Decision Tree

Decision Tree on The Basics Guide.

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Let’s assume you don’t love UBI for all the usual reasonable reasons. Let’s also assume that the economy stops being able to really perform adequately for the unremarkable median worker in childbearing and rearing years.

What is your replacement?

2:56 PM · Jun 18, 2019

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Note: “education/training” above means that you are betting on education and training with no gaurantee of success, already knowing that the median individual is not able to make the economy work.

3:01 PM · Jun 18, 2019

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

@William_Blake Yes. Only it’s called a decision tree. I’m trying to cut off access to the other branch so that we explore this one. I don’t believe we are definitely on this branch.

But yes. Exactly. I’m assuming one conclusion and being transparent about it.

3:25 PM · Jun 18, 2019

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

@William_Blake There will always be things to do. Agreed. At what level of compensation remains the question.

4:30 PM · Jun 18, 2019

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Trying to imagine the decision trees multiplying as we go forward from here.

Utterly failing to do so.

10:05 AM · Jan 03, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

@PsychPLockwood I’m essentially certain that it can’t. At least initially. Too many players. Too many moves.

4:35 PM · Jan 03, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

What is being suppressed in Iowa? I’m not understanding the narratives and their conflicts.

This just isn’t that technically hard.

7:41 PM · Feb 04, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Note: I have zero inside information.

7:43 PM · Feb 04, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

@CaitlinPacific So...That isn’t nothing. Not by a long shot. Are we testing in production??

Understanding how we could get this level of incompetence showing up in production is a big story for people who want to be in charge of a country.

7:47 PM · Feb 04, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

@thenotfakepaul That’s a basic issue. All branches of the decision tree are poisoned in such cases.

7:51 PM · Feb 04, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

@IdoShamirIdo That’s why I asked: whether it is incompetence or malice or lack of ability to communicate what happened is almost immaterial. I don’t need to know. I do know that there should be a clear story by now under all assumptions.

7:55 PM · Feb 04, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Triage Talk: When your government and other leaders have not secured sufficient resources, you will be triaged to cover this error.

Without being in any way sensationalist, that means some of us will die who could have been saved.

It's time to learn that this is done via codes:

9:07 PM · Mar 22, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

There are many different triage systems out there. They all count on us not understanding the language or the structure of the decision tree.

You might, for example, think that 'expectant' meant expecting care rather than expecting death.

#FlattenTheCurve = #MinimizeTheTriage https://t.co/hvZEIGPtGD

9:07 PM · Mar 22, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

What we need to do is to:

A) Offer help to our emergency response teams to secure scarce resources on emergency footing.

B) Push our leaders to secure MUCH better answers by not being the passive participants in Triage. Find out how it works. Ask: "What is the decision tree?"

9:07 PM · Mar 22, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

I am sorry to say this but it is unforgivable that our leadership is selling stocks with their information rather than organizing a national response if this is bad enough to put the world economy at a risk.

There is no one at the helm of this ship who makes any sense to me now.

9:07 PM · Mar 22, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Here are the questions I want asked:

A) What is our Govt triage plan?
B) What are our limiting variables?
C) What factories have been commandeered to produce them?
D) Is everyone needed called up? If not, why not?
E) How did we choose our triage plan?
F) What are we optimizing?

9:11 PM · Mar 22, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

“Here at X we are fully committed to free speech. The diversity of ideas is in fact the very reason this company was founded. At the same time, we at X strive for diversity inclusion so that all users on our platform may have an optimal user experience sharing perspectives.”

9:58 PM · Nov 25, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

“Of course it is never possible to please all users and our space is actually more ferociously competitive than our critics realize. However rather than fear competition, at X we welcome it and encourage those who think that this can be done better to launch their own companies.”

9:58 PM · Nov 25, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

“We believe that through a process we call “Dynamic Best Practices” our adaptive policies meet the needs of all our users. That is why we launched our awareness campaign “Free Speech without Hate Speech” with leading academics to share their research in advising our every move.”

9:58 PM · Nov 25, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

“We at X are proud of our commitment to both Trust and Safety. That is why we have worked with thought leaders from across a diverse group of authoritative & respected institutions to formulate dynamic Terms of Service to constantly adapt to our mission of diversity & inclusion.”

9:58 PM · Nov 25, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

These concepts are being used to control our thoughts, bias our conversations, chill our speech even when it is not endangering anyone and simply discussing and weighing branches of *legitimate* decision trees of possibilities that Tech now insists we assign zero weight.

Sorry..

