Theory of Geometric Unity: Difference between revisions

Line 415: Line 415:


<!--
<!--
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1379872184387039232}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1379872186740080647}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1379872188593926144}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1379874520526299136}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1380213544340221953}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1380213544340221953}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1380213544340221953
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Please retweet the quote tweeted thread above to get sound the Twitter algos. πŸ™
Unlike many theories, GU can already predict a lot about what comes next and even tells us that we have things wrong about particles we think we already know and understand: https://t.co/MsaPMPcFWR
|timestamp=5:38 PM Β· Apr 8, 2021
}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1383094525330038789}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1383094525330038789}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1383094525330038789
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I do wish people would understand that GU is rather serious and what it is attempting to say with new particle predictions, geometric possibilities and additional *temporal* dimensions.
Even if you assume it is wrong, it is the only attempt of its kind of which I am aware.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1383093745524961280
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=From https://www.edge.org/response-detail/27761
|media1=ERW-X-post-1383093745524961280.jpg
|timestamp=4:23 PM Β· Apr 16, 2021
}}
|timestamp=4:26 PM Β· Apr 16, 2021
}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1403434464328355846}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1403434464328355846}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1404131506121961473}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1404131506121961473}}