Geometric Unity Predictions: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein↵|username=EricRWeinstein" to "|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein |username=ericweinstein") |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379874520526299136 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379874520526299136 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=P.P.S. Remember that GU rejects three generations. In GU it’s 2 True generations plus 1 imposter. A priori, this could also be an effect of the imposter not being a true generation. | |content=P.P.S. Remember that GU rejects three generations. In GU it’s 2 True generations plus 1 imposter. A priori, this could also be an effect of the imposter not being a true generation. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872173033017346 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872173033017346 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=In strong GU: | |content=In strong GU: | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872179026677760 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872179026677760 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=As far as Fermion quantum number predictions that could open up new channels, Strong GU makes clear predictions. Explicitly, here would be the next Spin-1/2 particles internal symmetries we should find: | |content=As far as Fermion quantum number predictions that could open up new channels, Strong GU makes clear predictions. Explicitly, here would be the next Spin-1/2 particles internal symmetries we should find: | ||
|timestamp=7:02 PM · Apr 7, 2021 | |timestamp=7:02 PM · Apr 7, 2021 | ||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872184387039232 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872184387039232 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Additionally, Strong GU predicts that there will be 16 Spin-3/2 particles with Standard model symmetries conjugate to the Spin-1/2 generations and gives their ‘internal’ quantum numbers as: | |content=Additionally, Strong GU predicts that there will be 16 Spin-3/2 particles with Standard model symmetries conjugate to the Spin-1/2 generations and gives their ‘internal’ quantum numbers as: | ||
|timestamp=7:02 PM · Apr 7, 2021 | |timestamp=7:02 PM · Apr 7, 2021 | ||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872185871822848 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872185871822848 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Now, why if GU makes predictions do I appear to some to shy away from them? | |content=Now, why if GU makes predictions do I appear to some to shy away from them? | ||
| Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872186740080647 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872186740080647 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Thus while I can tell you what GU predicts is next, they push for a QFT calculation of energy scale to make others sound vague. | |content=Thus while I can tell you what GU predicts is next, they push for a QFT calculation of energy scale to make others sound vague. | ||
| Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872187692187648 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872187692187648 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Lastly: I would caution about getting too far ahead of our experimentalist friends. Let them sort out their confidence and not push them to be too definite prematurely. | |content=Lastly: I would caution about getting too far ahead of our experimentalist friends. Let them sort out their confidence and not push them to be too definite prematurely. | ||
| Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872188593926144 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1379872188593926144 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=P.S. Happy to attempt to sharpen what GU can say. But not working on my own outside the community. If you want more precise predictions than I already have, I’d need access to normal resources (e.g. constructive QFT colleagues). Working outside from home it’s probably impossible. | |content=P.S. Happy to attempt to sharpen what GU can say. But not working on my own outside the community. If you want more precise predictions than I already have, I’d need access to normal resources (e.g. constructive QFT colleagues). Working outside from home it’s probably impossible. | ||
|timestamp=7:02 PM · Apr 7, 2021 | |timestamp=7:02 PM · Apr 7, 2021 | ||
Latest revision as of 22:23, 5 May 2026
In strong GU:
SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) (Standard Model)
Is contained in U(3)xU(2) inside
Spin(6)xSpin(4) =SU(4)xSU(2)xSU(2)
(Before the more difficult non compact Spin(6,4).)
I’d look first to the extra 1D reductive U(1) if the experiments hold up. Then to Spin(6) x Spin(4):
@EricRWeinstein What are your thoughts on this and how does it fit with Geometric Unity? https://www.bbc.com/news/56643677
As far as Fermion quantum number predictions that could open up new channels, Strong GU makes clear predictions. Explicitly, here would be the next Spin-1/2 particles internal symmetries we should find:
Additionally, Strong GU predicts that there will be 16 Spin-3/2 particles with Standard model symmetries conjugate to the Spin-1/2 generations and gives their ‘internal’ quantum numbers as:
Now, why if GU makes predictions do I appear to some to shy away from them?
A: I don’t.
But string theorists hide the fact that they disconnected themselves from normal science by trying to force everyone else *except* String Theorists into answering hyperspecific challenges.
Thus while I can tell you what GU predicts is next, they push for a QFT calculation of energy scale to make others sound vague.
So let’s talk vague: Look at the above containments and SM quantum numbers. That’s not vague. Now ask String Theorists the SAME question...and compare.
Lastly: I would caution about getting too far ahead of our experimentalist friends. Let them sort out their confidence and not push them to be too definite prematurely.
But my advice is to watch *relative* predictive responses of those w/ “Beyond the Standard Model” theories. 🙏
P.S. Happy to attempt to sharpen what GU can say. But not working on my own outside the community. If you want more precise predictions than I already have, I’d need access to normal resources (e.g. constructive QFT colleagues). Working outside from home it’s probably impossible.
P.P.S. Remember that GU rejects three generations. In GU it’s 2 True generations plus 1 imposter. A priori, this could also be an effect of the imposter not being a true generation.
Again I would need QFT colleagues trying to help me see if that is a possible effect.
This article is a stub. You can help us by editing this page and expanding it.Related Pages[edit]
- You Know You’re in GU When
- Early is another name for wrong
- Gauge Theory
- General Relativity
- I’ve Got a Good Feeling About This
- Peer Injunction
- Peer Review
- Quantum Gravity
- Quantum Field Theory
- Scientific Method
- Standard Model
- String Theory
- The Scientific Method is the Radio Edit of Great Science
- Theory of Geometric Unity