7,239
edits
Load-Bearing Fictions: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(→On X) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Load-bearing-fictions.jpg|thumb]] | |||
'''Load-bearing fictions''' are socially constructed beliefs, narratives, or assumptions that may be partially false, oversimplified, or internally inconsistent, yet play a critical role in maintaining the stability and functioning of complex societies. The term was introduced by Eric Weinstein in discussions on ''The Portal'' podcast and related public commentary dating back to at least 2017. | |||
The concept draws an analogy from architecture: just as a load-bearing wall supports a structure even if it is aesthetically imperfect, a load-bearing fiction supports social order even if it cannot withstand strict scrutiny. Removing or destabilizing such a fiction without providing a viable replacement may lead to systemic failure rather than progress. | |||
== Description == | |||
According to Weinstein, modern societies rely on numerous tacit agreements and simplifying narratives to coordinate behavior among large populations with unequal access to information, expertise, and power. These narratives often function as heuristics that allow institutions to operate despite complexity, uncertainty, or contradiction. | |||
Load-bearing fictions differ from ordinary falsehoods in that their primary value is '''structural rather than factual'''. While they may conflict with empirical reality or logical consistency, they help preserve trust, legitimacy, and coordination across institutions such as law, media, science, religion, and governance. | |||
== Examples == | |||
Examples discussed by Weinstein include: | |||
* Simplified narratives about democratic representation and political equality | |||
* Legal assumptions about the reliability of juries or the impartiality of institutions | |||
* Cultural norms that downplay conflicts between stated values and actual incentives | |||
* Professional or moral conventions that obscure power asymmetries for the sake of social cohesion | |||
These beliefs are not necessarily endorsed as literally true, but are treated as necessary approximations that allow systems to function. | |||
== Tension with truth-seeking == | |||
A central theme in the concept is the tension between truth-seeking and social stability. Weinstein argues that aggressively dismantling load-bearing fictions in the name of transparency or rationality can produce unintended consequences, particularly when the underlying systems lack alternative structures capable of bearing the same social load. | |||
As technological change, specialization, and information asymmetry increase, the strain on existing load-bearing fictions grows, raising questions about whether they can be reformed, replaced, or must eventually fail. | |||
== Related concepts == | |||
The concept is related to discussions in sociology, philosophy, and political theory concerning: | |||
* Social myths and legitimating narratives | |||
* "Noble lies" and institutional trust | |||
* Complexity, coordination problems, and systemic risk | |||
However, Weinstein emphasizes that load-bearing fictions are best understood not as moral deceptions, but as emergent features of large-scale coordination under constraint. | |||
== Quotes == | |||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
| Line 141: | Line 178: | ||
* [[Oral Torah vs Written Torah]] | * [[Oral Torah vs Written Torah]] | ||
* [[Free Speech]] | * [[Free Speech]] | ||
* [[Managed Reality TM]] | |||
* [[Truman Show]] | |||
[[Category:Concepts]] | |||
[[Category:Culture]] | [[Category:Culture]] | ||
[[Category:Ericisms]] | [[Category:Ericisms]] | ||
[[Category:Sensemaking]] | |||