Paul Samuelson: Difference between revisions

Line 512: Line 512:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=François Divisia or [[Ken Arrow]] or '''Paul Samuelson''' or Satoshi or [[Ronald Coase]] etc.... would be easy to defend.  
|content=[[François Divisia]] or [[Ken Arrow]] or '''Paul Samuelson''' or Satoshi or [[Ronald Coase]] etc.... would be easy to defend.  


But Graciela Chichilnisky or Bert Balk would be more interesting offbeat choices I could defend. I don't think they got their due for what is coming in mathematical econ.
But Graciela Chichilnisky or Bert Balk would be more interesting offbeat choices I could defend. I don't think they got their due for what is coming in mathematical econ.
Line 536: Line 536:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=[[Ken Arrow|Arrow]], Frisch, '''Samuelson''', VonNeumann, Nash, Friedman, Smith, Mill, Divisia, '''Coase''', Marshall, Fisher, Debreu, Tinbergen, etc.  
|content=[[Ken Arrow|Arrow]], Frisch, '''Samuelson''', VonNeumann, Nash, Friedman, Smith, Mill, [[François Divisia|Divisia]], '''Coase''', Marshall, Fisher, Debreu, Tinbergen, etc.  


I have deep issues with economics. But I don’t think I understand your point.
I have deep issues with economics. But I don’t think I understand your point.