Editing Jeffrey Epstein (section)

=== 2020 ===

<!--
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1301192870154498054}}
-->

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1289143049256185857
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=Uh, first of all I don’t think we’ve met and pretending that I am “gushing” about someone is not a good introduction. It makes me think “not good faith” given that Cernovich has said horrendous things in the past which we have called wretched and worse. I’d take this up with him.

As for this case, I’m not really interested in Epstein/Ghislaine and company. I want to know whether my country was involved in state protected trafficking in minors & why our press refuses generally to do journalism in this case. Grateful to all doing the work to settle this.

If you have answers and know more about it, go for it. I personally am terrified that we have a gentleman’s agreement not to ask whether this is tied to the intelligence community and I appreciate those trying to find out the truth given the stakes. I don’t have more background.
|timestamp=3:17 AM · Jul 31, 2020
}}

<!--
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1286336717688102913}}
-->

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1285108742875279360
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=I predict an escalating series of tragic spectacular coincidences surrounding Jeffrey Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell, our press, our wealthy and our intelligence communities. 

Because Quantum Mechanics! Or because Black Lives Matter!! Or Something. Yep. Must be quantum or racism...
|timestamp=12:06 AM · Jul 20, 2020
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1285105242757980160
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=Jeffrey Epstein: coincidence magnet.

The “fair coin” that comes up tails every time. Because no one wants to be labeled a conspiracy theorist.

As a Mathematician I can say that this IS statistically possible. As a human, I would say don’t listen to me as a mathematician here... https://x.com/PalmerReport/s/PalmerReport/status/1285063675221606400
|timestamp=11:52 PM · Jul 19, 2020
}}

<!--
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1283098872680603648}}
-->

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1275585021185716224
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=I don’t think that is where this is. I have no inside scoop and am not a general Clinton Body Count guy.

There is some structure around Epstein that all of us civilians are endangered by. Some piece of a dark world spilled into all of our lives. And many eyes are watching.
|timestamp=5:22 PM · Jun 23, 2020
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1262849887432962048
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=Everyone focused on trying to get me and @EpsilonTheory to talk to each other on Epstein, collapse, markets and other topics, can now lay off. It has just happened. 

[Good call on your part planet 🌍 btw. Much as I hate to admit it...]
|timestamp=8:57 PM · May 19, 2020
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1258092729596182528
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=Listen carefully: you don’t have to elect Biden or Trump.

The world has woken up via being suddenly shut in doors by crazy incompetent people largely born in the 1940s and 1950s without a coherent explanation. Or plan.

Lives lost. Nurses sacrificed. Jobs & businesses destroyed.

You don’t have to take these choices. *Nobody* smart wants these people except to defeat each other. You don’t really like Fox. Or CNN. Or the NYT. Except when they go after your enemies.

Okay. So go cold turkey. Call them all what they are: The UnWorkables.

You would be better off with a thoughtful and competent 45 year old electrician or self made businessperson as president. Almost no ordinary people have family business interests in China or Ukraine. Chose anyone without dementia. Pick someone who can’t remember the moon landing.

Pick someone who never met '''Jeffrey Epstein'''. Pick someone who can code or with a masters degree or better in STEM.

You don’t have to keep picking the card the magician is forcing you to select as your card. It’s not YOUR card. It’s the magician’s card. Grab the magicians wrist.

That card says “Biden”. Take that card and a lighter and set it on fire. Then grab the deck and pick another card, rifle it to check for markings on the back, look to see if they all say Biden, and chose a different card at random. This was never a primary. There was no election.

If the enormous generation of you young folk can’t use this mismanagement of a pandemic by a bipartisan kleptocratic gerontocracy, then you aren’t thinking like young folk at all. Demand your debt free future and the removal of this preposterous class of ancient legacy predators.

Learned helplessness is UnAmerican. This is like China or Russia controlling our minds from a bad sci-fi thriller. But we are being controlled by our grandparents and parents instead. And they don’t care.
 
This is beyond insane and it has never been like this. Ever.

Rant over.
|timestamp=10:54 AM · May 6, 2020
}}

<!--
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1249039288177549312}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1248701529055363073}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1237449910800101382}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1237170528395218944}}
-->

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1233421386590220288
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=Where are we on State-Sponsored pedophilia honey-pots?

