Peer Review: Difference between revisions

1,126 bytes added ,  18 June
Line 93: Line 93:




{{#widget:Tweet|id=55469441726693377}}
{{Tweet
{{#widget:Tweet|id=363741507557142529}}
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
{{#widget:Tweet|id=767774213553860608}}
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/55469441726693377
{{#widget:Tweet|id=800777477614280704}}
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=The anonymity differential in peer review has been exactly reversed from what makes sense.
 
Not to mention, obviously so.
|timestamp=8:18 PM · Apr 5, 2011
}}
 
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/363741507557142529
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content="I can’t figure out why my study of the pervasive denial of bias in academic peer review was rejected for publication." #paradoxofacademics
|timestamp=12:21 PM · Aug 3, 2013
}}
 
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/767774213553860608
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=If I wanted to destroy the scientific capability of an enemy nation, I would first get them to adopt accountability, metrics & peer review.
|timestamp=10:23 AM · Aug 22, 2016
}}
 
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/800777477614280704
|name=Eric Weinstein
|content=If you think about it, "Peer Review" is what potentially stops peers from reviewing your work. It's really Expert Suppression. Oh, language.
|timestamp=11:06 AM · Nov 21, 2016
}}
 
{{#widget:Tweet|id=}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=979383976325390336}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=979383976325390336}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1230888559411789824}}
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1230888559411789824}}