/ The "Adj.-Profession-Name" Formula, Disagreeables, & the "No-Living-Heroes" thy. Consider adjectives:
Embattled
Controversial
Divisive
Reclusive
Provocative
Struggling
Right-Wing
Eccentric
Self-styled
Far-Left
Recovering
Disgraced
Self-Promoting
Free-thinking
Volatile
etc.
2/ These adjectives are really reserved terms and the 'tells' of mainstream media letting you know who is off-narrative and who they have marked for reputation neutralization through FUD (Fear-Uncertainty and Doubt) campaigns.
3/ So what's wrong with calling a professor who is controversial, a "controversial professor" you may fairly ask? The problem is that MSM builds clientside architecture in your own mind that you don't notice. Proof? Check the graphic attached.
4/ Apparently in the entire history of the internet, this tweet is the first to ever use the phrase "controversial professor Paul Krugman" to describe @paulkrugman even though he is famous for being a controversial professor.
So...how can that be?
5/ Let’s first dig a bit to look for positive framings of my colleague “controversial professor” @jordanbpeterson. Consider these attachments for a man whose fame is largely due to being a noble inspirational heroic maverick.
The point is that real humans don’t talk like this.
6/ My point here is that our minds are programmed to recognize the “Gated Institutional Narrative” or GIN and to take our emotional instructions from it. This is Orwell’s 1984 Newspeak: Adjective-Profession-Target.
Or so asserts self-styled Internet personality @EricRWeinstein.
7/ So who are the targets? Men and women who are off the charts on the Big-5 psychometric for disagreeability. These people are the pool from which our greatest Nobel Laureates & even heroes were once drawn.
And right now the internet is having a bull market in disagreeability.
8/ This brings us to one of my most controversial theories: Ever since Lindbergh’s attempt to keep the US out of WWII, our institutions have fought against us having ANY living heroes with self-minted credibility.
This leaves a vacuum filled by acceptable institutional figures.
9/ The lesson learned from Lindbergh appears to be that Mavericks are too dangerous to institutions...and in the case of Lindbergh that made some sense. But what about a John Lennon? Frances Kelsey? Charlie Chaplin? Paul Robeson? Frank Wilkinson? Katharine Hepburn?
10/ Here’s the punchline: There are suddenly way way too many disagreeable individual voices to be found for people trying to escape from the constant cognitive abuse of our institutions, which want our co-dependence on them.
So something new *has* to happen.
Here goes...
/11
Either:
A) The spell of the GIN breaks and we have lots of real self-minted heroes again.
B) Disagreeables like Jordan Peterson, Camille Paglia, Nassim Taleb, Douglas Murray, Claire Lehman, etc... all get taken out.
C) The institutions seat some of the disagreeables.
/END My prediction is that the Gated Institutional Narrative will fail. Exotic measures will be tried to get rid of the strong voices as was done to Jean Seberg. And then, at long bloody last, the institutions will seat the disagreeables. Here’s to Harvard Professor Nassim Taleb.
2020
As I often point out, the US Federal Government is *proven* to be capable of conspiring to use our independent American News Media to covertly tarnish famous law abiding politically inconvenient Americans.
“Seberging”-cancellation is not conspiracy theory. It is conspiracy-fact.
Actress Jean Seberg was born November 13, 1938.
Fifty years ago, a senior editor at the Los Angeles Times came into possession of a dangerous piece of gossip, leaked to the paper by the FBI. We printed it, and the actress' life was destroyed.
Ask yourself: how many prominent law abiding politically inconvenient people has the US government tried to destroy?
We know:
Fred Hampton
John Lennon
Jean Seberg
Dick Gregory
MLK
Pete Seeger
How many other news hit pieces come from the Deep State & are fed to news? Only one?
I believe that we used to have real heroes (e.g. Katherine Hepburn) & our heroes got too expensive for our institutional class. Now, all who start to show too much public independence seem mysteriously to get taken down by media (e.g. @elonmusk).
After Jean, we have to wonder...
Think how impossible it is to believe this. The *only* time we ever really checked our own intelligence, we found a deep state using our mainstream independent news media to destroy citizens over politics.
Q: How many cancellation stories have you read? Are they ALL journalism?
Q: Who is writing these god-like messages at Twitter?
TIM is:
I’ll be very surprised if there‘s no quiet TIM working-group, ostensibly around foreign meddling in US matters, that has been exceeding a narrow mandate to influence what we see here.🙏
Related Pages
- Abomination Ratio
- Anti-Interesting
- Break-Glass-in-case-of-Emergency People
- Collateral Damage
- Communication Security Complex
- Church Committee
- Cobalt and Baby Blue-on-Blue
- Cult of the Art of the Possible
- Digital Wetwork
- Event Deconfliction
- Fact Burning
- Follow the Silence
- Image Cheapening
- Influence Operation
- Information Asymmetry
- Institutional Gaslighting
- The Invisible World is First Detected by the Visible World’s Failure to Close
- Jessupization
- Kayfabrication
- Law of Gaslighting
- Managed Reality TM
- Map the Silences
- Neo-Debunker
- No-Living-Heroes Theory
- Nothing Burger
- Prebunked Malinformation
- Responsible Conspiracy Theorizing
- Steady Hands
- The United States of Absolutely Nothing (U.S.A.N.)
- Tuskegee Principle
- Universal Institutional Betrayal