Operation COINTELPRO
References:
The crosshairs. The cries of "traitor". I don't know why everyone objects to the "Tea Party" rebranding. COINTELPRO wasn't even a word.
The Google search "death threat card utilized in cointelpro" is helpful for the Tea Party's crosshairs/traitor meme origin.
Redacted 11/20/64 US Government letter attempting to induce Martin Luther King Jr to kill himself: http://bit.ly/dYNrtO. #COINTELPRO #MLKday
@cindyfsolomon I'm thinking of doing more on Cointelpro and the history of suppression of Native Americans. Stay tuned.
@OwenBenjamin Rosenstrasse protest McCollum memo COINTELPRO, Jean Seberg, Fake News, MSM and Church/Pike Witold Pilecki Johann Trollmann Powell Memorandum Operation Mockingbird Meena Keshwar Kamal
To be clear: I donât trust the #releasethememo movement. I donât trust the MSM which suppresses & spins stories either. All I have is my own ability to try to piece together reality. I would like to find out that this memo is a contrived BS campaign. But how can we know? #kayfabe
So, having lived through the Church commission revelations of Cointelpro inside FBI, I want the safe parts of the memo released so I can see if itâs a big deal over nothing. Thus, Iâm for releasing the memo and hoping the #ReleaseTheMemo movement is a stunt. But it may not be...
My simple take on conspiracies: Looking at the @AndrewYang @MSNBC series, itâs clear that this is not a repeating accident. However what weâre really worrying about is this. What happens if we start to acknowledge these cryptic power moves? Does the world become Qanon & InfoWars?
If we teach COINTELPRO do we start believing in Reptilians? If we acknowledge the Powell Memo, do we believe in Illuminati next? Does questioning Epsteinâs death and any connection of his to intelligence communities legitimize all of Pizzagate? Does Jean Seberg destroy all news?
Does our suspicion that the Warren Report was used to silence questions around JFK open up the idea that our government is illegitimate when it releases findings?
Sadly, the answer is that weâre falling into 3 types. Conspiracy deniers, Conspricay nuts & a tiny third group.
The deniers fear legitimizing deep questions & concern about ground truth, interests, power, leverage, cryptic organizations, etc. Better to avoid the slippery slope without near certain evidence they say.
Nuts want hidden order everywhere. They want to be in on a secret world.
The third group (mine) has had it with both of these groups. We know enough to discuss Type I vs Type II error. We donât know whatâs going on most of the time so the nutters make us crazy. We also donât believe that Jeffrey Epsteinâs coverage is normal. We can map irregularity.
We also know we can be wrong & donât think that makes us nutters or dupes. Itâs Type I vs Type II error & we refuse to get all weird because it involves conspiracies. This is a normal thing to think about unless you know ABSOLUTELY nothing about the history of proven conspiracy!
Two of the most important issues at the moment in this space are about the news:
A) What is the explanation for the bizarre coverage of Jeffrey Epstein?
B) What is the explanation for the bizarre coverage every 4 years of popular candidates outside the system gaining traction?
We know enough to know that something is wildly off in both cases but we donât know exactly what. That makes both the Nutters & the deniers extremely uncomfortable with us. We may be near certain something is off like nutters but reject detailed theories w/o proof like deniers.
My conclusion is simple: consider joining us. If youâve outgrown radical pro-life v pro-choice. If youâre too smart for pure capitalism vs communism. If you canât get the old camps to work for you, consider taking Type I vs II approach to conspiracies. As you would anything else.
We must know what specific unit was behind the construct that was âJeffrey Epstein, financierâ and who authorized his construction.
We are always looking for a word. In 1971 that word was âCOINTELPROâ.
What is that word in 2020? If you know this word, get it to @jkbjournalist.
@Corey7999 @jkbjournalist Youâre not getting it. Mossad or Shin Bet would be the level of the FBI, KGB, CIA, etc. COINTELPRO was a program or unit *within* the FBI.
No matter which countries are involved we are looking for a specific program or a unit. Not an agency.
This article is a stub. You can help us by editing this page and expanding it.