5,994
edits
Ronald Coase: Difference between revisions
→2017
(→2017) |
(→2017) |
||
| Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content= | |content=If you're honest, then stop w/ the red herrings on Demand Curve modeling as my point is TOTALLY agnostic to that. You write that my paper "Is a good idea that deserves much more thought!" Okay. Don't tell me. Show me a lack of capture. Put in demand curve shocks. NOTHING changes. | ||
|thread= | |thread= | ||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
| Line 273: | Line 273: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content=@SamHarrisOrg @RadioFreeTom | |content=@SamHarrisOrg @RadioFreeTom | ||
10/TRADE (CONT.) | 10/TRADE (CONT.) | ||
Look at the slide & listen to this talk from a former Clinton administration economist. Notice the words 'Esoteric' vs. 'Exoteric'. Claiming the real arguments are too complex to math guys like me is laughable: | Look at the slide & listen to this talk from a former Clinton administration economist. Notice the words 'Esoteric' vs. 'Exoteric'. Claiming the real arguments are too complex to math guys like me is laughable: | ||
| Line 343: | Line 344: | ||
|content=@RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg @paulkrugman @NSF @theNASciences And, no I don’t call something a conspiracy because I disagree w/ experts. I usually agree w/ them! What I disageee with is using expertise to transfer wealth & agency from the supposedly childlike voters who intuit something is rigged but can’t name it in political 3 card Monty. | |content=@RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg @paulkrugman @NSF @theNASciences And, no I don’t call something a conspiracy because I disagree w/ experts. I usually agree w/ them! What I disageee with is using expertise to transfer wealth & agency from the supposedly childlike voters who intuit something is rigged but can’t name it in political 3 card Monty. | ||
|timestamp=6:11 PM · Dec 17, 2017 | |timestamp=6:11 PM · Dec 17, 2017 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Tweet | {{Tweet | ||
| Line 575: | Line 558: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content= | |content=Oh wow! That's what I *love* about economists: a total reliance on ad hoc selective application of standards to reach desired conclusions. | ||
This is fun. Please apply that selective standard evenly to all of Econ 101 and let's watch your *entire* field disintegrate. | This is fun. Please apply that selective standard evenly to all of Econ 101 and let's watch your *entire* field disintegrate. | ||
| Line 716: | Line 699: | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | ||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |username=EricRWeinstein | ||
|content= | |content=Sorry Miriam: The laypeople don't speak the academy's language so the academy resists the laity and disparages them. Renegade experts who are tired of the expert cartels' embargo against sharing more deep expertise with the laity can translate the laity to the cartels. Helpful? | ||
|timestamp=7:25 PM · Dec 16, 2017 | |timestamp=7:25 PM · Dec 16, 2017 | ||
}} | }} | ||