Peer Review: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:05, 2 March 2020

Peer review is a relatively new form of gate-keeping used by the [[Distributed Idea Suppression Complex ]] to suppress ideas. It functions to keep out bad ideas and amplify good ideas. Like any human process, it fails in its function at times. It sometimes amplifies bad ideas such as those exposed by the Grievance Studies Hoax. It sometimes suppresses important ideas such as those discussed in Episode 19.

Criticisms of the peer-review crisis include the ad hominem nature of the review, the appeal to authority, the selection bias, the confirmation bias and the replication crisis.

This article is a stub. You can help us by editing this page and expanding it.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Peer review is a relatively new form of [[gate-keeping]] used by the [[D.I.S.C.]] to suppress ideas. It functions to keep out bad ideas and amplify good ideas. Like any human process, it fails in its function at times. It sometimes amplifies bad ideas such as those exposed by the [[Grievance Studies Hoax]]. It sometimes suppresses important ideas such as those discussed in [[Episode 19]].
+Peer review is a relatively new form of [[gate-keeping]] used by the [[Distributed Idea Suppression Complex
+]] to suppress ideas. It functions to keep out bad ideas and amplify good ideas. Like any human process, it fails in its function at times. It sometimes amplifies bad ideas such as those exposed by the [[Grievance Studies Hoax]]. It sometimes suppresses important ideas such as those discussed in [[Episode 19]].
 Criticisms of the peer-review crisis include the [[ad hominem]] nature of the review, the [[appeal to authority]], the [[selection bias]], the [[confirmation bias]] and the [[replication crisis]].
 {{stub}}