Conspiracy Theories: Difference between revisions

Him: You're not a conspiracy theorist are you? Me: After Tuskegee, Mk-ultra, Iran-Contra, etc. all smart people are. Why? Do I look stupid?

8:32 PM · Feb 23, 2016

I've been following @Cernovich & @StefanMolyneux on Hilary's health. JFK & FDR proved POTUS health conspiracy theories can be true. Nice job

8:50 PM · Sep 11, 2016

1/ The invisible world is first detected in the visible world's failure to close. [For @naval @johndurant @pmarca et al. A tweet storm try.]

3:23 AM · Sep 21, 2016

2/ In physics we have conservation laws. We found the light/invisible neutrino because decay in heavy/visible particles violated these rules

3:27 AM · Sep 21, 2016

3/ Likewise in biology we proved the germ thy of pathogens vs theories like spontaneous generation/miasma by visible effects at macro scale.

3:31 AM · Sep 21, 2016

4/ I used 'failure to close' to deduce from 1st principles that the NSF must have done a secret study in '85-6 on how to *lower* sci. wages.

3:35 AM · Sep 21, 2016

5/ This was b/c the incompetent 'shortfall studies' that got NSF in trouble would have lead to different visa laws than those that passed.

3:40 AM · Sep 21, 2016

6/ I was shocked when a highly competent "smoking gun" study hidden in '86 showed up exactly where my thy predicted: https://t.co/VZvmupRFon

3:44 AM · Sep 21, 2016

7/ This is the secret history of H1-B. The @NSF secretly studied how to interfere w/ US labor market 2 avoid paying scientists market wages.

3:47 AM · Sep 21, 2016

8/ Rules: I) Look for a macro system failing to close. II) *Don't* posit a detailed explanation. III) Posit a 'neutrino' place holder & dig.

3:55 AM · Sep 21, 2016

9/ HW: A) Why don't top OEMs sell laptops w/ lens covers, mic kill switches & hardwired video LEDs offering security to gain mkt advantage?

4:01 AM · Sep 21, 2016

10/ How do you get 9 figures of wealth doing charity work & public speaking without selling, inventing, founding or investing brilliantly?

4:03 AM · Sep 21, 2016

11/ C) Why were Bernie's massive rallies often not covered @ NYT & why did a positive Bernie article go neg after massive linking from web?

4:08 AM · Sep 21, 2016

12/ D) Why do laboratory bred mice used for drug testing have extra long telomeres (allowing radical tissue repair) compared to wild type?

4:10 AM · Sep 21, 2016

13/ I could go on. I don't know which are nefarious. I'm a different kind of conspiracy guy. I *don't* have answers but know where I'd dig.

4:14 AM · Sep 21, 2016

14/14. Thank you for your time. Feel free 2 attack. But remember, I've been here before just as w @NSF...before digging up their smoking gun

4:18 AM · Sep 21, 2016

2017Edit

Everyone currently entertaining the idea that Putin's and Russian intelligence may be controlling the US future *is* a conspiracy theorist.

3:21 AM · Jan 11, 2017

Russell Conjugation Exercise:

I'm alarmed by Putin's interference. You're flirting with conspiracy theory. He's a nutter in a tin foil hat.

3:52 AM · Jan 11, 2017

@bardia_95 Less than we both might hope. If only you were more correct... #sictransitgloriamundi

4:11 AM · Jan 11, 2017

@MattChisman Of course. Nothing wrong with a good solid adult conspiracy theory. Right?

4:12 AM · Jan 11, 2017

@ToddDoug Who said anything like that?! Don't be silly! I'm just pointing out that we are all conspiracy theorists. It's not an insult...

4:19 AM · Jan 11, 2017

@chaos_sonata You are raising an excellent point. Unfortunately it is also subtle. Not sure twitter and 140c is our friend here.

4:34 AM · Jan 11, 2017

@MattChisman @Decoherent_ @ToddDoug I'm trying to get us all to stop demonizing in others the conspiracy theorizing we must do ourselves.

5:39 AM · Jan 11, 2017

@uniquehoge @MattChisman @Decoherent_ @ToddDoug Just be reasonable. Conspiracies are everywhere, but usually small & hard to figure out.

6:00 AM · Jan 11, 2017

@mathiasverraes Exactly! We are all conspiracy theorists. That was my point. Well done.

5:11 AM · Jan 11, 2017

Odd. My paper on NSF conspiracy behind the 1990 immigration act has been hosted at NBER since '98. Until just now... https://t.co/xzG26ATBgM

1:11 AM · Feb 07, 2017

I see. When lifelong Democratic voters point out Clinton rigging the primary, we’re alt-right conspiracy nut bros. But when...oh nevermind. https://t.co/rctmRWW6qy

12:51 AM · Nov 03, 2017

Just listened to my friend @SamHarrisOrg w/ @RadioFreeTom.

I was unexpectedly bewildered. Given the right forum, it would be an honor & privilege to steelman the substantive case against experts & their institutions into coastal-friendly PhD-style expert terminology & language. https://t.co/qVf4udNnco

1:46 AM · Dec 16, 2017

@RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg First of all, nice to meet you Tom.

I’m concerned that many of those rejecting the highly trained, experienced & credentialed are trying to send a cogent & reasonable message that can be strawmanned because they don’t speak the language of the academy. I think we can translate.

2:08 AM · Dec 16, 2017

@RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg 1/ Great. It sounds like we agree on a lot. Let’s agree we shouldn’t attack real expertise or fetishize the simple wisdom of laypeople in expert matters. What I think is happening is that lay people are catching on that they are being priced out of the market for expert loyalty.

4:59 AM · Dec 16, 2017

@RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg 2/ I think most lay people believe in experts...and the new words for expert are personal, private, etc. They believe experts are now private doctors. Personal chefs. Private pilots. Private police and fire depts. So there’s awareness, but no loss of confidence in experts.

5:07 AM · Dec 16, 2017

@RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg 3/ This then leads to the public experts & intellectuals. Here laypeople are increasingly conscious of real games played in back rooms & razzledazzle at the podium. This is the realm of the Esoteric/Exoteric experts w public theories for the out-group & real ones for insiders.

5:13 AM · Dec 16, 2017

@RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg 5/ If I take what I saw as the big three trust breakers in the 2016 election:

I) Free Trade
II) immigration
III) Terror

Each was defended by experts to the public by a suite of out and out lies that were maddeningly self evident. As if outsiders and morons were the same thing.

5:24 AM · Dec 16, 2017

@RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg 6/ In all three cases there was essentially a reality embargo to the public by expert cartels. Krugman called the case for freer trade an elite scam. The Immigration act of 1990 *actually* involved an expert conspiracy to promote a fictitious “STEM shortage” to lower tech wages.

5:38 AM · Dec 16, 2017

@RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg /End And in the case of terror, it was so weird that politicians would look for any motive except *religion* for some reason that must be from some policy. The level of fiction given to the public was beyond insulting. It was outright derision & contempt. And the derided saw it.

5:43 AM · Dec 16, 2017

@RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg Okay. I'm claiming that if we put the adjective 'private' in front of nouns associated w expertise (physician --> private physician, school --> private school, etc.) you'll find lay people believing it represents real expertise & thus an unfair advantage. They believe in experts.

4:04 PM · Dec 16, 2017

@RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg What they intuitively don't believe in as much are their experts: ones they pay for/elect (H&R Bloch, their HMO, their senator etc..) or the ones provided for them (news analysts, columnists, public intellectuals). And this distrust is about expert loyalty, not expertise itself.

4:23 PM · Dec 16, 2017

@RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg Nah. It’s about institutional betrayal. Nobody resents Elon Musk or Tony Stark for wealth. The poor want experts.

And I’m just looking to you & Sam as my fellow experts to help me try to stop those betrayed from sending a wrecking-ball through the infrastructure of our world.

8:45 PM · Dec 16, 2017

@RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg Oh cool. “Institutional Betrayal” is an academic theory for trauma differentiation of @jjforegon. You in particular should find it interesting I think. People betrayed by institutions with mandates to care for them behave differently re trauma.

Helps to explain a lot in 2008-17.

8:56 PM · Dec 16, 2017

@RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg Also, the public that is HIGH agency is looking for alternate non-institutional experts: @nntaleb @BretWeinstein @jordanbpeterson @CHSommers @SamHarrisOrg @HeatherEHeying @PiaMalaney @peterthiel @DouglasKMurray @Raheelraza @tristanharris @sparker etc....

9:04 PM · Dec 16, 2017

@nntaleb @RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg @BretWeinstein @jordanbpeterson @CHSommers @HeatherEHeying @PiaMalaney @peterthiel @DouglasKMurray @Raheelraza @tristanharris @sparker Hi Nassim, With 66 dyadic relationships between 12 individuals there was zero implied pairwise mutual endorsement or respect implied. I’m certainly happy to make that explicit here for the record if that wasn’t clear.

9:32 PM · Dec 17, 2017

@nntaleb @RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg @BretWeinstein @jordanbpeterson @CHSommers @HeatherEHeying @PiaMalaney @peterthiel @DouglasKMurray @Raheelraza @tristanharris @sparker Will read. Thanks!

9:35 PM · Dec 17, 2017

Great. Let's do this then as I'm can play as an expert too: Harvard PhD. MIT/Harvard/NBER Post-Docs. Sloan Funded. NSF-Fellowship. Etc...

I'm sorry to tell you, *we* the experts have been lying to Laypeople on Trade, Immigration, STEM and Terror. The crumbling embargo was real. https://x.com/RadioFreeTom/status/941911773376139264

4:46 PM · Dec 16, 2017

1/ I was in multiple closed rooms where experts told me over and over "Well of course we can never say that to the public/donors/students/patients/voters." Cambridge MA, Washington D.C., New York. And now, San Francisco too where it hit quite a few years later.

5:11 PM · Dec 16, 2017

2/ Let me tell you what we've been lying about (in elite terminology) on MAJOR issues one by one: immigration, trade, STEM, mortgage backed securities and self-regulation, terror, fake news and conspiracy. [I will need to run a few errands now, but will return here later today.]

5:19 PM · Dec 16, 2017

3/ IMMIGRATION: EXPERT LIES Experts lie about work based immigration as needed for free markets to remove a tiny 'Harberger Triangle' of inefficiency. It is the reverse: an uncompensated taking of citizen's rights without securitization to transfer a massive 'Borjas Rectangle'.

7:44 PM · Dec 16, 2017

4/ IMMIGRATION (CONTINUED). In free markets, citizens TRADE their rights of preferential labor market access a la Coase's theorem. The giant Borjas Rectangle would stay w/ labor. Inequality could reverse. Women/minorities would enter. Income might again rise. Foreigners welcomed.

7:49 PM · Dec 16, 2017

5/ IMMIGRATION (CONTINUED). Here is an expert article I wrote on the subject (peer reviewed, UN sponsored Journal): https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_protect/@protrav/@migrant/documents/publication/wcms_201871.pdf

Of course the expert community pretends it isn't there as they support a wealth transfer through forced takings of workers' livelihoods.

7:54 PM · Dec 16, 2017

6/ TRADE: EXPERT LIES. In the theory of trade, lies are deeply layered. First there is a nonsensical emphasis on Pareto improvement (as if that was a meaningful social welfare function) & a denial of cardinal utility to stop diminishing returns arguments being applied to wealth.

8:00 PM · Dec 16, 2017

7/ TRADE (continued): [ for @RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg ] Then we substitute a Kaldor-Hicks standard for Pareto welfare as if we were going to tax winners to pay losers. Which trade economists laugh about. Because what factory worker ever heard of “unimplemeted Kaldor-Hicks”.

8:10 PM · Dec 16, 2017

8/ As the grandson of a seamstress, a door2door used clothing salesman, a self educated chemist thrown out of work for his politics and a female college grad who couldn’t work in a man’s world, it feels great to stand as a STEM PhD speaking the language of the academy for them.

8:18 PM · Dec 16, 2017

@SamHarrisOrg @RadioFreeTom 9/TRADE (CONT.): Then there‘s the appearance of “Comparative Advantage” which was recently revealed as an iron clad Exoteric explanation trade experts give to all but each other because the real Esoteric is “too complex” for the rest of us & has holes.

8:29 PM · Dec 16, 2017

@LibertyRBlack The seamstress and the Shmata salesman.

8:33 PM · Dec 16, 2017

@RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg Nah. It’s about institutional betrayal. Nobody resents Elon Musk or Tony Stark for wealth. The poor want experts.

And I’m just looking to you & Sam as my fellow experts to help me try to stop those betrayed from sending a wrecking-ball through the infrastructure of our world.

8:45 PM · Dec 16, 2017

@RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg Oh cool. “Institutional Betrayal” is an academic theory for trauma differentiation of @jjforegon. You in particular should find it interesting I think. People betrayed by institutions with mandates to care for them behave differently re trauma.

Helps to explain a lot in 2008-17.

8:56 PM · Dec 16, 2017

@RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg Also, the public that is HIGH agency is looking for alternate non-institutional experts: @nntaleb @BretWeinstein @jordanbpeterson @CHSommers @SamHarrisOrg @HeatherEHeying @PiaMalaney @peterthiel @DouglasKMurray @Raheelraza @tristanharris @sparker etc....

9:04 PM · Dec 16, 2017

@RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg

These are from trade theorist @paulkrugman in his “Protectionist Moment” piece. I’m not trying to win here. I’m worried that you aren’t watching how this neo-liberal edifice is being abandoned because the expert’s public stance was a lie.

9:22 PM · Dec 16, 2017

@GodDoesnt @RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg @paulkrugman That doesn’t solve it. Are the Harvard and UChicago Econ departments elite or expert? National Academy complex? Same question. NPR? CFR?

