The Portal Wiki

Jeffrey Epstein: Difference between revisions

Page Discussion

Jeffrey Epstein (edit)

Revision as of 04:49, 20 July 2025

9,915 bytes added ,  20 July
→‎2021
Line 355: Line 355:
|timestamp=5:11 PM · Dec 1, 2021
|timestamp=5:11 PM · Dec 1, 2021
}}
}}


{{#widget:Tweet|id=1462873616635232258}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1462873616635232258}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1455027276261691393}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1455027276261691393}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1452890595551170566}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1452890595551170566}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1451991295149281281}}
 
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1445797250215469056}}
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1451991295149281281
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=Things I don't believe we can't conclusively resolve:
 
A) COVID's origin.
 
B) The Jeffrey Epstein story.
 
C) UAP.
 
D) JFK assassination.
 
E) Vegas Shooting.
 
F) Extent of 'Democracy Fortifying' in 2020.
 
G) Efficacy of Non-Vaccines.
 
H) Mysterious WEF 'Build Back Better' mantra.
 
I) Negative impacts of Trade known to have been suppressed.
 
J) Adulteration of BLS CPI measure of inflation.
 
K) Negative economic impacts of Immigration.
 
L) Sudden spike in fake 'Objective Third Party Fact Checking'.
 
M) Sudden "Diversity Equity Inclusion" explosion.
 
N) Collusion beween Tech Platforms functioning as Communications Utilities as well as with the Federal Government.
 
O) Death of John MacCaffee.
 
N) Chinese infiltraion of US basic research through 'Student Exchange'.
 
P) Take over of 'Peer Review' during Robert Maxwell's reign.
 
Q) Joe Biden's state of cognitive decline.
 
R) Nature of MSNBC campagin against Andrew Yang.
 
S) Nature of Dean Scream, Anti-Ron Paul and other interference in democracy by Mainstream media News.
 
T) Impact of loss of mandatory retirement on young people seeking work.
 
U) Rex84.
 
V) Collusion between National Academy and National Science foundation division of Policy Research and Analysis to fake demographic crisis in mid 1980s.
 
W) Lack on anyone building the significant & desperately needed new non-profit institutions despite skyhigh wealth inequality.
 
X) Loss of Academic Freedom across the board in Academe.
 
Y) Loss of the Lancet and other publications as trusted non-political sources of fact.
 
Z) The true nature of @EcoHealthNYC w its relationship to
@doddtra & Dr A. Fauci.
 
Moral: much of this 'ambiguity' is serving the few.
 
A last point: I don't know what happened in most all of these (the NSF & BLS stories being exceptions). I really don't. The quality of my guesses is not particularly high. The quality of my suspicions as to what IS resolvable has been *considerably* higher, at least historically.
|timestamp=12:17 PM · Oct 23, 2021
}}
 
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1445797250215469056
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=I hadn’t been saying much about @EcoHealthNYC for a reason. I don’t have many mentors, but a man I respect as my mentor was on the board: a heroic figure to me & to others. So I had hoped that the situation there was under adult supervision.
 
I appear to have had misplaced hopes.
 
In a different world, these issues would first be dealt w/ behind the scenes so as to avoid destruction to our infrastructure. I assume @EcoHealthNYC is a typical proxy for the government which uses outside contractors to evade restrictions on government. But this is way beyond.
 
No one has much commented on how high-powered the board has been. You have a director of the NSF as a board member for example.
 
No one is asking the hard questions yet. Like Epstein, this story doesn’t add up: I fear we don’t look for answers when we know many of them already.
 
If I were a reporter, I would ask the board members about @EcoHealthNYC’s BioWarfare responsibilities given its  @doddtra relationship. I would ask the 77 Nobel laureates about who organized the letter supporting the funding of Dr Daszak.
 
Journalists: Break a sweat. What is this?
 
This is a big deal. Treat Dr Daszak & Dr Fauci as they deserve: central figures in some story involving grey area BioWarfare strategy and responsibilities that we ordinary humans don’t understand because no one will explain it.
 
The strategy failed: duh. Time to declassify it. 🙏
|timestamp=10:05 AM · Oct 6, 2021
}}
 
 
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1440172227354259458}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1440172227354259458}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1432160805512888321}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1432160805512888321}}
Line 404: Line 498:
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1424241565409550340}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1424241565409550340}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1424241553837477888}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1424241553837477888}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1417630283101212672}}
 
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1417630283101212672
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=The cognitive tools for understanding any rationale behind NIH funded Gain of Function Research in China are almost certainly being withheld.
 
Look at it from the point of a true believer in the system. “We have to not lose the bioweapon arms race & should keep our rivals close.”
 
“But the public will never understand a partnership with our main rival as being safer than being frozen out of all CCP decisions. On the other hand we can’t be seen as engaging in a bioweapons arms race. So we had myriad ways to evade the optics of what we were actually doing.”
 
“Then COVID got out. Suddenly the whole world was talking about zoonotic bat respiratory Corona viruses: a subject the public had never heard of before. Our excuses & proxies for what is essentially military strategy for containment of CCP biowarfare ambitions were center stage.”
 
“Only we can’t talk about this. And our strategy that worked well enough when no one in the public knew “Gain of Function”, “Spike Protein” or “Zoonotic” terms stopped working when everyone on the planet was forced to become amateur scientists. Then we lost ‘Lab Leak is racism’.”
 
