Can’t Anybody Here Play This Game: Difference between revisions

Line 124: Line 124:
|content=Look, we could just hold a conference: '''"Fundamental Physics: Can't *Anybody* Here Play This Game?"'''
|content=Look, we could just hold a conference: '''"Fundamental Physics: Can't *Anybody* Here Play This Game?"'''


David, Ed, Maria, Cumrun, Nati, Lenny, Juan, Lee etc. could be respondents giving constructive feedback. We would then at least learn why we are where we are. But this is nuts.
[[David Gross|David]], [[Ed Witten|Ed]], Maria, [[Cumrun Vafa|Cumrun]], [[Nathan “Nati” Seiberg|Nati]], [[Lenny Susskind|Lenny]], Juan, [[Lee Smolin|Lee]] etc. could be respondents giving constructive feedback. We would then at least learn why we are where we are. But this is nuts.
|thread=
|thread=
{{Tweet
{{Tweet
Line 159: Line 159:
Here goes. What if the problem is our leadership. What if we asked  
Here goes. What if the problem is our leadership. What if we asked  


"Who believe String Theory wouldn't work?"
"Who believe [[String Theory]] wouldn't work?"
"Who never claimed LHC SUSY was imminent?"
"Who never claimed LHC SUSY was imminent?"
"Who never said Proton Decay was going to be found?"
"Who never said Proton Decay was going to be found?"
Line 172: Line 172:
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|username=EricRWeinstein
|content=Said differently, what if our leadership is brilliant but SPECIFICALLY untrustworthy in identifying the path forward. What if 1000 David Gross & Ed Wit1ten Keynotes setting the agenda are the problem? What if Lenny Susskind is not correct sbout non-string people wasting our time.
|content=Said differently, what if our leadership is brilliant but SPECIFICALLY untrustworthy in identifying the path forward. What if 1000 [[David Gross]] & [[Ed Witten|Ed Wit1ten]] Keynotes setting the agenda are the problem? What if [[Lenny Susskind]] is not correct sbout non-string people wasting our time.
|timestamp=8:36 PM · Jan 25, 2023
|timestamp=8:36 PM · Jan 25, 2023
}}
}}
Line 183: Line 183:
|content=What if we *excluded* people who are consistently wrong about the path forward and asked:  
|content=What if we *excluded* people who are consistently wrong about the path forward and asked:  


"Are there any OTHER ideas? Not Strings. Not Loops. Not Asymptotic Safety. Not Simple Compact GUTs. Not Quantum Computing. Not Black Hole Information. Not Technicolor. Not Amplitudes."
"Are there any OTHER ideas? Not [[String Theory|Strings]]. Not Loops. Not Asymptotic Safety. Not Simple Compact GUTs. Not Quantum Computing. Not Black Hole Information. Not Technicolor. Not Amplitudes."
|timestamp=8:36 PM · Jan 25, 2023
|timestamp=8:36 PM · Jan 25, 2023
}}
}}