Adjective, Occupation, Name Formula: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The "Adj.-Profession-Name" Formula, Disagreeables, & the "No-Living-Heroes" thy. Consider adjectives:  
<blockquote>
''The "Adj.-Profession-Name" Formula, Disagreeables, & the "No-Living-Heroes" thy. Consider adjectives:  


Embattled
* Embattled
Controversial
* Controversial
Divisive
* Divisive
Reclusive
* Reclusive
Provocative
* Provocative
Struggling
* Struggling
Right-Wing
* Right-Wing
Eccentric
* Eccentric
Self-styled
* Self-styled
Far-Left
* Far-Left
Recovering
* Recovering
Disgraced
* Disgraced
Self-Promoting
* Self-Promoting
Free-thinking
* Free-thinking
Volatile
* Volatile
etc.
* etc.''


These adjectives are really reserved terms and the 'tells' of mainstream media letting you know who is off-narrative and who they have marked for reputation neutralization through FUD (Fear-Uncertainty and Doubt) campaigns.
These adjectives are really reserved terms and the 'tells' of mainstream media letting you know who is off-narrative and who they have marked for reputation neutralization through FUD (Fear-Uncertainty and Doubt) campaigns.


So what's wrong with calling a professor who is controversial, a "controversial professor" you may fairly ask? The problem is that MSM builds clientside architecture in your own mind that you don't notice. Proof? Check the graphic attached.
So what's wrong with calling a professor who is controversial, a "controversial professor" you may fairly ask? The problem is that MSM builds clientside architecture in your own mind that you don't notice. Proof? Check the [https://twitter.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955120622123720704 graphic attached].


Apparently in the entire history of the internet, this tweet is the first to ever use the phrase "controversial professor Paul Krugman" to describe @paulkrugman even though he is famous for being a controversial professor.  
Apparently in the entire history of the internet, this tweet is the first to ever use the phrase "controversial professor Paul Krugman" to describe @paulkrugman even though he is famous for being a controversial professor.  
Line 26: Line 27:
So...how can that be?
So...how can that be?


Let’s first dig a bit to look for positive framings of my colleague “controversial professor” @jordanbpeterson. Consider these attachments for a man whose fame is largely due to being a noble inspirational heroic maverick.  
Let’s first dig a bit to look for positive framings of my colleague “controversial professor” @jordanbpeterson. Consider [https://twitter.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955124432543993856 these attachments] for a man whose fame is largely due to being a noble inspirational heroic maverick.  


The point is that real humans don’t talk like this.
The point is that real humans don’t talk like this.
Line 58: Line 59:
C) The institutions seat some of the disagreeables.
C) The institutions seat some of the disagreeables.


My prediction is that the Gated Institutional Narrative will fail. Exotic measures will be tried to get rid of the strong voices as was done to Jean Seberg. And then, at long bloody last, the institutions will seat the disagreeables. Here’s to Harvard Professor Nassim Taleb. [https://twitter.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955117591378329606 Source]
My prediction is that the Gated Institutional Narrative will fail. Exotic measures will be tried to get rid of the strong voices as was done to Jean Seberg. And then, at long bloody last, the institutions will seat the disagreeables. Here’s to Harvard Professor Nassim Taleb.


-'''Eric Weinstein''' on [https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/955117591378329606 X]
</blockquote>


{{#widget:Tweet|id=955117591378329606}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=955117591378329606}}