The Portal Wiki

UAP: Difference between revisions

Page Discussion

UAP (edit)

Revision as of 07:16, 17 January 2026

19,860 bytes added ,  Saturday at 07:16
→‎2022
No edit summary
Line 1,174: Line 1,174:


=== 2022 ===
=== 2022 ===


{{Tweet
{{Tweet
Line 1,357: Line 1,356:
}}
}}
|timestamp=3:13 PM ¡ May 12, 2022
|timestamp=3:13 PM ¡ May 12, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1526687914561744896
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@MickWest Appreciate your perspective. Didn’t have that before. Thanks Mick.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1526619922343727105
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I developed a private principle which has been useful in life. It says:
“A fair coin can’t always land on its side, seemingly by accident, without constant, deliberately cryptic active management by others unseen.”
This UAP coin always seems to land on its side.
|timestamp=5:45 PM ¡ May 17, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1526635004083572736
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@MickWest Mick, I don’t know how to communicate this, but you seem to want to be a dedicated debunker here. What direct evidence has been shared with the public, on its own, doesn’t seem to require this level of aggressive debunking. It’s just not that compelling. I agree with you on that.
|timestamp=6:45 PM ¡ May 17, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1526636492583383040
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@MickWest Simply put, trying to turn it all into the occult + swamp gas + reflections on a lens + lying to get attention etc…doesn’t seem very compelling. Some of it is surely that, but something else is likely at play. There’s too much that doesn’t fit that description for it to so easy.
|timestamp=6:51 PM ¡ May 17, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1526637009904623616
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@MickWest Hope you are right. Or wrong. But this is seemingly a lot weirder than you are admitting. Too many grownups with security clearances and training telling too many similar stories at this point. Maybe it’s all fake. If so, I’d be impressed. But I don’t understand your confidence.
|timestamp=6:53 PM ¡ May 17, 2022
}}
|timestamp=10:15 PM ¡ May 17, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1526700213657690112
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I’m just going to say it:
Is this our BEST video/data/imagery when it comes to withstanding scrutiny?? Why choose this??
Let us guess: there will be yet more releases of things that are less impressive than ordinary photography, photoshop, CGI, or video games.
Enough already.
|timestamp=11:04 PM ¡ May 17, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1526700215457107968
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=This is coming to feel like an infinite tease. Let’s stop making our nation, our military & our government look like idiots. Reveal or don’t. Show or don’t. We all get that there are security issues. But stop teasing with blobs, blurs and snippets less convincing than deep fakes.
|timestamp=11:04 PM ¡ May 17, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1535077868228603904
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@MickWest I had to admit that there is an unbelievable amount of indirect evidence that something is going on with not much direct evidence.
That’s pretty weird. But pretending that this is either debunked or real misses the point. And I can’t keep having this nonprogressing interaction.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1534920191800320001
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=My physics colleagues generally still have yet to incorporate what is going on in the changing UAP picture.
All of this lawyerly “observations that currently cannot be completely explained” soft language in the absence of hard data is pretty confusing.
|timestamp=3:27 PM ¡ Jun 9, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1534920194417537025
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Imagine if an MD said to you “For legal reasons protecting our clinic, I can’t share your data with you, but it is not impossible that a still small number of atypical cells may be non locally replicating above baseline.” as a way of letting you know you had metastasized tumor.
|timestamp=3:27 PM ¡ Jun 9, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1534920195713560576
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=You might, or might not, even understand what a serious situation you were in. It all sounds so bloodless.
If you did understand it, you would want to see the data. It is YOUR data after all. Data about you.
That’s where we are. No real data. Bloodless language. Few scientists.
|timestamp=3:27 PM ¡ Jun 9, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1534920196971847680
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=More or less, we are increasingly being told we have what *appear* to be *large* numbers of craft of unknown origin in our skies and seas taking an unusual interest in world military activities so that our own government has asymmetrically good data it doesn’t want to show us.
|timestamp=3:27 PM ¡ Jun 9, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1534920198356017152
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Some portion of the USG is saying we are repeatedly being visited by non human technology. Some other portion of the government is saying “Don’t say that” either because it is a lie or they want it to stay hidden.