Let’s try the following: How can we be sure that China, Russia or Iran wasn’t behind Epstein if we can’t ask the question of Epstein’s ties to intelligence? So either we KNOW his tie, or we are leaving a giant security hole.

Why is that anti-interesting? Wouldn’t we want to be sure that Epstein’s fortune didn’t come from China, Russia, etc.? Thus we either *know* that it didn’t and aren’t reporting what we know, or we have left the door open to the states that we are certain are trying to control us.

Pursue this even further: if news desks aren’t asking these questions, aren’t they under suspicion of being under control of foreign or domestic intelligence? That is can we essentially back out that some intelligence has captured legacy media if they aren’t willing to *ask* Qs?

Let me say as someone old enough to remember Watergate & the Church Committee, as recently as 40-50 years ago journalists would pursue stories about dirty tricks and Intelligence excesses. The phrase “No Comment” is familiar to anyone my age from this time.

Where is that phrase?

It is an entire concept that has disappeared: institutional accountability with institutions going after institutions rather than institutions going after those individuals who are the only ones who are still really raising questions.
|timestamp=7:59 AM · Feb 28, 2020
}}


{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1233410237387771907
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=The digital layer allows us to measure the market demand for many genuinely fascinating topics in which the legacy journalism layer pretends to take zero interest.

Odd. Guaranteed markets on real topics. Zero interest. Ownership of media by interests who do not need profit.

The digital layer allows us to to see reporters following people they never acknowledge even exist.

Who really cares? Why does it matter? Because institutions agree never to treat as real that which remains confined to the digital layer alone. Hence the reason we’ve stagnated.

I’d like to know where the “last known whereabouts of Ghislaine Maxwell” and “location of Epstein trading records from Villard House” and “ties to intelligence”  investigations are stalled out. Even where these stories ran into brick walls would be fascinating. Where is the DISC?
|timestamp=7:14 AM · Feb 28, 2020
}}

<!--
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1230880091896348673}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1220179678842933248}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1217886552962949121}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1215648519375081472}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1215648517005312001}}
-->

{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1215348170600763392
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=My simple take on conspiracies: Looking at the @AndrewYang @MSNBC series, it‘s clear that this is not a repeating accident. However what we’re really worrying about is this. What happens if we start to acknowledge these cryptic power moves? Does the world become Qanon & InfoWars?

If we teach COINTELPRO do we start believing in Reptilians? If we acknowledge the Powell Memo, do we believe in Illuminati next? Does questioning Epstein’s death and any connection of his to intelligence communities legitimize all of Pizzagate? Does Jean Seberg destroy all news?

Does our suspicion that the Warren Report was used to silence questions around JFK open up the idea that our government is illegitimate when it releases findings? 

Sadly, the answer is that we’re falling into 3 types. Conspiracy deniers, Conspiracy nuts & a tiny third group.

The deniers fear legitimizing deep questions & concern about ground truth, interests, power, leverage, cryptic organizations, etc. Better to avoid the slippery slope without near certain evidence they say.

Nuts want hidden order everywhere. They want to be in on a secret world.

The third group (mine) has had it with both of these groups. We know enough to discuss Type I vs Type II error. We don’t know what’s going on most of the time so the nutters make us crazy. We also don’t believe that Jeffrey Epstein’s coverage is normal. We can map irregularity.

We also know we can be wrong & don’t think that makes us nutters or dupes. It’s Type I vs Type II error & we refuse to get all weird because it involves conspiracies. This is a normal thing to think about unless you know ABSOLUTELY nothing about the history of proven conspiracy!

Two of the most important issues at the moment in this space are about the news: 

A) What is the explanation for the bizarre coverage of Jeffrey Epstein?

B) What is the explanation for the bizarre coverage every 4 years of popular candidates outside the system gaining traction?

We know enough to know that something is wildly off in both cases but we don’t know exactly what. That makes both the Nutters & the deniers extremely uncomfortable with us. We may be near certain something is off like nutters but reject detailed theories w/o proof like deniers.

My conclusion is simple: consider joining us. If you’ve outgrown radical pro-life v pro-choice. If you‘re too smart for pure capitalism vs communism. If you can’t get the old camps to work for you, consider taking Type I vs II approach to conspiracies. As you would anything else.
|timestamp=11:02 AM · Jan 9, 2020
}}

<!--
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1212785538098286592}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1212785541692805120}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1212785542716248064}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1212785548642832384}}
-->