Twin Nuclei Problem: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
The '''Twin Nuclei Problem of Cell and Atom''' is the recognition that having gained the power to manipulate cellular and atomic nuclei between 1952 and 1953, humanity is now in possession of unprecedented destructive power, and thus capable of self-extinction. All of human civilization is now one correlated experiment, and any sufficiently large event may be enough to end it, limiting its long-term future. That such an event has not yet occurred is largely a function of growth and luck. Since the early 1970s, growth has stagnated in all but a few economic activities, and as evidenced by the coronavirus pandemic, luck is fragile and running out. [[Eric Weinstein]] first | The '''Twin Nuclei Problem of Cell and Atom''' is the recognition that having gained the power to manipulate cellular and atomic nuclei between 1952 and 1953, humanity is now in possession of unprecedented destructive power, and thus capable of self-extinction. All of human civilization is now one correlated experiment, and any sufficiently large event may be enough to end it, limiting its long-term future. That such an event has not yet occurred is largely a function of growth and luck. Since the early 1970s, growth has stagnated in all but a few economic activities, and as evidenced by the coronavirus pandemic, luck is fragile and running out. [[Eric Weinstein]] first coined the idea in his [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LruYnDjkOgU first appearance] on [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJdKr0Bgd_5saZYqLCa9mng The Rubin Report]. | ||
== Preconditions == | == Preconditions == | ||
Revision as of 20:40, 17 March 2021
This article is a stub. You can help us by editing this page and expanding it.The Twin Nuclei Problem of Cell and Atom is the recognition that having gained the power to manipulate cellular and atomic nuclei between 1952 and 1953, humanity is now in possession of unprecedented destructive power, and thus capable of self-extinction. All of human civilization is now one correlated experiment, and any sufficiently large event may be enough to end it, limiting its long-term future. That such an event has not yet occurred is largely a function of growth and luck. Since the early 1970s, growth has stagnated in all but a few economic activities, and as evidenced by the coronavirus pandemic, luck is fragile and running out. Eric Weinstein first coined the idea in his first appearance on The Rubin Report.
Preconditions
The conditions for the Twin Nuclei Problem began at the end of World War II, with the use of atomic fission bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki to force Japan's surrender.
In 1953, Watson and Crick discovered the 3-dimensional structure of DNA.
History
The Big Nap is the history accompanying the Twin Nuclei Problem, and describes the transition from broad growth to the operation of society characterized by magical thinking, that nothing truly bad can happen.
Solution Decision Tree
At least one of the following must occur for the Problem to be solved, with or without a long-term human future. No possibility is sane.
- A great run of luck occurs.
- An unprecedented outbreak of wisdom occurs.
- We upload into silicon.
- We stabilize the environment and grow all markets so no one has reason to want.
- We move to the Moon, Mars, and a few space stations to sufficiently diversify.
- We escape the Solar System with new physics.
- We establish universal surveillance so no surprises can occur.
- We shortly terminate.
Videos
A community video illustrating the subject.
A clip from Episode 18 of The Portal Podcast.
Eric's Explanation from Discord
In 1945 we ended WWII with atomic devices. This was the end of conventional massive armed conflict.
Between 1952-54 we cracked the twin nuclei of atoms (Hydrogen fusion bombs) and cells (3-d structure of DNA).
We now live on borrowed time determined largely by luck, growth and the memory of WWII.
Our growth ran out, then our memory of WWII. We now live on Luck.
This has created a world wide epidemic of magical thinking that nothing truly bad can still happen.
During the 1945-1972 Epoch, growth was economically high, stable, broadly distributed, technologically lead.
During this period Derek de Solla Price discovered that science was on an unsustainable exponential.
He published 'Science Since Babylon' (1959?) predicting an end to scientific growth.
Science is upstream of technology which is upstream of markets. And the predicted end came around 1972.
During the 1945-1972 era, institutions built in assumptions about their future growth.
Those Embedded Growth Obligations or E.G.0.s are now unsustainable.
This has caused nearly all institutions to be headed by people willing to lie to keep the institutions alive.
There are a small number of fields where growth kept going (E.g. semiconductors, communications, and their outgrowths).
Mostly the world stagnated by the standards of the past around 1972.
Between 1972 and 2008 a long period of managed fake growth took place to disguise the end of the post WWII growth regime.
This was called, downsizing, deregulation, mergers/aquisition, globalization, 'best brightest' immigration, securitization, financialization. Etc.
Starting in the 1990s this Davos style economics began to result in massive wealth inequality in the developed world under a fig leaf of idealism.
By 2008, fake growth became unsustainable and the world woke up from a crazy dream of "The Great Moderation' to sanity.
It was that sanity that made the markets "go crazy."
Since 2008, no one really believes in market absolutism nor in government fairness nor in banking. But, oddly, we can't form new economic theories.
This zombie period lasted from 2008 until 2016 where the Trump and Brexit votes shocked the rent-seeking elite.
We are now trying to have new ideas. It is very difficult for them to form given the level of inequality.
As for the decision trees: if humanity is to have a future greater than 500 years with fusion devices and other horrors, what must happen?