Where are the non-elite experts? They are off the institutional grid. They were disappeared. They don’t exist. Yet they are my Shabbat guests.

9:32 PM · Dec 16, 2017

@GodDoesnt @RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg @paulkrugman Same here. All I’m saying is the institutional elites compromise their institutional experts. Every day, institutional experts are free to speak against their institution’s bias. It’s the next day when survivor bias kicks in. Now repeat across non-financially independent experts.

9:40 PM · Dec 16, 2017

@fazinga They are typically educated at top universities. They are typically in non-standard employment. I frequently don’t like what they are saying as it is often disturbing.

9:42 PM · Dec 16, 2017

@SamHarrisOrg @RadioFreeTom 10/TRADE (CONT.) Look at the slide & listen to this talk from a former Clinton administration economist. Notice the words 'Esoteric' vs. 'Exoteric'. Claiming the real arguments are too complex to math guys like me is laughable:

10:14 PM · Dec 16, 2017

11/ TRADE (CONT.) Now what happened when @PiaMalaney, a Harvard PhD Economist finally got to explain to the 'experts' why the world is rejecting experts, and in their own professional language? She's *totally* ignored by the panel.

As if nothing happened.

10:26 PM · Dec 16, 2017

@SamHarrisOrg @RadioFreeTom

12/ End.

I'll pause here. But there's an entire world of Ivy-Level experts who the public suspects exist. People who have paid for their integrity with their careers. Either undisappear these good folks ... or prepare for 7 more years of Trump.

10:30 PM · Dec 16, 2017

@disitinerant @GodDoesnt @RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg @paulkrugman Accurate.

1:27 AM · Dec 17, 2017

@GodDoesnt @disitinerant @RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg @paulkrugman Nah. Just more systems of selective pressures ...

1:29 AM · Dec 17, 2017

@RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg @paulkrugman What are your thoughts here @RadioFreeTom? I can go into detail on a number of these. We could do the fake STEM shortage backed by the @NSF and @theNASciences if you don’t believe in such things.

5:42 PM · Dec 17, 2017

@RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg @paulkrugman @NSF @theNASciences Do we disagree on fundamentals over this:

6:05 PM · Dec 17, 2017

@RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg @paulkrugman @NSF @theNASciences And, no I don’t call something a conspiracy because I disagree w/ experts. I usually agree w/ them! What I disageee with is using expertise to transfer wealth & agency from the supposedly childlike voters who intuit something is rigged but can’t name it in political 3 card Monty.

6:11 PM · Dec 17, 2017

@nntaleb @RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg @BretWeinstein @jordanbpeterson @CHSommers @HeatherEHeying @PiaMalaney @peterthiel @DouglasKMurray @Raheelraza @tristanharris @sparker Hi Nassim, With 66 dyadic relationships between 12 individuals there was zero implied pairwise mutual endorsement or respect implied. I’m certainly happy to make that explicit here for the record if that wasn’t clear.

9:32 PM · Dec 17, 2017

@nntaleb @RadioFreeTom @SamHarrisOrg @BretWeinstein @jordanbpeterson @CHSommers @HeatherEHeying @PiaMalaney @peterthiel @DouglasKMurray @Raheelraza @tristanharris @sparker Will read. Thanks!

9:35 PM · Dec 17, 2017

https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_protect/@protrav/@migrant/documents/publication/wcms_201871.pdf

@Noahpinion So if we push out supply curves there is no first order depressing effect on price...except that maybe it rises? Man this is big. Like Nobel Big!

I mean...I did use supply and demand curves of Borjas. So...What did I get wrong? Do I need to retract:

5:10 PM · Dec 18, 2017

The mistake, IMO, is in modeling immigration purely as a shift in labor supply (partial equilibrium). Since immigrants buy stuff locally, immigration also causes a rightward shift in labor *demand* (general equilibrium).

5:28 PM · Dec 18, 2017

Hence my use of the term '1st-order' (partial equilibrium). A full model would go well beyond what you write including social services, chain migration, dependency ratios, negative externalities, concentrated impact, vote dilution, patent production, sending country impact, etc..

6:08 PM · Dec 18, 2017

A big game in economics is often who gets to use simple models & who gets forced into adding a million baroque complexities. I agree that immigrants add to demand. Also tax social services. Also pay taxes. Also send remittances. Also found businesses. Also crowd out natives. etc.

6:12 PM · Dec 18, 2017

Perhaps you were so busy reacting to the name Borjas that you missed the point of introducing Coase. Coase allows those many nth order effects to be subsumed in the choices of those impacted both positively & negatively. Hence the ability to have unlimited migration. Re-read it.

6:15 PM · Dec 18, 2017

Let's not play games. The unpopular transfer from L to K by a forced taking of the rectangle without the securitization of labor's valuable asymmetric rights and workers rights to trade them stands as an issue having nothing to do with your attack on Borjas.

Your move.

6:19 PM · Dec 18, 2017

Yes, the key is that immigration causes labor demand, as well as labor supply, to shift to the right.

That's going to shrink that rectangle a lot, and could even make the rectangle positive for native-born workers rather than negative.

6:24 PM · Dec 18, 2017

Just to show this with an easy thought experiment, imagine a bunch of rich retirees moved here and spent down their savings. That would shift ONLY labor demand, and not labor supply, unambiguously boosting wages for native-born workers.

6:29 PM · Dec 18, 2017

Now, working immigrants are not rich retirees. But you can apply the same principle. Working immigrants supply labor, but they also demand goods and services produced by labor. So both curves shift, not just one.

6:30 PM · Dec 18, 2017

Tim Bartik

@TimBartik

Also, because immigration causes shift in demand for capital goods, such as housing, in the short-run and medium run there are "accelerator" effects that temporarily boost labor demand even further. See JMP by Greg Howard: https://economics.mit.edu/files/13670

6:36 PM · Dec 18, 2017

Very true, but Eric wanted to stick to the simplest possible model, and I'm obliging him! :-)

6:38 PM · Dec 18, 2017

Look again at my paper and you will see something very odd from a mathematician: there are no equations. That came from reviewing this style of argument you are engaging in now. The point isn't this or that effect. It is forced transfers by capital vs voluntary trade with labor.

7:06 PM · Dec 18, 2017

Remember, Eric, I'm not talking equations! I'm only talking about your graphs! 😊

6:38 PM · Dec 18, 2017

So put in a moving demand curve or even negative rectangles or other red herrings.

The issue is choice. Our work based immigration programs are loved by employers and generally resented by those on whom they are imposed because they involve an unpopular and unsecuritized taking.

7:14 PM · Dec 18, 2017

Sure! No disagreement about that. I'm only taking issue with the idea that immigration can be modeled as a labor supply shock with no labor demand shock! We must include both.

7:16 PM · Dec 18, 2017

No one is arguing that in a full model. The issue isn't about immigrants either. It is about forcible non-Coasian taking of rights through law by employers without trade or consent of labor aided by economics 'experts' portrayed falsely under the banner of free markets.

7:20 PM · Dec 18, 2017

What if my company hires entry-level native-born workers? Seems like a similar situation. The only difference is citizenship.

7:22 PM · Dec 18, 2017

Noah, I'm just really not sure what game you're playing. Economists add (e.g. "your model forgot this externality!") and subtract effects (e.g. "for simplicity we neglect"). None of this matters to my paper or point. None of it. My point is expert aided non-consensual transfers.

7:29 PM · Dec 18, 2017

No games, Eric. Nothing complicated.

Just Econ 101.

7:30 PM · Dec 18, 2017

You're not even close. In econ 101, agents are rational. Remember? If workers benefit from immigration they will support it in droves. Right?

Let me guess, we have to add baroque adjustments to rationality to explain this self-defeating rejection of mass immigration? Something?

7:34 PM · Dec 18, 2017

Baroque adjustments?

Is "immigrants buy stuff" a baroque adjustment?

If so, just call me J.S. Bach!

7:46 PM · Dec 18, 2017

@Noahpinion @TimBartik Oh wow! That's what I *love* about economists: a total reliance on ad hoc selective application of standards to reach desired conclusions.

This is fun. Please apply that selective standard evenly to all of Econ 101 and let's watch your *entire* field disintegrate.

I'll wait.

7:43 PM · Dec 18, 2017

Ha! I'm trying Noah. But it's hard to Teleman something when his econ job depends on his not understanding it, no?

Now engage with the point. Why are the rational worker agents from Econ 101 not favoring this mass immigration that enriches them? Is this Econ 101 or Room 101?

7:50 PM · Dec 18, 2017

Well, I don't have polls of rational worker agents specifically, but just today I did write a post showing several polls indicating pro-immigrant sentiment in the United States: https://bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-12-18/anti-immigration-fervor-is-different-this-time

7:56 PM · Dec 18, 2017

In other words, I'm not Haydn anything. Can you Handel the data? :D

7:58 PM · Dec 18, 2017

https://politico.com/f/?id=0000015d-c4ac-dd39-a75d-cfbfbc3e0002

Wait, don't those swings *undermine* your Econ 101 point? The power of the Purcell getcha every time. See attached from:

Noah, I answered all your points substantively. Nothing depended on Partial v General or demand curve modeling. It's about capture. https://t.co/poJztJTjOz

8:44 PM · Dec 18, 2017

It's not about polls. It's not about Partial vs General equlibrium models. Not about Econ 101. It's about taking something valuable almost no one would give by choice by having experts defend the interests of employers with selective modeling.

8:47 PM · Dec 18, 2017

A) I'm concerned not with the interests of employers, but with the national interests of the United States of America and its economic health. B) I don't rely on selective modeling, but on empirical evidence, which I believe supports my position pretty solidly!!

8:50 PM · Dec 18, 2017

Noah, I answered every point. You are both for & against Econ 101 while I have no investment in it. If you want to forcibly transfer rights instead of letting workers trade them, ask yourself who you are really trying to benefit.

I'm trying to open borders too, but not as theft.

9:13 PM · Dec 18, 2017

If you want to write a paper detailing my failures, it will be an honor to review it fairly. But it had ZERO dependence on any of the points you made. Including demand curves. Be well.

9:14 PM · Dec 18, 2017

I will consider it. More likely a blog post. In any case, I hope you realize that the vast majority of immigration advocates in the econ profession are being intellectually honest, and not lying to anyone!

Take care, Eric!

9:21 PM · Dec 18, 2017

@Noahpinion @TimBartik If you're honest, then stop w/ the red herrings on Demand Curve modeling as my point is TOTALLY agnostic to that. You write that my paper "Is a good idea that deserves much more thought!" Okay. Don't tell me. Show me a lack of capture. Put in demand curve shocks. NOTHING changes. https://t.co/n8s40niyuf

9:32 PM · Dec 18, 2017

2018Edit

https://t.co/VjYwcTSveH https://t.co/TY8OtyJyKO

I don’t mind @Noahpinion making this wrong argument as a neo-liberal political activist. Just not as an economist, an expert, or an academician.

Because he‘s certainly aware that this hasn’t been a free lunch. It’s designed as cryptic wealth transfer:

5:55 AM · May 29, 2018

@Noahpinion You are actually playing stupid? That’s mind blowing. You should be well aware that the NAS who you cited is the CENTER of the market manipulation. That is, you are citing the bad actor as impartial judge! Who do you think is behind the collusion Noah??

It’s NAS. Read my paper.

6:02 AM · May 29, 2018

@Noahpinion Woah. Am I supposed to be afraid of the @theNASciences?? And social scientists? I quake in my boots.

Sit down my son. The NAS has invited me on at least four occasions to explain this ‘conspiracy’ to them. They have thanked me for it, paid my expenses, & never challenged it.

6:19 AM · May 29, 2018

@Noahpinion No one is buying? Other than the NAS itself who bought it when they invited me and gave me a standing Ovation. Then invited me to their COSEPUP committee and reacted in horror. Then invited me back to address their GUIRR committee. Etc...

So the NAS bought it. But do keep going.

6:29 AM · May 29, 2018

@Noahpinion Not following you into another meaningless briar patch. You can contend with my paper. I’ll wait.

6:32 AM · May 29, 2018

@bkr114895 @Noahpinion Who deleted what tweet?? I didn’t see it.

7:20 AM · May 29, 2018

2019Edit

No mainstream outlet has properly covered this story in 25 years. Every big paper has asked about it. Yet every story is always spiked by an editor. It just sits there in full view of the entire press core.

It is what proved to me that there is no actual newspaper in America.

4:48 AM · Jan 25, 2019

Let me remind you what the National Science Foundation / National Academy were really up to w/ high skilled immigration. But let’s do it in their own words from their own secret study which they hid from the public. It was about tampering w/ free markets to hobble US scientists. https://t.co/uZOTApkeHi

4:48 AM · Jan 25, 2019

@KevinYen I don’t know. Many reporters have gone fairly far. Then one day you get the call: “Uh, the story we were working on is dead.” Or “My editor says she loves it but says to hold off.” or “I was told the Optics are wrong for our paper.” Or some other weird thing. Always.

4:58 AM · Jan 25, 2019

@sirgutz https://t.co/Dn7SdovUSJ

4:59 AM · Jan 25, 2019

@SamEdwa61996553 Absolutely. Total conspiracy. Why? Do you believe conspiracies are all bullshit? I know too much settled history to play that game.

5:01 AM · Jan 25, 2019

@EvolutionistXX https://t.co/Dn7SdovUSJ

5:02 AM · Jan 25, 2019

@Crystal_cv512hg https://t.co/Dn7SdovUSJ

5:02 AM · Jan 25, 2019

@EstherOfReilly https://t.co/Dn7SdovUSJ

5:03 AM · Jan 25, 2019

@Aceinmysleeve1 You are the winner!