“So what do we do? Do we have an open town-hall to explain all things that are part of delicate multi decade Wash DC political insider theory like “Constructive engagement”, “Iranian Nuclear Containment”, “Two State Solution”? Of course not. That’s why we have an expert class.”
 
So we sit around with the expert class withholding all the cognitive tools “we the people” need to figure out whether we have the CORRECT public spirited Elite. Which we do not.
 
Thus the ‘elite’ get more and more resentful that we are meddling in ‘their’ strategic endeavors. Ha. The idea that it’s time to come clean about Epstein, Iran, the West Bank, Strategic Engagement, Nuclear Bluffing, Climate & Wealth, internal spying, Assange and Snowden, simply never occurs to a class that believes it is acting in a way that can NEVER be open to public scrutiny.
 
Start from this insider premise that is never said out loud, “The purpose of democracy is to give the public the most minimal choice over multi-decade cryptic strategies that must be managed by insider classes, so that they can only slightly course correct from expert consensus.”
 
The populist premise is simpler: “You insiders seem to be incompetent at your jobs & more than competent at your extraction of wealth & obfuscation of all with which you have been entrusted. How can we force you ‘elite’ to account for your non-elite malfeasance and incompetence?”
 
That’s how I see it. We have to stop talking about this in the exact terms we are handed by the very ‘elite’ who don’t want us talking about the real issues. We need to stop using the framings we’re handed.
 
For example, “Gain of Function” is largely a euphemism for “weaponized”.
 
Do I believe in an actual Elite that cannot share everything with the public. Yeah. Think about it; It cannot be otherwise.
 
Do I believe in this *elite*? This is the Keystone Cops meets Mr Magoo.
 
So I am neither a populist nor a defender of the system as it is currently found.
 
We should join the populists in demanding answers based on pathological extractive, unethical and incompetent behavior.
 
But you cannot “burn it all the fuck down”, put it all on the blockchain or vote for complete transparency either.
 
We need a well paid actual public spirited elite public servant class.
 
And no one I know is willing to say this. They either defend the system as is, or want some radical revolution.
 
We need new folks in their 20s-50s. Not Fauci. Not Biden. Not Trump. Not Pelosi. Not McConnell.
 
If you’ve been in power for a long time and are now in your 70s & 80s? It is simply time to go. That’s not ageism.
 
That’s an IMPLICIT part of the system. We’ve never before remotely had a President & core group this out of touch, this old, and this technically over their heads.
 
Soapbox speech over.
 
As always, thanks for listening and letting me try out these ideas at scale. 🙏
|timestamp=4:39 PM · Jul 20, 2021
}}
 
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1415917992454463490}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1415917992454463490}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1415842693335289857}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1415842693335289857}}
Line 415: Line 564:
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1412552079634100229}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1412552079634100229}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1412550861260136450}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1412550861260136450}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1408522369514176515}}
 
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1408522365592498180}}
 
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1408522363168165888}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1408522369514176515
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=The person, @officialmcafee, who reached out to me *obsessed* about not being “suicided” like Jeffrey Epstein, is characterologically the same as the person described hours before his death by his wife here.
 
Assume for the moment that his wife is correct in what she says here
 https://x.com/disclosetv/sta/disclosetv/status/1408484338384179203
 
That would change the Bayesian priors considerably for me. The main doubt I had and that he might actually have killed himself is that my information was just over a year old. Prison could have changed someone. Very unlikely in McAfee’s case. But not impossible.
 
Now I think not.
 
No one on earth probably has gone to greater lengths (e.g. tattooing themselves) in communicating “If I am found dead like Jeffrey Epstein I was murdered.”
 
And he is found dead from gravity in a prison? That sounds like something else. That sounds like a message killing.
 
What is a “Message killing”? Well it’s not much talked about.
 
MESSAGE KILLING TARGET: Antonio R Caponigro.
 
When Tony C[a]ponigro was killed in 1980, he was found in the Bronx with $300 dollars shoved in his mouth and lower orifice.
 
MESSAGE: Don’t be Greedy.
 
MESSAGE KILLING TARGET: Marisol Macías Castañeda
 
A Mexican journalist, editor and blogger writing anonymously about drug cartels was murdered by Los Zetas. She was found with her computer keyboard and other peripherals.
 
MESSAGE: The Cartels can find those who blog anonymously.
 
MESSAGE KILLING TARGET: Abe Reles.
 
Reles was a Hitman who was just about to turn on Albert Anastasia in 1941. Instead He mysteriously fell to his death while under tight police supervision.
 
MESSAGE: “The bird (Reles) could sing (testify) but he couldn’t fly (defenestrated).” Applying the same logic here, POSSIBLE MESSAGE KILLING TARGET:John McAfee.
 
John died in *exactly* the way he told us he would *never* die: like Epstein.
 
MESSAGE: “We can get anywhere. You can’t stop it by taking elaborate precaution. We can always murder so it can’t be proven.”
|timestamp=8:27 PM · Jun 25, 2021
}}
 
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1407833968423079941}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1407833968423079941}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1407833966678249473}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1407833966678249473}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1407833964723773442}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1407827650387775490}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1407827650387775490}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1407827642808778753}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1407827642808778753}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1406495183449985028}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1406495183449985028}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1382349288324276225}}
 


{{Tweet
{{Tweet
Retrieved from "https://theportal.wiki/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/21951"