5,984
edits
Peer Review: Difference between revisions
→2025
(→2021) |
(→2025) |
||
| Line 465: | Line 465: | ||
=== 2025 === | === 2025 === | ||
{{ | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1932103957331251598 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Medical Peer Review starts then because of the passage of the Social Security Amendments of 1965 establishing Medicare. Scientific Peer Review comes out of Robert Maxwell, Pergamon Press and ultimately the Baumann Amendment a decade later responding to “Man, a Course of Study.” | |||
|thread= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1932099333119492254 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Your reminder that *all* science before 1965 was not “Peer Reviewed “ and hence is totally unreliable. Allegedly. | |||
|timestamp=3:35 PM · Jun 9, 2025 | |||
|media1=ERW-X-post-1932099333119492254-GtAyGoEbcAAMI1H.jpg | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=3:54 PM · Jun 9, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
| Line 523: | Line 544: | ||
{{ | {{Tweet | ||
{{ | |image=Eric profile picture.jpg | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1971297888375554464 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Peer Review is a recent unwanted development in Science. | |||
The lie is that it is bedrock science and dates back to the founding of the Royal Society. I’ve covered this extensively. | |||
|thread= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1971290031496233205 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Our institutions are often lying about science. And *they* are the ones saying “We cannot allow public questioning of our institutions of science by PhDs.” | |||
And if you don’t believe me, start with the lie about Peer Review and Journals. | |||
We are literally lying about Peer Review: | |||
|media1=ERW-X-post-1971290031496233205-G1tt1hvagAA25SA.jpg | |||
|timestamp=7:05 PM · Sep 25, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Grond21-profile.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/Grond21/status/1971290971951579259 | |||
|name=James | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/Grond21 | |||
|username=Grond21 | |||
|content=How are they lying about peer review? I am sorry, I don't understand | |||
|timestamp=7:05 PM · Sep 25, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=7:05 PM · Sep 25, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1971633993000145312 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Ask yourself the following. | |||
Q1: Would you rather have the science and scientists from before the advent of Peer Review during 1965-75, or after? | |||
Q2: Do you trust scientists more or less if they claim that Peer Review is essential, and dates to the founding of the Royal Society? | |||
|quote= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=t_a_stephens-profile.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/t_a_stephens/status/1971333657651749151 | |||
|name=Thomas Stephens | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/t_a_stephens | |||
|username=t_a_stephens | |||
|content=@EricRWeinstein It’s amazing that peer review is such a recent development. Prior to reading your comments on it, I had just assumed it was a longstanding tradition in the sciences. | |||
Science obviously worked fine before peer review, and it may just drive groupthink more than anything else. | |||
|timestamp=9:59 PM · Sep 25, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=4:15 PM · Sep 26, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1971639845278961819 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Editors who are distinguished fiercely independent researchers themselves, with huevos of steel, integrity, a cuture of collegiality, autonomy, money, and a variety of strong differing opinions. | |||
|quote= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=ha1331-profile.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/ha1331/status/1971633993000145312 | |||
|name=Henrik | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ha1331 | |||
|username=ha1331 | |||
|content=@EricRWeinstein What sould replace peer review or would improve on the current system? | |||
|timestamp=5:52 PM · Sep 26, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=6:15 PM · Sep 26, 2025 | |||
}} | |||
== Relevant Essays and Papers == | == Relevant Essays and Papers == | ||