5,994
edits
| Line 415: | Line 415: | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1380213544340221953}} | {{#widget:Tweet|id=1380213544340221953}} | ||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1380213544340221953 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Please retweet the quote tweeted thread above to get sound the Twitter algos. π | |||
Unlike many theories, GU can already predict a lot about what comes next and even tells us that we have things wrong about particles we think we already know and understand: https://t.co/MsaPMPcFWR | |||
|timestamp=5:38 PM Β· Apr 8, 2021 | |||
}} | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1383094525330038789}} | {{#widget:Tweet|id=1383094525330038789}} | ||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1383094525330038789 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=I do wish people would understand that GU is rather serious and what it is attempting to say with new particle predictions, geometric possibilities and additional *temporal* dimensions. | |||
Even if you assume it is wrong, it is the only attempt of its kind of which I am aware. | |||
|thread= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1383093745524961280 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=From https://www.edge.org/response-detail/27761 | |||
|media1=ERW-X-post-1383093745524961280.jpg | |||
|timestamp=4:23 PM Β· Apr 16, 2021 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=4:26 PM Β· Apr 16, 2021 | |||
}} | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1403434464328355846}} | {{#widget:Tweet|id=1403434464328355846}} | ||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1404131506121961473}} | {{#widget:Tweet|id=1404131506121961473}} | ||