25: The Construct: Jeffrey Epstein: Difference between revisions

Line 226: Line 226:


<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><em>00:23:50</em><br>Would we ever have the use of orgies and honeypots together with an elaborately constructed backstory in which an actor and the character they played were entirely different? This is, in fact, the story of Ellie Cohn, perhaps Israelā€™s most famous spy discovered in Damascus, as if he was an Arab who had come from Argentina as a Playboy using alcohol and women in order to integrate himself into the highest echelons of Syrian society, particularly the intelligence and defense communities. So, yes, people are constructed to be something other than they are, and honeypots are very much a possible use in the intelligence world. </p>
<p><em>00:23:50</em><br>Would we ever have the use of orgies and honeypots together with an elaborately constructed backstory in which an actor and the character they played were entirely different? This is, in fact, the story of Ellie Cohn, perhaps Israelā€™s most famous spy, discovered in Damascus as if he was an Arab, who had come from Argentina as a Playboy using alcohol and women in order to integrate himself into the highest echelons of Syrian society-particularly the intelligence and defense communities. So, yes, people are constructed to be something other than they are, and honeypots are very much a possible use in the intelligence world. </p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->


Line 234: Line 234:


<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><em>00:24:45</em><br>Is there any attempt to gain control of innocent influencers? That is, are there any circumstances in which people simply have the crime of being influential used against them? In fact, you can look for Section A of the Reserve Index, people to be rounded up in times of national emergency inside the United States. This might include professors, labor organizers, professionals, authors, the independently wealthy. In other words, there is very much an interest in keeping track of people whoā€™ve done nothing wrong, but in times of national emergency, you might want to make sure that none of these people are capable of influencing the population. </p>
<p><em>00:24:45</em><br>Is there any attempt to gain control of innocent influencers? That is, are there any circumstances in which people simply have the crime of being influential used against them? In fact, you can look for Section A of the Reserve Index, people to be rounded up in times of national emergency inside the United States. This might include professors, labor organizers, professionals, authors, the independently wealthy. In other words, there is very much an interest in keeping track of people whoā€™ve done nothing wrong, but [who], in times of national emergency, [one] might want to [ensure] are [not] capable of influencing the population. </p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->


<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><em>00:25:28</em><br>Lastly, one of the things that we hear most frequently is that there is no ability to have conspiracies, because any large group of people would not be able to keep a secret. Itā€™s a really silly idea, because COINTELPRO, which was discovered by the Citizensā€™ Committee To Investigate The FBI in, 1971, when the word showed up in documents they stole from an office of the FBI in Media, Pennsylvania, and then they used the Freedom Of Information Act in order to find out what COINTELPRO was, and it turned out that it was a permanent dirty tricks campaign living inside of the FBI, and that the Deep Throat construct inside of the Watergate story of Woodward and Bernstein was, in fact, Mark Felt, who I believe was the head of COINTELPRO after J Edgar Hoover. So what weā€™re going to be doing is simply exploring how the things that have been proven to be true might enter into the story of the unfortunate Jeffrey Epstein. </p>
<p><em>00:25:28</em><br>Lastly, one of the things that we hear most frequently is that there is no ability to have conspiracies, because any large group of people would not be able to keep a secret. [Thatā€™s] a really silly idea; [consider the following facts]: [The word] ā€œCOINTELPROā€ was discovered by the Citizensā€™ Committee To Investigate The FBI in 1971, when the word showed up in documents [the Committee] stole from an office of the FBI in Media, Pennsylvania. Then, they used the Freedom Of Information Act in order to find out what COINTELPRO was, and it turned out that it was a permanent dirty tricks campaign living inside of the FBI, and that the Deep Throat construct inside of the Watergate story of Woodward and Bernstein was, in fact, Mark Felt, who I believe was the head of COINTELPRO after J Edgar Hoover.
Ā 
</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->


<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><em>00:26:35</em><br>In this circumstance, I want to say what it is that Iā€™m asking for, and Iā€™m going to be talking about the Church and Pike Commissions and having them redone in the current era. If you donā€™t know what the Church and Pike Committees were, I believe the Church Committee was in the Senate and the Pike Committee was in the House. They were an attempt to investigate our own intelligence community in order to understand what the US had become in an era that was rife with dirty tricks campaigns, often against our own citizens and often against people who had done nothing wrong other than exercising their constitutional rights to dissent from official narrative, and, in general, mainstream perspectives. </p>
<p>
Ā 
So, weā€™re going to be simply exploring how the [aforementioned conspiracies, which] have been proven to be true might enter into the story of the unfortunate Jeffrey Epstein.<em>00:26:35</em><br>In this circumstance, I want to say what it is that Iā€™m asking for, and Iā€™m going to be talking about the Church and Pike Commissions, and having them redone in the current era. If you donā€™t know what the Church and Pike Committees were-I believe the Church Committee was in the Senate and the Pike Committee was in the House-they were an attempt to investigate our own intelligence community in order to understand what the US had become in an era that was rife with dirty tricks campaigns, often against our own citizens and often against people who had done nothing wrong other than exercise their constitutional rights to dissent from official narrative, and, in general, mainstream perspectives. </p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->


