The Portal Wiki

Arbitrage: Difference between revisions

Page Discussion

Arbitrage (edit)

Revision as of 19:13, 9 December 2025

4,388 bytes added ,  9 December
no edit summary
No edit summary
Ā 
Line 9: Line 9:
|content=Q:Given that '[[Peer Review|peer review]]' is objectively a major danger to innovators, why make it difficult-to-impossible to [[Arbitrage|arbitrage]]? Cui bono?
|content=Q:Given that '[[Peer Review|peer review]]' is objectively a major danger to innovators, why make it difficult-to-impossible to [[Arbitrage|arbitrage]]? Cui bono?
|timestamp=1:51 PM Ā· Nov 16, 2009
|timestamp=1:51 PM Ā· Nov 16, 2009
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/807998283675115520
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=@gjb2345 This is the 1st I'm hearing that @Cernovich is a quality journalist! I thought he was a journalism [[Arbitrage|arbitrageur]]. Does he agree w u?
|timestamp=5:19 PM Ā· Dec 11, 2016
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/851839042417074176
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=There are 2 reserved phrases business uses for [[Arbitrage|arbitraging]] the letter of the law against its spirit: "a beautiful thing", [[Perfectly Legal|"perfectly legal."]]
|timestamp=4:47 PM Ā· Apr 11, 2017
}}
}}


Line 20: Line 42:
|content=@GadSaad Ah! Trying to [[Arbitrage|arbitrage]] a Gadfather permission against the Scaramucci directive?
|content=@GadSaad Ah! Trying to [[Arbitrage|arbitrage]] a Gadfather permission against the Scaramucci directive?
|timestamp=7:20 PM Ā· Jul 30, 2017
|timestamp=7:20 PM Ā· Jul 30, 2017
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/915649019388428288
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=[[Perfectly Legal]], adj.: Of a case where the letter of the law has been [[Arbitrage|arbitraged]] against its spirit (see Pettifog).
https://t.co/NF042hDMLg
|timestamp=6:45 PM Ā· Oct 4, 2017
}}
}}


Line 74: Line 109:
|content=I have also seen what @stephstem went through as a colleague of his.
|content=I have also seen what @stephstem went through as a colleague of his.


So, I have more faith than most that this is a HUGE arbitrage: IQ is not intelligence and Iā€™ve discovered an enormous discrepancy in the market.Ā  I canā€™t seem to swing a cat without hitting a Black genius.
So, I have more faith than most that this is a HUGE [[Arbitrage|arbitrage]]: IQ is not intelligence and Iā€™ve discovered an enormous discrepancy in the [[Markets|market]].Ā  I canā€™t seem to swing a cat without hitting a Black genius.
|timestamp=7:29 PM Ā· Jul 15, 2020
|timestamp=7:29 PM Ā· Jul 15, 2020
}}
}}
Line 169: Line 204:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Look to those who have ā€œstopped outā€ of their trade. It doesnā€™t mean embracing Biden or the Media. They are not reasonable. It means being w/o a current plan. Itā€™s better to tread water for a while hoping a ship will pass or land will be seen than to head right for the sea floor.
|content=Look to those who have ā€œstopped outā€ of their trade. It doesnā€™t mean embracing [[Joe Biden|Biden]] or the Media. They are not reasonable. It means being w/o a current plan. Itā€™s better to tread water for a while hoping a ship will pass or land will be seen than to head right for the sea floor.
|timestamp=4:57 PM Ā· Jan 8, 2021
|timestamp=4:57 PM Ā· Jan 8, 2021
}}
}}
Line 184: Line 219:
|content=Unpopular Opinion: musical and STEM intelligences are largely fungible and represent massive human Capital [[Arbitrage|arbitrage]] opportunities. You may have to clear a lot of confounding cognitive debris out of the way first, but the opportunity exists and is largely unexploited.
|content=Unpopular Opinion: musical and STEM intelligences are largely fungible and represent massive human Capital [[Arbitrage|arbitrage]] opportunities. You may have to clear a lot of confounding cognitive debris out of the way first, but the opportunity exists and is largely unexploited.
|timestamp=4:35 PM Ā· Jan 30, 2021
|timestamp=4:35 PM Ā· Jan 30, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1450584856371494912
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Next question: Why canā€™t we try it with even *one* major private research university? As an experiment? What is causing the *universal* lurch towards Critical Theory, Post-Modernism, sky high tuition, low rigor, and censorship? Why is no university [[Arbitrage|arbitraging]] this situation FTW?
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1450584855520038912
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=What bad thing happens to a university that refuses to implement Diversity/Equity/Inclusion(tm), announces that the imbalances are the result of complicated forces not limited to oppression, and decides to go back to academic rigor while firing administrators to pre-1990 levels?
|timestamp=10:09 PM Ā· Oct 19, 2021
}}
|timestamp=10:09 PM Ā· Oct 19, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1470781902860738562
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=I would like nothing better than to get the ā€˜truthinessā€™ you mention out of economics. But it may not go as well as you are expecting. This ainā€™t the ā€˜70s ā€™80s or ā€˜90s anymore, after all.
Letā€™s talk ā€œtruthinessā€. Are you game?
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1470776196199813134
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Most importantly; is there any evidence that BLS is actually computing inflation within a Cost-of-Living framework as it claims? Are we really computing inflation, or are we managing the exoteric perception of inflation, as you appear to be doing here, while masking the esoteric?
|timestamp=3:22 PM Ā· Dec 14, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1470776198347341828
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=The great danger here is that the economic worldview is powerful precisely because it [[Arbitrage|arbitrages]] deep analysis (which caused me to count myself a fan of yours) with fantasy, arrogance and cryptic political cheerleading disguised as analysis (which lost me as a fan of yours).
|timestamp=3:22 PM Ā· Dec 14, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1470776200192745486
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Q: to what extent should a *portion* of economics be put into intellectual receivership and managed by other fields until economics becomes intellectually more solvent? To what extent should we undo ā€œEconomic Imperialismā€?
Would love to have it out.
https://t.co/8enJ5Quhcn
|timestamp=3:22 PM Ā· Dec 14, 2021
}}
|timestamp=3:45 PM Ā· Dec 14, 2021
}}
}}


Retrieved from "https://theportal.wiki/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/24871"