Editing Jeffrey Epstein (section)

=== 2021 ===
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1415365900794875911
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=<nowiki>#</nowiki>[[Follow the Silence|FollowTheSilence]]
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1415364326257401858
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=It is hard to read this story of '''Epstein’s''' inexplicable deal with prosecutors without specialized vocabulary not meant for the public. The magical words are likely to be “event deconfliction” and “[[Blue on Blue|blue on blue incident]]”. 

Otherwise you would think that this is about Ken Starr.
|timestamp=5:35 PM · Jul 14, 2021
|media1=ERW-X-post-1415364326257401858-E6RiWgpUUAM4t86.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1415364332595007490
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=If any reporters want to ask about the history of deconfliction between the Federal and International IC and local law enforcement they can contact these entities listed by the DOJ.

This lists the three major deconfliction database systems: SAFETNet, RISsafe, and Case Explorer:
|timestamp=5:35 PM · Jul 14, 2021
|media1=ERW-X-post-1415364332595007490-E6RiW6cVcAEDYqq.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1415364334696341510
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I just called to ask CaseExplorer for South Florida about the history and federal participation in deconfliction circa 2000-2008. I was getting the history going back to 1990. 

Then I mentioned a '''Jeffrey Epstein'''.

“Sir, I am now going to terminate this call.”

Reporters? Anyone?
|timestamp=5:35 PM · Jul 14, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1415364335841419266
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=The Guardian called him a Billionaire. The New York Times called him a suicide. Others called him a disgraced Financier.

Wouldn’t we have to rule out IC construct? Why will no media ask about the possibility of a state sponsored Pedophile IC operation?

Is there no press at all?
|timestamp=5:35 PM · Jul 14, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1415364337078730753
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=He was not a billionaire. He was not a currency trading hedge fund genius. He was not a simple suicide.

This isn’t about Ken Starr.

I would not trust any newspaper that refuses to ask this question:

Was Epstein a state sponsored operation tripped over by local law enforcement?
|timestamp=5:35 PM · Jul 14, 2021
}}
|timestamp=5:41 PM · Jul 14, 2021
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1466301827259850753
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=P.S. And...I appear to be back to being throttled more agressively after several threads were throttled less agressively or not at all by twitter. 

At least at first on this thread. We will see whether that continues. CC'ing @lexfridman @benshapiro @jordanbpeterson @SamHarrisOrg
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1466299741898035201
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=So this just appears now!?! And what do we learn? That if "Sources and Methods" of the Intelligence Community might be compromised, prosecutors regularly decline to push for full prosecution EVEN IN THE CASE OF SEXUAL ABUSE of minors and INFANTS.

Bingo: [[Follow the Silence]].
|media1=ERW-X-post-1466299741898035201-FFlMFKvVUAMTsju.png
|media2=ERW-X-post-1466299741898035201-FFlNjjQVcAUrpt7.png
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=JasonLeopold-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/JasonLeopold/status/1466158702390497280
|name=Jason Leopold
|usernameurl=https://x.com/JasonLeopold
|username=JasonLeopold
|content=I have spent a decade, literally, collecting hundreds of IG reports from the CIA via #FOIA. I've filed 13 requests and sued the agency 3 times since 2012. When @a_cormier_ & I started to review these docs earlier this year we spotted a disturbing pattern
|timestamp=9:34 PM · Dec 1, 2021
}}
|timestamp=6:54 AM · Dec 2, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1466299744586588163
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=We have an undisclosed program; there's some kind of 'understanding' that we don't understand. I very well understand why we don't casually compromise "Sources &amp; Methods". But trafficking kids is NOT casual business. Nor is USING them as part of 'Sources &amp; Methods' for kompromat.
|timestamp=6:54 AM · Dec 2, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1466299746021036034
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=One question now creates 2 teams:

Team A) 'Sources &amp; Methods' are above child trafficking in importance.

Team B) Child Trafficking is above any exemption for our 'Sources &amp; Methods'.