<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><em>00:27:17</em><br>It is extremely important to me that the United States remain a place that is not only not hostile to heterodox thinking, but leads the world in heterodox thinking. This is our comparative advantage against places like China and Russia, which use fear to intimidate their people. If we cannot have heterodox thinkers operating with a feeling of safety in our own country, I believe that we are lost. Because I donā€™t think we are going to be able to compete with powers that are able to organize people and use violence to coerce people into doing things that our people would find absolutely unpalatable. </p>
<p><em>00:27:17</em><br>It is extremely important to me that the United States remain a place that is not only not hostile to heterodox thinking, but leads the world in heterodox thinking. This is our comparative advantage against places like China and Russia, which use fear to intimidate their people. If we cannot have heterodox thinkers operating with a feeling of safety in our own country, I believe that we are lost, because I donā€™t think we are going to be able to compete with powers that are able to organize people and use violence to coerce people into doing things that our people would find absolutely unpalatable. </p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->


<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><em>00:27:55</em><br>Further, if youā€™re running a kind of conspiracy, and I donā€™tā€”Iā€™m not against conspiracies, and Iā€™m not against the intelligence community, but itā€™s important that the conspiracies be ethical, that they be public-minded, and that they be of a very high caliber. You shouldnā€™t be able to trip over a conspiracy doing nothing wrong, and find yourself in a world of pain. </p>
<p><em>00:27:55</em><br>Further, if youā€™re running a kind of conspiracy-and Iā€™m not against conspiracies, and Iā€™m not against the intelligence community-but itā€™s important that the conspiracies be ethical, that they be public-minded, and that they be of a very high caliber. You shouldnā€™t be able to trip over a conspiracy [when youā€™re] doing nothing wrong, and find yourself in a world of pain. </p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->


<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><em>00:28:17</em><br>What Iā€™m going to say about Jeffrey Epstein is that if the official story isnā€™t true, and that in fact, he was an intelligence community construct, either US or foreign, then he was a very poor intelligence construct. It was easy to trip over Jeffrey Epstein. He was not well-constructed. And Iā€™ll get into what I think may have been going on shortly. But the key point is, I had someone potentially reach out to me and intimidate me a bit. I donā€™t know if it was directed, but they seem to know a great deal about me and they were trying to, I thought, dissuade me from talking about this and investigating this. </p>
<p><em>00:28:17</em><br>What Iā€™m going to say about Jeffrey Epstein is that if the official story isnā€™t true, and that in fact he was an intelligence community construct-either US or foreign-then he was a very poor intelligence construct. It was easy to trip over Jeffrey Epstein. He was not well-constructed. And Iā€™ll get into what I think may have been going on shortly. But the key point is, I had someone potentially reach out to me and intimidate me a bit. I donā€™t know if it was directed, but they seemed to know a great deal about me, and they were trying to-I thought-pdissuade me from talking about this and investigating this. </p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->


<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><em>00:28:54</em><br>My feeling about this is if Iā€™m tripping over your construct, then you goofed; itā€™s not my problem. You drew up this person, whoever you may be, if Iā€™m correct about this, and you made a mistake, and Iā€™m going to say what that mistake is, but it shouldnā€™t be my job to get out of your way. It should be your job to make sure that I never run across your problem. So I believe that Jeffrey Epstein, if he was an intelligence construct, was extremely badly drawn. </p>
<p><em>00:28:54</em><br>My feeling about this is [that] if Iā€™m tripping over your construct, then you goofed; itā€™s not my problem. You drew up this person, whoever you may be-if Iā€™m correct about this-and you made a mistake, and Iā€™m going to say what that mistake is, but it shouldnā€™t be my job to get out of your way. It should be your job to make sure that I never run across your problem. So I believe that Jeffrey Epstein, if he was an intelligence construct, was extremely badly drawn. </p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->


<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><em>00:29:26</em><br>All right, hereā€™s what went into my meeting of Jeffrey Epstein. My recollection is that Jeffrey Epstein had a staff of young adult women who I would guess were in their late twenties, perhaps early thirties. They seemed very professional. They seemed very attractive and they seemed to take his schedule and all of the sort of incidental executive function duties off of his hands. Principally, I dealt with them, according to my recollection, and not with Jeffrey directly. I believe I became aware that Jeffrey wanted to see me, and since I was at that time involved in a small hedge fund, I went to see him on 71st Street across from the Frick Museum. </p>
<p><em>00:29:26</em><br>All right, hereā€™s what went into my meeting of Jeffrey Epstein. My recollection is that Jeffrey Epstein had a staff of young adult women who I would guess were in their late twenties, perhaps early thirties. They seemed very professional. They seemed very attractive and they seemed to take his schedule and all of the sort of incidental executive function duties off of his hands. Principally I dealt with them, according to my recollection, and not with Jeffrey directly. I believe I became aware that Jeffrey wanted to see me, and since I was at that time involved in a small hedge fund, I went to see him on 71st Street across from the Frick Museum. </p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->


59

edits