Villard House
This article is a stub. You can help us by editing this page and expanding it.2019Edit
I think folks arenât getting at all what Iâm saying. I donât disagree that Epstein was a sociopath. That *was* my read of him. But there was a 2nd layer. A role,mission or job. The two were in conflict. The sociopath just wasnât focused enough on science/trading to play the role.
For 15 Yrs starting before his Florida conviction, Iâve said that Epstein was a âconstructâ because that sociopath could not have constructed that unnatural role by himself. My guess has been that someone/thing hired a sociopath to play a different one focused on science/trading.
So did he fool me? Perhaps. If he has no connection to any intelligence community, he fooled me. If he really cared about science he fooled me. If he really ran a ccy trading strategy out of Villard house he fooled me. If he was a genius he fooled me. If this wasnât kayfabe..
But intelligence communities do create assets. They do fit them with backstories and characters to play. That is my guess here. And the role that was being played was a badly drawn Gatsby-Bond like character who would never blink. So, am I wrong? Was this bastard state-protected?
Youâll note that Iâm completely agnostic in this theory as to whether the underlying sociopath would commit suicide given the opportunity. Maybe! How would I know? I wouldnât.
What I do know is that if he was playing a role, his character as written would never commit suicide.
What Iâve been trying to focus folks on is that thereâs likely more than one layer here. There was a sick man & a separate role he wasnât fully able to play. Poke at the role: ccy trading, Villard House, IC contacts, associates, tax evasion, etc and see it all come crashing down.
1/ WE NEED A NEW CHURCH COMMITTEE: Fred Hampton Edition.
Today is the 50th anniversary of the US assassination of our own citizen Fred Hampton, inventor of the Rainbow Coalition. This year is the 40th anniversary of our killing of Jean Seberg via the FBI direction of our Press.
2/ With the inexplicable âPerfect Stormâ death of Jeffrey Epstein & likely govt direction of our corporate press not to seek categorical denial of our intelligence community w regard to ANY link to Jeffrey Epsteinâs pedophilia & traffic in minors, we MUST investigate our own IC.
3/ We would never have learned about our own Government crimes against MLK Jr, Dick Gregory, Jean Seberg, Fred Hampton & others if we the people were not in control of our permanent Government class.
Without investigation, the people are no longer in control of our Govenrment.
4/ Whatâs the emergency? Itâs the silence & bizarre behavior around Epstein:
Q1: Ghislaine Maxwell has a passport. Where and when was it last recorded and why is this of interest to no corporate media?
Q2: Where is the categorical denial or refusal to comment on IC ties to JE?
5/ Q3: Prince Andrewâs interview is close to the most bizarre thing Iâve ever seen on video. Those questions were all expected. What was that?
Fred Hampton reminds us that our permanent class in Govât can kill extrajudicially. Jean Seberg reminds us it uses our press against us.
6/ Learn to listen for the âsounds of silenceâ. Silence around @AndrewYang and @TulsiGabbard. Silence around Ghislaine. Silence around Epsteinâs Villard House office in NYC and trading records. Silence around IC ties. And silence around the Church & Pike Committees. #BackToChurch
End/ Iâm calling on @AndrewYang, @BernieSanders, @TulsiGabbard & other Mavericks to LEAD the charge asking about the silence reaching epidemic proportions. Itâs time to investigate ourselves which has always been A NORMAL PART OF DEMOCRACY. It has nothing to do w tinfoil đ©s.đ
2020Edit
Iâve spent a lot of time on this. The story here is not Epstein or Maxwell. Itâs the bizarre mission of our US press to misdirect us. The questions were always the same:
Epstein 'madam' Ghislaine Maxwell 'is a foreign spy hiding in Israel' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7843659/Ghislaine-Maxwell-reportedly-foreign-spy-hiding-Israel.html via @MailOnline
A) Can you the press seek an on-the-record official denial that Epstein was operating/trafficking attached to US and/or foreign intelligence?
B) Can the press tell us where Ghislaineâs passports were last seen at a border?
C) Is Epsteinâs death a âmessage killingâ to us all?
D) Can you the press tell us the whereabouts of the detailed records of Epsteinâs *trading* operation from âVillard Houseâ in Manhattan?
E) If the hedge fund currency trading never took place, was the source of Epsteinâs wealth the missing assets & pensions of Robert Maxwell?
F) Why are *none* of the esteemed members of the commentariat conspicuously calling for a second Church/Pike style investigation of excesses of our intelligence communities? WTF?
G) Many famous members of the press follow this account closely. Do I not exist? You do write to me.
H) Are you thinking, whoever the hell you are, that you can just intimidate us all? I get that you can get to anyone anywhere. Big deal. Can you get to MILLIONS of us anytime anywhere? Do you see this going away? Are we *all* afraid youâll call us âAlex Jonesâ or kill us? Really?