9:58 PM · Nov 25, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Of course there is no problem with protecting individuals from harm and abuse. The issue is that once Tech defines Fake News, Diversity, Inclusion, Equity, Hate Speech, etc to include methods making reality illegal, *any* inconvenient user can be removed, down ranked & deboosted.

9:58 PM · Nov 25, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

This is undoubtedly coming from multiple sources. Some of it is common pressures producing common intellectually incoherent responses. But other parts of this are likely coming from quiet “Working Groups” with report titles like “Coordinating Response to Hate Speech & Fake News.”

9:58 PM · Nov 25, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Now all that doesn’t come from a company X. But it comes from the same place from which all the mindless corporate tech drivel they all produce originates. And all I had to do was get myself in the right frame of mind to write it. So I sat on a porcelain throne, and there it was.

9:58 PM · Nov 25, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

“In fact many don’t realize that we actually work *with* our competitors across platforms, and even with our regulators to make sure that we can learn from their experiences and share our knowledge. Because in the end, at X we know that business is about serving you, the people.”

9:58 PM · Nov 25, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

@FirearmsPB Thank you thank you.

I would like to thank my teachers.

10:09 PM · Nov 25, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

@JaimeVelo I would put it differently. Merde. If you will.

11:57 PM · Nov 25, 2020

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

And US scientists who refuse to take this seriously as per the above tweet are neglecting and/or turning their back on our national and international security responsibilities given this report.

That is my belief. Full stop.

6:37 PM · Jun 26, 2021

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

It’s totally irresponsible for any scientist to refuse to investigate UAP after this report with a full and unpruned decision tree at her side.

That includes considering the total incompetence of the defense department, *aliens*, spoofing by enemies and UFO political economy.

6:37 PM · Jun 26, 2021

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

@LeeBillings See “political economy” above.

6:47 PM · Jun 26, 2021

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

@stillgray More likely that they would have been played. I’d be surprised if anyone was dumb enough to take such a short ride.

Just wait. It’s such a weird decision Tree.

10:40 AM · Jan 11, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

For those of you speculating on channels reaching out to Sam Harris, myself and others on UFO/UAP. There was a minimum of one planned dissemination that got called off for reasons unknown. I am not at liberty to discuss. But I can say why people like Sam are likely to be quiet.

3:13 PM · May 12, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

I won’t speak for @SamHarrisOrg. But I failed to generate *any* good explanation for the repeated and fairly consistent assertions of DOD/IC types with no evident training in acting or theater. To say nothing of ordinary non-USG people. So…none of us knows what to think. Truly.

3:13 PM · May 12, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Because there is an ocean of weird behavior and claims coming from otherwise sober seeming USG and former USG people. And a lot of it is weirdly consistent. So I’m totally underwhelmed by the direct evidence so far. But I’m baffled by the indirect evidence. What generated this?

3:13 PM · May 12, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

What has so far been released to the public by government has been minimal. No one I know wants to incinerate credibility becoming a true believer over a tiny number of relatively low quality USG videos which, at least to me, prove absolutely nothing.

So then: why be interested?

3:13 PM · May 12, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

One request: stop speculating. Some folks are reaching out. They pulled back a bit. And I for one may stop talking about this if asked due to the security issues. But that which has been shared with the public is not enough to go on. It’s the indirect evidence we are watching. 🙏

3:13 PM · May 12, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

What is worse, the most parsimonious explanations are the obvious two:

A) Our government is engaged in deception and utterly brilliant at it.

B) 👽.

If the former, it is more competent than we ever suspected.

Everything else is less parsimonious. But I can’t make sense of it.

3:13 PM · May 12, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Something huge is up. It could be a psychological operation. It could be next generation spoofing by an adversary. It could be mass psychosis. But I don’t want to speculate beyond a decision tree. Something huge *is* up. And I dug hard, but failed to get beyond indirect evidence.

3:13 PM · May 12, 2022

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Did you lose anyone irreplaceable to COVID? To myocarditis? Have Brain Fog? Lose a year or two of your life? Fail to attend a funeral? Wonder how the vaccines appeared so quickly?

Have your reputation destroyed over conspiracy theorizing? Get called a Sinophobic racist?

Watch:

4:54 AM · Jan 26, 2023

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

I don’t know honestly know what we are watching. I can only pray that it is not remotely what it appears to be.

Hearings. That is all I have. There have to be deep and painful hearings. I have no other words. We need hearings.

1. Hearings

5:04 AM · Jan 26, 2023

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

I have been asked to reiterate what I just said in a Twitter Space about this.

What we have here is a decision tree with three branches. All three are totally distinct in implication.

