Jump to content

Seberging: Difference between revisions

Seberging (edit)

Revision as of 04:47, 4 March 2026

6,913 bytes added ,  4 March
→‎2017
Line 248: Line 248:
}}
}}
|timestamp=12:30 AM · Jan 17, 2017
|timestamp=12:30 AM · Jan 17, 2017
}}
=== 2018 ===
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955140105034809344
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=/END My prediction is that the Gated Institutional Narrative will fail. Exotic measures will be tried to get rid of the strong voices as was done to [[Seberging|Jean Seberg]]. And then, at long bloody last, the institutions will seat the disagreeables. Here’s to Harvard Professor Nassim Taleb.
|media1=ERW-X-post-955140105034809344-DUFW21xVAAAQKrN.jpg
|media2=ERW-X-post-955140105034809344-DUFW21zVMAAz01E.jpg
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955117591378329606
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=1/ The [[Adjective, Occupation, Name Formula|"Adj.-Profession-Name" Formula]], Disagreeables, & the [[No-Living-Heroes Theory|"No-Living-Heroes"]] thy. Consider adjectives:
Embattled</br>
Controversial</br>
Divisive</br>
Reclusive</br>
Provocative</br>
Struggling</br>
Right-Wing</br>
Eccentric</br>
Self-styled</br>
Far-Left</br>
Recovering</br>
Disgraced</br>
Self-Promoting</br>
Free-thinking</br>
Volatile</br>
etc.
|timestamp=4:39 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955119083095171072
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=2/ These adjectives are really reserved terms and the 'tells' of mainstream media letting you know who is off-narrative and who they have marked for reputation neutralization through [[Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD)|FUD (Fear-Uncertainty and Doubt)]] campaigns.
|timestamp=4:45 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955120622123720704
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=3/ So what's wrong with calling a professor who is controversial, a "controversial professor" you may fairly ask? The problem is that MSM builds clientside architecture in your own mind that you don't notice. Proof? Check the graphic attached.
|timestamp=4:51 PM · Jan 21, 2018
|media1=ERW-X-post-955120622123720704-DUFE4AfVMAA8Sxx.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955121503653085184
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=4/ Apparently in the entire history of the internet, this tweet is the first to ever use the phrase "controversial professor Paul Krugman" to describe @paulkrugman even though he is famous for being a controversial professor.
So...how can that be?
|timestamp=4:54 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955124432543993856
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=5/ Let’s first dig a bit to look for positive framings of my colleague “controversial professor” @jordanbpeterson. Consider these attachments for a man whose fame is largely due to being a noble inspirational heroic maverick.
The point is that real humans don’t talk like this.
|timestamp=5:06 PM · Jan 21, 2018
|media1=ERW-X-post-955124432543993856-DUFImTEVoAAtgWY.jpg
|media2=ERW-X-post-955124432543993856-DUFImTDVoAEZMnL.jpg
|media3=ERW-X-post-955124432543993856-DUFImUkVoAAf0Bk.jpg
|media4=ERW-X-post-955124432543993856-DUFImUlVQAAcbBH.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955128183816253440
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=6/ My point here is that our minds are programmed to recognize the [[Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN)|“Gated Institutional Narrative” or GIN]] and to take our emotional instructions from it. This is Orwell’s 1984 Newspeak: Adjective-Profession-Target.
Or so asserts self-styled Internet personality @EricRWeinstein.
|timestamp=5:21 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955129704385662976
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=7/ So who are the targets? Men and  women who are off the charts on the Big-5 psychometric for disagreeability. These people are the pool from which our greatest Nobel Laureates &amp; even heroes were once drawn.
And right now the internet is having a bull market in disagreeability.
|timestamp=5:27 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955131952377442304
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=8/ This brings us to one of my most controversial theories: Ever since Lindbergh’s attempt to keep the US out of WWII, [[No-Living-Heroes Theory|our institutions have fought against us having ANY living heroes with self-minted credibility]].
This leaves a vacuum filled by acceptable institutional figures.
|timestamp=5:36 PM · Jan 21, 2018
|media1=ERW-X-post-955131952377442304-DUFPcROU0AEURlO.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955134621078835200
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=9/ The lesson learned from Lindbergh appears to be that Mavericks are too dangerous to institutions...and in the case of Lindbergh that made some sense. But what about a John Lennon? Frances Kelsey? Charlie Chaplin? Paul Robeson? Frank Wilkinson? Katharine Hepburn?
|timestamp=5:46 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955136753454624768
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=10/ Here’s the punchline: There are suddenly way way too many disagreeable individual voices to be found for people trying to escape from the constant cognitive abuse of our institutions, which want our co-dependence on them.
So something new *has* to happen.
Here goes...
|timestamp=5:55 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955138512214306816
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=/11
Either:
A) The spell of the [[Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN)|GIN]] breaks and we have lots of real self-minted heroes again.
B) Disagreeables like Jordan Peterson, Camille Paglia, Nassim Taleb, Douglas Murray, Claire Lehman, etc... all get taken out.
C) The institutions seat some of the disagreeables.
|timestamp=6:02 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
|timestamp=6:08 PM · Jan 21, 2018
}}
}}


Retrieved from "https://theportal.wiki/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/26057"