5,994
edits
| Line 792: | Line 792: | ||
=== 2024 === | === 2024 === | ||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1773060797847208382 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=[Note for Curt: This is the whole point of Geometric Unity. They are three geometries. Which are all one geometry, and that is only possible in the rarest of circumstances. Which we are in oddly. | |||
Metric Geometry: General Relativity GR | |||
Fiber Geometry:ย Standard Model SM | |||
Symplectic Geometry: Hamiltonian Quantization of the SM. ] | |||
|thread= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=TOEwithCurt-profile.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/TOEwithCurt/status/1773057150199238985 | |||
|name=Curt Jaimungal | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/TOEwithCurt | |||
|username=TOEwithCurt | |||
|content=I'm confused. This lecture doesn't negate the geometric foundations of GR. Einstein differentiates between how gravity and electromagnetism relate to the structure of space, all the while pointing to his ultimate goal of unification. As for the rest of the original article linked, I'm unsure how the quotes from Einstein support the author's title. GR is indeed a geometric theory; however, Einstein's viewpoint was that its geometric nature doesn't singularly distinguish it from the broader domain of physics, where geometry has always played a fundamental role. If anything, Einstein is saying not to confuse the map with the territory. | |||
|timestamp=6:52 PM ยท Mar 27, 2024 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |image=Eric profile picture.jpg | ||
| Line 809: | Line 829: | ||
|timestamp=6:52 PM ยท Mar 27, 2024 | |timestamp=6:52 PM ยท Mar 27, 2024 | ||
}} | }} | ||
|timestamp=6:53 PM ยท Mar 27, 2024 | |timestamp=6:53 PM ยท Mar 27, 2024 | ||
}} | }} | ||