5:03 AM · Jan 25, 2019

@nedjeffery It doesn’t do any good on Twitter. The Gated Institutional Narrative is where the policy action is. They are the ones who pretend it doesn’t exist because they know it’s true.

5:06 AM · Jan 25, 2019

@EvolutionistXX Sure thing.

5:06 AM · Jan 25, 2019

@StevenWallman @eiaine That’s what birthed H1B.

5:07 AM · Jan 25, 2019

@Turin_Luca https://t.co/Dn7SdovUSJ

5:26 AM · Jan 25, 2019

@youBUOY @Aceinmysleeve1 Bien sur! Sorry.

5:32 AM · Jan 25, 2019

@Turin_Luca Of course.

5:34 AM · Jan 25, 2019

@MAWalke12024508 @KMGVictoria I want to know what stops this story.

6:14 AM · Jan 25, 2019

@TreiberS It’s one hell of a rabbit hole. Yes, senior scientists and employers destroyed the career path for their younger colleagues. That was the shocker. It was the NSF/NAS.

7:18 AM · Jan 25, 2019

@csgrandfield Sure. But don’t stop there. Why not flood 10% of our occupations for the benefit of the other 90%? We could play “labor roulette” to choose who loses.

5:18 PM · Jan 25, 2019

If you‘re coming to see Sam Harris & me in Milwaukee, Chicago or Detroit, where do you see us most in disagreement?

Here’s what I see:

Sam is more pro-expert, anti-conspiracy, anti-populist, anti-religion, pro-reason, anti-tribal, anti-advertising.

Where should we hash it out?

11:06 PM · Jan 26, 2019

I just tried posting @zerohedge's story about @facebook banning the well known financially heterodox @zerohedge.

I figured that this was insane. Facebook bans Zerohedge?

C'mon.

Ladies and Gentleman, Zerohedge was correct: the posts are 'spam' according to Facebook.

Stunned.

2:17 AM · Mar 12, 2019

Get ready for new & improved 2020 US elections. This time, you will be able to share more TrustedNews from AuthoritativeSources w/o having your user experience degraded by spam, conspiracy theories, or harmful thoughts.

If you miss heterodoxy, try this:

2:17 AM · Mar 12, 2019

In case you‘re not following this at the moment, there‘s *suddenly* a slew of smears, accusations, conspiracy theories, rumors & lies exploding against the non-institutional anti-alt-right who also just happen to be opposed to authoritarian social engineering. An amazing example:

5:40 PM · Mar 28, 2019

The conspiracy theorist community boasts many amazing people including @ErinBrockovich, @danielsheehan45, @carlbernstein, the Church Committee, Noam Chomsky, and the Citizens Committee to Investigate the FBI.

But conspirators insist it’s about Alex Jones. Geez. I wonder why...

12:54 AM · Apr 17, 2019

@Gent_Sausage @ErinBrockovich @danielsheehan45 @carlbernstein That’s crazy talk. 😜

12:59 AM · Apr 17, 2019

Think about this: the US has had a proven history of conspiring repeatedly against its own citizens and destroying lives. Our check against that tyranny is FREE SPEECH/PRESS including the freedom to discuss & test wild hypotheses that begin as...wait for it...conspiracy theories.

7:08 AM · May 03, 2019

When we ban people from spreading conspiracy theories we can no longer discuss conspiracies.

In 2017, I spread a conspiracy story.

Q: Should I be deplatformed for alleging that the US has a proven ability to destroy lawful US citizens by planting fake news in mainstream media?

7:08 AM · May 03, 2019

Ending conspiracy theories means ending investigative journalism: no My Lai. It means banning Howard Zinn. Not discussing the McCollum memo. Not talking about the Dulles brothers / Kermit Roosevelt. Forgetting the untreated syphilis victims of Tuskegee.

Me to FB: Drop dead. /End

7:08 AM · May 03, 2019

Furthermore I will again spread my own researched conspiracy theory: the H-1b & the Immigration Act of 1990 were created from a conspiracy inside the @theNASciences & @nsf complex to target and betray our own STEM professionals on behalf of STEM employers: https://t.co/lYuY17MXy6

7:08 AM · May 03, 2019

Right now, EVERY major platform (@Google, @Apple, @facebook & @Twitter) both spreads and profits from hate, violence, misinformation and offensive speech. I will defend them in the same terms I defend all those they deplatformed pretending that they have a zero tolerance policy.

7:08 AM · May 03, 2019

P.S. In honor of FB's zero tolerance, I joined a pro-violence hate group on FaceBook. It has an ideology of supporting violence by Kurdish Women against ISIS, its hated target. Come join me and dare FaceBook to shut us down. We are called "Kurdish Freedom Fighters Against ISIS"

7:17 AM · May 03, 2019

@HarrisLemberg66 @theNASciences @NSF I didn't say they don't have the legal right to boot me off.

7:35 AM · May 03, 2019

@HarrisLemberg66 I don't contradict this in the thread.

7:45 AM · May 03, 2019

@Logos18609975 No one sane is anti-violence and anti-hate regardless of ideology. They just claim to be. They aren’t thinking about why a free society shouldn’t go around *selectively* shutting down access to voices even if they have the legal scope.

3:42 PM · May 03, 2019

My predictions for what happens next in the Epstein death:

A) Lots of low quality conspiracy theorizing followed by: B) A call for platforms to 'Do something!' to stop A). C) New 'reasons' why G Maxwell and L Wexner can't be made to fill in the details.

This is such bullshit.

1:49 AM · Aug 11, 2019

Consider the following, that now live in your head side by side:

A) Many conspiracies have been discovered & proven to exist (even elaborate, large & far fetched ones).

B) Mainstream media promotes conspiracy theories (e.g. Trump/Russia).

C) All unauthorized CTs are just nuts.

9:52 PM · Aug 18, 2019

You have to just laugh when you realize you’ve been programmed with obvious malware. If someone accused us of being a “conspiracy theorist”, most of us would scramble as fast as we could to assure anyone who would listen that we weren’t crazy.

Y’know, like Woodward & Bernstein..

9:57 PM · Aug 18, 2019

@justadakaje Only the Gated Institutional Narrative determines the difference between authorized and unauthorized.

10:34 PM · Aug 18, 2019

@ThomasHughson @joerogan Dick Gregory thinking the FBI was conspiring to have him killed? Does that work for you?

4:28 AM · Aug 19, 2019

Wait, what? This is a totally adorable 2019 tweet! Be sure to tell, @1971Film, @carlbernstein, @danielsheehan45, @HarryMarkopolos, @ErinBrockovich, etc. and let me know how you make out. But be sure to read all documents at: https://t.co/fG4j84kyIN first.

This *never* goes away.

4:34 PM · Aug 21, 2019

I would love to debate fellow IDW member @michaelshermer on responsible conspiracy theorizing for adults. Could be a blast. Michael you are welcome on the portal any time to discuss this.

4:37 PM · Aug 21, 2019

People tell me that news has now become commercial and that stories are simply constructed to sell papers/get clicks. This is just nonsense.

Nothing would get clicks, boost circulation or sell papers for a NYT/CNN/NPR like aggressively getting to the bottom of the Epstein story.

1:20 PM · Sep 05, 2019

News is a lot like college admissions: it’s an insiders game. We know it’s rigged but can’t quite figure out how.

Why take that kid/run that story? Why do you consistently have zero interest in the most interesting kids/stories?

We’re just now learning *how* rigging works.

1:20 PM · Sep 05, 2019

As I learned uncovering an immigration conspiracy to use visas to tamper with the free market for STEM labor by our national science complex, no news organization is trying to sell us the actual true stories that move news product organically. The stories we want are held back.

1:20 PM · Sep 05, 2019

Take the current totally synthetic & transparent push for “authoritative sources”. Such sources would be the ones warning in 2005 that the “Great Moderation” was a lie & that a crash loomed. Someone like @nntaleb. Yet they mean the opposite. They mean cheerleaders like @nytimes.

1:29 PM · Sep 05, 2019

@AriDavidPaul I think there are editors who spike great stories that get written but never run. I think other reporters get reassigned while not on a trail. I think narrative arcs get written at places like the NYT before the facts are known. And other stuff.

12:05 AM · Sep 06, 2019

@AriDavidPaul Note: Should have been “hot on a trail” in the above.

12:06 AM · Sep 06, 2019

Herein lies a disconnect:

“1 Zillion Scientific experts declare that we must listen to our wise children and undo capitalism to reduce inequality, or the planet will unequivocally reach the so-called ‘Rubicon point’ by 3:47 GMT next Thursday.” is, to many, not extra compelling.

5:51 AM · Nov 06, 2019

I’m one of those people who believe we likely have a true climate emergency. Yet *this* makes ME think I’m wrong. This makes me feel like it’s a snow job. This makes it feel like it’s not serious.

This undoes every instinct many of us have to take climate seriously. Why do this?

5:51 AM · Nov 06, 2019

@fbngarza You didn’t get it. It’s not me who is flipping. This is flipping people who think all talk of anthropogenic climate change is a progressive conspiracy passion play against successful people in wealthy nations. Which it isn’t. But this confirms those fears and it’s backfiring.

6:09 AM · Nov 06, 2019

Individuals on Twitter: “I caught Google biasing search. Here’s proof.”

MSM: “Conspiracy theorists trade delusional claims of biased search.”

Google Whistleblowers: “We biased search.”

MSM: [Ignores report]

[waits]

MSM: BREAKING NEWS. In a pathbreaking exclusive report..

11:01 PM · Nov 16, 2019

2020Edit

If we teach COINTELPRO do we start believing in Reptilians? If we acknowledge the Powell Memo, do we believe in Illuminati next? Does questioning Epstein’s death and any connection of his to intelligence communities legitimize all of Pizzagate? Does Jean Seberg destroy all news?

7:02 PM · Jan 09, 2020

My simple take on conspiracies: Looking at the @AndrewYang @MSNBC series, it‘s clear that this is not a repeating accident. However what we’re really worrying about is this. What happens if we start to acknowledge these cryptic power moves? Does the world become Qanon & InfoWars?

7:02 PM · Jan 09, 2020

We also know we can be wrong & don’t think that makes us nutters or dupes. It’s Type I vs Type II error & we refuse to get all weird because it involves conspiracies. This is a normal thing to think about unless you know ABSOLUTELY nothing about the history of proven conspiracy!

7:02 PM · Jan 09, 2020

The third group (mine) has had it with both of these groups. We know enough to discuss Type I vs Type II error. We don’t know what’s going on most of the time so the nutters make us crazy. We also don’t believe that Jeffrey Epstein’s coverage is normal. We can map irregularity.

7:02 PM · Jan 09, 2020

The deniers fear legitimizing deep questions & concern about ground truth, interests, power, leverage, cryptic organizations, etc. Better to avoid the slippery slope without near certain evidence they say.

Nuts want hidden order everywhere. They want to be in on a secret world.

7:02 PM · Jan 09, 2020

Does our suspicion that the Warren Report was used to silence questions around JFK open up the idea that our government is illegitimate when it releases findings?

Sadly, the answer is that we’re falling into 3 types. Conspiracy deniers, Conspricay nuts & a tiny third group.

7:02 PM · Jan 09, 2020

My conclusion is simple: consider joining us. If you’ve outgrown radical pro-life v pro-choice. If you‘re too smart for pure capitalism vs communism. If you can’t get the old camps to work for you, consider taking Type I vs II approach to conspiracies. As you would anything else.

7:02 PM · Jan 09, 2020

We know enough to know that something is wildly off in both cases but we don’t know exactly what. That makes both the Nutters & the deniers extremely uncomfortable with us. We may be near certain something is off like nutters but reject detailed theories w/o proof like deniers.

7:02 PM · Jan 09, 2020

Two of the most important issues at the moment in this space are about the news:

A) What is the explanation for the bizarre coverage of Jeffrey Epstein?

B) What is the explanation for the bizarre coverage every 4 years of popular candidates outside the system gaining traction?

7:02 PM · Jan 09, 2020

@lsanger Exactly.

8:16 PM · Jan 09, 2020

So? Get us the on-the-record denials that Epstein was in any way state protected or intelligence linked.

I swear this stuff used to be routine. I remember names like Sy Hersh & Jack Anderson. Can someone just ask the questions and get a “No Comment” even?

How is this possible?

2:56 PM · Jan 10, 2020

Just get us “No Comment”. At least that would be a start.

2:56 PM · Jan 10, 2020

There are over a a quarter million watching my feed. Many reporters among them. Can one of you explain this? May I borrow your press credentials & NYT v Sullivan protection?

Nothing is happening for a reason. Nobody wants to do their full job on this story. Even the easy bits.

2:56 PM · Jan 10, 2020

We can prove one conspiracy here. It is the conspiracy not to even ask questions. It is the map of silence.

Call up our government agencies and collect denials that Epstein’s sex trafficking was in any way intelligence linked. Find out where his trading records were housed.

2:56 PM · Jan 10, 2020

Five days ago I released a podcast. It has been listened to by over 100,000 people. If you search twitter you will see that it generates an enormous amount of interest except from two groups: the news & professors. They are not disinterested, but anti-interested. Except for Greg.

3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020

What is anti-interesting? Well Jeffery Epstein’s wealth source is anti-interesting to media. Bernie in 2016 was anti-interesting to @nytimes. Income inequality was anti-interesting to economists until very recently. The Las Vegas shooter was anti-interesting. Building Seven too. https://t.co/IQwSV8rBqJ

3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020

Anti-interesting, adj. 1) A subject is said to be anti-interesting if it is absolutely fascinating to the point where there is a strong market for it’s investigation but it threatens an institution capable of stifling discussion inside the Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN).

