Morals: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:00, 3 December 2025

This article is a stub. You can help us by editing this page and expanding it.

On X

2020

I’ve spent a lot of time on this. The story here is not Epstein or Maxwell. It‘s the bizarre mission of our US press to misdirect us. The questions were always the same:

Epstein 'madam' Ghislaine Maxwell 'is a foreign spy hiding in Israel' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7843659/Ghislaine-Maxwell-reportedly-foreign-spy-hiding-Israel.html via @MailOnline

5:19 PM · Jan 2, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

A) Can you the press seek an on-the-record official denial that Epstein was operating/trafficking attached to US and/or foreign intelligence?

B) Can the press tell us where Ghislaine’s passports were last seen at a border?

C) Is Epstein’s death a “message killing” to us all?

5:19 PM · Jan 2, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

D) Can you the press tell us the whereabouts of the detailed records of Epstein’s *trading* operation from “Villard House” in Manhattan?

E) If the hedge fund currency trading never took place, was the source of Epstein’s wealth the missing assets & pensions of Robert Maxwell?

5:19 PM · Jan 2, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

F) Why are *none* of the esteemed members of the commentariat conspicuously calling for a second Church/Pike style investigation of excesses of our intelligence communities? WTF?

G) Many famous members of the press follow this account closely. Do I not exist? You do write to me.

5:19 PM · Jan 2, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

H) Are you thinking, whoever the hell you are, that you can just intimidate us all? I get that you can get to anyone anywhere. Big deal. Can you get to MILLIONS of us anytime anywhere? Do you see this going away? Are we *all* afraid you‘ll call us “Alex Jones” or kill us? Really?

5:19 PM · Jan 2, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

And for those of you who ask why I never mentioned Israel and the Mossad publicly.. Here is your answer: I don’t connect the dots for you.

I have been on this early out of a love of the US & Israel. You deserved to know that this is not some plot of CIA, “The Jews” or Mossad.

5:19 PM · Jan 2, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

If this turns out to be in part an evil intelligence operation trafficking minors, it will be the responsibility of some *tiny* number of raging assholes. Maybe Saudi assholes, maybe Jewish villains and maybe evil CIA folks. Who knows. But it won’t be entire peoples at fault.

5:19 PM · Jan 2, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

As an ordinary US Jew who thought he spotted an OBVIOUS Intelligence operation in 2003-4, I wanted to be on the other side of this thing when it blew, so I could support the US and Israeli ICs which need to be strong & secret but non evil. So now Daily Mail has finally reported!

5:19 PM · Jan 2, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Moral: remember whoever it turns out was behind Epstein, it wasn’t “The Americans” or “the Jews”. US Jews were also both outspoken & tiptoeing around this mess for 15Yrs. Epstein was an obvious cancer. But cancers are treatable. It is the US press misdirection that’s metastatic.

5:19 PM · Jan 2, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Now go investigate the story! If he wasn’t an asset get the official denials. Discuss a redo of Church/Pike. If there is nothing to find, we deserve to know. Is it our damn country or not? Simple question. Is the press there to get the stories or to kill them? Get this over with!

5:19 PM · Jan 2, 2020

2021

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Things I don't believe we can't conclusively resolve:

A) COVID's origin.

B) The Jeffrey Epstein story.

C) UAP.

D) JFK assassination.

E) Vegas Shooting.

F) Extent of 'Democracy Fortifying' in 2020.

G) Efficacy of Non-Vaccines.

H) Mysterious WEF 'Build Back Better' mantra.

7:17 PM · Oct 23, 2021

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

I) Negative impacts of Trade known to have been suppressed.

J) Adulteration of BLS CPI measure of inflation.

K) Negative economic impacts of Immigration.

L) Sudden spike in fake 'Objective Third Party Fact Checking'.

M) Sudden "Diversity Equity Inclusion" explosion.

7:17 PM · Oct 23, 2021

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Q) Joe Biden's state of cognitive decline.

