The Portal Wiki

Gauge Theory: Difference between revisions

Page Discussion

Gauge Theory (edit)

Revision as of 23:35, 11 February 2026

20,467 bytes added ,  11 February
→‎2009
Line 4: Line 4:


=== 2009 ===
=== 2009 ===
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/2082949941
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=CLAIM: [[Gauge Theory]] is the natural marginalism for economics. CHALLENGE: help launch a 2nd marginal revolution virally via social networks.
|timestamp=11:46 PM · Jun 08, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/2124613641
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=[[Gauge Theory]] in 1 tweet: A derivative is rise/run so define the rise as measured from a *variable* reference plane set endogenously.
|timestamp=12:49 AM · Jun 12, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3745507262
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Top twitterers @KimKardashian @aplusk @oprah @britneyspears seem to be put off following me. Hmm. Got it: more [[Gauge Theory|gauge field theory]]!
|timestamp=12:12 AM · Sep 04, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3764262953
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=So I ask my followers: RT to @KimKardashian to put her talents and twitter account in the service of science, markets, and [[Gauge Theory|gauge thy]].  #geom
|timestamp=8:08 PM · Sep 04, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3863485026
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Define Inflation. Anyone? All this talk about predicting markets and no one can DEFINE [[Inflation|INFLATION]] or even engage the question? [[Gauge Theory|#GaugedKonus]]
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3821074910
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Challenge to Paul Krugman: okay *define* inflation under evolving preferences w/o [[Gauge Theory|gauge theory]]. Don't predict or control it. Just define it.
|timestamp=4:26 PM · Sep 07, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3825154914
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Okay: Here are 10 reasons the world blew up more plausible  than Paul's "Economics abandoned truth for math and beauty" theory.
|timestamp=8:18 PM · Sep 7, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3825196475
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Theory #10 It was a rookie mistake. Bernanke forgot the National "Safe Word" established with Goldman for just such situations.
|timestamp=8:21 PM · Sep 7, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3825242632
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Theory #9: This was a completely unforseable event. We just forgot to tell Roubini, Taleb, Schiller, Abdulali, Len Bole, Makopoulus, etc...
|timestamp=8:23 PM · Sep 7, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3825386023
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Theory #8: "What crisis? A few friends are stuck driving Maybachs and holding off on Bugattis. I'm old fashioned: is that now a crisis?"
|timestamp=8:31 PM · Sep 7, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3825445888
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Theory #7: It wasn't a systemic problem but a very limited and isolated failure where a few Big Apples spoiled the bunch.
|timestamp=8:35 PM · Sep 7, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3825534008
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Theory #6: Economics is confused that its parents are Evolution and Math-Physics because it was conceived in a threesome with ProWrestling.
|timestamp=8:40 PM · Sep 7, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3825621831
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Theory #5: Whatever the problem is, it had absolutely nothing to do with  perverse incentives of economists. Couldn't. Impossible. No way.
|timestamp=8:45 PM · Sep 7, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3825763735
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Theory #4: "Wait a minute. In science you can't just..you know..make stuff up about H. Sapiens? Uh...where's the eraser? No. The BIG one."
|timestamp=8:53 PM · Sep 7, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3825855612
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Theory #3: We lost time when the public was not sufficiently sophisticated to understand the Chinese Wall between Hank Paulson.
|timestamp=8:59 PM · Sep 7, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3826058159
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Theory #2: As a prank, Economics attached the names of Lower-Status economists to the work warning of disaster by the senior dudes. Our bad.
|timestamp=9:10 PM · Sep 7, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3826260367
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Theory #1: All the rest were jokes to get you to care what really happens in economics. Read this: http://bit.ly/EconTheater (and thanks!)
|timestamp=9:22 PM · Sep 7, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3826364298
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=On pg. 8 of that link. You will see senior economists boasting about going after 1 Trillion from SS by cooking the inflation [[Gauge Theory|gauge]]. Beauty??
|timestamp=9:28 PM · Sep 07, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3826412902
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Nothing personal Paul. You're the best. But you're also dead wrong. Economics fails when it turns its back on truth, beauty and science.
|timestamp=9:31 PM · Sep 7, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3829547297
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Actually @dabacon look at it like this. Imagine Weinberg declared [[Gauge Theory|gauge fields]] dead because [[String Theory|string theory]] failed to live up to Ed's claims.
|timestamp=12:28 AM · Sep 8, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3829670726
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Imagine @dabacon that Dawkins declared that Darwin was wrong because Lemarck failed. Krugman->Dawkins. Greenspan->Lemarck. Thinkers->Darwin.
|timestamp=12:35 AM · Sep 8, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3830029414
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=So, I'm not annoyed. Taleb bought lunch yesterday and reminded me to ignore the mainstream. If anything, I'm freed.
|timestamp=12:54 AM · Sep 8, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3830990494
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Peculiar twitter recommendation: Follow @d_allison in the hopes of getting him to use his twitter account. Many of the best, say little.
|timestamp=1:44 AM · Sep 8, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3845309967
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Ok @dabacon Beauty in Econ:</br>
SpaceTime-&gt;OrdinalPrefs x Time</br>
InternalSymm-&gt;Util Re-Params</br>
[[Gauge Theory|GaugeFields]]-&gt;Indifference\Mkts</br>
FieldStrength ...