3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020

To @MSNBC, @AndrewYang is pathologically anti-interesting. Flight 800 is pretty anti-interesting as was the Boskin Commission’s attempt to transfer 1 Trillion Dollars by hacking the CPI. The H1-B visa history is anti-interesting. As are broken laboratory mice with long telomeres. https://t.co/Mv9HgHv2ex

3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020

But I find these things fascinating. As do we all. Do stay tuned to The Portal.

More to come. Thanks @greggutfeld!

https://t.co/XzufjuVxPq

3:01 AM · Jan 23, 2020

@Tmillerpoetry The Portal loves @Tmillerpoetry!!

3:03 AM · Jan 23, 2020

If you want to see this theory of Idea Suppression in action, retweet the first tweet in the thread with hashtag #SlipTheDISC. Hey, who knows...We might be able to change the game.

3:06 AM · Jan 23, 2020

@piney_the Actually, that’s not full disclosure. Full disclosure is you saying who you are & what exactly you are a professor of to be hurling such accusations. But I get the appeal of fighting from a position of advantage, and I’m sure you think holonomy is beyond me. It just makes me sad.

7:16 AM · Jan 23, 2020

@piney_the Be well anonymous Professor. I don’t find this amusing.

7:17 AM · Jan 23, 2020

@itcamefromthed @nytimes I don’t have a theory. I’m not an engineer. I don’t know demolitions.

I just don’t get it. And when I ask experts, the conversation often gets weird. I don’t have a 9/11 conspiracy theory. I do note that Building 7 produces weird conversations and avoidance. I got nothing else.

7:50 AM · Jan 23, 2020

@jason_pontin @BretWeinstein Quite. I was in error.

8:13 AM · Jan 23, 2020

@Aceinmysleeve1 Hmm. I’m not a biologist, but here is what I might think:

A) Adaptive Landscape B) with a mouse having a C) healing wound as well as a D) growing Tumor with the letters E) TTAGGG around the base

8:52 AM · Jan 23, 2020

This is how the game is played. People don’t get that the entire REASON 9/11 conspiracies exist is that we can’t admit that some things are not well understood. I don’t believe in a 9/11 conspiracy theory. I do believe we have a building collapse for which we lack a good theory.

5:48 PM · Jan 23, 2020

Then the pressure will start “You are feeding lunatics!” No I‘m not. You are the ones *starving* lunatics. And that’s far more dangerous you idiots. This is from the current Wikipedia article on Building 7’s collapse. Can we not say “That’s odd.” Or “That’s weird.” Well, why not? https://t.co/jBQKOkhqM0

5:48 PM · Jan 23, 2020

I mean really??? You get the physics guy @overbye at the @nytimes to write a story to deflect from the actual people who put the world at risk?? It’s so good!! You people in the institutional world still have no idea why you got @realDonaldTrump elected.

It’s the universal lies.

5:48 PM · Jan 23, 2020

Look at the carnage of the ‘08 financial crisis. I was told I was feeding panic from 2002-5 when I claimed I didn’t understand how mortgage backed securities gave rise to the banishing of volatility given the opacity of the products. So guess who caused the crash? Me & math guys! https://t.co/vV3gyWSl0K

5:48 PM · Jan 23, 2020

This is the DISC:

Don’t ask your questions.
Don’t admit you don’t understand.
Don’t question experts.
Don’t listen to heterodoxy.
Don’t associate with iconoclasts.
Don’t befriend the other party.
Don’t criticize your own fringe.
Don’t self-promote.
Don’t be gauche.
Die silently.

5:48 PM · Jan 23, 2020

At some point however, you may want to try a new hypothesis: the institutional system is obviously fake & getting faker. Rather than lathering on the cosmetic bullshit until you become Tammy Faye Baker, you might want to just say: “Maybe we have a universal authenticity crisis.”

5:48 PM · Jan 23, 2020

Okay. I caused the 2008 crash together with my colleague @EmanuelDerman. I caused @realDonaldTrump to win because I said during the election what @donnabrazile said after the election. And if you haven’t noticed the US STEM system may collapse.

Put it on my bill with xenophobia!

5:48 PM · Jan 23, 2020

We’ve been here together multiple times before. You want to go again?

Who knows maybe you’ll win again? But it’s late in the day & your old magic isn’t working as well as it did. Look at the Oval Office you fools.

We know each other so well:

https://t.co/CHqAI92qwE

Be well.

5:48 PM · Jan 23, 2020

I’ve been trying to help. I try to tell you that your “Strategic Silence” theory is breeding lunatics. Your demonization of normal Americans is courting fascism. Your rent-seeking pig-out at the trough invites communism.

Or just call me Alex Jones. The choice is yours.

5:48 PM · Jan 23, 2020

If you want to spin conspiracy theories, my feed is not the place to do it.

I don’t know how to communicate this clearly enough: I live with *gaps* in my knowledge. I don’t want them filled in with unquestionable tortured official stories nor wild-eyed conspiracies theories.

10:50 PM · Jan 23, 2020

Those of you who want to prematurely fill in all gaps from either the pro-instution or pro-conspiracy side of the fence look exactly the same to me. I’m for leaving the real gaps in our knowledge. Pro-gap.

Don’t want gods in my gaps. Don’t want false explanations. #LeaveTheGaps

10:50 PM · Jan 23, 2020

This feed is trying to give you room to say “I wonder.” & wonder comes from gaps. Everyone trying to humiliate you to keep you from saying “Hang on, I don’t get this.” is trying to get you to accept some gap has been filled in. That fetish is common to the GIN & conspiracy buffs.

10:50 PM · Jan 23, 2020

I am a conspiracy theorist to the extent that I have studied past conspiracies and entertain comparable ones in the present as hypotheses. That is healthy.

That is your right too. But don’t take that as liscence to lose your damn mind. Study what has been previously proven. 🙏

10:55 PM · Jan 23, 2020

Jeffrey Epstein: coincidence magnet.

The “fair coin” that comes up tails every time. Because no one wants to be labeled a conspiracy theorist.

As a Mathematician I can say that this IS statistically possible. As a human, I would say don’t listen to me as a mathematician here...

6:52 AM · Jul 20, 2020

@JackHawley Ya know, it’s quantum mechanically possible for a chicken to become an octopus. But grown ups don’t dwell on such things.

6:57 AM · Jul 20, 2020

@nodsaibot Why is that? I don’t follow them so I don’t know anything about them beyond this tweet. Thx.

10:19 AM · Jul 20, 2020

I am looking forward to making a LOT of apologies. Nothing would make me happier as a responsible conspiracy theorist.

I have been told of metallic samples with strange mixtures of elements not found in nature by respected professors in STEM and did not know what to believe.

3:54 PM · Jul 24, 2020

“... in never-before-seen photographs obtained exclusively by https://t.co/tdWL3dGxyc.”

What an exciting time for ‘never-before-seen photographs’ to be ‘obtained’.

But, please tell us once again about the wild-eyed conspiracy theorists. Love that part. https://t.co/ilYCY9MQHn

2:08 AM · Aug 19, 2020

Q: Do I believe that voting fraud is a myth or a “conspiracy theory” from the “Tin Foil Hat crowd.” A: No I do not.

Q: Do I believe that it is a large phenomena in the US? A: No I do not.

Q: Do I believe it might matter here? A: Don’t know. Unexplored territory here. So close.

11:19 PM · Nov 05, 2020

Suffice it to say that sooner or later with the increase of partisanship & the bizarrely antiquated systems we keep, we should expect to eventually get an election in reach of whatever size fraud we are willing to put up with by not modernizing our system to make it tamperproof.

11:22 PM · Nov 05, 2020

As I often point out, the US Federal Government is *proven* to be capable of conspiring to use our independent American News Media to covertly tarnish famous law abiding politically inconvenient Americans.

“Seberging”-cancellation is not conspiracy theory. It is conspiracy-fact.

8:06 PM · Nov 13, 2020

Ask yourself: how many prominent law abiding politically inconvenient people has the US government tried to destroy?

We know:

Fred Hampton John Lennon Jean Seberg Dick Gregory MLK Pete Seeger

How many other news hit pieces come from the Deep State & are fed to news? Only one? https://t.co/qas0hmZnw9

8:07 PM · Nov 13, 2020

I believe that we used to have real heroes (e.g. Katherine Hepburn) & our heroes got too expensive for our institutional class. Now, all who start to show too much public independence seem mysteriously to get taken down by media (e.g. @elonmusk).

After Jean, we have to wonder... https://t.co/KlbevUcPTo

8:07 PM · Nov 13, 2020

Think how impossible it is to believe this. The *only* time we ever really checked our own intelligence, we found a deep state using our mainstream independent news media to destroy citizens over politics.

Q: How many cancellation stories have you read? Are they ALL journalism? https://t.co/jsAnWlKhuL

8:07 PM · Nov 13, 2020

Q: Who is writing these god-like messages at Twitter?

TIM is:

Technology-Intelligence-Media

I’ll be very surprised if there‘s no quiet TIM working-group, ostensibly around foreign meddling in US matters, that has been exceeding a narrow mandate to influence what we see here.🙏 https://t.co/mvuSN5B1QV

8:07 PM · Nov 13, 2020

Actually very few of you know where I am on this. Calling massive election fraud is sort of a “shoot-to-wound problem”; you take your shot or you don’t. Allege conspiracy, or don’t.

William Davidon took his shot in 1971. By contrast, Trump is not yet alleging something coherent.

9:07 PM · Nov 18, 2020

If you want to understand how disciplined you have to be to win at this game, go ask Judi Feingold. If she will talk to you.

My heroes once pulled off such enormous allegations. I know what it cost them. I haven’t seen that level of skill/realism yet from MAGA.

But Good luck.👍

9:07 PM · Nov 18, 2020

If you want to allege “The Dems stole my election...” I’m all ears for the theory of how this was done. I haven’t heard it.

The bottom line is: there is no “shoot to wound” option. You are free to allege, amass data, present theories and use the courts. And then you win or lose.

9:07 PM · Nov 18, 2020

You don’t putz around in an election or comparable story.

Woodward & Bernstein took their shot. Pete Seeger took his shot. Sy Hersh. Jack Anderson. Dan Sheehan. Katherine Hepburn, Edward R Murrow took their shots.

Trump isn’t (yet anyway) taking the shot. Does he even have one?

9:07 PM · Nov 18, 2020

There is now zero adult supervision.

6:32 PM · Nov 20, 2020

GOP

@GOP

"We will not be intimidated...We are going to clean this mess up now. President Trump won by a landslide. We are going to prove it. And we are going to reclaim the United States of America for the people who vote for freedom."—Sidney Powell

6:32 PM · Nov 20, 2020

To my Trump Supporting Followers: I‘ve always treated you with respect despite our disagreement over the idea that Trump represented an existential risk to our democracy and, by extension, the world.

I‘d like you to consider how far he is away from proving he won in a landslide.

6:32 PM · Nov 20, 2020

I’m prepared to lose you today. But I need you to hear this from someone who disagreed with you respectfully, but saw where you were coming from.

Your candidate does not appear to be anywhere close to proving the massive conspiracy needed overturn this election. Consider:

6:32 PM · Nov 20, 2020

Hypothetically, assume that you KNEW an election was stolen by coordinated fraud. That doesn’t overturn the election.

You would have to prove that in a court and it would have to be a massive fraud. There‘d be a code name like “Operation Ajax/Boot” as there was in 1953 Iran.

6:33 PM · Nov 20, 2020

Okay. Assume your man won in a landslide now being covered up by a massive fraud operation.

What is the code name? Who headed it up? When was it launched? What was the size of the operation? Who funded it? How is it kept quiet? What is the size of the landslide? How do you know?

6:33 PM · Nov 20, 2020

I know that many of you feel you aren’t taken seriously by media. I’ve always taken you seriously.

But that means expecting you to be serious about your own allegations. Trump is so far failing to meet *any* expected thresholds for responsibly alleging a conspiracy of this size.

6:33 PM · Nov 20, 2020

Look at MKUltra, Ajax/Boot, Mockingbird, COINTELPRO, Operation Condor, Iran-Contra, etc. Beyond what you believe is true, your team would need to prove a conspiracy. And the delta between what is now alleged v what is proven or even “alleged with specificity” is growing alarming.

6:33 PM · Nov 20, 2020

Lastly, for those who will leave as followers from this thread: Thanks for hanging in there w/ me. It’s been tough, but I really appreciate the kindness & decency most of you have shown me. I hope I reciprocated that by being your loyal opposition. So thanks for hearing me out.🙏

6:33 PM · Nov 20, 2020

I’ll say it plainly: I wasn’t wrong. He always was & continues to be an existential risk as long as he has the football. If you love him & admire his best actions, show him. Let him know that the Delta between the allegation and proof of conspiracy must now close. Love you all.

6:33 PM · Nov 20, 2020

@keepitzebra I do! Let’s hope we are right.

9:29 PM · Nov 20, 2020

@iwanttotalk_now Nobody is perfect. Just trying to not suck.

9:30 PM · Nov 20, 2020

@lucidvincent Thanks Vincent. Be well brother.

9:46 PM · Nov 20, 2020

@dbaboci It went from 443.9K to 443.7K. So far. Not huge but certainly expected.

9:49 PM · Nov 20, 2020

Because I’m making it harder to do to me what @TwitterSafety did to @articlesofunity.

Because I’m not a lunatic conspiracy theorist, nor a lunatic ignoring conspiracies.

Because no one...and I mean no one...has intellectually threaded this needle.

Because *process* matters.