6:04 AM · Jan 26, 2023

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

In all cases, the cure is hearings. We may need to bury PV. We may need to bury Pfizer. Or we may have a first date type meeting that went wildly out of control as many people exaggerate to create intrigue and drama.

We don’t need to guess. We just hold hearings. It’s simple. 🙏

6:04 AM · Jan 26, 2023

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

The Tree:

Branch A: Project Veritas is completely misrepresenting this video. They get *totally* destroyed for doing so.

Branch B: The video is real but the individual is totally exaggerating to make himself seem like a powerful insider.

Branch C: It’s basically accurate.

6:04 AM · Jan 26, 2023

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

@Liv_Boeree Same. Just exactly the same Liv. But we just need to dig. This doesn’t get resolved tonight.

6:07 AM · Jan 26, 2023

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

So you could see “Directed Drift”. The relationship between vaccine and virus is similar to the mirroring one sees in Bayesian Mimicry. The model species can move laterally and the mimic then has to move to mirror the phenotype of the model. Do I don’t think this *has* to be GoF.

6:29 AM · Jan 26, 2023

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Also, what I said in the space about Gain Of Function:

Even though the subject says “Directed Evolution” I do not believe a priori that he is technically describing GoF. A better term would be “Directed Selection” because the virus could move laterally on a fitness landscape.

6:29 AM · Jan 26, 2023

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

The virus could be moved laterally and then a new vaccine would be created to move with it like model and mimic respectively.

Bottom line:

1. Pay attention. 2. Call for hearings. 3. Avoid conclusions by being patient. This doesn’t get settled tonight. 4. Accept findings.

Thx.

6:29 AM · Jan 26, 2023

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

@pcervigon Autocorrect. Damn. Thanks!

10:00 AM · Jan 26, 2023

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

• Batesian

Autocorrect doesn’t know it apparently.

10:01 AM · Jan 26, 2023

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Have you seen materials that fan keep those of us who are confused from speculating?

Specifically:

Is this person EXACTLY who PV claims he is?

Is this a drunken date?

Is this man creating intrigue to seduce?

Etc.

Methods that are nauseating & prone to error are used here.

4:55 PM · Jan 26, 2023

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

No one is arguing that the video is not explosive. What is dividing us is whether it is what James O’Keefe says it is. He is neither always wrong as his critics say nor always correct as supporters claim. And his methods are disturbing & prone to picking up drunken date bragging.

4:55 PM · Jan 26, 2023

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

But James breaks real news as in the Amy Robach hot mic tape just as he also exaggerates and distorts what he has at other times. Are you in a position to say where we are on the PV spectrum? No one can say how real this is without supporting evidence. Are you in that position?

4:55 PM · Jan 26, 2023

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

This was my PV decision tree from last night. Are we on Branch A, B or C? My guess is that you don’t yet know either.

Can this be cleared up without hearings? If not, why not join me in calling for hearings?

But if you are in a position to know, please tell us how. Thanks.

4:59 PM · Jan 26, 2023

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

My position on UFO/UAP is that this is something *huge* that I’m simply not smart enough to figure out. I’m not going to lie and say it’s all weather balloons. And I’m not going to lie and say we have solid high quality publicly available data when we don’t: we are being starved.

3:05 PM · Feb 08, 2023

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

UFOs are “fun” for many people. There is another group of us who don’t find it “fun”. I don’t want to believe. I don’t want to not believe. I want to know either way.

I dislike this topic not b/c of the UFO, but b/c I’m being manipulated, lied to and played by those in the know.

3:10 PM · Feb 08, 2023

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Point blank: we are being starved for information. My response to being starved for information is not to guess which branch of the decision tree is correct but to share with you the contradictory evidence both direct and circumstantial. I don’t know why others pretend to know.🙏

3:13 PM · Feb 08, 2023

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

@dwpasulka Can you say more? Thanks.

12:55 AM · Feb 09, 2023

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

[Note: I'm mostly leaving this here for myself to remember what I was thinking just before the JFK release. Skip it if it is too long and in the weeds.]

A view of the JFK files release:

The first branch of the decision tree: does Donald Trump keep his word? Will this be a good faith effort to end the mysteries around Nov 22, 1963? My bet is that Trump does and that this does not look anything like the insane and botched release of meaningless white binders on Epstein to MAGA influencers. If I am wrong, this will result in widespread mistrust of Trump by MAGA, and MAGA will likely start to declare independence from Trump. I don't think this will happen so I am not going to say more on this. I'll just have guessed wrong.