R) Nature of MSNBC campagin against Andrew Yang.

S) Nature of Dean Scream, Anti-Ron Paul and other interference in democracy by Mainstream media News.

T) Impact of loss of mandatory retirement on young people seeking work.

U) Rex84.

7:17 PM · Oct 23, 2021

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

V) Collusion between National Academy and National Science foundation division of Policy Research and Analysis to fake demographic crisis in mid 1980s.

W) Lack on anyone building the significant & desperately needed new non-profit institutions despite skyhigh wealth inequality.

7:17 PM · Oct 23, 2021

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

X) Loss of Academic Freedom across the board in Academe.

Y) Loss of the Lancet and other publications as trusted non-political sources of fact.

Z) The true nature of @EcoHealthNYC w its relationship to @doddtra & Dr A. Fauci.

Moral: much of this 'ambiguity' is serving the few.

7:17 PM · Oct 23, 2021

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

A last point: I don't know what happened in most all of these (the NSF & BLS stories being exceptions). I really don't. The quality of my guesses is not particularly high. The quality of my suspicions as to what IS resolvable has been *considerably* higher, at least historically.

7:49 PM · Oct 23, 2021

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

So this just appears now!?! And what do we learn? That if "Sources and Methods" of the Intelligence Community might be compromised, prosecutors regularly decline to push for full prosecution EVEN IN THE CASE OF SEXUAL ABUSE of minors and INFANTS.

Bingo: Follow the Silence.

6:54 AM · Dec 2, 2021

Jason Leopold

@JasonLeopold

I have spent a decade, literally, collecting hundreds of IG reports from the CIA via #FOIA. I've filed 13 requests and sued the agency 3 times since 2012. When @a_cormier_ & I started to review these docs earlier this year we spotted a disturbing pattern

9:34 PM · Dec 1, 2021

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

We have an undisclosed program; there's some kind of 'understanding' that we don't understand. I very well understand why we don't casually compromise "Sources & Methods". But trafficking kids is NOT casual business. Nor is USING them as part of 'Sources & Methods' for kompromat.

6:54 AM · Dec 2, 2021

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

One question now creates 2 teams:

Team A) 'Sources & Methods' are above child trafficking in importance.

Team B) Child Trafficking is above any exemption for our 'Sources & Methods'.

I believe that if Epstein needed to use kids for S&M as Kompromat, we lost our plot entirely.

6:54 AM · Dec 2, 2021

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Seriously, I am not being naive here. If we have to abuse children to gain security for the country, maybe we don't have the right to a nation? If our intelligence community is so pathetic...look you get the idea. If the US isn't protecting kids from our own IC, we aren't the US.

6:54 AM · Dec 2, 2021

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

I understand we may occassionally have to fell a monster overseas. I understand that sometimes there's a ticking time bomb and 'extraordinary methods' are needed. I understand that we must surveil people or engage in illegal acts while undercover.

But you-can't-use-kids. Period.

6:54 AM · Dec 2, 2021

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Is there some GIANT understanding involving our journalists & news desks that when the IC says 'Sources & Methods' we all just say 'Ok. Anything you say boys.' Like, for example with @arobach being shut down on Epstein:

Abuse of Kids > Sources & Methods

6:54 AM · Dec 2, 2021

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Notice how everything adds up if there's a giant understanding that Sources & Methods trump everything protecting innocent children? You just say 'Sources & Methods are at risk'. Explains Acosta, Robach, Veritas, etc. Boom: No more Epstein mysteries. It's all 'Sources & Methods'.

6:54 AM · Dec 2, 2021

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Q: Why no discussion of Villard House records?
A: Sources & Methods.

Q: Why no investigation of Epstein's Hedge Fund's trading partners & brokerage?
A: Sources & Methods.

Q: Why do editors claim no one cares about Epstein?
A: Sources & Methods.

Q: Project Veritas?
A: S&M.