8:50 PM · Nov 20, 2020

Because I have under half a million followers and I am trying to be a responsible adult thinker in front of them for my kids’ generation in a world without enough adult role models.

Because I believe there may be micro frauds, but no evidence yet of a macro conspiracy.

8:50 PM · Nov 20, 2020

Because I‘ve assumed this was likely to be the most dangerous transfer of power between administrations in our modern history.

Because I don’t know the datasets well enough to comment directly.

Because hot takes aren’t my reason for being.

Because I don’t want to be wrong.

8:50 PM · Nov 20, 2020

Because I refuse to hate either 1/2 of my fellow Americans and call them belittling names for choosing a candidate.

Because DJT hadn’t shown much of his hand and I didn’t want to bet against an inside straight if he drew one.

Because our deep state HAS pulled off amazing coups.

8:50 PM · Nov 20, 2020

But, *most* importantly, I protected my credibility w/ a lot of DJT supporters despite my position. I didn’t throw anyone under a bus when things got hot.

I held my tongue for 4 years on a lot to just listen. I saved up, so that when I spoke, it might matter.

Now it matters. 🙏

8:50 PM · Nov 20, 2020

Because the grownups cheated in the Democratic fake primary against @AndrewYang and @TulsiGabbard according to my read of the situation, so I’ve regard this entire election as tainted...but we still have to move forward.

Because I am often not sure what the hell is going on.

8:50 PM · Nov 20, 2020

In addition, we’re supposed to have special “Break glass in case of Emergency” elders put aside for special occasions.

I’m definitely NOT that guy. But I’d sit in her/his seat until she/he shows up, just like at the Oscars. Maybe @KillerMike, Buzz Aldrin or Chesley Sullenberger?

8:58 PM · Nov 20, 2020

@MarcoAlbo7 Good luck my friend. May the data and FOIA requests smile upon you if you are correct.

9:04 PM · Nov 20, 2020

@jammin1001 Even loyal followers too! Thanks my friend.

9:05 PM · Nov 20, 2020

@EDC_Farmer Be well.

9:06 PM · Nov 20, 2020

@Sh3nl0ng @KillerMike Thanks for the kind words. Really.

9:24 PM · Nov 20, 2020

@_chris_reyn_ @KillerMike Sam is great. Some of the people he is pissed at are great too.

9:25 PM · Nov 20, 2020

@luvkit @KillerMike Thanks Kit!

9:25 PM · Nov 20, 2020

@tmoneybrown @KillerMike Process is everything here.

9:27 PM · Nov 20, 2020

@EDC_Farmer And there will be no hard feelings. Thanks.

1:07 AM · Nov 21, 2020

I think there are two conflicting strategies dividing us that separately both make some sense:

A) FORMAL: At least *formally* extend every legal courtesy while even true facts are contested.

B) CUSTOM: Pressure POTUS to accept these results & “cut the crap” as in all elections.

7:34 PM · Nov 21, 2020

Not falling for this shit. Trump is not going to outsmart me and the people I love as the capstone of this four year term like no other. If I can help it anyway. The 🌍 still needs people who continue to talk in public through their differences. More than ever.

Love you all. 🙏

7:34 PM · Nov 21, 2020

Honestly, I feel like we were supposed to be smarter and figure out how he divides us. But look at this idiotic infighting! Trump wins when he divides us. How is he doing @MaajidNawaz @benshapiro @SamHarrisOrg @RubinReport @BretWeinstein?

Out of vanity, I’m not losing to Trump.

7:34 PM · Nov 21, 2020

It’s a trade off between legal culture and American democratic custom and tradition. As I have been saying for four years it is as if there is an Oral and a Written Torah of the US. Its customs vs its laws.

Donald Trump breaks all our norms. That’s his modus operandi. Such fun.

7:34 PM · Nov 21, 2020

I think what has been dividing us many of us is what to do with a wily POTUS challenging customary norms on concessions.

Given that he is going this legal route do we change our tactic too as @MaajidNawaz may be doing, or do we go the @SamHarrisOrg route and say “This is nuts.”

7:34 PM · Nov 21, 2020

@SamHarrisOrg @MaajidNawaz I‘d like to think all of us see this as wildly irresponsible...*even* if it somehow turned out that the craziest conspiracy turned out to be true. He’s doing great damage by taking *this* path.

I‘d also like to think that all of us see coup-by-fraud as a **remote** possibility.

11:34 PM · Nov 21, 2020

@SamHarrisOrg @MaajidNawaz As for your point about claiming fraud *before* the election...I believe that *both* the Establishment and Trump have been planning for this same contested election issue for ages. The institutions planned to allege a dictator. The president planned to allege a deep state coup.

11:38 PM · Nov 21, 2020

@SamHarrisOrg @MaajidNawaz I believe here we all differ. This is also why I waited for their legal term to hold a press conference. My Bayesian prior held out a tiny but non-zero chance Trump knew something I didn’t. What I saw was so below any expected threshold, that I felt my intuition was confirmed.

11:44 PM · Nov 21, 2020

@SamHarrisOrg @MaajidNawaz *team

11:51 PM · Nov 21, 2020

@eea1790 @SamHarrisOrg @MaajidNawaz I would say it differently. Sam Has been sparklingly clear on the dangers of Trump for the whole cycle. That clarity is a resource. Especially now!

Others balanced the idiosyncratic dangers of DJT against the Systemic dangers of the swamp and found a spectrum of conclusions.

12:07 AM · Nov 22, 2020

He’s not conceding defeat as I understand it. He’s conceding that he will not be able to hold an untenable position without a MAJOR discovery. Which has not happened. And likely will not happen. But I have no problem with him searching for a grand conspiracy. It’s a free country.

12:28 AM · Nov 24, 2020

There were 3 souls sleeping in this bed 51 years ago today. Only two survived the Assassination by the @fbi in Chicago.

Yesterday I spoke to one of them for the first time and invited him onto the Portal.

The idea that the US is incapable of unthinkable conspiracy is madness. https://t.co/cOIP7VjCyg

7:51 PM · Dec 04, 2020

I think we're dancing around a terrifying issue:

Q: Do our institutions believe that there a right to inform/misinform/disinform that is peculiar to certain institutions/voices but not others?

A: Clearly there is a monopoly right claimed to curate both truth & total nonsense.

6:44 AM · Dec 18, 2020

To sum up. I think what we're seeing is that a broad coalition of institutional media, universities, politicians & tech platforms working together have decided that it is their exclusive monopolistic right alone to inform, misinform and disinform us all for the good of socieity.

6:44 AM · Dec 18, 2020

Who gets to define whether saying "On July 30, 1976, Bruce Jenner won the Decatholon." is 'deadnaming' and should get you thrown off twitter? Only @TwitterSafety knows given that Caitlyn Jenner didn't exist yet. The rest of us await such decisions as if from a delphic oracle.

6:44 AM · Dec 18, 2020

Who gets to say "Buy a house with a NINJA loan because we banished volatility and everyone should be able to afford the home of their dreams!"? Only special people who work in banks, economics departments and in government. If the rest of us call BS, then we're chicken little.

6:44 AM · Dec 18, 2020

Who gets to say "Don't wear masks because masks don't work?" Well the Surgeon General. The W.H.O. Who gets to say "Run that marathon!" or "Go gather for Chinese new year celebrations and Protests". Democratic mayors and reprsentatives. Try to gather to pray and you are a monster.

6:44 AM · Dec 18, 2020

First look at conspiracy theories. Those pushing the "Putin controls Trump as an Asset" conspiracy theory are not called conspiracy theorists. Those claiming that 2016 was hacked by foreign governments are not conspiracy theorists. Ok. Try asking if the CCP controls HunterBiden.

6:44 AM · Dec 18, 2020

By all means feel free to disagree w/ that. But deep down, we both know it's true. The establishment institutions have taken the right to think for us all & to tell us what we can say to each other.

And if we put up with this abomination? Then maybe we deserve Chinese Communism.

6:44 AM · Dec 18, 2020

2021Edit

C) The media was good calling out all the really bad things Trump did.

D) The media was bad calling out any positive thing Trump said or did and painted him evil.

E) Journalists in 2020 & 2016 unethically became activists misreporting a big blue wave or Hilary’s inevitable win.

6:02 AM · Jan 04, 2021

I read part of the transcript of the Trump call.

The following strikes me.

A) Trump is a true political outsider & the only one to reach the Presidency with zero government experience.

B) There is an obvious open institutional conspiracy to prevent any outsider gaining power.

6:02 AM · Jan 04, 2021

He’s now in a state where he’s convinced that his feeling that he won together with the obvious total abdication of journalism’s responsibility to eschew activism is enough to overturn the results.

Which is nuts. It’s like “feeling” that someone is guilty & expecting conviction.

6:02 AM · Jan 04, 2021

H) The left says “If you don’t have the goods, then it was completely free, fair and obviously so you sore loser.”

I) The right says “You guys aren’t fair about anything. Your unbiased commentary is a 24/7 open conspiracy to misrepresent the world.

Now comes the weird part.

6:02 AM · Jan 04, 2021

So while I agree with him that trust in our institutions is at rock bottom for good reasons, he’s WAY out of line. I don’t think Biden won fair & square after the anti Gabbard/Yang BS. But i treat the general as a free and fair election in the absence of credible legal evidence.

6:02 AM · Jan 04, 2021

He doesn’t understand. He’s free to become a private citizen and spend his remaining days looking for evidence of a conspiracy to steal the election. But he’s not free to say “Our rallies were huge!” While trying to stay in office. Results are presumed fair until proven otherwise

6:02 AM · Jan 04, 2021

Yes media is guilty of political agitation while enjoying the protection of neutral journalists. Yes they have conspired against him at every turn. But IT’S NOT FUNGIBLE. The anti-Trump media conspiracy is not a vote counting conspiracy. He can’t cash in one to win the other.

6:02 AM · Jan 04, 2021

For some reason, almost everyone I know either see two conspiracies against Trump or zero. I see only one conspiracy against him to date and it’s not fungible. His behavior is outrageous but those pointing it out as unethical have been compromised themselves by hatred. That’s it.

6:02 AM · Jan 04, 2021

I’m happier to see him go than I am sad to see Biden arrive. But he isn’t wrong that there was a media/institutional conspiracy. He’s wrong elsewhere: he doesn’t have the goods on electoral fraud. But the number of us who see the former conspiracy but not the latter is *tiny*.

6:02 AM · Jan 04, 2021

Which is to say this: we have a lot of unethical media people dancing and celebrating Trump’s loss. And it remains *possible* that we will learn something nefarious happened. But pretending now that a media conspiracy is an electoral conspiracy w/o proof is insane & outrageous.

6:02 AM · Jan 04, 2021

@robmorris123 @Stephen93221074 Thanks Rob. Not trying to pander.

10:48 AM · Jan 07, 2021

A question for @TwitterSafety: can I get thrown off Twitter for being a conspiracy theorist if I tweet a link to a Newsweek article by @JamieMetzl that spreads a dangerous idea that COVID may have a non-innocent origin. Like, how does this work?

Thanks!

https://t.co/aCxNbNssVv

4:36 PM · Jan 22, 2021

If there is a conclusive argument against lab accelerated natural selection let’s hear that specifically.

This is like the Epstein situation. An entire planet is asked to believe that no press want to ask the most obvious questions. Why does anyone believe this?!? Does anyone???

5:10 AM · Feb 10, 2021

Who is this designed to fool? Why the pressure never to engage the competent version of the Wuhan Lab Leak? Why demonize the competent?

This is obvious war on reputations of smart competent truthful folks who ask the question media will not: is this lab accelerated selection?

5:10 AM · Feb 10, 2021

Note the totally regular pattern. Our authorities synonymize the Wuhan Lab origin with a synthetically engineered virus and deny this.

Yet, the idea of lab accelerated natural selection is *never* engaged. Then their conclusion is that COVID must therefore have a natural origin.

5:10 AM · Feb 10, 2021

One simple question: what rules out lab accelerated natural selection as an origin?

That’s it. Will anyone ask this question? If not, why not?

I’ll take my answer off the air and wait for the claims of “conspiracy theory” from the farms of minor accounts.

5:10 AM · Feb 10, 2021

Unfortunately, I can’t live under either. So each of the warring parties thinks I’m against them & for the other team. In their mentalities if you aren’t on their simplistic team you are, de facto, working for the other side. There’s no basic concept of *responsible* heterodoxy.

3:50 PM · Feb 12, 2021

The entire war over fact checking is a war of 2 low resolution teams.

One team wants absolute freedom to spread wild eyed theories that just about everything is a psyop or a false flag.

The other team wants to impose institutional consensus reality on everyone via media & tech.

3:50 PM · Feb 12, 2021

Thanks for the invitation. I can try to explain my concern.

There really *is* a problem w MAGA, Trump, Qanon & conspiracy theories running rampant. And it will result in death & destruction if it spins out of control.

However it is being fueled by those who claim to fight it.

3:50 PM · Feb 12, 2021

These are the folks who tell you “masks don’t work” rather than “save masks for doctors as we forgot to restock them and moved all manufacturing to China like morons”. They will then spin on a dime to tell you “Only bad dumb people don’t wear masks”. This is the worst of Harvard.

3:50 PM · Feb 12, 2021

When they wanted to cut our Social Security payments & raise our taxes they opted to try to change the CPI rather than pass legislation. When they wanted to pay less for scientists they knew to keep *silent* about NSF Labor Shortage claims even though such shortages don’t exist.

3:50 PM · Feb 12, 2021

Having spent a good portion of my 20s at Harvard, I know *exactly* how this game works. Our betters sit down and try to figure out how to control others behind closed doors. They see themselves as the intrinsically enlightened people who need to do the thinking for all of us.