I believe that if Epstein needed to use kids for S&amp;M as Kompromat, we lost our plot entirely.
|timestamp=6:54 AM · Dec 2, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1466299747396829189
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Seriously, I am not being naive here. If we have to abuse children to gain security for the country, maybe we don't have the right to a nation? If our intelligence community is so pathetic...look you get the idea. If the US isn't protecting kids from our own IC, we aren't the US.
|timestamp=6:54 AM · Dec 2, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1466299748726362113
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I understand we may occassionally have to fell a monster overseas. I understand that sometimes there's a ticking time bomb and 'extraordinary methods' are needed. I understand that we must surveil people or engage in illegal acts while undercover.

But you-can't-use-kids. Period.
|timestamp=6:54 AM · Dec 2, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1466299750152507392
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Is there some GIANT understanding involving our journalists &amp; news desks that when the IC says 'Sources &amp; Methods' we all just say 'Ok. Anything you say boys.' Like, for example with @arobach being shut down on Epstein: 

{{#widget:YouTube|id=vjwf9F_v5cI}}

Abuse of Kids &gt; Sources &amp; Methods
|timestamp=6:54 AM · Dec 2, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1466299751821824007
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Notice how everything adds up if there's a giant understanding that Sources &amp; Methods trump everything protecting innocent children? You just say 'Sources &amp; Methods are at risk'. Explains Acosta, Robach, Veritas, etc. Boom: No more [[Jeffrey Epstein|Epstein]] mysteries. It's all 'Sources &amp; Methods'.
|timestamp=6:54 AM · Dec 2, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1466299753226903555
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Q: Why no discussion of Villard House records?</br>
A: Sources &  Methods.

Q: Why no investigation of Epstein's Hedge Fund's trading partners & brokerage?</br>
A: Sources & Methods.

Q: Why do editors claim no one cares about Epstein?</br>
A: Sources & Methods.

Q: Project Veritas?</br>
A: S&M.
|timestamp=6:54 AM · Dec 2, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1466299754648797184
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Q: Why report Epstein was a disgraced Financier when no one seems to have traded with him?</br>
A: Sources &amp; Methods.

Q: Why so little interest in covering Ghislaine relative to Kyle Rittenhouse?</br>
A: Sources &amp; Methods.

Q: Why did no one ask where GM last crossed a border?</br>
A: S &amp; M.
|timestamp=6:54 AM · Dec 2, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1466299756028719105
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Moral: Our kids cant vote. We bring them into the world totally dependent on us. If we have a country that deserves an Intelligence Service, we have a right to know that kids are 100% OFF LIMITS as regards 'Sources &amp; Methods' by the IC of us or our allies. Period.
Kids &gt;&gt;&gt; S &amp; M.
|timestamp=6:54 AM · Dec 2, 2021
}}
|timestamp=7:02 AM · Dec 2, 2021
}}

<!--
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1472457328993599488}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1472434098429841410}}


{{#widget:Tweet|id=1466213382239916034}}
-->

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1466213382239916034
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=“I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,” Trump booms from a speakerphone. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.” - @NYMag

What was that about? Jeffrey Epstein was not a “disgraced financier”, 14 year olds are not “Beautiful women…on the younger side.”

Was Trump sending us a message, a warning or a confession? Whatever it was, it’s a big deal. Time to revisit this article: 

https://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/#print

I once again note people reading things in that I didn’t write. I can’t help you. The difference between making a confession and sending us a warning about Epstein covers a *lot* of possible territory.

Think before assuming.
|timestamp=5:11 PM · Dec 1, 2021
}}

<!--
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1462873616635232258}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1455027276261691393}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1452890595551170566}}
-->

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1451991295149281281
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=Things I don't believe we can't conclusively resolve:

A) COVID's origin.

B) The Jeffrey Epstein story.

C) UAP.

D) JFK assassination.

E) Vegas Shooting.

F) Extent of 'Democracy Fortifying' in 2020.

G) Efficacy of Non-Vaccines.

H) Mysterious WEF 'Build Back Better' mantra.

I) Negative impacts of Trade known to have been suppressed.

J) Adulteration of BLS CPI measure of inflation.