The net effect: destruction of trust in government and science.
|timestamp=3:27 PM ¡ Jun 9, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1534920199647817734
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=It is now time to inform us all. It is either an elaborate USG psyop hoax or something of incomparable significance. It’s not swamp gas anymore. It’s not Mylar balloons and a few people desperate to get on television.
But it is definitely time to end the soft language. It’s big.
|timestamp=3:27 PM ¡ Jun 9, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1535047047639748608
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@MickWest Mick, no offense, but at this point you are just wrong. There are factions within government, ex-government and government contracting, and some of them are saying that. Enough.
Or as you say: BS. Sorry.
|timestamp=11:51 PM ¡ Jun 9, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1535075562602917888
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@MickWest Mick, don’t take this the wrong way. But you are highly motivated and stigmatizing. When you ask “who?” you are playing dumb. I have agreed with you that the videos aren’t compelling. But you don’t quit.
So either play the debunker or don’t. But this isn’t 2 guys and 3 videos.
|timestamp=1:45 AM ¡ Jun 10, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1535076502747852805
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@MickWest Obviously a lot of serious people are scared about reputational attacks. But this isn’t in range of just debunking a few videos anymore. Something is going on. We just can’t know with confidence if it is real deception or real phenomena until real data is released.  Clear?
|timestamp=1:48 AM ¡ Jun 10, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1535077183575666688
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@MickWest I’m getting fatigued. I don’t talk much about the Tic Tac. Or the Zimbabwe kids. Or Lue. Or Remote Viewing. Clear?
There are an enormous number of IC and DOD related folks who want to know what we are seeing. And this “Debunking” grainy videos feels petty. It’s not the videos.
|timestamp=1:51 AM ¡ Jun 10, 2022
}}
|timestamp=1:54 AM ¡ Jun 10, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1537888145496084480
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=And…I’m back to being Twitter throttled it seems, so feel free to retweet if this seems like it has low engagement. Sorry!
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1537887755862040578
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Happening in about an Hour at 2pm Pacific Time.
Join Astrophysics Professors Loeb & Keating and me as we discuss the current bizarre status of UFO/UAP in the sciences. Join us!
cc: @GalileoProject1, @DrBrianKeating #UFOTwitter
|timestamp=7:59 PM ¡ Jun 17, 2022
}}
|timestamp=8:01 PM ¡ Jun 17, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1549620077884067840
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=This could include someone like Eric Davis, Bob Lazar, Travis Taylor, etc. maybe at blackboard talking over equations/Lagrangians, rather than merely speaking in prose
And if this doesn’t exist, why doesn’t it exist? Forgive me, but I don’t know the history here. Seems odd. Thx.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1549620076294586369
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Request for Help: have any of the technical folks claiming UAP knowledge been interviewed by technical folks w/ knowledge of General Relativity & Particle physics?
I would like to watch such a conversation dealing with the dry science of how UAP are claimed/thought to work. 🙏
|timestamp=4:59 AM ¡ Jul 20, 2022
}}
|timestamp=4:59 AM ¡ Jul 20, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1569374888426885120
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=So one version of events is that the military holds this high quality video/data because the UAP focused on our advanced militaries. The other version is that UAP cover stories are used by the Military to disguise what are sensitive security issues. But without the hard data…
🙏
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1569372950503243776
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I have been told this repeatedly by sober seeming USG and ex-USG folks. That both the US Navy and Air Force hold video of *arbitrarily* high quality backed up by extensive sensor data.
I have seen none of it. Zero. If I had signed away my right to disclose, I could not say this.
|timestamp=5:10 PM ¡ Sep 12, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1569373963448635392
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=It may all be an elaborate lie. But the basic stories are pretty consistent. And one of them is that the UAP take an asymmetric interest in our advanced militaries. Unfortunately, that is also consistent with military disinformation, weapons R&D, spying, etc. i.e. cover stories.
|timestamp=5:14 PM ¡ Sep 12, 2022
}}
|timestamp=5:18 PM ¡ Sep 12, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570098837645332486
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=So if #ufotwitter ever wanted to know why I didn’t take #UFO seriously, it was because I thought it was *preposterous* given lack of evidence.
And if #ScienceTwitter wants to know why I spun on a dime, it’s because it IS linked to the post-Einsteinian physics of our survival.