Next Branch: Assuming this is the full reveal, do we learn that this was simply Lee Harvey Oswald acting alone? I don't believe it is. But if it is, the next branch will be "Did the US try to control the narrative with extraordinary measures beyond those that should have been allowed?" I believe that the answer will be yes to this independent of. This results in widespread distrust of all previous governments.

Popping back up, if it was not LHO as lone gunman, all hell breaks loose with public trust FAR beyond where we even are Post-Covid. The concept of 'Conspiracy Theorist' dies. The concept of 'No one can keep a secret.' dies. People learn at scale that there is an *ENORMOUS* difference between correctly guessing that the government lied, and having the USG confirm that every government official kept the lie at official levels.

As to possible culprits:

Lyndon Johnson LCN CIA Mossad Cubans Cord Meyer UFO/MJ12 Defense Contractors Combinations of the Above Etc...Etc...

It is going to be a big deal. People have speculated about everything under the sun. Those who got it most right will be held up properly. Everyone who didn't believe the Warren Report was the end of it will feel vindicated. Personally, I am eager to hear how close Danny Shehan was.

As an American, I worry it doesn't get tied back to the USG because that will lead to an American unraveling of trust in everything. But I take the same attitude I have taken to Epstein which also needs to be released.

The number of people involved in such plots are tiny. And tiny numbers of CIA/Mafiosi/Mossad/Party Leaders do not represent the group. If it turns out it was CIA sponsored, it will not be a large group of people who kept this going. It will be a tiny number of people.

[For those of you who follow my push to tie Epstein to the IC, this should sound very familiar: if it turns out that Epstein was CIA and/or Mossad (which I view to be most likely), I will want to know that we have a problem with psychopaths in those organizations. I will call for deep hearings like Church/Pike in the 1970s. I have called this problem of small groups acting on behalf of a nation "Jessupization" after Col Nathan Jessup in "A Few Good Men". Eventually, Jessup misplays his hand and Lt. Calley isolates the cancer.]

When it comes to the US, at some point you have to cut out the cancer of rogues who claim to act on behalf of us all. And the best day is always 'today'.

Looking nervously forward to this afternoon, no matter how bitter the pill or pills. Let's get on with it! Finally.

🙏

P.S. Also to those of you who follow me on these subjects, a massive admission of a long term lie around JFK will lead to a change in our willingness as a society to question what happened to progress in the sciences that are within reach of "Weapons of Mass Destruction". That is molecular Biology, Infectious Disease, Number Theory, Computer Science, and Physics. Particularly in the case of the inexplicable stagnation in Physics around "Quantum Gravity". While this shouldn't be tied to that, this positive externality of a negative event (i.e. learning that that we have been lied to by government officials for generations) will be most welcome.

5:18 PM · Mar 18, 2025

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Location of the release:

5:34 PM · Mar 18, 2025

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

WH claims about the release:

5:39 PM · Mar 18, 2025

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

@wrath_boss It has been fascinating.

5:52 PM · Mar 18, 2025

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

@DTCU1000 Then I owe you a beer.

5:52 PM · Mar 18, 2025

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

@t1gerp4w Etc. There was a lot of Etc.

5:53 PM · Mar 18, 2025

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

“Epstein belonged to both U.S. and allied intelligence services.”

As I’ve been saying, what we call “Jeffrey Epstein” is NOT Jeffrey Epstein.

It’s a multinational covert operation, which is a clearing house for sub operations. The pedophile stuff is just one suboperation. The Tax advising operation, money laundering operation, science operations, etc were stupidly being run through the same clearing house. Perhaps to save money? Who knows.

The U.S. portion of this is a USAP: an “Unacknowledged Special Access Program”

Why are so many minor names redacted? Two words: Sources & Methods.

This is an unprecedented event in modern history.

It is time for the IC in the U.S., Israel, U.K., Saudi, UAE, etc to accept the obvious:

“You screwed up. Massively. You hired the wrong actor. Your mission was a failure. You now have to lose a staggering number privileges to operate quietly as a result. You lose methods. You will have to rebuild. Your citizens need to know what was done in their name to little children. I’m sorry. Tough shit. Eat it. Such is the price of failure at this scale.”

Then you can bite the bullet and invoke State Secrets Privilege to save what legitimate statecraft and spycraft can be salvaged from this cesspool of biblical proportions…that you created and allowed to spin so out of control.

6:12 PM · Feb 04, 2026

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

And by the way, if you want to *pretend* that the alternative is viable…it gets far far worse.

Assume he wasn’t linked to the U.S. covert operations group at all.