K) Negative economic impacts of Immigration.

L) Sudden spike in fake 'Objective Third Party Fact Checking'.

M) Sudden "Diversity Equity Inclusion" explosion.

N) Collusion beween Tech Platforms functioning as Communications Utilities as well as with the Federal Government.

O) Death of John MacCaffee.

N) Chinese infiltraion of US basic research through 'Student Exchange'.

P) Take over of 'Peer Review' during Robert Maxwell's reign.

Q) Joe Biden's state of cognitive decline.

R) Nature of MSNBC campagin against Andrew Yang.

S) Nature of Dean Scream, Anti-Ron Paul and other interference in democracy by Mainstream media News.

T) Impact of loss of mandatory retirement on young people seeking work.

U) Rex84.

V) Collusion between National Academy and National Science foundation division of Policy Research and Analysis to fake demographic crisis in mid 1980s.

W) Lack on anyone building the significant & desperately needed new non-profit institutions despite skyhigh wealth inequality.

X) Loss of Academic Freedom across the board in Academe.

Y) Loss of the Lancet and other publications as trusted non-political sources of fact.

Z) The true nature of @EcoHealthNYC w its relationship to 
@doddtra & Dr A. Fauci.

Moral: much of this 'ambiguity' is serving the few.

A last point: I don't know what happened in most all of these (the NSF & BLS stories being exceptions). I really don't. The quality of my guesses is not particularly high. The quality of my suspicions as to what IS resolvable has been *considerably* higher, at least historically.
|timestamp=12:17 PM · Oct 23, 2021
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445797252643971079
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=This is a big deal. Treat Dr Daszak &amp; Dr Fauci as they deserve: central figures in some story involving grey area BioWarfare strategy and responsibilities that we ordinary humans don’t understand because no one will explain it.

The strategy failed: duh. Time to declassify it. 🙏
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445797247011082250
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I hadn’t been saying much about @EcoHealthNYC for a reason. I don’t have many mentors, but a man I respect as my mentor was on the board: a heroic figure to me &amp; to others. So I had hoped that the situation there was under adult supervision.

I appear to have had misplaced hopes.
|timestamp=5:04 PM · Oct 6, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445797248982347776
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=In a different world, these issues would first be dealt w/ behind the scenes so as to avoid destruction to our infrastructure. I assume @EcoHealthNYC is a typical proxy for the government which uses outside contractors to evade restrictions on government. But this is way beyond.
|timestamp=5:05 PM · Oct 6, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445797250215469056
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=No one has much commented on how high-powered the board has been. You have a director of the [[National Science Foundation (NSF)|NSF]] as a board member for example.

No one is asking the hard questions yet. Like [[Jeffrey Epstein|Epstein]], this story doesn’t add up: I fear we don’t look for answers when we know many of them already.
|timestamp=5:05 PM · Oct 6, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445797251259912201
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=If I were a reporter, I would ask the board members about @EcoHealthNYC’s BioWarfare responsibilities given its @doddtra relationship. I would ask the 77 Nobel laureates about who organized the letter supporting the funding of Dr Daszak.

Journalists: Break a sweat. What is this?
|timestamp=5:05 PM · Oct 6, 2021
}}
|timestamp=5:05 PM · Oct 6, 2021
}}


{{#widget:Tweet|id=1440172227354259458}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1432160805512888321}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1424904119446245387
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=Many appear to be on the lookout for any and all issues that allow authoritarians to concentrate power. So far we have: 

A) Child trafficking.

B) Climate catastrophe.

C) “X is actually a public health issue.”

D) Society is Structurally bigoted/Evil.

E) “It’s a PANDEMIC people!”

B) and E) are traditionally somewhat compelling but are clearly now being used by leaders. The others are transparently not compelling. Epstein taught us no one in office cares about child trafficking enough to get to the bottom of what was going on w/ our government and Epstein.

Disagree? Okay: Hold one brutal hearing this year on Epstein, the records of his mysterious Hedge Fund, child trafficking and any links between Epstein and Intelligence communities.

