Jump to content

Peer Review: Difference between revisions

1,097 bytes added ,  29 September
Line 354: Line 354:
}}
}}


{{#widget:Tweet|id=1418821315683766273}}
 
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1418821315683766273
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=For researchers who live on '''Peer Review''', even the last year and a half cannot shake their belief in '''Peer Review'''!
 
'''Peer Review''' replaced a system that worked better around the time I was born in 1965. We should talk about whether it works. It doesn’t. It left us weak & deranged.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1418820299689058306
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=“If you look at the research that was done, it was highly recommended by *'''Peer Reviewed'''*…by our United States '''Peer Reviews'''. It got a very high score in the '''Peer Review system'''.” -Dr Fauci on the Use of '''Peer Review''' in approving NIH grants for GoFR in Wuhan
|media1=ERW-X-post-1418820299689058306-SLrk1hizioSlNZ1i.png
|timestamp=6:28 AM · Jul 24, 2021
}}
|timestamp=6:32 AM · Jul 24, 2021
}}
 


{{Tweet
{{Tweet