Jump to content

Lefty Enervation Packet: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
Eric compares levels of understanding to [[Victor-Victoria Problem|layers of counter-intuition]]:
Eric compares levels of understanding to [[Victor-Victoria Problem|layers of counter-intuition]]:
* First-order counter-intuition sees through naive ideas (e.g., mocking flat-Earth beliefs).
* First-order counter-intuition sees through naive ideas (e.g., mocking flat-Earth beliefs).
* Many stop there, failing to pursue second-order skepticism, which could uncover actual conspiracies (e.g., Iran-Contra, Tuskegee, Twitter files).
* Most stop there, failing to pursue second-order counter-intuition, which could uncover actual conspiracies (e.g., Iran-Contra, Tuskegee, Twitter files).
* The system equates any questioning beyond this point with fringe conspiracy thinking, thus socially punishing deeper inquiry.
* The system equates any questioning beyond first-order counter-intuition with "fringe" or "crackpot" thinking, thus socially punishing deeper inquiry.


This mechanism makes it difficult to distinguish between legitimate concerns and illegitimate, ill-founded theories, effectively marginalizing thoughtful inquiry and shielding the status quo.
This mechanism makes it difficult to distinguish between legitimate concerns and illegitimate, ill-founded theories, effectively marginalizing thoughtful inquiry and shielding the status quo.