I’ll wait. Will apologize if it happens.

Cc: @alexstamos

So the problem is that climate and pandemic may require coordinated action. But there is seemingly no one honest & competent enough to forgo the opportunity to spread authoritarian control to surveillance, censorship, and expectations of obedience inconsistent with free society.

I’d support the need of public spirited government to narrowly tell us what to do in the most limited of legitimate circumstances requiring coordination beyond our usual. 

I don’t support what I’m seeing which is institutional fetish for using pandemic, climate, etc for control.

We have to rid ourselves of a class of authoritarians who want to turn everything into a catastrophe requiring the surrender of our personal freedom & privacy.

By the same token, sometimes there is a war or pandemic. And you may need war-time leaders over peacetime careerists.🙏
|timestamp=6:23 PM · Aug 9, 2021
}}

<!--
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1424243321233313793}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1424241565409550340}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1424241553837477888}}
-->

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1417630283101212672
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=The cognitive tools for understanding any rationale behind NIH funded Gain of Function Research in China are almost certainly being withheld.

Look at it from the point of a true believer in the system. “We have to not lose the bioweapon arms race & should keep our rivals close.”

“But the public will never understand a partnership with our main rival as being safer than being frozen out of all CCP decisions. On the other hand we can’t be seen as engaging in a bioweapons arms race. So we had myriad ways to evade the optics of what we were actually doing.”

“Then COVID got out. Suddenly the whole world was talking about zoonotic bat respiratory Corona viruses: a subject the public had never heard of before. Our excuses & proxies for what is essentially military strategy for containment of CCP biowarfare ambitions were center stage.”

“Only we can’t talk about this. And our strategy that worked well enough when no one in the public knew “Gain of Function”, “Spike Protein” or “Zoonotic” terms stopped working when everyone on the planet was forced to become amateur scientists. Then we lost ‘Lab Leak is racism’.”

“So what do we do? Do we have an open town-hall to explain all things that are part of delicate multi decade Wash DC political insider theory like “Constructive engagement”, “Iranian Nuclear Containment”, “Two State Solution”? Of course not. That’s why we have an expert class.”

So we sit around with the expert class withholding all the cognitive tools “we the people” need to figure out whether we have the CORRECT public spirited Elite. Which we do not.

Thus the ‘elite’ get more and more resentful that we are meddling in ‘their’ strategic endeavors. Ha. The idea that it’s time to come clean about Epstein, Iran, the West Bank, Strategic Engagement, Nuclear Bluffing, Climate & Wealth, internal spying, Assange and Snowden, simply never occurs to a class that believes it is acting in a way that can NEVER be open to public scrutiny.

Start from this insider premise that is never said out loud, “The purpose of democracy is to give the public the most minimal choice over multi-decade cryptic strategies that must be managed by insider classes, so that they can only slightly course correct from expert consensus.”

The populist premise is simpler: “You insiders seem to be incompetent at your jobs & more than competent at your extraction of wealth & obfuscation of all with which you have been entrusted. How can we force you ‘elite’ to account for your non-elite malfeasance and incompetence?”

That’s how I see it. We have to stop talking about this in the exact terms we are handed by the very ‘elite’ who don’t want us talking about the real issues. We need to stop using the framings we’re handed.

For example, “Gain of Function” is largely a euphemism for “weaponized”.

Do I believe in an actual Elite that cannot share everything with the public. Yeah. Think about it; It cannot be otherwise.

Do I believe in this *elite*? This is the Keystone Cops meets Mr Magoo.

So I am neither a populist nor a defender of the system as it is currently found.

We should join the populists in demanding answers based on pathological extractive, unethical and incompetent behavior.

But you cannot “burn it all the fuck down”, put it all on the blockchain or vote for complete transparency either.

We need a well paid actual public spirited elite public servant class.

And no one I know is willing to say this. They either defend the system as is, or want some radical revolution.

We need new folks in their 20s-50s. Not Fauci. Not Biden. Not Trump. Not Pelosi. Not McConnell.

