The Portal Wiki

Geometric Unity Predictions: Difference between revisions

Page Discussion

Geometric Unity Predictions (edit)

Revision as of 17:29, 27 September 2025

4,271 bytes added ,  27 September
no edit summary
No edit summary
Ā 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{#widget:YouTube|id=PYRYXhU4kxM|start=4261}}
{{#widget:YouTube|id=PYRYXhU4kxM|start=4261}}


{{#widget:Tweet|id=1379872173033017346}}
{{Tweet
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1379872184387039232}}
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1379872186740080647}}
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379874520526299136
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1379872188593926144}}
|name=Eric Weinstein
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1379874520526299136}}
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=P.P.S. Remember that GU rejects three generations. In GU itā€™s 2 True generations plus 1 imposter. A priori, this could also be an effect of the imposter not being a true generation.
Ā 
Again I would need QFT colleagues trying to help me see if that is a possible effect.
|thread=
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872173033017346
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=In strong GU:
Ā 
SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) (Standard Model)
Ā 
Is contained in U(3)xU(2) inside
Ā 
Spin(6)xSpin(4)
=SU(4)xSU(2)xSU(2)
(Before the more difficult non compact Spin(6,4).)
Ā 
Iā€™d look first to the extra 1D reductive U(1) if the experiments hold up. Then to Spin(6) x Spin(4):
|media1=ERW-X-post-1379872173033017346.jpg
|quote=
{{Tweet
|image=11Equity-profile.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/11Equity/status/1379832703848230916
|name=11
|usernameurl=https://x.com/11Equity
|username=11Equity
|content=@EricRWeinstein What are your thoughts on this and how does it fit with Geometric Unity?
https://www.bbc.com/news/56643677
|timestamp=4:25 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
}}
|timestamp=7:02 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872179026677760
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=As far as Fermion quantum number predictions that could open up new channels, Strong GU makes clear predictions. Explicitly, here would be the next Spin-1/2 particles internal symmetries we should find:
|timestamp=7:02 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
|media1=ERW-X-post-1379872179026677760.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872184387039232
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Additionally, Strong GU predicts that there will be 16 Spin-3/2 particles with Standard model symmetries conjugate to the Spin-1/2 generations and gives their ā€˜internalā€™ quantum numbers as:
|timestamp=7:02 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
|media1=ERW-X-post-1379872184387039232.jpg
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872185871822848
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Now, why if GU makes predictions do I appear to some to shy away from them?
Ā 
A: I donā€™t.
Ā 
But string theorists hide the fact that they disconnected themselves from normal science by trying to force everyone else *except* String Theorists into answering hyperspecific challenges.
|timestamp=7:02 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872186740080647
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Thus while I can tell you what GU predicts is next, they push for a QFT calculation of energy scale to make others sound vague.
Ā 
So letā€™s talk vague: Look at the above containments and SM quantum numbers. Thatā€™s not vague. Now ask String Theorists the SAME question...and compare.
|timestamp=7:02 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872187692187648
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Lastly: I would caution about getting too far ahead of our experimentalist friends. Let them sort out their confidence and not push them to be too definite prematurely.
Ā 
But my advice is to watch *relative* predictive responses of those w/ ā€œBeyond the Standard Modelā€ theories.
šŸ™
|timestamp=7:02 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
}}
{{Tweet
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872188593926144
|name=Eric Weinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=P.S. Happy to attempt to sharpen what GU can say. But not working on my own outside the community. If you want more precise predictions than I already have, Iā€™d need access to normal resources (e.g. constructive QFT colleagues). Working outside from home itā€™s probably impossible.
|timestamp=7:02 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
}}
|timestamp=7:11 PM Ā· Apr 7, 2021
}}


{{stub}}
{{stub}}
Retrieved from "https://theportal.wiki/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/22498"