6,486
edits
Chess-Opening Problem: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
A possible solution may be to acknowledge all the common arguments and proceed with the assumption everyone is aware of the basics. | A possible solution may be to acknowledge all the common arguments and proceed with the assumption everyone is aware of the basics. | ||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1624054155349221377 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=And if you’re curious as to what the effect is on me, I’d say that [[Chess-Opening Problem|these moves are still part of the well worn chess opening phase of the debate I’d be eager to skip]]. | |||
So far, I’m saying “X is a disaster.” and Dan says “X’ is fine.” You can guess the next 2-3 moves from that. | |||
|thread= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1624048339984568323 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=To those exposed to my view that fundamental physical theory is in a 50 year stagnation, may I recommend this counter argument thread put forward by @nu_phases? This is what constructive academic debate & critique looks like, advancing our understanding of the chasm of thought. | |||
|quote= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=nu_phases-profile-N2mdKUuJ.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/nu_phases/status/1598331715340054528 | |||
|name=Daniel Green | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/nu_phases | |||
|username=nu_phases | |||
|content=I am trying an experiment. | |||
Every day in December, I will post 1 result from the past 40 years (ie 1983-present) that fundamentally changed my corner of (fundamental) physics | |||
Here are my rules</br> | |||
- Nothing already earning a Nobel prize</br> | |||
- Not a ranking, just my preferences | |||
|timestamp=3:02 PM · Dec 1, 2022 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=2:11 PM · Feb 10, 2023 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1624049395938299904 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=To those interested in these topics, I also recommend following @martinmbauer and @nu_phases. Both accounts are run by people trying to do real physics from what I have read of their work. I may disagree with them at times, but I’m open to their arguments changing my perspective. | |||
|timestamp=2:15 PM · Feb 10, 2023 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=2:34 PM · Feb 10, 2023 | |||
}} | |||
== Common Arguments that Never Get Resolved == | == Common Arguments that Never Get Resolved == | ||