6:54 AM · Dec 2, 2021

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Q: Why report Epstein was a disgraced Financier when no one seems to have traded with him?
A: Sources & Methods.

Q: Why so little interest in covering Ghislaine relative to Kyle Rittenhouse?
A: Sources & Methods.

Q: Why did no one ask where GM last crossed a border?
A: S & M.

6:54 AM · Dec 2, 2021

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Moral: Our kids cant vote. We bring them into the world totally dependent on us. If we have a country that deserves an Intelligence Service, we have a right to know that kids are 100% OFF LIMITS as regards 'Sources & Methods' by the IC of us or our allies. Period. Kids >>> S & M.

6:54 AM · Dec 2, 2021

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

P.S. And...I appear to be back to being throttled more agressively after several threads were throttled less agressively or not at all by twitter.

At least at first on this thread. We will see whether that continues. CC'ing @lexfridman @benshapiro @jordanbpeterson @SamHarrisOrg

7:02 AM · Dec 2, 2021

2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

This is a bigger conversation. There is a lot of behavior on Twitter that is intended to intimidate people that hides behind pro-social rationalizations.

Tell me if you’ve heard the following excuses for *truly* antisocial posting:

A) It’s perfectly legal.
B) It’s just a joke!

5:33 AM · Dec 17, 2022

Elon Musk

@elonmusk

What should the consequence of doxxing someone’s real-time, exact location be? Assume your child is at that location, as mine was.

5:00 PM · Dec 16, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

C) The public has a right to know!
D) The person targeted is successful so it’s not a problem.
E) The data is publicly available.
F) I’m just shitposting.
G) Oh, he’s an edge-lord.
H) She had it coming.
I) We give our targets a chance to respond.
J) He brought the issue up first.

5:33 AM · Dec 17, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

K) She just has such a punchable face.
L) I don’t view commies as people.
M) I don’t view the AltRight as human.
N) First day on the internet?
O) No justice, no peace.
P) Gotta break a few eggs to make an omelette.
Q) Anyone who posts under their real name deserves what’s coming.

5:33 AM · Dec 17, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

R) Libtards are such whining crybabies.
S) I’m a critic!
T) I’m saving the public from charlatans.
U) Well, my audience liked it.
V) Famous people are asking for it.
W) I’m a journalist.
X) Chapelle is way worse than I am.
Y) I’m just a small account.
Z) It’s fun.

Ok. Now what?

5:33 AM · Dec 17, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

The 1st thing to say is that a lot of those excuses are being used to cover up intentionally interpersonally destructive behavior. That is, folks who WANT to hurt others are generally on the look out for how they can hurt people and NOT pay the social price of being a psychopath.

5:33 AM · Dec 17, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

MORAL I: If you enjoy the pain from hurting other named people, you are generally going to find a way to explain that what you are doing is for the good of the world. That is, *every* sadist can find an excuse between “This is normal.” and “I do it for society. Thank me later.”

5:33 AM · Dec 17, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

How can you tell the difference between a psychopath and say a true comedian, journalist, etc? Psychopaths do not attempt to minimize damage to families. Regular folks try to target institutions before named individuals. They regularly attempt to give others generosity of spirit.

5:33 AM · Dec 17, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

MORAL II: Excuses work because they muddy the water of abuse. The above excuses are appropriated from contexts where they make sense. But most internet critics are nothing of the kind. A criticism helps us course-correct. A stalker doesn’t want you to improve. They want anguish.

5:33 AM · Dec 17, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

MORAL III: A lot of what is visible on Twitter hides behavior offsite, and even offline. An apparent Twitter critic may be real-life stalker/sadist. There‘s no way to understand what is happening to public figures like @elonmusk by just looking at Twitter. This is just surface.

5:33 AM · Dec 17, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

MORAL IV: Many people on Twitter feel that the very rich on the site have so much money that they never need to worry about anything. This is close to being the dumbest idea ever.