|timestamp=6:22 PM · Sep 8, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3845402642
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Now @dabacon: do you know anyone in physics with a blog and the cojones to engage this? I claim that Paul can't define inflation w/o [[Gauge Theory|gauge]].
|timestamp=6:27 PM · Sep 8, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3846093722
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=So @riemannzeta and @dabacon: I don't want to get specualtive or distracted. Hard claim: Krugman can't define [[Inflation|inflation]] in theory w/o [[Gauge Theory|gauge]].
|timestamp=7:05 PM · Sep 8, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3846197290
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I'll be happy to make a precise statement to that effect when a physicist or geometer with some self respect steps forward to host a debate.
|timestamp=7:10 PM · Sep 8, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3850074461
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Ok Paul: if you even had a perfect world, *define* inflation with evolving ordinal tastes O_t under prices p_t if O_t isn't fixed by Magic?
|timestamp=10:30 PM · Sep 8, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3850206941
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=That "Magic" is lying about H. Sapiens. It is also ugly. Beauty removes the lie. So if we're full of it, invite us to Princeton. I'll come.
|timestamp=10:37 PM · Sep 8, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3852411813
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Thanks to @orzelc for the blog post and engaging: http://bit.ly/11wa5A
Now what about our friends Sean, Sabine, Dave, etc... on [[Gauge Theory|gauge thy]]?
|timestamp=12:28 AM · Sep 9, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3861738662
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Now Steinn Sigurðsson weighs in on Orzel/Bacon & "Weinstein v. Krugman" with "Economical with the Astronomical" http://bit.ly/hSVhO . Sean?
|timestamp=12:03 PM · Sep 9, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3861809617
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=But notice that no one engages the science question: DEFINE INFLATION in thy w/o D. Geom. That's weird right? Who uses [[Gauge Theory|gauge thy]]? So: Do it.
|timestamp=12:08 PM · Sep 9, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3861831164
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=My point is that not only can they cannot define inflation w/ changing tastes in theory, economics buries the folks who point this out!
|timestamp=12:10 PM · Sep 9, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3861896267
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=So Paul: Define Inflation. Just *Define* it. Extend the Konus index to changing tastes w/o beauty. If this is nuts, why the hold up?
|timestamp=12:15 PM · Sep 9, 2009
}}
|timestamp=1:59 PM · Sep 9, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3877568772
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I feel confident of what I have said about [[Gauge Theory|Gauge theory]] and [[Inflation]]. Here is something much more far out: George Soros' Thy as a [[Gauge Theory|gauge Thy]]
|timestamp=1:46 AM · Sep 10, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3886926550
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Kayfabe solves it by fiat while, as the quotes show, it is thought unsolvable even in standard theory. But In [[Gauge Theory|Gauge theory]] it is solvable.
|timestamp=1:16 PM · Sep 10, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3914702698
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Paul Krugman: Will you review the work of Malaney-W on [[Gauge Theory]] and Economics removing static taste and disproving Fisher&Shell?
|timestamp=4:49 PM · Sep 11, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3927641157
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=So @cmilroy asks about [[Gauge Theory|gauge theory]] and agent based models. Yeah. We think that's smart in a micro foundations of macro sort of way.
|timestamp=3:57 AM · Sep 12, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4308903179
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I'm told again that [[Gauge Theory|gauge theory]] in economics is wrong because "people aren't electrons." Sounds deep! Pity about the logic.
|timestamp=5:14 AM · Sep 23, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/4745934281
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=For the 1st time in more than 10Y, an econ. dept. con huevos has invited a presentation on [[Gauge Theory]] as a 'new marginalism'.
|timestamp=10:03 PM · Oct 09, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5179889307
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@dscoughlin Re: "Applying principles or discovering artifacts?" in [[Gauge Theory|gauge theory]]. Neither. Discovering principles is the focus.
|timestamp=6:55 PM · Oct 26, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5467930361
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Thanks to Prof. Sanjay Reddy and the New School Advanced Microecomomics seminar for a great workout on [[Gauge Theory]] and Selection.
|timestamp=2:32 AM · Nov 06, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5478724618
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Just back from the future. Thanks to Seed magazine for breaking the story of [[Gauge Theory in Economics]] in 2011! (I kid, I kid)
|timestamp=1:52 PM · Nov 06, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5510786756
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=A twittersearch on [[Gauge Theory]] now leads to pornography:"Hey physicists, here's some hot outdoors [[Gauge Theory|Gauge theory]] for you! http://bit.ly/...."
|timestamp=5:38 PM · Nov 07, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5572290090
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Now if you push Terry Tao's [[Gauge Theory|Gauge theory]] intro on kids using formal definitions you'll blow their little neurons to bits. Don't do it!
|timestamp=11:16 PM · Nov 09, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5572485822
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=When I ask if I can teach [[Gauge Theory|gauge theory]] to little kids, I'm trying to find examples in real life. Yet we don't understand our own subjects.
|timestamp=11:23 PM · Nov 09, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5573852175
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=So @republicofmath asks what I mean by 'teach' [[Gauge Theory|gauge theory]] to kids. I mean, can you recognize & understand bundles and their connections.
|timestamp=12:14 AM · Nov 10, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/5574222109
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=CLAIM: I could teach a 7YO why intertemporal economic welfare is based on [[Gauge Theory|gauge theory]] so she could explain Dale Jorgenson's error.
|timestamp=12:28 AM · Nov 10, 2009
}}