If you’ve been in power for a long time and are now in your 70s & 80s? It is simply time to go. That’s not ageism.

That’s an IMPLICIT part of the system. We’ve never before remotely had a President & core group this out of touch, this old, and this technically over their heads.

Soapbox speech over. 

As always, thanks for listening and letting me try out these ideas at scale. 🙏
|timestamp=4:39 PM · Jul 20, 2021
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1415918734854688769
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=<nowiki>*</nowiki>too
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1415917990718054405
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=The point is who labels others crackpots. Or haven’t we noticed?

It’s the class who said Hilary would win easily. That we’d banished volatility before 2008. That the Wuhan Lab Leak was racism. That labor shortages exist in mkt economies. That carbs are good, while fat is bad.
{{Tweet
|image=Dream_S14-profile-XvEazo1T.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/Dream_S14/status/1415879092986007554
|name=Roaring20s
|usernameurl=https://x.com/Dream_S14
|username=Dream_S14
|content=@EricRWeinstein was the first talking about Epstein being an intelligence “agent” (Mossad IIRC), that was a long time ago, his brother @BretWeinstein was the first to speak about the lab leak, a long time ago, both were labelled as crackpots, now both being shown to be accurate
|timestamp=3:40 AM · Jul 16, 2021
}}
|timestamp=6:15 AM · Jul 16, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1415917992454463490
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Those who believe [[Jeffrey Epstein|Jeffery Epstein]] was a “disgraced financier” rather than a construct of an Intelligence Community &amp; who never ran a billion $ forex hedge fund. People who think String Theory is our leading theory of physics. Or who said NAFTA lifts all boats like a rising tide.
|timestamp=6:15 AM · Jul 16, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1415917993423360003
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=People who believe an octave has 12 notes, but can’t say why 12. Those who think MSNBC just kept misreporting Andrew Yang’s candidacy by accident over and over again. At some point you just have to realize that those who can’t think for themselves HAVE to call those who do names.
|timestamp=6:15 AM · Jul 16, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1415917994308345858
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=It’s tough getting things wrong over &amp; over again as per the above. And every time we go through the exercise the increasingly desperate normies who cling to groups/experts should become more obvious to you. If you’ve followed this account, know that this behavior will NEVER die.
|timestamp=6:15 AM · Jul 16, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1415917995910524930
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=The sheep among us will always be angry because their gods will always fail them until we reform our institutions. Which may or may not happen. Time will tell.

But have some compassion: Hug a sheep or NPC today. Tell them there is still hope and it’s not to late to become human.
|timestamp=6:15 AM · Jul 16, 2021
}}
|timestamp=6:18 AM · Jul 16, 2021
}}

<!--
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1415842693335289857}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1415841953023893505}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1415440376106684416}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1415438469443190784}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1415364337078730753}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1415364334696341510}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1415364326257401858}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1412552079634100229}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1412550861260136450}}
-->

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1408522369514176515
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=The person, @officialmcafee, who reached out to me *obsessed* about not being “suicided” like Jeffrey Epstein, is characterologically the same as the person described hours before his death by his wife here.

Assume for the moment that his wife is correct in what she says here… https://x.com/disclosetv/sta/disclosetv/status/1408484338384179203

That would change the Bayesian priors considerably for me. The main doubt I had and that he might actually have killed himself is that my information was just over a year old. Prison could have changed someone. Very unlikely in McAfee’s case. But not impossible.

Now I think not.

No one on earth probably has gone to greater lengths (e.g. tattooing themselves) in communicating “If I am found dead like Jeffrey Epstein I was murdered.”

And he is found dead from gravity in a prison? That sounds like something else. That sounds like a message killing.

What is a “Message killing”? Well it’s not much talked about. 

MESSAGE KILLING TARGET: Antonio R Caponigro.

When Tony C[a]ponigro was killed in 1980, he was found in the Bronx with $300 dollars shoved in his mouth and lower orifice. 

MESSAGE: Don’t be Greedy.

MESSAGE KILLING TARGET: Marisol Macías Castañeda

A Mexican journalist, editor and blogger writing anonymously about drug cartels was murdered by Los Zetas. She was found with her computer keyboard and other peripherals.

