Dale Jorgenson: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein↵|username=EricRWeinstein" to "|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein |username=ericweinstein") |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3618131148 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3618131148 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Rules are that it has to be in the Econ department on video with [[Gary Becker|Becker]] present at Chicago or [[Dale Jorgenson|Jorgenson]] at [[Harvard]]. | |content=Rules are that it has to be in the Econ department on video with [[Gary Becker|Becker]] present at Chicago or [[Dale Jorgenson|Jorgenson]] at [[Harvard]]. | ||
|thread= | |thread= | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3617527422 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3617527422 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=[[Arrow's Impossibility Theorem|Arrow's impossibility theorem]] can be seen as a cohomological obstruction to constructing representative consumers without magical thinking. | |content=[[Arrow's Impossibility Theorem|Arrow's impossibility theorem]] can be seen as a cohomological obstruction to constructing representative consumers without magical thinking. | ||
|timestamp=2:42 AM · Aug 29, 2009 | |timestamp=2:42 AM · Aug 29, 2009 | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3617738723 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3617738723 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=[[Gary Becker|Becker's]] theory of [[Stable Tastes|stable homogenous tastes]] on the other hand is....words fail me...the greatest indictment of [[Peer Review|peer review]]. Ever. | |content=[[Gary Becker|Becker's]] theory of [[Stable Tastes|stable homogenous tastes]] on the other hand is....words fail me...the greatest indictment of [[Peer Review|peer review]]. Ever. | ||
|timestamp=2:54 AM · Aug 29, 2009 | |timestamp=2:54 AM · Aug 29, 2009 | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3617798373 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3617798373 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Just for a moment...put yourself in my shoes. I have an amazing theory of welfare with evolving tastes and a cult that claims [[Stable Tastes|stable tates]]. | |content=Just for a moment...put yourself in my shoes. I have an amazing theory of welfare with evolving tastes and a cult that claims [[Stable Tastes|stable tates]]. | ||
|timestamp=2:57 AM · Aug 29, 2009 | |timestamp=2:57 AM · Aug 29, 2009 | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3617875123 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3617875123 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Why stop at [[Stable Tastes|stable tastes]]? Why not declare yourself the last Pasha of Scotland and immune from bigamy laws as a winged son of Zeus? | |content=Why stop at [[Stable Tastes|stable tastes]]? Why not declare yourself the last Pasha of Scotland and immune from bigamy laws as a winged son of Zeus? | ||
|timestamp=3:01 AM · Aug 29, 2009 | |timestamp=3:01 AM · Aug 29, 2009 | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3618080234 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/3618080234 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=$500 Challenge: Get me an invited Econ gig at Chicago / [[Harvard]] to confront the theory of ordinal welfare with [[Stable Tastes|stable homogenous tastes]]. | |content=$500 Challenge: Get me an invited Econ gig at Chicago / [[Harvard]] to confront the theory of ordinal welfare with [[Stable Tastes|stable homogenous tastes]]. | ||
|timestamp=3:13 AM · Aug 29, 2009 | |timestamp=3:13 AM · Aug 29, 2009 | ||
Latest revision as of 23:25, 5 May 2026
This article is a stub. You can help us by editing this page and expanding it.
Arrow's impossibility theorem can be seen as a cohomological obstruction to constructing representative consumers without magical thinking.
Becker's theory of stable homogenous tastes on the other hand is....words fail me...the greatest indictment of peer review. Ever.
Just for a moment...put yourself in my shoes. I have an amazing theory of welfare with evolving tastes and a cult that claims stable tates.
Why stop at stable tastes? Why not declare yourself the last Pasha of Scotland and immune from bigamy laws as a winged son of Zeus?
$500 Challenge: Get me an invited Econ gig at Chicago / Harvard to confront the theory of ordinal welfare with stable homogenous tastes.