411
edits
mNo edit summary |
Winterflags (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
'''Tyler:''' Thank you Eric. | '''Tyler:''' Thank you Eric. | ||
  |   | ||
'''Eric:''' When we were talking about what topics we could begin with, I didn't want to begin with economics | '''Eric:''' When we were talking about what topics we could begin with, I didn't want to begin with economics â and you suggested âthe Apocalypseâ is a great place to start. The great benefit of this is that if we get past it, the rest of the conversation will be post-apocalyptic. Â | ||
  |   | ||
'''Tyler:''' The Apocalypse itself is economics of course, but I was just thinking that virtually any good theory of politics needs some notion of the Apocalypse. Letâs say you thought the time horizon for the universe or a human civilization were potentially infinite. You would then be so concerned with minimizing existential risk, that nothing would get done. Whereas if you think âwell, you know mankind has another 800 years left on earth on average and by that time probably will have blown ourselves up or an asteroid will comeâ, then you think âwhat glorious things can we do with those 800 yearsâ, and it's quite a difference in perspective. So an infinite time horizon might actually choke off rational thought about political decision-making. Â | '''Tyler:''' The Apocalypse itself is economics of course, but I was just thinking that virtually any good theory of politics needs some notion of the Apocalypse. Letâs say you thought the time horizon for the universe or a human civilization were potentially infinite. You would then be so concerned with minimizing existential risk, that nothing would get done. Whereas if you think âwell, you know mankind has another 800 years left on earth on average and by that time probably will have blown ourselves up or an asteroid will comeâ, then you think âwhat glorious things can we do with those 800 yearsâ, and it's quite a difference in perspective. So an infinite time horizon might actually choke off rational thought about political decision-making. Â |
edits