Remember: Any billionaire with a child they love is vulnerable to any psycho with an opportunity.

5:33 AM · Dec 17, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

MORAL V: Free speech is about restraining ourselves w/ culture so that we don’t need rules to tell us what we can say. It’s NOT a free-for-all for sadists. Free speech would NEVER develop in a culture in which Mores were not strong, shared and effective in prohibiting sociopathy.

5:33 AM · Dec 17, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

FINAL MORAL: If you want to be a critic, a journalist, a comedian, or even a troll, develop a code of ethics. Don’t hybridize w/ abuse Check in w/ yourself as to whether you’re really working out abuse, rage, envy or status issues. Try to minimize unnecessary damage to others.

5:33 AM · Dec 17, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

My thoughts anyway. Eager to hear yours. 🙏

Shabbat Shalom to one and all.

File:FkKBdO-UoAIRsV2.jpg

5:33 AM · Dec 17, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Monthly Reminder Moral: it’s really really really hard to fake a field. Economic Index Numbers like CPI are not real numbers. They are naturally group-valued *FIELDS* that would be nearly impossible to fake and manipulate.

The *entire* subject is off. Peer review won’t help. 🙏 https://t.co/b7UztQB0L4

File:FLP8pUdUcAEwwlo.jpg

4:37 PM · Feb 10, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

I think this isn’t right.

We have a world where institutions BLATANTLY lie in the vague direction of the truth to make the truth…uh…punchier. More viral.

Some people, upon detecting the lies (e.g. “Climate modeling is settled science”), decide there’s no truth in it *at all*.

7:04 PM · Apr 6, 2022

The New Statesman

@NewStatesman

🔴On the Republican Party: “Because of Trump’s fanaticism, the worshipful base of the Republican Party barely regards climate change as a serious problem. That’s a death warrant to the species.”

2:03 PM · Apr 6, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Many believe there is no chance COVID was Zoonotic because we are lying about the lab by saying it has to be Zoonotic. But we don’t know.

Many people are convinced Ivermectin is a total COVID solution since we’re obviously lying about human medicine as Horse Dewormer. It isn’t.

7:22 PM · Apr 6, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

No one knows if Epstein killed himself. We just know our papers aren’t aggressively reporting that story. So many assume Epstein’s death is fake or an obvious hit. Because it could be either, but our lame institutions don’t dare ask even the easy questions. So we lurch to oppose.

7:22 PM · Apr 6, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Many people don’t believe that Russia/Ukraine is a threat or even real because they can see the obvious daily spin. But it is a huge threat and an atrocity. We’re just lying and spinning parts of it.

They don’t believe the Fed has ANY function because it does do some bad stuff.

7:22 PM · Apr 6, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Moral: if you want a better model of Trump Supporters try this one: they prefer idiosyncratic lying/spin/distortion by a gadfly as an antidote to coordinated credentialed institutional polished lying with amazing production values. Further, they don’t think *anyone* offers truth.

7:22 PM · Apr 6, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

But they will react to spin and hype as if there is ZERO substance behind it if that spin and hype are coordinated across multiple venues, institutions & talking heads.

They aren’t principally embracing Trump or idiocy. They are rejecting obvious coordination of hype.

That.🙏

7:22 PM · Apr 6, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

One example, offered freely and without my asking:

7:29 PM · Apr 6, 2022

WalterIII

@WalterIII

That would be me. A lifetime studying science but have never spent one second looking into climate change. Too many experiences with the left's consensus herd. Don't care about Ukraine, either. Anything they're all in on I ignore.

7:14 PM · Apr 6, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

I don’t think there is any history of my ever commenting on @SBF_FTX.

It is because I never deeply understood what was going on when it was explained to me. I’m not going to lie: I felt dumb.

Moral: be very careful celebrating success that you don’t understand for its own sake.

4:31 PM · Nov 12, 2022

SBF

@SBF_FTX

2) I'm really sorry, again, that we ended up here.

