5,984
edits
Free Speech: Difference between revisions
→2018
(→2017) |
(→2018) |
||
| Line 242: | Line 242: | ||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=948296256475906048}} | {{#widget:Tweet|id=948296256475906048}} | ||
{{# | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id= | {{Tweet | ||
{{#widget:Tweet|id= | |image=Eric profile picture.jpg | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/948296256475906048 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|content=How is it that from a vast number of public speakers in the extended @SamHarrisOrg family you @EricRWeinstein seem to be the the first one to bring up the marvelous Marshall Rosenberg and #nonviolentcommunication #nvc ??? I don't know that I am. But it seems weird to me that I haven't heard it from anyone else given the amount of attention to "hate speech" and "speech as violence". If I have this wrong, point me to others discussing this in the context of free speech/hate speech. | |||
Thx! | |||
|timestamp=8:53 PM · Jan 02, 2018 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/972880042161192960 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|content=“So, quick summary: There is no campus free speech crisis, the kids are all right, those that say otherwise have lost all perspective” -@JeffreyASachs | |||
But we do have some lovely parting gifts for our contestant Jeffrey here on “Let’s-Build-a-Strawman!” | |||
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SynqYb-6bXY | |||
|timestamp=5:00 PM · Mar 11, 2018 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/974723901740609536 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|content=1/2 The free speech community is itself divided as to whether the case for free speech is better made focusing on speech specifically intended to offend, or necessary speech deemed outrageous & attacked by authoritarians wishing to control & stigmatize reasonable civil discourse. | |||
|timestamp=7:07 PM · Mar 16, 2018 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/976132843871940608 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|content=Oh this is good: "Free Speech Grifters"! Let me save you time Mari. Everyone needs to be very very afraid of: | |||
@BretWeinstein, @clairlemon , @DouglasKMurray, @CHSommers, @jordanbpeterson, @RubinReport, @joerogan, @SamHarrisOrg, @benshapiro, me etc.. | |||
Why? We're not MSM compliant. https://x.com/mariuyehara/status/975754244904161281 | |||
|timestamp=4:26 PM · Mar 20, 2018 | |||
}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1075799222551605249 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|content=There is not one single word or phrase in any language ever spoken that is without potential wholesome legitimate use by anyone living anywhere. | |||
No language-level bans can withstand scrutiny. Not one. | |||
And, for the record, I‘m not even a free speech absolutist... | |||
|timestamp=5:04 PM · Dec 20, 2018 | |||
}} | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1076162355589898240}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1076162355589898240 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|content=The following is an (unauthorized) RISKVERTISMENT for @DrBronner. | |||
I love DR BRONNER soap! Their luxurious Castille soaps are no less amazing than their corporate bravery in support of Psychedelic Research on substances which are currently illegal! | |||
<nowiki>#</nowiki>RewardCourage #Riskvertise. If you know of other firms that don’t buckle under pressure and who are interested in underwriting free speech, psychedelic research, and other unpopular worthy causes, please let me know! Let’s experiment with paying it forward until we find underwriters who don’t cut &run. | |||
|timestamp=5:07 PM · Dec 21, 2018 | |||
}} | |||
{{#widget:Tweet|id=1077751822243192834}} | |||
{{Tweet | |||
|image=Eric profile picture.jpg | |||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1077751822243192834 | |||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |||
|content=2/ This would be organized by by some group like CFR, NAS or some other blue chip institution. It would be looking to figure out how to handle the “problems” of popular nullification of institutional objectives. In short it would view Brexit, Trump and restrictionism as “hate”. | |||
3/ This quiet meeting would bring together the major “stakeholders”(?) which would not include the public. The twin problems the meeting would actually be trying to solve are “free speech” and “democratic choice” which the public generally doesn’t want solved at all. | |||
|timestamp=2:23 AM · Dec 26, 2018 | |||
}} | |||
| Line 256: | Line 335: | ||
|timestamp=8:42 AM · Dec 18, 2018 | |timestamp=8:42 AM · Dec 18, 2018 | ||
}} | }} | ||
=== 2019 === | === 2019 === | ||