🙏
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570090986969403394
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Under Newton, we were free to explore the cosmos: 1686-1905.
Einstein then enforced house arrest to our solar system:1905-Now.
@elonmusk then said chemical rockets could get us 2 more spheres w Newtonian laws.
But survival hinges on going *beyond* Einstein, not back to Newton.
|timestamp=4:43 PM ¡ Sep 14, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570092276206149632
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I’m not going to complicate the basic story with caveats. That’s the basic plot.
Either there is freedom to leave based on new ideas, like GU, or the Einsteinian restrictions will persist.
If they persist; we probably can mildly elongate survival here by decades via wisdom.
|timestamp=4:49 PM ¡ Sep 14, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570095403038814215
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=But if we can leave to explore the universe by going beyond Einstein, anyone else out there can visit.
This brings us to UFO/UAP. Assuming a distribution of life in the cosmos:: some life is behind us in science, with others ahead.
A (loose) argument then links UAP to survival:
|timestamp=5:01 PM ¡ Sep 14, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570096379405676544
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=If life is abundant & we’re not the top of the hierarchy (which is reasonable to me), I’d guess that UAP would be here if that is possible in Einstein’s successor theories. The absence of UAP is strong but *inconclusive* proof that Einstein’s restrictions persist in all theory.
|timestamp=5:05 PM ¡ Sep 14, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570097237136658433
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Hence my interest in UAP. UAP from distant worlds would be a strong indication that it is possible to diversify our shared risk which is that all known technological life is dependent on one atmosphere linking our three main existential risks:
A) Climate</br>
B) Pathogen</br>
C) Radiation
|timestamp=5:08 PM ¡ Sep 14, 2022
}}
|timestamp=5:15 PM ¡ Sep 14, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1571559955060396033
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Just now on the Santa Monica freeway in broad daylight.
I know, I know, it’s slightly blurry. Granted… but it was gone before I knew it. https://t.co/uIqtYhOMHq
|timestamp=6:01 PM ¡ Sep 18, 2022
|media1=Fc9NcvnaIAIj3Dw.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1571662632763138048
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@vallez_joe Even @MickWest says this is unlikely to be a Mylar balloon.
|timestamp=12:49 AM ¡ Sep 19, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1571927945471750146
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@LoudmouthLisa UAP is the US government’s new name for UFO:
https://t.co/Ac2eksun7i
|timestamp=6:23 PM ¡ Sep 19, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1575577748604452864
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Though I’d get some help, trying to figure out what the heck is actually going on. Thanks Lue. https://t.co/9bkSYNnzXt
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1574582593890095104
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=This official US government military website has now REMOVED its extremely bizarre insignia…as if this was just totally normal behavior.
|timestamp=2:11 AM ¡ Sep 27, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1574582595806904320
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I have no idea what’s going on or what the official narrative will be around this. I was told to focus on its color scheme as the main clue.
This pattern of “extend, then retract” has been my consistent experience of the entire official USG, IC, DoD, part of the UAP/UFO world.🙏
|timestamp=2:11 AM ¡ Sep 27, 2022
}}
|timestamp=8:06 PM ¡ Sep 29, 2022
|media1=Fd2TnB8VEAE7Ifq.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1580322072084983808
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@thatdudej6 @Deepfryguy76 @Puthoffbyputho1 @dwpasulka @TUPACABRA2 @FullStackLogan Many decision makers interpret UFO-UAP in religious terms. And the population has an enormous pre-existing memetic complex of religious ideology. So it is essential. Even if you are a hard core atheist.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1580319421330907136
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=1) General Relativity
2) (Pseudo-)Riemannian Geometry
3) Quantum Field Theory
4) Material Science/Condensed Matter
5) Nuclear Physics/Weaponry
6) Disinformation Theory
7) Cult Indoctrination/Deprogramming
8) Propaganda
9) Preference Falsification Theory
10) Mansfield Amendment
|timestamp=10:08 PM ¡ Oct 12, 2022
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1580319424627691520
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=11) Science Policy Theory (V Bush)
12) Selection (Abstracted)
13) Comparative Eschatology
14) Anti-Gravity Pseudo-science involving top physicists and mathematicians in the era of the So-Called ‘Golden age of General Relativity’.
15) GU
16) Mind control.
Remember: you asked! ;-)
|timestamp=10:08 PM ¡ Oct 12, 2022
}}
|timestamp=10:18 PM ¡ Oct 12, 2022
}}
}}


Retrieved from "https://theportal.wiki/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/25471"