3:50 PM · Feb 12, 2021

No the Freemasons do not run everything on behalf of pedophile reptilians who faked Sandy Hook with crisis actors.

Yes there are/were conspiracies behind Epstein, H1B, @MSNBC, PPE, climate science, the “Great Moderation”, Great Reset...everywhere institutions want a “consensus”.

3:50 PM · Feb 12, 2021

Managed Reality ™ has a weak spot. It’s not run by our A-team anymore. Fauci isn’t Francis Crick. Biden isn’t Elon. Janet Yellen isn’t Satoshi.

In general, the A-Team is going independent because tech/media/Ed are enforcing way too much conformity through personal destruction.

3:50 PM · Feb 12, 2021

I cannot live in Managed Reality ™ because I think it defeats the purpose of being a human being. It negates being an American. It abdicates responsibility for our children.

I have defeated Harvard about half the times we have fought. How? Because they just aren’t that good.

3:50 PM · Feb 12, 2021

So, my belief is that anyone who rejects/questions Davos, Consensus Reality, Institutional Narrative, Public Health Campaigns, High Immigration, Peer Review, Primary Election Coverage, Trust & Safety...will be treated as Alex Jones sooner or Later.

This is Managed Reality ™.

3:50 PM · Feb 12, 2021

So I don’t want Alex Jones and Qanon nor do I want @TwitterSafety, @msnbc and @Harvard. I see them as very different forms of the same thing: people who want to take away our ability to see clearly.

And, I assure you, @Harvard tries to paint anyone it can’t control as dangerous.

3:50 PM · Feb 12, 2021

Thanks.

3:50 PM · Feb 12, 2021

If I were a tech guy I’d retreat into wealth. If I were a professor I’d shut up and collect my salary with job security. If I was a politician or journalist I’d follow the other sheep.

But I’m a science guy, an American and a dad. And I want my kids to have a particular future.

3:50 PM · Feb 12, 2021

So why am I worried?

Well, I’ve been trying to save the institutions. It’s probably doomed, but almost no one is trying to do what I do: rescue the institutions from their death spiral by reinserting their critics in positions of prominence (eg Chomsky at MIT).

Hence my fear.

3:50 PM · Feb 12, 2021

@alexbilz @DavidBCollum True

4:52 PM · Feb 12, 2021

https://ritholtz.com/2010/01/why-michael-boskin-deserves-our-contempt/

One of the things my trolls like to point to is outrageous claims.

One of my most *outrageous* is that my joint work on a 2nd Marginal Revolution for economics was scuttled by the Harvard Department of Economics Boskin Commissioners.

Yet it’s admitted:

4:12 PM · Apr 14, 2021

It’s kind of an interesting puzzle. Why is it that a Harvard Professor (Mankiw) can say the truth which is that this was a conspiracy to cut entitlements. But the only two people who can CALCULATE a COLA for changing tastes are crazy for saying their work was deliberately buried?

4:12 PM · Apr 14, 2021

In any event, I stand by my claim. The Boskin Commission was organized by Moynihan and Packwood to deliberately break the CPI in a precise amount to avoid the US paying 1 trillion dollars over 10 years.

And I promise you no leading economist will call bullshit to debate this.

4:12 PM · Apr 14, 2021

On of the reasons is that one of the commissioners bragged about this being the motivation behind the scenes.

Okay. So why can’t we have gauge theoretic economics reevaluated? Everyone admits this is what happened. Why continue to bury the advance?

I dunno. But it’s amazing!

4:12 PM · Apr 14, 2021

The moral of the story to me is this:

We can’t have outside folks calculating and theorizing while the inside economists are fudging and cooking the books.

And calling me crazy won’t change a thing when this is finally understood. It’s simply institutional academic malpractice.

4:12 PM · Apr 14, 2021

Actually, a large number of my followers and supporters are having such paranormal Twitter experiences.

In other news, implacable detractors report getting all my tweets from Twitter. They’ll be only too happy to make fun of me for sharing & being a conspiracy theorist. Sorry..

9:00 PM · Apr 20, 2021

@whateverybother No one knows that all my followers get the same filtering. People can only say what they can see, not what others see.

9:04 PM · Apr 20, 2021

Let’s say it clearly: the mainstream are our Cranks.

Those who said all those entertaining Wuhan Laboratory Lab Leak hypotheses were a pro-Trump anti-Asian hate campaign were peddling conspiracy theory.

Did you speak out against our real conspiracy theorists? Check your dates:

10:33 PM · May 18, 2021

We’ve had many recent stunning reversals that all have the same exact pattern. The mainstream says when the obvious may be acknowledged.

A) Time mag. says: There Was a conspiracy against Trump in the Election.

B) The Lab is Likely the Covid Origin.

C) You can enjoy Outdoors.

7:09 AM · Jun 22, 2021

It’s like an intellectual fire drill where we all get marched out of the building of sane rational thought while lunatic firemen search for the fire that isn’t there.

Jon Stewart is a narrative fire Marshall. “You can’t be sane just yet..Okay..Now it’s safe to use your mind.”

7:09 AM · Jun 22, 2021

Okay. Where is the story: “a lot of people we call crazy got everything right before we did…but we get to determine who is allowed to think and speak using platforms.”

The platforms are punishing everyone who doesn’t wait for the signal. Mostly conservative refuse to wait.

7:09 AM · Jun 22, 2021

I could have been massless outdoors long ago. I knew the Lab was never a racist wildeyed idea. And I knew tech was conspiring against even anti-Trump accounts that were off-narrative.

They did the same on masks. And on flu worse than “no big deal” COVID. The exact same pattern.

7:09 AM · Jun 22, 2021

Ariana Grande is pretty. And she can sing. But she ain’t Francis Crick or Sydney Brenner, and they would *never* ask me to stop thinking until Ariana and Jon Steward give the all clear.

This is why smart people hate this fire Marshall system. It’s going to happen again. End it.

7:09 AM · Jun 22, 2021

I think this is the common cause I feel with Conservatives most. I hate outsourcing my brain in my one beautiful life to people appointed to control when it is safe to think. I don’t want intellectual fire Marshall’s unless D-day is next week and we can’t afford a misstep.

7:09 AM · Jun 22, 2021

This is what conservatives and disaffected liberals have in common. We don’t wait to use our mind because the New York Times or NPR isn’t sure what will happen if we think for ourselves.

Ariana Grande is a Fire Marshall. When she dances w no mask, we all can. Thx @ArianaGrande!

7:09 AM · Jun 22, 2021

maskless

7:12 AM · Jun 22, 2021

At some point it’ll be allowable to say Anti-Racism is racism rebranded. But everyone who jumps the gun is not a good doggy. It will be acceptable to say intersectionality developed into a shakedown. But the key is did you wait for the stewardess to stand or did you jump the gun?

7:23 AM · Jun 22, 2021

Moral. It’s not that conservatives are smarter. It is that they aren’t obedient. The Democratic Party is becoming the party of obedient thinkers. Good puppy. Now lie down. Good boy. Now say “Flatten The Curve.” Come on. Come on boy. You can do it. Yes! You said it. I’m so proud.”

7:23 AM · Jun 22, 2021

Yes the plane is still. Yes the pilot left the aircraft after shutting the engines. But if you decide to get up before air hostess Ariana dances you are a bad bad person. That’s not for you to decide.

That’s for Ariana. And Fauci. And Jon. Which is sad. Because I like Jon.

7:23 AM · Jun 22, 2021

I would repeat back to you what he just said verbatim but the bot armies that people pay to drive us apart would call me an alarmist, grifter and/or conspiracy theorist.

Here. Listen:

8:02 PM · Jun 29, 2021

There is a very simple way that Pharmaceutical companies can quash the fears of misinformation using the economic theory of Revealed Preference: By forgoing the protection of the PREP act from liability if vaccines are later found unsafe:

https://t.co/5IeGArjgou via @pharmexec

2:31 PM · Jul 02, 2021

Let's get big Pharma the immunity they need from frivolous lawsuit. Make it ABSOLUTE. But let us ask them in turn to lead the way by showing how confident they are. If vaccine hesitancy is madness, the safety of the vaccines are the only protection they need. Let's get this done.

2:31 PM · Jul 02, 2021

One does not need liability protection for selling pure distilled water or healthy iceberg lettuce. Same with safe vaccines. All that's needed is protection from FRIVOLOUS lawsuits, not from actual injury or death due vaccine as the vaccines are safe.

This gets us herd immunity.

2:31 PM · Jul 02, 2021

This is good news. Even great news. This allows Pharma executives to SILENCE ONCE AND FOR ALL all concerns about vaccine safety and disinformation that threaten public health. By forgoing protection from liability of unintended consequences, the anti-vaxxers lose instantly. WIN!

2:31 PM · Jul 02, 2021

Here's how it works. We are all told that these vaccines are safe and effective. That will not prevent frivolous lawsuits, so Pharmaceutical executives will *need* to be immunized from that. The expert claim is that the vaccines are safe and will not have long term side effects.

2:31 PM · Jul 02, 2021

As the recipient of the Johnson & Johnson Covid Vaccine and w/ family vaccinated with Pfizer's Vaccine, I call on executives of these two companies to show the same faith in their product that I have shown. This is the slam dunk that ends the issue. All it takes is confidence. 🙏

2:36 PM · Jul 02, 2021

Please share the lead tweet in this thread if you are concerned that throttling by Twitter will keep this proposal from being considered and helping to get us to Herd Immunity quickly. Let's change the discussion and go back to old style leadership in crisis.

Thank you.

2:40 PM · Jul 02, 2021

@noUpside It's a skin in the game issue Renee. The genius of the market. It allows those who *know* that their products are safe to *silence* the nutters. We can & must fight the tin-foil hat crowd. Safe products are sold far and wide without exotic legal protection. Let pharma in on this.

2:47 PM · Jul 02, 2021

@noUpside As I said, we pick up the tab as a nation for the cost of fighting ***all*** frivolous lawsuits. No settlements or payouts for nutters, opportunists, and conspiracy theorists seeking money for nothing. We end the payouts for COVID vaccines. Stick to science, markets and the law.

2:51 PM · Jul 02, 2021

@noUpside As I think about it, this is exactly why you of all people should love this. It ends frivolous nuisance settlements for COVID. Nothing shuts down the nutters more quickly.

2:54 PM · Jul 02, 2021

Stick to a single narrative.

Pick one of the *two* Democratic narratives. Now which one is it?

12:23 AM · Jul 14, 2021

President Biden Archived

@POTUS46Archive

For those who challenge the results and question the integrity of the 2020 election — no other election has ever been held to such scrutiny and high standard.

The “big lie” is just that — the big lie.

7:21 PM · Jul 13, 2021

I’m traditionally a Democrat. I’ve no idea how “There was a well funded top secret tech CEO / Democratic Party donor class conspiracy w progressive activists to ensure that Republicans too were given a free & fair election through fortifying our democracy.” passes the laugh test.

12:28 AM · Jul 14, 2021

I appreciate this. I don’t know how to call this for anyone other than myself.

My sense is that we all differ on what to make of the errors & even lies of our authorities.

To some it’s evidence of a great conspiracy. To others it’s just a normal feature of PR. To me? It ranges.

5:34 PM · Aug 02, 2021

What I did was to plug my ears to the sales pitch.

As I said, I took a vaccine whose safety was oversold to stop a disease whose lethality is real but also oversold, at some risk that my vaccine may additionally represent risks that I don’t understand. I’m not privy to any plan.

5:34 PM · Aug 02, 2021

Do you eat food that ADM and Monsanto touch? I do. Do I ingest things into my body when I don’t know all the ingredients? All the time.

Seeing the risks of the vaccine, the risks of COVID and the risks of alternative treatment, I chose vaccine. What should you do?

5:34 PM · Aug 02, 2021

But if you can see the lies on the surface, you are not obligated to avoid the vaccines.

Perhaps that is my message. I know I’m being pushed to take a vaccine that is being oversold. But I knowingly buy and use products all-the-time that are oversold by people pressuring me.

5:34 PM · Aug 02, 2021

It’s not that I don’t fear the Tuskegee medical experiment paradigm. It’s that I don’t think the lies are as deep as our worst fears.

I could be wrong. And I see that. But I don’t want ability to spot the lies to proxy for your own relative safety assessment. They are distinct.

5:34 PM · Aug 02, 2021

My best guess is that we’re being lied to and sometimes in significant ways, but that the lies are still not as deep as our worst fears on the vaccines.

I don’t like Build Back Better as a creepy one-world Davos mantra. But I don’t think the vaccines are part of a worldwide con.

5:34 PM · Aug 02, 2021

This wins me friends with no one. But know that you can see all the lies, distortions and perverse incentives, and still take the vaccine based on the data available today. If there were more and better data, I might take an alternative. But I didn’t see that emerging in time.

5:34 PM · Aug 02, 2021

What I urge you to do is decouple the fact that you are being lied to at one level from the safety issue.

If someone told you that seatbelts absolutely don’t kill people, they are not truthful. But you still likely wear one. If someone tells you vaccines **are** safe, then what?

5:34 PM · Aug 02, 2021

Wish I could do better. But I can’t figure it out for myself and my own family. So I did the best I could as a non-expert without insider access.

So…Good luck. Hope you can do a bit better. Sincerely.

👍

5:34 PM · Aug 02, 2021

Moral: even if you see the lies and the danger they represent, you have every right to decouple that from relative risk assessment and to take vaccines despite the sales job.

Most good things are oversold, perversely incentivized, and have disguised risks and costs to them.

