National Science Foundation (NSF)

2009

Confused by the fact that science sees religion as its chief threat. Might we worry instead about threats posed by NSF/NIH/NAS?

1:14 PM · Jul 27, 2009

I find @EricRWeinstein addressed by @NSF speaking in the first person singular. Think Eric: what did Moses do in this situation?

10:08 PM · Sep 3, 2009

Oh @NSF do not confuse me more. Did thou not fund me to go to MIT? Did thou not command me to gain the PhD for our nation's good?

10:59 PM · Sep 3, 2009

Give me a sign @NSF: what are we going to do about the epidemic level of hogwash that threatens our nation in finance/markets?

11:03 PM · Sep 3, 2009

2010

2011

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

@erikbryn @Noahpinion @fmanjoo No. I refused to believe it until people told me what they were up to. You may want to read this rather carefully. I’m not making this up:

https://users.nber.org/~sewp/references/archive/weinsteinhowandwhygovernment.pdf

7:11 AM · Jan 6, 2020

@erikbryn @Noahpinion @fmanjoo Let me have the NSF tell you in their own words why they want so many of your graduate students to be foreign. From section 5:

 
7:15 AM · Jan 6, 2020


We need an emergency talk about this media war on @AndrewYang & @TulsiGabbard that was waged on @RonPaul, @BernieSanders & others before.

This is what I call the “Vampire Effect”; institutions will not reflect certain people just as vampires supposedly don’t reflect in a mirror. https://t.co/YAVjs1ujbk

 
8:33 PM · Jan 7, 2020

This isn’t cute as #YangMediaBlackout. This isn’t hidden any more. This is a boast by our media. Their point to all of us is: “Fuck you and your illusions”. And We aren’t calling it what it is: a declaration of war by our own media and parties against our own democratic process.

8:33 PM · Jan 7, 2020

Forget the Russians tampering in US democracy. That’s amateur hour. The Russians aren’t bragging like this. @MSNBC has been asking: “So tough guys, whatcha gonna do about the fact that we just keep knocking your milkshake into your date’s lap?”

8:33 PM · Jan 7, 2020

I’ve experience it every time I bring up the secret NSF study that lead to the H1B visa. There is an absolute black out. But because I have the study, media can’t say it doesn’t exist. So they just refuse to reflect it. Same w/ other such issues. There’s just *no* MSM reflection.

8:33 PM · Jan 7, 2020

We need to just be done with this open coup against meaningful elections. This is “Magicians choice” ... which is no choice at all. To hell with our news magicians. We need to make their credibility a financial issue. Open to suggestions.

Take a look:

https://vocal.media/theSwamp/a-visual-history-of-the-yang-media-blackout

8:33 PM · Jan 7, 2020

This is the Distributed Idea Suppression Complex or DISC in action.

A hyper specific allegation that the @NSF and GUIRR inside the @theNASEM in 1986 directed an internal economic analysis to figure out how much they would have to pay STEM workers in the future.

 
5:32 PM · Jan 17, 2020

The study is economically competent using both supply & demand, and then found new US graduates would have to be paid 6 figures shortly. They termed this the “pessimistic scenario”, and then (and I‘m not making this up) faked an *incompetent* DEMOGRAPHIC study by removing demand!

5:32 PM · Jan 17, 2020

The *competent* ECONOMIC study was protected and buried by never releasing it and removing the date and author from it. The author is still attached to NSF. To be clear: our @NSF is faking incompetence. The mainstream media is faking disinterest. Why? To not reveal the reasoning.

5:32 PM · Jan 17, 2020

The reason we have sky high STEM immigration is wage tampering. The @NSF & @theNASEM undermined our own model of scientific independence, academic freedom & irreverent science that was the envy of the word by flooding US markets with pliable STEM labor. And over what? Just wages.

5:32 PM · Jan 17, 2020

Now who is willing to get the @NSF on the record denial? Only the right leaning @BreitbartNews here! And US Instutional media treats anything that appears there as automatically beneath discussion. This is the logic of the Gated Institutional Narrative:

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/01/16/national-science-board-u-s-is-losing-technology-lead-over-china/

5:32 PM · Jan 17, 2020

I don’t exist. Breitbart doesn’t exist. The secret study doesn’t have an author, a date or publication. All restrictionists are automatically racists. Blah blah..

But then why not call a liar @nsf? Why invite me to the National Academy 4 separate times to present this @theNASEM?

5:32 PM · Jan 17, 2020

Ask yourself why your trusted media won’t put this story to rest. Just deny it @NSF. I triple-dirty-dog dare you. I would love the pleasure of having your spokespeople on The Portal to use your superior access to documents to explain.

Welcome to the DISC. Let’s do this thing.

5:32 PM · Jan 17, 2020

2021


2022

2023

  This article is a stub. You can help us by editing this page and expanding it.