And for those of you who ask why I never mentioned Israel and the Mossad publicly.. Here is your answer: I donât connect the dots for you.
I have been on this early out of a love of the US & Israel. You deserved to know that this is not some plot of CIA, âThe Jewsâ or Mossad.
If this turns out to be in part an evil intelligence operation trafficking minors, it will be the responsibility of some *tiny* number of raging assholes. Maybe Saudi assholes, maybe Jewish villains and maybe evil CIA folks. Who knows. But it wonât be entire peoples at fault.
As an ordinary US Jew who thought he spotted an OBVIOUS Intelligence operation in 2003-4, I wanted to be on the other side of this thing when it blew, so I could support the US and Israeli ICs which need to be strong & secret but non evil. So now Daily Mail has finally reported!
Moral: remember whoever it turns out was behind Epstein, it wasnât âThe Americansâ or âthe Jewsâ. US Jews were also both outspoken & tiptoeing around this mess for 15Yrs. Epstein was an obvious cancer. But cancers are treatable. It is the US press misdirection thatâs metastatic.
Now go investigate the story! If he wasnât an asset get the official denials. Discuss a redo of Church/Pike. If there is nothing to find, we deserve to know. Is it our damn country or not? Simple question. Is the press there to get the stories or to kill them? Get this over with!
The digital layer allows us to measure the market demand for many genuinely fascinating topics in which the legacy journalism layer pretends to take zero interest.
Odd. Guaranteed markets on real topics. Zero interest. Ownership of media by interests who do not need profit.
The digital layer allows us to to see reporters following people they never acknowledge even exist.
Who really cares? Why does it matter? Because institutions agree never to treat as real that which remains confined to the digital layer alone. Hence the reason weâve stagnated.
Iâd like to know where the âlast known whereabouts of Ghislaine Maxwellâ and âlocation of Epstein trading records from Villard Houseâ and âties to intelligenceâ investigations are stalled out. Even where these stories ran into brick walls would be fascinating. Where is the DISC?
2021Edit
You *can* trust newspapers & national news organizations that have aggressively followed up on finding the trading records & filings of Jeffrey Epsteinâs Multi-Billion dollar hedge fund located in Villard House & have directly asked about his ties to the intelligence communities.
What would you say to the same needs in reverse? I, for example, want to know if Jeffrey Epstein had ties to the US intelligence community and has some measure of immunity to operate as a pedophile & trafficker.
Q: Was his Florida arrest what you call a âBlue on Blueâ screw up?
Q: I want to know if I am risking my life by repeatedly asking why no national news organization asks you on the obvious direct on-the-record questions about his financial records or ties to the intelligence communities including the FBI. Am I?
Q: Do our sources and methods permit a blind eye to child sex trafficking by foreign controlled agents?
Q: Does the FBI work with tech platforms to control the reach of citizens who ask these questions to you that the @nytimes @washingtonpost, @cnn & @npr conspicuously will not?
Q: Do you have the financial records & filings of Jeffrey Epsteinâs supposed âhedge fundâ offices at Villard house? If not, why not? If so, was there a Foreign Currency trading fund?
Q: Can the FBI be trusted with End to End encryption if it will not answer these questions? đ
Please quote tweet the top tweet in thread to counteract downranking by Twitter. We need these questions asked by our news media. Make this a story. Force them to simply do their job on what could be the biggest story of the decade & donât ever call @TwitterSafety âSafetyâ again.
I think folks get confused that Jeffrey Epstein was valued for providing sex to his circle.
I donât think thatâs right. Many in his circle had access to sex.
You have to take a next step to see it.
The thing Epstein offered that his friends just couldnât get...was silence.
Think Iâm wrong? Then where are any competent probing articles on this story in national news media.
Every one of us who talks about this story knows fear. I do. All the time. Fear is the product. Sex silenced by terror.
Are you a reporter? Then why havenât you filed the story?
Ask for the hedge fund filings. Ask on the whereabouts of the contents of his Villard House office. Then try to get some rest.
Not so easy as it sounded right?
No, Epstein provided a blackout curtain of silence woven from implied terror. And you need state cooperation for that.
Usual Disclaimer: I am not feeling suicidal and have no further knowledge Beyond what I put out months ago. I am not a threat as I only met him once briefly and have no other intimate secrets requiring my silence. Iâm now just a broken record that everyone has heard before.
I have two bits of information about JE that are not public.
1) An interchange from McAfee on Epstein.
2) Knowledge that Epstein was asking after me in a late email just before he died. I have no idea why. There is no more contact about Epstein than one meeting about 20yrs ago.
GU is now public. I have no more information as to its connection to Epstein other than he wanted it taken to Villard house. Iâd like to talk to relevant physicists quickly given its role in the story. I give my permission to release *any* Epstein security video of me. Thanks.
