Ideological Dining a la Carte: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
The concept that you can take parts of different ideologies that you find beneficial without swallowing the whole group of other ideas that typically come along with that ideology. | The concept that you can take parts of different ideologies that you find beneficial without swallowing the whole group of other ideas that typically come along with that ideology. | ||
Eric's go-to for this a " | Eric's go-to for this a "[[Xenophilic Restrictionist]]". | ||
A xenophile is a person with intense interest/love for other cultures, this is normally paired with an open borders policy. | A xenophile is a person with intense interest/love for other cultures, this is normally paired with an open borders policy. | ||
Revision as of 05:59, 4 March 2026
Long: "X a la carte"
Short: "X prix fixe"
Where X is any element of {BlackLivesMatter, SocialJustice, Feminism} trying to dictate virtue.
The concept that you can take parts of different ideologies that you find beneficial without swallowing the whole group of other ideas that typically come along with that ideology.
Eric's go-to for this a "Xenophilic Restrictionist".
A xenophile is a person with intense interest/love for other cultures, this is normally paired with an open borders policy.
Restrictionist in this context is an immigration restrictionist, that is derided as a Xenophobic perspective.
Thus a "Xenophilic Restrictionist" would be viewed as an oxymoron/contradiction in terms without decoupling them from their typically associated ideologies.
This article is a stub. You can help us by editing this page and expanding it.