5,984
edits
(→On X) |
(→On X) |
||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="tweet-content"> | <div class="tweet-content"> | ||
CLAIM: It is unethical to offer rent seekers anonymity w/ peer review if they refuse to risk profit 'shorting' what they block. | <big>CLAIM: It is unethical to offer rent seekers anonymity w/ peer review if they refuse to risk profit 'shorting' what they block. | ||
</big> </div> | |||
<div class="tweet-date"> | <div class="tweet-date"> | ||
Nov 15, 2009 | Nov 15, 2009 | ||
| Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="tweet-content"> | <div class="tweet-content"> | ||
Q:Given that 'peer review' is objectively a major danger to innovators, why make it difficult-to-impossible to arbitrage? Cui bono? | <big>Q:Given that 'peer review' is objectively a major danger to innovators, why make it difficult-to-impossible to arbitrage? Cui bono?</big> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="tweet-date"> | <div class="tweet-date"> | ||