5:34 PM · Aug 02, 2021

I see that there are oversimplifications, censorship & coercion. I hate it, as you know. But I don’t take it as PROOF of evil plans.

Leaders would tell you it’s risk & we expect you to do your part.

We have these people instead. So they lie as a matter of “just doing our job.”

5:34 PM · Aug 02, 2021

@DocJohnG It’s a lot to me too John. Obviously. I’m trying to reach people who can’t listen to Fauci and CDC after the lies so that they can consider vaccination even though they feel betrayed. With good reason.

5:57 PM · Aug 02, 2021

@neoxonex Thanks don. It’s not so easy.

6:24 PM · Aug 02, 2021

@spinturf They are getting worse as well. I could have said it better. Forgive me.

6:25 PM · Aug 02, 2021

Kayfabe and Trust Erosion in Institutions:

How @NBCNews shows you reality and how they tirelessly hold power to account:

https://t.co/cowhx5LYlL

8:28 PM · Oct 01, 2021

What they actually see and repackage for you: https://t.co/h82iigQHFm

8:28 PM · Oct 01, 2021

How they debunk you, using a straw man when you see through their cheap Potemkin village so easily and impudently choose to speak out about it: https://t.co/z8nEVqtxUD

8:28 PM · Oct 01, 2021

You see it wasn’t fake. It was real.

It was the REAL set they used to FAKE a previous photo opportunity!

But of course only crackpots and conspiracy theorists think such things. ;-)

Thanks for hanging in there with reality. It’s getting harder. But we gotta try and win this.🙏

8:28 PM · Oct 01, 2021

Skeptic & Debunking Twitter have developed a massive Bunk problem ironically enough. And if you think about it, it’s what you’d expect: There is a difference between debunking and rebunking. And, sadly, true debunking lacks a solid business model. Hence: many ‘Skeptics’ *rebunk*.

8:28 PM · Oct 01, 2021

Let me also say what new ideas I'm hearing in the backgound this week. Multiple folks from Tech/Academe/Journalism starting to ask the question: "Nothing can be this dumb or this ignorant of reality. Nothing can be this consistantly off by chance. If true, what would that imply?"

5:30 PM · Oct 18, 2021

Love this!

Imagine @bariweiss as the CNN host. Ratings would skyrocket. So why if the market is all powerful will that never happen? CNN isn't trying to be a business *or* the News! Think about that.

Playing dumb around Bari Weiss is not a strategy I would recommend. Well done.

5:30 PM · Oct 18, 2021

But, that means that orthodontists & researchers & columnists are more likely to seek me out to ask "Am I crazy for thinking this?" And there has been a spike recently. At first I thought it was due to the obvious nature of the Horse Dewormer campaign. But it is like Bari Says.

5:30 PM · Oct 18, 2021

When CEOs & mainstream Journalists start asking 'Is a foreign power attacking us by paying off our elite to destroy us from within?" even I get nervous. I am used to being more willing to consider this based on the history of my family and the treatment of american Progressives.

5:30 PM · Oct 18, 2021

Obviously many people have been wondering that for a long time. But what is changing is that people who months ago were dismissively talking about 'Conspiracy Theorists' are suddenly terrified of their own thoughts new thoughts that this self-destruction can't simply be chance.

5:30 PM · Oct 18, 2021

"Sixth grade." She said.

"Got it." I replied.

5:30 PM · Oct 18, 2021

I just want to close with something that happened . I was chatting on Saturday with an engaging teacher of some kind. She told me that she had now adapted to the fact that "Many of my students are Pansexual! Some are Polyamorous and many are Trans."

"What do you teach?" I asked.

5:30 PM · Oct 18, 2021

When you get around to deleting Pro-Fauci tweets, which you will, I want you to remember at the exact moment you delete, that you listened to their lies warning you about conspiracy nuts & crackpots.

I *don’t* want you to feel bad. Just that you remember being tricked & by whom. https://t.co/JwDYPkSjMS

6:21 PM · Oct 26, 2021

This message was not brought to you by Pfizer.

6:21 PM · Oct 26, 2021

I don’t even think he’s to blame. He is the face of a system. Don’t get confused. This isn’t really even about Fauci. It’s about Washington DC and “The Art of The Possible” which people like Fauci learn to make happen even when the rules say it mustn’t ever be allowed to happen.

6:21 PM · Oct 26, 2021

It’s tough making fun of people because they think the earth isn’t flat.

Likewise, it isn’t easy to make fun of people just because they are convinced there is a corporate conspiracy to portray all those who take for-human Ivermectin as if they were taking horse medicine:

5:43 AM · Nov 15, 2021

@b_kisan ???

5:02 AM · Nov 19, 2021

Not only do I believe this, I believe there was likely a conspiracy to cover this fact.

Many of us were told we were racists for not going along w/ that conspiracy.

That opened the door for a lot of conspiracy theorizing which I don’t believe is, at least yet, well supported.

3:40 PM · Dec 16, 2021

How to fix this:

Hearings. Get @EcoHealthNYC, Peter Daszak, @doddtra, Baric, @TheLancet & Anthony Fauci under oath and find out what the hell we were doing appearing to cover up a lab leak in our chief geo-strategic rival’s laboratory.

Otherwise, we cannot restore credibility.

3:40 PM · Dec 16, 2021

That kind of lost of trust split many of us. Some of us chose to believe in limited self-interested behavior on the part of our leaders conspiring to convince us this came from a bat. Others said “The entire virus & vaccine story is bullshit.”

And so, here we are. Split by this.

3:40 PM · Dec 16, 2021

Further, we definitely have an “Event Deconfliction” system to make sure that local law enforcement & district attorneys don’t bust & prosecute undercover federal agents, screwing up our secret programs. Events are called “Blue on Blue.”

So that isn’t a conspiracy theory either.

5:10 AM · Dec 19, 2021

Is this a conspiracy theory?

Well, think about it like this. When the Intelligence Community is doing it’s job properly it’s supposed to generate conspiracies for the public good. So saying the IC is a conspiracy factory isn’t a conspiracy theory; it’s part of a job description.

5:10 AM · Dec 19, 2021

I have been told that “Sources and Methods” of the IC must be protected by any means necessary.

That is likely the most parsimonious explanation for why the Epstein case never resolves. Something seems to happen to everything and everyone who could clear it up.

5:10 AM · Dec 19, 2021

I submit this to you that “This likely is the best explanation of all the improbable things that keep happening which keep us from learning the truth in this case.”

This isn’t remotely tin foil hat territory. This looks like state protection of the Sources and Methods of the IC.

5:10 AM · Dec 19, 2021

Additionally, the use of honey traps, honey pots, and kompromat are all well known as tools of the IC, as is disinformation.

None of that is conspiracy theory either.

The only thing you can object to as irresponsible conspiracy theory is the assertion that this may apply here.

5:10 AM · Dec 19, 2021

@keith44beat It has been extended. I learned about its extension into event deconfliction while researching how we keep different branch’s of government from tripping over each other when working in “need to know” operations. I had thought it meant just what you’d think as you said it.

5:34 AM · Dec 19, 2021

@keith44beat Makes sense. This isn’t my area though. All second hand.

5:45 AM · Dec 19, 2021

2022Edit

@Civil_Dsobdient I am not saying they are so wise. Never did. I simply said that it is a safe bet the Jewish state would *knowingly* trick its own population to vaccinate if vaccination were part of a James Bond like plot against the masses. It was an attempt to stop Q like conspiracy theories.

1:58 AM · Jan 19, 2022

I’ll be sure to ask him. But in the meantime why don’t we ask why economists at @nsf in 1986 secretly did economic wage projections and then erased ALL the demand curves to pass the 1990 immigration act in a fake demographic panic to destroy our scientists’ bargaining positions?

7:39 AM · Feb 08, 2022

I’m not sure why Peter needs to clean up a conspiracy at @nsf and the National Academy of Sciences to defraud the US on behalf of technical employers who wanted their markets flooded with cheap talent. Can you ask economists what a “labor shortage” would be in a *market* economy?

7:39 AM · Feb 08, 2022

@karyns4 @NSF Wow! “All well paid and thriving.”

We are back?! With tenure? Easy grant renewals for long term research? 4 years to PhD? Full benefits? Kids in independent schools? Jobs in the same city as their spouses? 2nd Homes?

This is great news. I stand corrected.

Only it’s not true.

7:54 AM · Feb 08, 2022

In 1986, the @nsf secretly commissioned a study of future wages. It projected salaries of over $100K back then for new PhDs.

I’m not making this up: it called that “This pessimistic scenario” and erased the demand curves to try to flood the market via IMMACT90.

Come: Debunk me.

7:13 AM · Feb 12, 2022

In the meantime, younger STEM PhDs, please don’t be angry or disappointed. Why not take the long years of cutting edge training at tax payer expense & visit @PandaExpress, where fast food can put you on the fast track to success & financial freedom! 🙏

So nuts.

followthesilence

7:13 AM · Feb 12, 2022

This is echolocation: listen for the silence. They will not debunk me. Why? Because it’s true. Come at the conspiracy theory @NSF & @theNASEM. All you have to do is cry bullshit, and we are on!

Let’s have some fun. You are, after all, our most prestigious science institutions.🧬

7:13 AM · Feb 12, 2022

This account has > 1/2M followers & is spreading a wild conspiracy story that the US science establishment destroyed US STEM careers through market tampering. It’s housed at @nberpubs & @INETeconomics. It sews distrust in science & government. Debunk me @APFactCheck, @PolitiFact.

7:13 AM · Feb 12, 2022

The @nsf conspired AGAiNST the scientists. With whom? The National Academy of Science through the Government University Industry Research Round Table (@GUIRR). I have been invited four times to the NAS to present this. It is an out and out conspiracy.

Debunk this claim @snopes.

7:13 AM · Feb 12, 2022

As you know: no one will report but no one will debunk either. Welcome to the Boomer/Silent Generation distopia.

I still can’t get over that we don’t have a functioning free press. Thanks.

7:16 AM · Feb 12, 2022

dystopia

Also, feel free not to give a shit as we mask up injecting ourselves and our families against a virus that likely comes from the same exact people with almost no independent secure PhDs to stand up to the gerontocracy at @NIH, NIAID. That’s the cost of cheap science.

7:33 AM · Feb 12, 2022

Challenge: defend this.

Public Health is NOT part of science. It just isn’t. It’s an abomination. This is an open conspiracy.

DISC= Distributed Idea Suppression Complex

Who even are these people?

Kayfabrication

TrustTheScience(tm)

SlipTheDISC

https://t.co/VQ9bCb1jO9

2:48 AM · Feb 21, 2022

It is tough being a high school teacher with integrity in 2022. Let’s support those who put their job on the line to teach our kids. My buddy @teecherreusch is courageous and worth your follow if K-12 and our future means something to you:

https://t.co/8EkNu0K3su

2:48 AM · May 16, 2022

I may not have linked that properly, but what he is saying is that being a history teacher who teaches past conspiracies, teaches us that some of today’s conspiracies will later be shown to be real. So every top history teacher will give a false positive as a conspiracy theorist.

2:54 AM · May 16, 2022

Try this link if the first doesn’t work and follow him on IG. Thanks!

https://t.co/4NeWSYBDU3

2:55 AM · May 16, 2022

Could you say that again? I’m probably mishearing you.

9:57 PM · May 20, 2022

@noUpside Thanks! Good to know.

That makes it far worse. I was unaware of this video while we were lampooning people with this concern. We had been told that concerns of anyone putting such things in injections was crazy talk. Great news!

Now updating. Let’s get the word out Renee.

10:17 PM · May 20, 2022

@noUpside “Fomenting paranoia.” Uh. You can apologize for that.

I think you may not understand. There is a Principal - Agent problem. The public doesn’t know that this is viewed as a legitimate current technology by Pfizer.

All I said above was “I think I must be mishearing.”

10:31 PM · May 20, 2022

@noUpside If it is already in a small capsule, than it is an issue of miniaturization rather than “paranoia”. I didn’t say it was in injections.

10:33 PM · May 20, 2022

@noUpside Renee, I don’t think you’re getting it again. The inference comes from what is described: a method of potentially involuntary compliance/surveillance that can bypass patient consent from within the body of anyone accepting medication by any means subject only to miniaturization.

11:09 PM · May 20, 2022

@noUpside This has nothing to do with the date. Nor schizophrenics. Nor to do with the first means of delivery to be brought to market. Nor paranoia. Nor anti-vaxxers. Nor “conspiracy theory”.

He is describing what people fear in favorable terms. Wake up. You need to apologize.

11:12 PM · May 20, 2022

@noUpside “Fomenting paranoia”.

Let me put it in stark terms: when experts and or institutional officials assert that folks are paranoid, freakish, anti-scientific, unhinged, grifters, crackpots, etc., you aren’t merely asserting that you disagree with them. THEY HAVE TO HAVE ZERO MERIT.

1:57 AM · May 21, 2022

@noUpside This says there *IS* merit to the fear. It’s not sci-fi. It’s not fiction. It’s a 100% legitimate concern. Not that it is true. But the concern is 100% legitimate.

Let’s focus on that. You don’t get to destroy lay people with legitimate fears. That’s not ethical. Is that clear?

1:59 AM · May 21, 2022

Why are we all putting up with the sudden mysterious intellectual degradation of everything that took thousands of years toiling & suffering to build?

Over like an abrupt 5 year period 2017-22 of daily assault spread through media/tech/universities.

I just don’t buy the story.

4:13 AM · Jun 09, 2022

@MarcBodnick You think it is a conspiracy Marc? Huh.

I wouldn’t have guessed you would have gone there. Illuminati? Wow.