MESSAGE: The Cartels can find those who blog anonymously.

MESSAGE KILLING TARGET: Abe Reles.

Reles was a Hitman who was just about to turn on Albert Anastasia in 1941. Instead He mysteriously fell to his death while under tight police supervision. 

MESSAGE: “The bird (Reles) could sing (testify) but he couldn’t fly (defenestrated).” Applying the same logic here, POSSIBLE MESSAGE KILLING TARGET:John McAfee.

John died in *exactly* the way he told us he would *never* die: like Epstein.

MESSAGE: “We can get anywhere. You can’t stop it by taking elaborate precaution. We can always murder so it can’t be proven.”
|timestamp=8:27 PM · Jun 25, 2021
}}

<!--
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1407833968423079941}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1407833966678249473}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1407827650387775490}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1407827642808778753}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1406495183449985028}}
-->

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1382349286495555595
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=“In today’s regulatory environment It’s virtually impossible to violate rules. And this is something the public really doesn’t understand...It’s impossible for a violation to go undetected; certainly not for an extended period of time.” -Former NASDQ Chairman, Bernie Madoff

This is what institutional betrayal looks like when you stare straight in its eyes: relaxed, confident, respectable, smooth, knowledgeable.

It’s COVID pronouncements. Or String Theory. Or CPI revisions. Or “Labor Shortages”. Or fast-track trade treaties:

https://youtu.be/ab1NTIlO-FM

Many years ago 2002-6, I would give talks about Madoff & Epstein using “Black Arts Capital LLC” as a proxy, with the tag line “We’d tell you what we’re doing, but then...”

I guessed BM might be front-running his own business. Boy was I wrong on the specifics.

RIP Bernie Madoff.
|timestamp=8:05 AM · Apr 14, 2021
}}

<!--
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1377092653913841666}}
-->

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1377092653913841666
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=I think folks get confused that Jeffrey Epstein was valued for providing sex to his circle.

I don’t think that’s right. Many in his circle had access to sex.

You have to take a next step to see it.

The thing Epstein offered that his friends just couldn’t get...was silence.

Think I’m wrong? Then where are any competent probing articles on this story in national news media.

Every one of us who talks about this story knows fear. I do. All the time. Fear is the product. Sex silenced by terror.

Are you a reporter? Then why haven’t you filed the story?

Ask for the hedge fund filings. Ask on the whereabouts of the contents of his Villard House office. Then try to get some rest.

Not so easy as it sounded right?

No, Epstein provided a blackout curtain of silence woven from implied terror. And you need state cooperation for that.
Usual Disclaimer: I am not feeling suicidal and have no further knowledge beyond what I put out months ago. I am not a threat as I only met him once briefly and have no other intimate secrets requiring my silence. I’m now just a broken record that everyone has heard before.
|timestamp=7:57 PM · Mar 30, 2021
}}

<!--
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1374888037595836418}}
-->

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1368239282884808704
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=It’s so weird what the internet chooses to infer. Obviously I’m worried about a tie back to some unit of Israeli intelligence. It’s Robert Maxwell’s daughter for Godsake.

The internet fixates generally  & internet Israel critics more than most. Internet inference is very weird. https://t.co/J7rnjkNDYO

Some of my motivation is to communicate that *if* some unit in Israel is ultimately directly implicated, it sure as hell isn’t “The Jews” or “Israel” that is behind this. That ordinary Jews would risk everything to stop such techniques. And I’m willing to make the point concrete.

Do I know that it is Israel behind this? No. Do I think one nation acted alone? I’m not even positive that Epstein was state sponsored. What do I believe? That Israel and the US WERE part of a GROUP of national ICs that turned a blind eye to child sex trafficking at a *minimum*.

How big is that group? Well, I believe *If* it exists it contains at least 2 nations not 1. And while I love Israel and have lived there, I’m very worried about the universal silence over this.

Why am I doing this? In part to stand up for 2 countries I *love* & fear went wrong.