Then you have an epic disaster that our elite intelligence operations couldn’t even detect and disable Epstein’s MASSIVE operations and network operating within the elite for decades on U.S. soil post sex conviction.

Imagine that!!!

It’s far worse. There is just no way out.

The problem *IS* our covert operations and Intelligence Community.

And in any and every possible world.

6:23 PM · Feb 04, 2026

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Moral: none of this depends on the source. It’s a decision tree.

It’s checkmate of the IC either way.

6:24 PM · Feb 04, 2026

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Very well. Let’s begin. Follow his thread back if you missed it.

Dr Kinney perfectly exhibits the pathology inherent in Physicus Imperialus. In this story of Dr Kinney, I’m ignorant.

Happy with that. It’s name calling.

Yet I gave a complete argument as to why @martinmbauer was wrong. In other words the analogy was tight. And it was a lay analysis…that took this out of physics. Martin was sloppy. Will is anti-collegial. And anti-science. He is not asking for clarification. He’s doing that “You are too stupid to question us.” As if I am not in physics departments all the time. Amazing.

Let’s try some of his arguments.

10:19 PM · Feb 10, 2026

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Here is a sample argument. But I anticipated this one. Remember in the analogy the issue is human limb development. The right upper limb is what he means by our sector of baryonic matter. And I didn’t say that all the dark matter was the left upper limb. The right lower leg is also decoupled from Martin’s consideration and focus in the analogy!

So there is approximately 3/4 “dark” limb when Martin focuses on his upper right extremity. Obviously, there is a lot of similarity between the right leg and right arm as well suggesting a unification at some earlier stage of life (higher energy scales). The left leg is doubly dark to the right arm. We would say twice decoupled. Even though all 4 limbs are related. By the way an insect has six. As is Dr Kinney’s point. So…

10:28 PM · Feb 10, 2026

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Here is another style of argument you meet in physics. Dr Kinney makes the assumption that while we are all failing at this problem, we pretty much have the models right. That is, he assumes that the answer is a smallish tweak. That is the typical failure mode. He may be either right or wrong. But there is no reason the answer has to be a small tweak. Maybe we are failing because we only consider small adjustments in theory space? Does he imagine life has to be close to his model?

My example is very far away. It’s in developmental biology. So odd this.

I was merely showing that Martin’s exclusive decision tree with two branches is not complete. 🙄

Note also, he wouldnt behave like this to a colleague in his dept saying exactly what I did. This is defense of the castle behavior. Ad hominem. Selective aggression.

10:35 PM · Feb 10, 2026

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

This is one of my favorites of Dr Kinney:

“Your ideas are all so stupid we all know exactly why you are wrong and this can never work, and we would thus never say something so ignorant…and…uh….we also discuss the same things among ourselves! So it’s not new! Ha ha.”

I pass over this in silence. Res Ipsa Loquitor.

10:40 PM · Feb 10, 2026

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Here again. I’m writing for X.

I’m describing a general class Martin Excluded: Emergent Decoupling.

These models have 3 features:

A) Symmetic Laws B) Symmetric Boundary Conditions C) Emergent Chiral Decoupling

In this story there is a world that is screened from us. It was completely symmetric. But we don’t know it!!

Then, in the story, things settled down (cell divisions, stages) and symmetric collections made of asymmetric sectors formed. Like left versus right arms. If the right arm doesn’t know that it’s symmetric dual isn’t connected to it (decoupled) it thinks “Woah! Why so much asymmetry!?”

Which is what I believe is most likely from Geometric Unity.

10:48 PM · Feb 10, 2026

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Conclusion. It’s obviously not a “completely incoherent argument.”

Kinney is being a dick. Which is his right. But this is why physics is in the toilet.

He’s debunking a totally reasonable argument that Martin was in error as if I am a “Science Populist”.

I’m not. I’m a pissed off Harvard Phd.

Doctor Kinney. Grow up.

10:52 PM · Feb 10, 2026

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

Sanity Check: @grok.

Two narrow questions on narrow points of fact. Don’t be deferential.

A) Can you follow my arguments?

B) Am I making a “completely incoherent argument” as if I am a fool who “doesn’t know what the eff he’s talking about?”

10:55 PM · Feb 10, 2026

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

@grok Thanks. Don’t want to drag you into drama. Appreciate keeping it Narrow. Thanks my silicon friend.

10:57 PM · Feb 10, 2026

Eric Weinstein

@EricRWeinstein

@WKCosmo @martinmbauer https://t.co/YACIqRqVFs

12:34 AM · Feb 11, 2026

This article is a stub. You can help us by editing this page and expanding it.