5,984
edits
Horse-and-Rider Problem: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The "Horse-and-Rider Problem" refers to a tension between an individual with extraordinary talents or ideas (the "rider") and the individual's achievements or contributions to society (the "horse"). The core issue is that these outliers are often brilliant and essential to progress, but their personalities, opinions, or behaviors may make them dangerous to the status quo in conventional systems. This leads to a situation where society or institutions might try to disconnect or isolate the person from their accomplishments to avoid dealing with their unconventional views or behaviors. | The "'''Horse-and-Rider Problem'''" refers to a tension between an individual with extraordinary talents or ideas (the "rider") and the individual's achievements or contributions to society (the "horse"). The core issue is that these outliers are often brilliant and essential to progress, but their personalities, opinions, or behaviors may make them dangerous to the status quo in conventional systems. This leads to a situation where society or institutions might try to disconnect or isolate the person from their accomplishments to avoid dealing with their unconventional views or behaviors. | ||
This concept thus highlights the problem (as seen by institutions) of balancing the contributions of brilliant, non-conformist individuals with the desire of institutions (like governments or universities) to maintain control and coherence. It points out the paradox that societies often benefit from these outliers but also feel the need to suppress or marginalize them to avoid dealing with their disruptive potential. The term also implies that while society may claim to support innovation, it often struggles with the difficult dynamics of accommodating people who challenge consensus and status quo. | This concept thus highlights the problem (as seen by institutions) of balancing the contributions of brilliant, non-conformist individuals with the desire of institutions (like governments or universities) to maintain control and coherence. It points out the paradox that societies often benefit from these outliers but also feel the need to suppress or marginalize them to avoid dealing with their disruptive potential. The term also implies that while society may claim to support innovation, it often struggles with the difficult dynamics of accommodating people who challenge consensus and status quo. | ||