Hopefully things can find a way to recover. Hopefully this can bring some amount of transparency, trust, and governance to them.

Ultimately hopefully it can be better for customers.

4:31 PM · Nov 12, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Other things that made/make me feel dumb:

Bernie Madoff’s Returns
COVID origin questions = Racism
Fauci
Hilary’s Inevitability
Quantum Gravity
Jeffrey Epstein’s CCY trading Claims
CPI Construction
UFO/UAP
Chinese Graduate Students in STEM
Open Borders
Defund The Police
DEI
NIH

4:46 PM · Nov 12, 2022

2023

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Imagine if it were leaked that COVID came from an NIH grant: “This-has-no-business-being-in-the-public-domain.”

Or if Epstein were foreign intelligence operating with tacit approval of the US IC: “This-is-not-intended-for-public-consumption.”

Capisce?

https://x.com/Badbydefault/status/1645631029825224706

4:01 AM · Apr 11, 2023

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

My point: you public servants have protected AND failed too much. You smear *every* one of us who merely trips over your mile-wide trail of incompetent statecraft from Bagram to Wuhan that passes through 71st St Manhattan & east of Dayton.

MORAL: Protect less or succeed more. 🙏

4:01 AM · Apr 11, 2023

2025

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

I think many of you made a huge mistake about the “Client List”. About “Lolita Express”. About “Pedophile Island.” That is, if the goal was to use Epstein to get justice, and put an end to this abuse of children and civilians by the sickest members of the world’s ICs.

You had fun with memes. And you let an IC sponsored pedophile get away. We were supposed to be pushing the press:

“Why don’t you ask **any** truly detailed questions about a supposed multi billion dollar FX hedge fund that may not have existed at all?” That was…and is…the first order of business.

We can’t know exactly what he did, where and when.

But there is no way to fake this hedge fund. Either he had an enormous fund or he didn’t. We can get all the details if he did. Or push as to why they don’t exist.

I don’t know if he killed himself. I don’t even know if he is dead. I don’t know if there is “the Epstein client list”.

The thing we know best is that he claimed to manage a multibillion dollar fund that ***cannot*** be hidden. Where are its records and employees?????????” Why does the press avoid reporting on this fund like the plague???? It was headquartered at Villard House for Christ sake. Madison Avenue. Who liquidated it? Who worked there? wtf?

This manager to this mystery fund is like a captain who supposedly has one of the world’s largest mega yachts…that somehow isn’t registered or flagged. It leaves no wake. No shipyard built it or serviced it. It has no crew. No harbor master has ever seen it.

“It’s so quiet that Lockheed asked to study it. It’s said to be made of optically neural superconducting ice crystals that form only from the tears of virgin sea lions cooled to absolute zero so it can’t be seen. He brilliantly purchased a Bugis Prahu Charter that was grandfathered in before the 1609 Mare Liberum was in force so that he alone may sail the seas without ever communicating with other vessels or harbors. It is said that his carbon fiber anchor and chain stretched to the bottom of the Challenger Deep so that he didn’t need to approach the shore for years on end.”

C’mon.

The key was that he wasn’t a “disgraced financier”. He was a construct fitted with a mysterious poorly drawn backstory. And that construct probably belonged to several Allied nation states:

“He’s so brilliant that he only accepts people who surrender total control of their wealth under power of attorney. He is closed to anyone who doesn’t have 1 Billion dollars minimum. In fact: his investor list is so discreet, and is said to be so secretive and closely guarded that he has only one known client.”

Did you not realize that outside investors are a liability to a cover story or front? Beware any super secretive fund that has a story why they dont want family office or institutional money. This is not the only one btw.

Hence…the exclusivity.

Why was he obsessed by Gravity? He was almost certainly a front used for funding edgy science, information gathering, control, etc away from normal channels.

