The Portal Wiki

UAP: Difference between revisions

Page Discussion

UAP (edit)

Revision as of 03:38, 19 January 2026

3,164 bytes added ,  Monday at 03:38
→‎2021
Line 76: Line 76:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@jason_pontin @JamesOKeefeIII @AndrewYang @MSNBC Ok. The “overwhelming consensus” on the etiology of ulcers? Economists on The “Great Moderation”?
|content=@jason_pontin Ok. The “overwhelming consensus” on the etiology of ulcers? Economists on The “Great Moderation”?


I mean I thought that the idea of Pentagon videos of UFOs was total bullshit.  
I mean I thought that the idea of Pentagon videos of UFOs was total bullshit.  
Line 101: Line 101:


Your move AP.
Your move AP.
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=AP-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/AP/status/1350195349437243392
|name=The Associated Press
|usernameurl=https://x.com/AP
|username=AP
|content=Podcasts rife with misinformation remain on social platforms like Apple and Google as extremists exploit a loophole left after the tech companies cracked down on other mediums.
https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-conspiracy-theories-media-misinformation-social-media-b7bb0ace8a617af733357f6ee15aca03
|media1=AP-X-post-1350195349437243392.jpg
|timestamp=9:37 PM · Jan 15, 2021
}}
|timestamp=6:51 PM · Jan 17, 2021
|timestamp=6:51 PM · Jan 17, 2021
}}
}}
Line 1,857: Line 1,870:
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1473054650798542852
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1473009754104418306
|name=Eric Weinstein
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@s_offiler @michaelshermer Not saying anything beyond that I find the videos released uncompelling as data.  I find the incident super interesting. Would like to see the entire time series of data taken in by all sensors.
|content=There are many sightings that are bunk. Your issue is with the nature of the complement of that set. But debunking will need to be done in all future scenarios. Nature of the beast.
|thread=
|thread=
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
Line 1,873: Line 1,886:
Time to de-stigmatize the whole topic and help the data talk. The claimed phenomenon of UFO/UAP, after all, should be a scientific question.
Time to de-stigmatize the whole topic and help the data talk. The claimed phenomenon of UFO/UAP, after all, should be a scientific question.


https://t.co/kx5NgtILML
https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/galileo/people?page=2
|timestamp=5:24 PM · Dec 20, 2021
|timestamp=5:24 PM · Dec 20, 2021
}}
}}
Line 1,887: Line 1,900:
|timestamp=5:24 PM · Dec 20, 2021
|timestamp=5:24 PM · Dec 20, 2021
}}
}}
{{Tweet
|image=delta_waverider-profile-7be1m6Ax.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/delta_waverider/status/1473008558874800131
|name=Paul Vidal
|usernameurl=https://x.com/delta_waverider
|username=delta_waverider
|content=There is no debunking UAP at this stage - the only question is: what are these these technologies which appear to defy the laws of physics as we know them?
The alien question is related yet separate. I've seen nonhuman beings myself. Again the question remains: what are they?
|timestamp=7:13 PM · Dec 20, 2021
}}
|timestamp=7:17 PM · Dec 20, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1473054650798542852
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Not saying anything beyond that I find the videos released uncompelling as data.  I find the incident super interesting. Would like to see the entire time series of data taken in by all sensors.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=michaelshermer-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/michaelshermer/status/1473035513024106498
|name=Michael Shermer
|usernameurl=https://x.com/michaelshermer
|username=michaelshermer
|content=Dear @EricRWeinstein See my presentation to the group on Bayesian probabilities that UAPs = ordinary terrestrial phenomena far more than extraordinary terrestrial/ET phenom. Odds of ETIs coming here or Chinese/Russians discovered new physics very low, video artifacts very high.
|quote=
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1473009754104418306
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1472981235941056512
|name=Eric Weinstein
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@delta_waverider There are many sightings that are bunk. Your issue is with the nature of the complement of that set. But debunking will need to be done in all future scenarios. Nature of the beast.
|content=After a zoom call yesterday with Avi Loeb, I’ve decided to join Harvard’s Galileo Project on its Research Team.
|timestamp=7:17 PM · Dec 20, 2021
 
Time to de-stigmatize the whole topic and help the data talk. The claimed phenomenon of UFO/UAP, after all, should be a scientific question.
 
https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/galileo/people?page=2
|timestamp=5:24 PM · Dec 20, 2021
}}
|timestamp=9:00 PM · Dec 20, 2021
}}
}}
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
Line 1,902: Line 1,952:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@michaelshermer I haven’t seen any compelling data. I have been told that such data exists in abundance from multiple sources that I trust. No idea how to square that.
|content=I haven’t seen any compelling data. I have been told that such data exists in abundance from multiple sources that I trust. No idea how to square that.
|timestamp=9:04 PM · Dec 20, 2021
|timestamp=9:04 PM · Dec 20, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=s_offiler-profile-0gMd5XsO.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/s_offiler/status/1473053875036905479
|name=Steve Offiler
|usernameurl=https://x.com/s_offiler
|username=s_offiler
|content=Doesn't square with Fravor's account. Listen to him on Lex Fridman's podcast. Lots of great tech detail. It can't be just video artifacts because his "Tic Tac" story had four eyewitnesses in agreement with both video and radar data.
|timestamp=10:13 PM · Dec 20, 2021
}}
}}
|timestamp=10:16 PM · Dec 20, 2021
|timestamp=10:16 PM · Dec 20, 2021
Line 1,920: Line 1,979:


Maybe I was too hasty about dismissing KG. Opening my mind again.
Maybe I was too hasty about dismissing KG. Opening my mind again.
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=gillibrandny-profile-JnyfzKar.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/gillibrandny/status/1473395474090672133
|name=Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand
|usernameurl=https://x.com/gillibrandny
|username=gillibrandny
|content=If we want to defend our airspace and maintain our strategic edge, we need to investigate Unidentified Aerial Phenomena and determine if they belong to a foreign entity or something else altogether. It's a national security issue — and we can't bury our heads in the sand.
|media1=gillibrandny-X-post-1473395474090672133.jpg
|timestamp=8:50 PM · Dec 21, 2021
}}
|timestamp=5:55 AM · Dec 23, 2021
|timestamp=5:55 AM · Dec 23, 2021
}}
}}
Retrieved from "https://theportal.wiki/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/25494"