Load-Bearing Fictions
I think thereâs some contradictions that we legitimatelyâeven lies. I talk about load-bearing fictions. We have to have some number of load-bearing fictions in any society because you canât actually just do everything in broad daylight and hope that everything that we want can be harmonized. Some people are gonna have to accept that there are trade-offs who canât intellectually accept that there are trade-offs, and they will require load-bearing fictions. For example, we do convict innocent people using our system of justice. And thereâs nothing magical about 12 people on a jury being able to decide what actually happened. But if we donât have some kind of mysticism around the wisdom of a jury of our peers, we wonât be able to mete out almost any justice at all. So I donât think that we can hope for a sort of childâs vision of an honest society. But what I find really impressive is the rent-seeking aspect of keeping it so expensive to investigate something that itâs impossible. So you talked about a system of selective pressures where if you raise certain questions, you wonât be employed and therefore through directed survivor bias, thereâs nobody at the top of a profession who will speak about something openly and in public.
- Eric Weinstein on The Portal Ep. 4
There was, once upon a time, a heuristic that said the best way to have a multicultural society is that you have to have some load-bearing fictions. Like "all religions are equally problematic in all ways"âthere's no way that's true. Jains are not equally problematic as Jews, Jews are more problematic than Jainsâand I'm able to say that because I'm Jewish.
As a result, those sharistics hardened into dogmas because they were necessary to keep our society operating. We have to believe at the moment that a jury of 12 people knows how to convict somebody based on guilt, even though the DNA evidence shows that that's not a real rubric. I mean, it's a heuristic. Maybe it works some of the time, right? So as these sort of heuristics have been breaking down, and these heuristics of the left are on top of the ones that are necessary for civil societyâthey, the desire to maintain this complex of ideas like, "trade is always good"âno, trade is not always good for all people. That's, it's beyond moronic!
- Eric Weinstein on The Portal Ep. 7
On X
Some ask why I support âload bearingâ & âadult-levelâ fictions over the truth & request examples. Hereâs one: itâs likely structurally important that Supreme Court Justices continue performing in costume to suggest theyâre spiritually superior druids of unfathomable legal genius.
Â
I respectfully disagree. The immigration tale of US is an essential load-bearing national mythology lIke "1 man 1 vote." This is our story. https://x.com/martyrmade/status/826493460786008066
What makes America great *is* in large part our mythology. If we tear all load-bearing myths to shreds (e.g. a 'Free Press') we undo the US.
The U.S. President today didnât ârecognizeâ Jerusalem as Israelâs capital. Rather we finally stood up to those who insist that we pretend it isnât.
My problem is that we are not honest about the cost of these fictions. Further the cost of destroying these fictions may be immense. Do not discount the structural reality of a âload bearing fiction.â
This is a point I have also made in a different form. âWe hold these truths to be SELF-EVIDENT...ALL men...are endowed by their CREATOR with certain UNALIENABLE Rights,â
You can complain all you want but those words are load bearing. Thatâs partly why this atheist says prayers.
Thread: Iâve come to the conclusion that the collapse weâre in now is the inevitable end of what purely secular liberalism looks like. (A sad reality as someone who wrote a book defending liberalism.) The tolerance baked into liberalism is what let Wokeism into the system
If one worships at the altar of pure reason one may also lead a noble life. In fact it is wholly possible that one may lead a better and more moral life than the pious hypocrite down the street. Thatâs not the problem. The problem is secular humanism coordinating and scaling.
When you hit the âwhy questionsâ over & over you have no last line of defense when a sociopath or crazy person openly tells you âWhatâs wrong with my redefinition of human flourishing? Why are you right and Iâm wrong? Who died and made you the arbiter of truth? Why these rules?â
Thatâs bad enough. But the real danger is breakaway factionalism. What if entire groups of citizens find incompatible ideologies irresistible? What unifies them? How do you hold citizens together when multiple groups say âdifferent people have different rights.â You need bedrock.
See Also
- 4: Timur Kuran - The Economics of Revolution and Mass Deception
- 7: Bret Easton Ellis - The Dark Laureate of Generation X
- 21: Ashley Mathews (aka Riley Reid) - The mogul and brains behind America's Sweetheart
- 37: Surfing the Wake of The Woke
- Canât vs Mustnât
- Oral Torah vs Written Torah
- Free Speech
 This article is a stub. You can help us by editing this page and expanding it.