Iâm quite concerned now given Johnâs 2020 call.
So this just appears now!?! And what do we learn? That if "Sources and Methods" of the Intelligence Community might be compromised, prosecutors regularly decline to push for full prosecution EVEN IN THE CASE OF SEXUAL ABUSE of minors and INFANTS.
Bingo: Follow the Silence.
I have spent a decade, literally, collecting hundreds of IG reports from the CIA via #FOIA. I've filed 13 requests and sued the agency 3 times since 2012. When @a_cormier_ & I started to review these docs earlier this year we spotted a disturbing pattern
We have an undisclosed program; there's some kind of 'understanding' that we don't understand. I very well understand why we don't casually compromise "Sources & Methods". But trafficking kids is NOT casual business. Nor is USING them as part of 'Sources & Methods' for kompromat.
One question now creates 2 teams:
Team A) 'Sources & Methods' are above child trafficking in importance.
Team B) Child Trafficking is above any exemption for our 'Sources & Methods'.
I believe that if Epstein needed to use kids for S&M as Kompromat, we lost our plot entirely.
Seriously, I am not being naive here. If we have to abuse children to gain security for the country, maybe we don't have the right to a nation? If our intelligence community is so pathetic...look you get the idea. If the US isn't protecting kids from our own IC, we aren't the US.
I understand we may occassionally have to fell a monster overseas. I understand that sometimes there's a ticking time bomb and 'extraordinary methods' are needed. I understand that we must surveil people or engage in illegal acts while undercover.
But you-can't-use-kids. Period.
Is there some GIANT understanding involving our journalists & news desks that when the IC says 'Sources & Methods' we all just say 'Ok. Anything you say boys.' Like, for example with @arobach being shut down on Epstein:
Abuse of Kids > Sources & Methods
Notice how everything adds up if there's a giant understanding that Sources & Methods trump everything protecting innocent children? You just say 'Sources & Methods are at risk'. Explains Acosta, Robach, Veritas, etc. Boom: No more Epstein mysteries. It's all 'Sources & Methods'.
Q: Why no discussion of Villard House records?
A: Sources & Methods.
Q: Why no investigation of Epstein's Hedge Fund's trading partners & brokerage?
A: Sources & Methods.
Q: Why do editors claim no one cares about Epstein?
A: Sources & Methods.
Q: Project Veritas?
A: S&M.
Q: Why report Epstein was a disgraced Financier when no one seems to have traded with him?
A: Sources & Methods.
Q: Why so little interest in covering Ghislaine relative to Kyle Rittenhouse?
A: Sources & Methods.
Q: Why did no one ask where GM last crossed a border?
A: S & M.
Moral: Our kids cant vote. We bring them into the world totally dependent on us. If we have a country that deserves an Intelligence Service, we have a right to know that kids are 100% OFF LIMITS as regards 'Sources & Methods' by the IC of us or our allies. Period. Kids >>> S & M.
P.S. And...I appear to be back to being throttled more agressively after several threads were throttled less agressively or not at all by twitter.
At least at first on this thread. We will see whether that continues. CC'ing @lexfridman @benshapiro @jordanbpeterson @SamHarrisOrg
2022Edit
So let me get this straight. A âBritish Socialiteâ and a âDisgraced Financierâ recruited underage girls for their own debauched amusement as a romantic couple?
Does it occur to the New York Times that they are âgroomingâ us all to accept what they refuse to investigate & report?
Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted of conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein to recruit, groom and abuse underage girls, is set to be sentenced on Tuesday. She could spend much of the rest of her life in prison.
Follow updates. https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/06/28/nyregion/ghislaine-maxwell-news-epstein?smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytimes
âThe disgraced financier hanged himself in a Manhattan jail cell one month after his July 2019 arrest as he awaited his own trial on sex trafficking charges.â
Can the New York Times prove either one of their claims:
A) What was the nature of his hedge fund?
B) He hung himself?
I had 2 conversations with J Epstein. In one of them, he told me he had a huge hedge fund which traded currencies at his personal discretion. From what he said, it seemed VERY unlikely that he traded currencies, much less at scale.
Q: Was Epstein lying about having a hedge fund?
I donât believe ANY of this story youâre âreportingâ @nytimes. I donât think you know he was a disgraced financier. I donât think you know he hung himself. I donât think you believe that these people were recruiting as a romantic couple for their own amusement.
Stop grooming us.
My *guess* is that there was no currency trading hedge fund housed here at Villard House in Manhattan. Can the New York Times please establish whether the entire Jeffrey Epstein history is a constructed backstory? Multi-Billion dollar currency hedge funds canât be totally hidden.
The way I look at this is that you the @nytimes know what youâre reporting is an official story. You also know that we know it is simply the official cover story. But what you WANT us to know is that you will not do your job as a newspaper while you are doing your other job here.