{{Tweet
{{Tweet
Line 11: Line 484:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Lee Smolin: Eric Weinstein and Pia Malaney say Economics is a Gauge theory.</br>
|content=Lee Smolin: Eric Weinstein and Pia Malaney say Economics is a [[Gauge Theory|Gauge theory]].</br>
Economist Y: Lee Smolin says Economics is a gauge theory.
Economist Y: Lee Smolin says Economics is a gauge theory.
|thread=
|thread=
Line 26: Line 499:
}}
}}
|timestamp=1:59 PM · Nov 13, 2009
|timestamp=1:59 PM · Nov 13, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/6179166637
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Considering using the [[Gauge Theory|dual gauge theoretic economic indices]] of production to measure "Income Generation Over Normal" or IGON-values.
|timestamp=8:38 PM · Nov 29, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/6649381477
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I should say that the idea that [[Gauge Theory]] would bring field theory to economics was any easy sell to Samuelson. The details never took.
|timestamp=2:59 AM · Dec 14, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/6650182763
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Paul Samuelson told me these lines of his would ward off any detractors who did not understand what Lie groups and [[Gauge Theory|gauge theory]] could solve.
|timestamp=3:27 AM · Dec 14, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/6880681250
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=[[Gauge Theory|Gauge theoretic economics]] interest has come recently from @mathpunk @dabacon @diffeomacx @riemanmzeta @tylercowen @ahaspel etc... Loving it.
|timestamp=3:02 AM · Dec 21, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/6880914448
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I should say that [[Gauge Theory|Gauge theoretic economics]] is also all about academic freedom, quashed as it was by the rennegade Boskin Commission idiocy.
|timestamp=3:11 AM · Dec 21, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/6933565112
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=.@riemannzeta: Samuelson's economics is to Newtonian physics what [[Gauge Theory|gauge theoretic economics]] is to Einstein/Yang-Mills http://bit.ly/PSINAE
|timestamp=4:27 PM · Dec 22, 2009
}}
}}


Retrieved from "https://theportal.wiki/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/25754"