It wasn’t one thing. He wasn’t a creepy front company…he was a mall filled with different business providing different goods and services. It wasn’t all about raping kids. Some collection of people invested something like 9 figures in creating a weird 11-12 figure fairy tale via leverage. And it was used for a lot of things. It was called Jeffrey Epstein.

Moral: focus on the cover story. Not the memes. Go after the press first. Figure out exactly who is stopping the fund from being dissected. Focus on the non reporting.

This is what Anti-Interesting is all about. Use it.

One man’s opinion. 🙏

Last edited 6:29 PM · Jul 12, 2025

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Fascinating exchange gentlemen…so odd.

Why don’t you also bring up the metaplectic correction and point out that I don’t mention that?

Or ordering considerations of classical operators?

That would allow you both to cast even more (unsupported) aspersions.

In truth you are not making a deep point. You are making the quantum supremacy point that we should take classical limits of quantum systems. Not naively quantize classical theories…like we used to do when we were succeeding.

Yet the Standard Model stubbornly remains a classical field theory that got quantized. Mysteriously dodging near certain death on all sides. What are the odds!!

Well, there might be deep classical reasons for that improbable outcome that escape the quantum supremacists. I mean…it’s just possible.

MORAL: Not everyone is an ignorant idiot just because they think your community is 40+ years stalled groupthinking this exact way. I don’t think you are ignorant or stupid. I don’t think you are pseudoscientists. Or grifters. Or any of that. I just think you are wrong in your total approach. That’s just science. The quantum gravity crowd has demanded a victory parade for 40+ years over all other approaches while it fails to launch year after year after year. That is not science. I’m sorry. I don’t make that rule.

MORAL II: You might want to bring up polarization independence and the difficulty of proving (projective) flatness in the polarization discussion, if you want to be even more condescending. You might also laugh to yourselves that the classical hadron and lepton sectors don’t even separately quantize! I don’t know why this doesn’t occur to you. And finally, you might want to assert that I am ignorant of Groenewold–van Hove and have a chuckle about that too. Just a suggestion.

Have fun. And good day, gentlemen. Keep up the high standards and good work.

2:56 PM · Sep 6, 2025

Tim Henke

@TimHenke9

Buddy, we're not doing "quantum supremacy". But if you wanna quantise a classical theory you must work for it. You don't get to yell "self-quantising" and call it a day

You must check topological conditions & choose/prove independence of polarisation & the prequantum line bundle

3:23 PM · Sep 6, 2025

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Which is both INCREDIBLE and difficult as it stands. Yes? No? I mean I think I get this.

Like it’s almost a miracle that it works at all:

3:34 PM · Sep 6, 2025

Tim Henke

@TimHenke9

Now you're getting it! :)

And not only difficult but often simply false. Many classical phase spaces dont admit prequantum line bundles. Others don't have a unique one

And the choice of polarisation can be the difference between a finite- and infinite-dimensional Hilbert space!

3:43 PM · Sep 6, 2025

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

“Buddy”

“Now you're getting it! :)”

You guys are just so full of yourselves. What are you…in your 20s? Born around AdS/CFT? Am I your problem student finally coming along to “get it”?

You think I can’t understand you! Right? Like you are my teacher or something. Adorable.

I forget what this community is like. You do realize you are still playing with toy models working a million miles away from actual laboratory physics?

Take a look out your window Tim: No quarks. No neutrinos. No generations. You are on the train to NERPH (Not Even Remotely Physics). You just don’t know it. Before long you will leave for a job so you can buy a house or retire without ever having made contact with physical reality. As a physics person. Wake up.

You’re not even in spacetime Tim. You are likely playing with Riemann surfaces. Your “Higgs Fields” are often valued in the adjoint bundles. Your metrics are often Euclidean signature. Your SUSY is likely unsupported by any LHC superpartners. Etc. Etc.

You actually think I don’t get it because if I did “get it” I would certainly agree with you.

Like I can’t read what you wrote here or I wouldn’t be saying these things: