1,568
edits
18: Slipping the DISC: State of The Portal and Chapter 2020: Difference between revisions
18: Slipping the DISC: State of The Portal and Chapter 2020 (edit)
Revision as of 09:16, 26 February 2020
, 26 February 2020→No Living Heroes
| Line 245: | Line 245: | ||
===No Living Heroes=== | ===No Living Heroes=== | ||
01:00:39 This brings us to a final issue, which I think is incredibly important, which has to do with why there are no living heroes | 01:00:39 This brings us to a final issue, which I think is incredibly important, which has to do with why there are no living heroes. In effect, we almost don't believe in heroism. As soon as somebody starts to make us excited about the world and what is possible for the individual, we come to start feeling terrible about that person unless they're trapped inside of a Marvel movie, or something like that. If you go back to the history of ticker tape parades, he will see that there were many ticker tape parades given for individual aviators, individual explorers, ships captains who put their ship at risk to rescue the crew of another. | ||
01:01:18 And in fact this pattern or largely stopped. | 01:01:18 And in fact this pattern or largely stopped. | ||
01:01:22 My contention is that the difficult case of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Lindbergh Charles Lindbergh] may have marked a turning point | 01:01:22 My contention is that the difficult case of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Lindbergh Charles Lindbergh] may have marked a turning point. In Lindbergh's case, he had flown solo to Europe from the United States and come back a hero, I believe in the late 1920s. Now, Lindbergh was a very difficult human being to deal with, because he was an authentic hero, and he was also somebody who believed in America First and in isolationism, and given the Nazi Menace in Europe, I think it's almost an unforgivable position nevertheless. The fact is that Lindberg commanded tremendous popularity and that popularity could have been used to keep the u.s. Out of War. | ||
01:02:06 What I find is that since Lindbergh | 01:02:06 What I find is that since Lindbergh it has been very rare to elevate any individual to the point where they can oppose our institutions. The Pete Seeger's and Albert Einstein's of the world who fought against McCarthyism. We're a huge danger. | ||
01:02:25 To the industry that was cropping up around anti-communism. | 01:02:25 To the industry that was cropping up around anti-communism. | ||
| Line 259: | Line 259: | ||
01:02:37 We have been frightened about individuals coming to rival our institutions in terms of power. And that's what's so great about the new Revolution in longform podcast thing and all of these other forms of social media. Now, we have a great danger in that most of these platforms are mediated. We saw what happened to Alex Jones. It's quite possible that if these powerful institutions come to believe that a particular individual should be removed. They can always choose to enforce the rules in a different way. We saw recently the Advent of terms of service changes in to include deadnaming now if I say that Walter Walter Carlos | 01:02:37 We have been frightened about individuals coming to rival our institutions in terms of power. And that's what's so great about the new Revolution in longform podcast thing and all of these other forms of social media. Now, we have a great danger in that most of these platforms are mediated. We saw what happened to Alex Jones. It's quite possible that if these powerful institutions come to believe that a particular individual should be removed. They can always choose to enforce the rules in a different way. We saw recently the Advent of terms of service changes in to include deadnaming now if I say that Walter Walter Carlos | ||
01:03:23 Compose the album switched-on Bach or perform the album switched-on Bach that is a true statement. But because Walter Carlos became Wendy Carlos, I have no idea whether or not I can be accused of deadnaming imagine that you have a hundred such rules rules that are never spelled out never clear that can be enforced any which way to deny someone access to the major platforms. This is the great danger with this moment. We have unprecedented access, but we also have a gating function which can be turned on at any time if we fall out of line with the institutions. I want to read one tweet that has been on my mind for quite some time. This tweet came from a contributor to The Washington Post is a professor at the Fletcher school and it said, | 01:03:23 Compose the album switched-on Bach or perform the album switched-on Bach that is a true statement. But because Walter Carlos became Wendy Carlos, I have no idea whether or not I can be accused of deadnaming imagine that you have a hundred such rules rules that are never spelled out never clear that can be enforced any which way to deny someone access to the major platforms. This is the great danger with this moment. We have unprecedented access, but we also have a gating function which can be turned on at any time if we fall out of line with the institutions. I want to read one tweet that has been on my mind for quite some time. This tweet came from a contributor to The Washington Post is a professor at the Fletcher school and it said, "Good Morning Eric. I'm going to leave out the parentheses. | ||
01:04:13 So I read up on a few of your | 01:04:13 So I read up on a few of your notions and I have some thoughts but my basic conclusion is simple: what's true isn't new, and what's new isn't true. | ||
01:04:23 I think it's fantastic. I was stung by a because at first I was under the impression that we were still living in a world in which the Washington Post New York Times Harvard Stanford. What have you control the major conversation? But coming off of a recent date at the Ice House in Pasadena, which was a live gig with Peter Thiel. I started to realize how powerful this new movement is. We can reach anyone anywhere and I think that the Gated institutional narrative deserves to have the battle that it's been been bruising for what I now believe is that the Gated institutional narrative has been spoiling for a fight. We are quickly coming to the point where we have a David-and-Goliath moment. We now need to try to re-inflate the individuals who are uncorrelated who are not particularly good at taking orders don't like committee meetings who don't want to sign a loyalty oath, but who are passionately committed to the public good, and to some version of intellectual meta-honesty. We need these people to once again take up positions inside of the institutions, and I would like to, in fact, inflict myself on my favorite institution, Harvard University. The children of Harvard University have always been divided into White Sheep and Black Sheep, and there's no question that I represent Black Sheep Harvard, but I also think that one of the features of the University that makes its great is it has tolerated both its white sheep and it's black sheep. It is time to do battle with the oppressive structures that have been used to silence new ideas. If in my family I assert that there might be as many as three revolutionary Nobel-quality ideas in 1 clutch, how many ideas might there be suppressed if that is actually true? How many people are sitting on top of intellectual gold that never got its chance to see the light of day? What I'd like to do is to try to do battle with the disc to show you the | 01:04:23 I think it's fantastic. I was stung by a because at first I was under the impression that we were still living in a world in which the Washington Post New York Times Harvard Stanford. What have you control the major conversation? But coming off of a recent date at the Ice House in Pasadena, which was a live gig with Peter Thiel. I started to realize how powerful this new movement is. We can reach anyone anywhere and I think that the Gated institutional narrative deserves to have the battle that it's been been bruising for what I now believe is that the Gated institutional narrative has been spoiling for a fight. We are quickly coming to the point where we have a David-and-Goliath moment. We now need to try to re-inflate the individuals who are uncorrelated who are not particularly good at taking orders don't like committee meetings who don't want to sign a loyalty oath, but who are passionately committed to the public good, and to some version of intellectual meta-honesty. We need these people to once again take up positions inside of the institutions, and I would like to, in fact, inflict myself on my favorite institution, Harvard University. The children of Harvard University have always been divided into White Sheep and Black Sheep, and there's no question that I represent Black Sheep Harvard, but I also think that one of the features of the University that makes its great is it has tolerated both its white sheep and it's black sheep. It is time to do battle with the oppressive structures that have been used to silence new ideas. If in my family I assert that there might be as many as three revolutionary Nobel-quality ideas in 1 clutch, how many ideas might there be suppressed if that is actually true? How many people are sitting on top of intellectual gold that never got its chance to see the light of day? What I'd like to do is to try to do battle with the disc to show you the | ||