6,558
edits
Can’t vs Mustn’t: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(→Quotes) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1834500203992547393 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|content=Contrarian opinion lightly held: | |||
The so-called “Naturalistic Fallacy” may be just that. But we should probably rapidly reconsider the wisdom of trying to get rid of it. Or even pointing it out at scale. | |||
Said differently, '''assume that society may have previously used religion and/or nature to create a coordinated sense of “ought”, “must” and “mustn’t”.''' | |||
In the absence of both, there is no coordinating source. And we may need one or the other to coordinate a needed sense of obligation. | |||
|timestamp=12:51 AM · Sep 13, 2024 | |||
|thread= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1834500203992547393 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|content=Contrarian opinion lightly held: | |||
The so-called “Naturalistic Fallacy” may be just that. But we should probably rapidly reconsider the wisdom of trying to get rid of it. Or even pointing it out at scale. | |||
Said differently, '''assume that society may have previously used religion and/or nature to create a coordinated sense of “ought”, “must” and “mustn’t”.''' | |||
In the absence of both, there is no coordinating source. And we may need one or the other to coordinate a needed sense of obligation. | |||
|timestamp=12:51 AM · Sep 13, 2024 | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1834499273406185522}} | {{#widget:Tweet|id=1834499273406185522}} | ||