Israel has had some terrible operations (e.g. Lillehammer) like the US (e.g. Cointelpro). And their strength comes from being strong enough to face those horrors when the happen.

And I believe in my 2 favorite nations enough to ask the questions whose answers I fear to my soul.

I have said this before. But the fixation on Israel never rests. So neither will its honest critics and its defenders. I would like to think I can count my self among both their ranks. End.
|timestamp=8:37 AM · Mar 6, 2021
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1367858910435024901
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Please quote tweet the top tweet in thread to counteract downranking by Twitter. We need these questions asked by our news media. Make this a story. Force them to simply do their job on what could be the biggest story of the decade &amp; don’t ever call @TwitterSafety ‘Safety’ again.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1367855371314819078
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=What would you say to the same needs in reverse? I, for example, want to know if Jeffrey Epstein had ties to the US intelligence community and has some measure of immunity to operate as a pedophile &amp; trafficker.

Q: Was his Florida arrest what you call a “Blue on Blue” screw up?
|timestamp=3:11 PM · Mar 5, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1367855373441409027
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Q: I want to know if I am risking my life by repeatedly asking why no national news organization asks you on the obvious direct on-the-record questions about his financial records or ties to the intelligence communities including the FBI. Am I?
|timestamp=3:11 PM · Mar 5, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1367855374418669574
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Q: Do our sources and methods permit a blind eye to child sex trafficking by foreign controlled agents?

Q: Does the FBI work with tech platforms to control the reach of citizens who ask these questions to you that the @nytimes @washingtonpost, @cnn &amp; @npr conspicuously will not?
|timestamp=3:11 PM · Mar 5, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1367855375307841536
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Q: Do you have the financial records &amp; filings of [[Jeffrey Epstein|Jeffrey Epstein’s]] supposed “hedge fund” offices at Villard house? If not, why not? If so, was there a Foreign Currency trading fund? 

Q: Can the FBI be trusted with End to End encryption if it will not answer these questions? 🙏
|timestamp=3:11 PM · Mar 5, 2021
}}
|timestamp=3:25 PM · Mar 5, 2021
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1367855371314819078
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=What would you say to the same needs in reverse? I, for example, want to know if Jeffrey Epstein had ties to the US intelligence community and has some measure of immunity to operate as a pedophile & trafficker.

Q: Was his Florida arrest what you call a “[[Blue on Blue]]” screw up?

Q: I want to know if I am risking my life by repeatedly asking why no national news organization asks you on the obvious direct on-the-record questions about his financial records or ties to the intelligence communities including the FBI. Am I?

Q: Do our [[Sources and Methods|sources and methods]] permit a blind eye to child sex trafficking by foreign controlled agents?

Q: Does the FBI work with tech platforms to control the reach of citizens who ask these questions to you that the @nytimes @washingtonpost, @cnn & @npr conspicuously will not?

Q: Do you have the financial records & filings of Jeffrey Epstein’s supposed “hedge fund” offices at Villard house? If not, why not? If so, was there a Foreign Currency trading fund? 

Q: Can the FBI be trusted with End to End encryption if it will not answer these questions? 🙏

Note Added To Thread: There is no way in hell any account of this size taking this crazy risk to ask direct questions to the FBI about Jeffrey Epstein and the Intelligence community has engagement numbers this low without interference from Twitter. 

@jack: can you hear me?

Please quote tweet the top tweet in thread to counteract downranking by Twitter. We need these questions asked by our news media. Make this a story. Force them to simply do their job on what could be the biggest story of the decade & don’t ever call @TwitterSafety ‘Safety’ again.
|timestamp=7:11 AM · Mar 5, 2021
}}

<!--
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1360259053268598786}}
-->

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1360254928929738756
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=Thanks for the invitation. I can try to explain my concern.

There really *is* a problem w MAGA, Trump, Qanon & conspiracy theories running rampant.  And it will result in death & destruction if it spins out of control.

However it is being fueled by those who claim to fight it.

The entire war over fact checking is a war of 2 low resolution teams.