I donât believe the WHOLE Epstein story.
Thatâs my guess. đ
2023Edit
The central question remains:
Was Jeffrey Epstein a *construct* of the intelligence community, who as state sponsored predator cannot be investigated by news media cooperating with government for âreasons of national security.â
That should sound crazier than it does today:
I have been asserting that Epstein was OBVIOUSLY not a major financier since well before his Florida arrest in 2006.
These leaders are meeting him years after his conviction and incarceration.
This thing appears just *impossibly* fake. Iâm sorry. It seems fake. Just fake.
CIA's William Burns, Goldman's Kathryn Ruemmler, Noam Chomsky, the president of Bard College, a Kissinger consultant and a Rothschild. They all met with Jeffrey Epstein in the years after his conviction, documents show. https://www.wsj.com/us-news/jeffrey-epstein-calendar-cia-director-goldman-sachs-noam-chomsky-c9f6a3ff?mod=e2tw
Simple question: can we be said to have a free press if it refuses to investigate the legally mandated financial records and filings of a multi-billion dollar currency trading hedge fund at Villard House in Manhattan, directed by Jeffrey Epstein that I claim simply never existed?
The claim from his team of exclusively young female employees at his 71st residence was that he only used Ultra Orthodox men to trade for him and that he issued all trading instructions, which required only a few minutes a day due to his brilliance.
I pointed out, nearly a decade ago, that there were no financial employees at all. No portfolio managers, no analysts, nothing.
My claim is that we all tripped over a MASSIVE âtoo big to failâ intelligence operation whose major revelation is not about Epstein but about near TOTAL material control of our news by intimidation and harassment of reporters:
ABC News Defends Its Epstein Coverage After Leaked Video Of Anchor
2025Edit
I think many of you made a huge mistake about the âClient Listâ. About âLolita Expressâ. About âPedophile Island.â That is, if the goal was to use Epstein to get justice, and put an end to this abuse of children and civilians by the sickest members of the worldâs ICs.
You had fun with memes. And you let an IC sponsored pedophile get away. We were supposed to be pushing the press:
âWhy donât you ask **any** truly detailed questions about a supposed multi billion dollar FX hedge fund that may not have existed at all?â That wasâŠand isâŠthe first order of business.
We canât know exactly what he did, where and when.
But there is no way to fake this hedge fund. Either he had an enormous fund or he didnât. We can get all the details if he did. Or push as to why they donât exist.
I donât know if he killed himself. I donât even know if he is dead. I donât know if there is âthe Epstein client listâ.
The thing we know best is that he claimed to manage a multibillion dollar fund that ***cannot*** be hidden. Where are its records and employees?????????â Why does the press avoid reporting on this fund like the plague???? It was headquartered at Villard House for Christ sake. Madison Avenue. Who liquidated it? Who worked there? wtf?
This manager to this mystery fund is like a captain who supposedly has one of the worldâs largest mega yachtsâŠthat somehow isnât registered or flagged. It leaves no wake. No shipyard built it or serviced it. It has no crew. No harbor master has ever seen it.
âItâs so quiet that Lockheed asked to study it. Itâs said to be made of optically neural superconducting ice crystals that form only from the tears of virgin sea lions cooled to absolute zero so it canât be seen. He brilliantly purchased a Bugis Prahu Charter that was grandfathered in before the 1609 Mare Liberum was in force so that he alone may sail the seas without ever communicating with other vessels or harbors. It is said that his carbon fiber anchor and chain stretched to the bottom of the Challenger Deep so that he didnât need to approach the shore for years on end.â
Câmon.
The key was that he wasnât a âdisgraced financierâ. He was a construct fitted with a mysterious poorly drawn backstory. And that construct probably belonged to several Allied nation states:
âHeâs so brilliant that he only accepts people who surrender total control of their wealth under power of attorney. He is closed to anyone who doesnât have 1 Billion dollars minimum. In fact: his investor list is so discreet, and is said to be so secretive and closely guarded that he has only one known client.â
Did you not realize that outside investors are a liability to a cover story or front? Beware any super secretive fund that has a story why they dont want family office or institutional money. This is not the only one btw.
HenceâŠthe exclusivity.
Why was he obsessed by Gravity? He was almost certainly a front used for funding edgy science, information gathering, control, etc away from normal channels.
It wasnât one thing. He wasnât a creepy front companyâŠhe was a mall filled with different business providing different goods and services. It wasnât all about raping kids. Some collection of people invested something like 9 figures in creating a weird 11-12 figure fairy tale via leverage. And it was used for a lot of things. It was called Jeffrey Epstein.
Moral: focus on the cover story. Not the memes. Go after the press first. Figure out exactly who is stopping the fund from being dissected. Focus on the non reporting.
This is what Anti-Interesting is all about. Use it.
One manâs opinion. đ