Exclusion: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{{#widget:YouTube|id=C84cpRGGC5U|start=1499}} | {{#widget:YouTube|id=C84cpRGGC5U|start=1499}} | ||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1334022321867083776 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Look we have to face up. The supposedly completely intolerant conservatives are often WAY more tolerant & inclusive than the āDiversity & Inclusion(tm)ā crowd who ironically donāt seem to realize their obsession with uniformity & [[Exclusion|exclusion]]. I canāt explain it if you canāt see it. | |||
|thread= | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1334022316225806336 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Thanks for the snotty invitation. | |||
Let me explain the difference. I have referred to Fox as a conservative propaganda network historically every time Iām ON their conservative shows. And I get asked back. | |||
@msnbc, @npr, @nytimes donāt talk to me anymore even when Iām the expert. | |||
|timestamp=6:31 AM Ā· Dec 2, 2020 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1334022319132405762 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=I used to get called by all those outfits. Sometime around 2011-2015 @npr and @nytimes seriously changed character. Lots of activist hires. My knowledge didnāt change. My politics didnāt change. But the move from center left journalism to unashamed activism was an enormous shift. | |||
|timestamp=6:31 AM Ā· Dec 2, 2020 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1334022320520740864 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein | |||
|username=EricRWeinstein | |||
|content=Now Iām not asked on by @seanhannity. But Iāve been asked by @greggutfeld & @TuckerCarlson. @IvankaTrump has followed me. @AnnCoulter and @michellemalkin have retweeted me. @glennbeck and @charliekirk11 have reached out. Despite what I say about MAGA being impossible as a choice. | |||
|timestamp=6:31 AM Ā· Dec 2, 2020 | |||
}} | |||
|timestamp=6:31 AM Ā· Dec 2, 2020 | |||
}} | |||
Revision as of 06:46, 4 March 2026
Exclusion is often as or more important than inclusion.
You need some means of excluding chaos for your system to function.... Right now, the most important thing is to exclude people who can't think properly from conversations of critical importance, because everyone else can't carry that person in their attempt to reason morally about a technical issue.
-Eric Weinstein on The Jolly Swagman #100 @ 25 min
Thanks for the snotty invitation.
Let me explain the difference. I have referred to Fox as a conservative propaganda network historically every time Iām ON their conservative shows. And I get asked back.
@msnbc, @npr, @nytimes donāt talk to me anymore even when Iām the expert.
I used to get called by all those outfits. Sometime around 2011-2015 @npr and @nytimes seriously changed character. Lots of activist hires. My knowledge didnāt change. My politics didnāt change. But the move from center left journalism to unashamed activism was an enormous shift.
Now Iām not asked on by @seanhannity. But Iāve been asked by @greggutfeld & @TuckerCarlson. @IvankaTrump has followed me. @AnnCoulter and @michellemalkin have retweeted me. @glennbeck and @charliekirk11 have reached out. Despite what I say about MAGA being impossible as a choice.
Look we have to face up. The supposedly completely intolerant conservatives are often WAY more tolerant & inclusive than the āDiversity & Inclusion(tm)ā crowd who ironically donāt seem to realize their obsession with uniformity & exclusion. I canāt explain it if you canāt see it.
A white car pulls up beside me at a light with his window rolled down. The driver is trying to tell me something. I reflexively open my window:
āDumb, dumb. Are you dumb?ā
Taken aback, I say nothing. A metal object is hurled at me. The driver speeds off. It is a liquor flask.
I look at the liquor flask now in my car. I think: āHow should I have handled it differently?ā
Never roll down your window? Donāt drive? Move states? Size up drivers based on appearance?
Then I realized: this problem is isomorphic to this very issue I deal with on Twitter.
The world is losing it. You have a right to a measure of insulation.
I think having a metal booze flask thrown directly at my face by a raging fellow motorist is weirdly clarifying. Exclusion is as important as inclusion. I will be slower to roll down my window from now on. Sad.
I donāt know how to tell you this.
You are *against* āequityā: you are SUPPOSED to be a merit driven hierarchical organization to your core.
4-F is an example of what? *Exclusion*. āUnfit for military service.ā
As for diversityā¦You are SUPPPOSED to be ableist, ageist, etc.
Is mother at home? Or should we just hand China the keys and tell them where we keep the single malt as we make sure that the morbidly obese and aged feel welcome in our special forces units.
I canāt believe this is how we unravel everything we learned how to do correctly.
Do you believe that the armed services of a superpower are made stronger by embracing DIVERSITY-EQUITY-INCLUSION into the core of its mission?
@missmeltmyheart Exclusion which violates equality of outcome then? Thx.