One team wants absolute freedom to spread wild eyed theories that just about everything is a psyop or a false flag.

The other team wants to impose institutional consensus reality on everyone via media & tech.

Unfortunately, I can’t live under either. So each of the warring parties thinks I’m against them & for the other team. In their mentalities if you aren’t on their simplistic team you are, de facto, working for the other side. There’s no basic concept of *responsible* heterodoxy.

No the Freemasons do not run everything on behalf of pedophile reptilians who faked Sandy Hook with crisis actors.

Yes there are/were conspiracies behind '''Epstein''', H1B, @MSNBC, PPE, climate science, the “Great Moderation”, Great Reset...everywhere institutions want a “consensus”.

Having spent a good portion of my 20s at Harvard, I know *exactly* how this game works. Our betters sit down and try to figure out how to control others behind closed doors. They see themselves as the intrinsically enlightened people who need to do the thinking for all of us.

When they wanted to cut our Social Security payments & raise our taxes they opted to try to change the CPI rather than pass legislation. When they wanted to pay less for scientists they knew to keep *silent* about NSF Labor Shortage claims even though such shortages don’t exist.

These are the folks who tell you “masks don’t work” rather than “save masks for doctors as we forgot to restock them and moved all manufacturing to China like morons”. They will then spin on a dime to tell you “Only bad dumb people don’t wear masks”. This is the worst of Harvard.

So I don’t want Alex Jones and Qanon nor do I want @TwitterSafety, @msnbc and @Harvard. I see them as very different forms of the same thing: people who want to take away our ability to see clearly.

And, I assure you, @Harvard tries to paint anyone it can’t control as dangerous.

So, my belief is that anyone who rejects/questions Davos, Consensus Reality, Institutional Narrative, Public Health Campaigns, High Immigration, Peer Review, Primary Election Coverage, Trust & Safety...will be treated as Alex Jones sooner or Later. 

'''This is Managed Reality ™.'''

I cannot live in Managed Reality ™ because I think it defeats the purpose of being a human being. It negates being an American. It abdicates responsibility for our children.

I have defeated Harvard about half the times we have fought. How? Because they just aren’t that good.

Managed Reality ™ has a weak spot. It’s not run by our A-team anymore. Fauci isn’t Francis Crick. Biden isn’t Elon. Janet Yellen isn’t Satoshi.

In general, the A-Team is going independent because tech/media/Ed are enforcing way too much conformity through personal destruction.

So why am I worried?

Well, I’ve been trying to save the institutions. It’s probably doomed, but almost no one is trying to do what I do: rescue the institutions from their death spiral by reinserting their critics in positions of prominence (eg Chomsky at MIT). 

Hence my fear.

If I were a tech guy I’d retreat into wealth. If I were a professor I’d shut up and collect my salary with job security. If I was a politician or journalist I’d follow the other sheep. 

But I’m a science guy, an American and a dad. And I want my kids to have a particular future.

Thanks.
|timestamp=7:50 AM · Feb 12, 2021
}}

<!--
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1359907015187779586}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1359892698828730373}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1359369032978161666}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1354116596705316864}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1351831628302094336}}
-->

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1351056795054329862
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=Normally I would think that our interests would be best served by self-investigation of the IC through redoing the Church/Pike Committees.

But given the hands closing around the throat of free unsurveiled action and open idea exchange, pardoning Assange and Snowden makes sense.

Or more simply put: if our bizarre press and elected representatives refuse to ASK about Jeffrey Epstein’s links to the Intelligence world, what choice do we have but pardoning those who do the work abdicated by government & the press while they cowardly refuse to do their jobs?

I should also say that the problem isn’t as simple as Assange & Snowden. Assume for the moment that they both acted in a principled fashion and did so with great care. You’d still have the issue that pardons send a signal to less principled actors which could be catastrophic.

We need an intelligence community we can trust to *not* be open. That is the conundrum we face. How do we gain oversight and protect ourselves against a secret world that we want to remain opaque?

This is a giant liability of not being able to rest on a shared national culture.
|timestamp=10:40 PM · Jan 17, 2021
}}