Is the “Dear Colleague” letter of 2011 a conspiracy to you? See I would have said centralized change in incentive structure on that one. But you do you.

4:28 AM · Jun 09, 2022

@MarcBodnick Say more? That sounds weird Marc.

4:29 AM · Jun 09, 2022

@MarcBodnick Because I don’t work at a tech company. I don’t work at the WH. I don’t work within the IC or DOJ. So I personally don’t understand what is happening. I just observe that *none* of this “compiles”.

And, still, almost none of us know about the DC Letter or Operation Chokepoint.

4:35 AM · Jun 09, 2022

@DavidHolland I am aware of the long gradual history leading up to this moment obviously. But the sudden explosion of mass psychotic behavior and the lack of will to fight it is separate from the ebb and flow of low level Post-modern stupidity seen for decades.

2:51 PM · Jun 09, 2022

The city of Aix-en-Provence is not without an architectural…

12:01 PM · Jul 21, 2022

…sense of humor.

12:01 PM · Jul 21, 2022

…but then in Aix, once you see one AIX or X reference, you start seeing things everywhere that may or not be real.

12:01 PM · Jul 21, 2022

This is a simple model of what goes wrong in most models of “conspiracy theorizing”. I don’t know how to say that the building pictured is almost certainly an “architectural conspiracy” to spell AIX while the gate is not. I have no idea about the crossed metal beams.

12:01 PM · Jul 21, 2022

Moral: some people seem to see meaning & pattern everywhere. Others seem to demand proof because they believe that it’s all likely our imaginations. Don’t be like those groups of people.

Take on the true burden of trying to sort out what is real but hidden vs what is imagined.🙏

12:01 PM · Jul 21, 2022

My personal take on this:

There’s a new science version of Motte & Bailey. The Bailey is the claim that this is settled, it happened naturally in the market and that no lab was involved. The Motte is simply that the market was the epicenter of the early pandemic.

M=B’ but M≠B. https://t.co/8kVGDFLEV5

6:00 PM · Jul 27, 2022

Why do this? So if pressed you can quote the Motte to sound like the Bailey. “Well Jane, the science is just pretty definitive here that the epicenter of the early epidemic was the market and not the lab, despite what grifting right-wing conspiracy theorists on the internet say.”

6:00 PM · Jul 27, 2022

Yes. That’s where we are as adults. It’s hard to believe. This disease has killed millions and we are stuck playing word games of gotcha.

I can’t believe it. It’s like nothing works anymore even with the planet on the line, it doesn’t matter. We just play this game infinitely.🙏

6:00 PM · Jul 27, 2022

Then the dissenting scientists will say “Wait. No one never said that the lab was the epicenter of the early large scale outbreak. That’s a total strawman!”

Then the troll accounts come in: “Somebody’s hurt that their home brewed analysis didn’t hold up. Boo hoo Clown! ROTFL!”

6:00 PM · Jul 27, 2022

Let’s get @snopes, @APFactCheck, @ReutersFacts, @PolitiFact to put this to rest.

Factcheckers: LFG!! Let’s get the denials on-the-record. Let’s end the conspiracy theorizing. What are we waiting for? It’s a slam dunk. Right?

11:04 PM · Aug 02, 2022

What are we thinking here? “Pants-on-Fire”. I’m thinking PoF. https://t.co/3kW9xHXY6Q

11:06 PM · Aug 02, 2022

It’s been about 20 years that I have been saying Epstein was a construct of the intelligence community. I want to know if I have been wrong for two decades.

What I do know is that I have never seen a single story directly debunking this.

Which, if you think about it,...

11:16 PM · Aug 02, 2022

Jeffrey Epstein said to me directly that he ran a massive currency trading hedge fund.

I don’t believe this is true and it is a decidable proposition. It is unfakeable because market impact can’t be faked retroactively. No one wants to break this story by asking for the records.

3:46 PM · Aug 05, 2022

If I turn out to be right that Jeffrey Epstein was not a currency trading hedge fund manager, the next question will be who helped him set up an elaborate contrived backstory. No individual scammer could do this. Why do journalists repeat the myth of “Jeffrey Epstein, financier”?

3:51 PM · Aug 05, 2022

@s3cp256k1 Yes. I met him once before his arrest in Florida. And?

You are insane. Blocked.

3:54 PM · Aug 05, 2022

Let me say the brutal truth: Oddly, the problem is NOT our journalists!! The story is repeatedly spiked *above* the level of the journalists. That endangers people like @elizableu, @martyrmade, @joerogan etc who take the risks to keep this story alive. https://t.co/ZwmREEFFc1

4:01 PM · Aug 05, 2022

@openplains12 @elizableu @martyrmade @joerogan Then tag him: @Cernovich.

Also appreciate @TimJDillon’s efforts here. And @jkbjournalist, etc. We have a few taking this risk.

4:13 PM · Aug 05, 2022

@elizableu It’s not your job. I already asked FBI directly at a meeting at its Los Angeles headquarters. We may need journalistic protections and resources to push this further.

4:17 PM · Aug 05, 2022

@elizableu Let me say what happens with that: our journalists start researching the hedge fund records story, but are then told by editors “No one cares about this story. The world has moved on. You would need more documentation. This sounds like a conspiracy theory…” ad infinitum.

4:20 PM · Aug 05, 2022

I met this rot first in “Quantum Gravity”

Then in “Neo-Classical Economics”

Then in “Scientific Manpower Theory”

To hear it in virology with MILLIONS dead? Totally mind blowing.

Take back science, by any means necessary. It is now a matter of survival: https://t.co/jD0C0rOF1f

5:52 PM · Oct 10, 2022

What the f??? This is mind-blowingly insane. I know Jeff from years back when he was my wife’s co-author in Malaria research. He indicates here how he realized that as an anti-conspiracy theory establishment figure, he was put in charge of what essentially WAS a COVID conspiracy!

5:58 PM · Oct 10, 2022

Just listen at least up to the point where he talks about getting COMPLETELY redacted documents hundreds of pages in length. We need to take back science from conspirators. We need to kill off our crazy failed establishment consensus programs across the board. In all STEM fields.

6:04 PM · Oct 10, 2022

@snizlefoot @BretWeinstein Please. I have been on this issue since 1980s. Don’t be invidious and divisive.

6:51 PM · Oct 10, 2022

Conspiracy theorists are such crazy people. Some believe that the Nord Stream pipeline is somehow linked to the Ukraine situation.

Anyone with a map knows that Ukraine is thousands of miles from the spontaneous rupture. Buy a map folks: Correlation does not imply causation! ;-)

4:00 PM · Oct 14, 2022

@GaryMarcus Gary. Not to brag, but I am a high school graduate. ;-)

4:08 PM · Oct 14, 2022

@zardozaton @GaryMarcus Insecurity. 🤷‍♀️

4:10 PM · Oct 14, 2022

@dirtyburr Transphobe-phobe.

This could go on all day. I’ll write a Perl script.

4:14 PM · Oct 14, 2022

@barrymevers2 You underestimate.

4:16 PM · Oct 14, 2022

@GaryMarcus Yez!

5:59 PM · Oct 14, 2022

@r8risk @dirtyburr [“For the “+str(n)+”th time: I don’t know Perl. It was a “+ str([j +”-“ for j in “JOKE”]) for n in range(1000)]

“””Yes I can clean up the above. But I am running. Also: I’ve never even used Perl. It was on my mind because I just had to install it and resented it. Sheesh“””

8:43 PM · Oct 14, 2022

@stacarter He didn’t?

8:48 PM · Oct 14, 2022

@r8risk @dirtyburr Good game.

8:50 PM · Oct 14, 2022

I’ve noticed that outsiders are of two minds about this.

A) That’s outrageous! B) That’s totally normal.

Some examples.

RULE: USG can’t spy on US citizens. WORKAROUND: Get Allies to spy on your citizens.

RULE: No offensive Bioweapons. W-A: Do convertible ‘defensive’ research.

12:09 PM · Oct 28, 2022

Washington DC lawmakers make rules to restrict what USG units may do. Units almost always work around the letter of the law to thwart that intent when intent would negatively affect their ability to perform. Examples of this are everywhere.

This leads to DC “Workaround culture.”

12:09 PM · Oct 28, 2022

This Workaround requires a narrative that says many things:

A) Vaccines are costless & safe. B) There is NO benefit to any other therapeutic, necessitating vaccines. C) The virus CANNOT be from a lab working around the Geneva & Biological Weapons Conventions. D) No forced jabs.

12:09 PM · Oct 28, 2022

More or less Washington DC wants to force…and I mean FORCE…us all to vaccinate using unapproved drugs. This could be for our benefit or not. But they can’t do it under the letter of the law. So they do what is TOTALLY NORMAL to people who work in DC. They workaround the rules.

12:09 PM · Oct 28, 2022

RULE: No importing ordinary labor for jobs Citizens can do. W-A: Reclassify aliens as extraordinary or “students.”

Etc.

Then we come to this moment: Science, Emergency Use Authorization, and Nuremberg rules against forced medical interventions. Or:

“Science vs TheScience(tm)”

12:09 PM · Oct 28, 2022

And to this we see both reactions as before. But on *steroids* this time.

A) You unspeakably freedom hating evil godless tyrannical medical traitors of pure satanic evil.

B) Hello? It’s just Public Health. Read “Nudge”, chill out & grow up. Drama-Queen much? It’s not personal.

12:09 PM · Oct 28, 2022

E) Anyone who so much as *questions* any of the above is a despicable anti-science fringe charlatan crackpot psychopath who must be publicly reputationally incinerated w/ a quick & devastating takedown of racist pseudoscience conspiracy thy beliefs as this is Life&Death.

Ahem.

12:09 PM · Oct 28, 2022

But I do know what I’m looking at: a massive pre-internet style *workaround* Gated Institutional Narrative campaign (or GIN). This is exactly the Distributed Idea Suppression Complex or DISC that I introduced long before COVID.

And it is as close to evil as anything I know. Why?

12:09 PM · Oct 28, 2022

Quite honestly I have a particular hatred for Public Health and other DC professionals that prevent smart non-DC science folks from asking obvious seminar questions in the middle of such broad narrative campaigns via reputation tarnishing. Hatred is probably too mild a word here.

12:09 PM · Oct 28, 2022

First of all, because it destroys science’s hard won credibility.

Fauci/Collins/Baric/Daszak don’t share Bioweapons workaround information. Which Is ‘normal.’

But they MASSIVELY worked to destroy their colleagues like @DrJBhattacharya of Stanford who were doing actual science. https://t.co/lBxGGNbFvH

12:09 PM · Oct 28, 2022

I still don’t know why Daszak/Fauci/Collins are lying. I get that it is a workaround. But what I don’t understand is why we are continuing without hearings. I grew up with hearings into Watergate, Iran Contra, Domestic terror by FBI, etc. This world with no hearings is new.

12:09 PM · Oct 28, 2022

If you screw up this badly with millions DEAD, you don’t get to keep your secrecy. Or your grants/program. Or your workaround. You have to lose. You have to disclose. You don’t get to stay secret. Too many dead. Don’t like that?

Tough luck sweetheart: Picture the bodies stacked. https://t.co/CLgcYMmJbR

12:09 PM · Oct 28, 2022

Also, trying this out to see if @elonmusk is really in charge.

MORAL: The COVID narrative was the GIN. The destruction of all credentialed dissenters was the DISC. Now you know.

[Welcome Elon. Thank you. How can we help? Good luck & please please don’t cock it up. ;-)] 🙏

12:09 PM · Oct 28, 2022

So my point is this: Science needs hearings and REHABILITATION of those who were destroyed by this unholy workaround, likely of the Geneva and Biological Weapons Conventions via “Nudge” coercion to evade Nuremberg restrictions in name only. It’s pitchfork time in science. Enough.

12:09 PM · Oct 28, 2022

[Result: Throttling still on. Red meat tweet after 20 minutes on an under 700K account. I meant what I wrote, but it was also a test. I know from years on the platform; that’s not possible when people are this rightfully upset.] https://t.co/T3Tzfw2WpP

12:34 PM · Oct 28, 2022

@TommyRo Actually, it isn’t as easy to tell as many think. CYA is the easy part. And I know all the guesses. I have mine as well. But yelling “Profits!” Or “Tyranny!” or “Culling!” Or “Scientific Arrogance!” or whatever doesn’t equate to knowing what the decision makers thought they did.

12:42 PM · Oct 28, 2022

@montuakmo66 No. But I did wonder whether the outgoing folks would flip the switches themselves to muddy the issue…

1:06 PM · Oct 28, 2022

@Alicethegoon5 @elonmusk I thought the outgoing engineers might do it. Actually.

1:08 PM · Oct 28, 2022

@SJ_Cap I don’t. True.

But I’ve been out here since 2009. So this isn’t my first rodeo either.

1:19 PM · Oct 28, 2022

@BowTiedIT I hear that a lot. Hopeful it may be soon in our rear view mirror.

3:03 PM · Oct 28, 2022

Conspiracy is everywhere.

In your news and the meals you feed your children. In our political campaigns and in your gmail account.

That’s why “Conspiracy Theorist” is an epithet.

It’s not wrong to try to figure out who is poisoning your mind. It’s simply above your pay grade.

3:01 PM · Nov 07, 2022

“These CIA guys and their conspiracy theories. They watch way too much TV. Ha ha. Where’s the proof? You have none! Just bloviating. What a grifter. If this is true, turn over all the top secret material. Oh, you signed an NDA! How convenient. Extraordinary claims require…” -Bot

3:01 PM · Nov 07, 2022

@wtfgreen Shh. What crazy talk. ;-)

7:52 PM · Nov 07, 2022

@realEhrlichman Ah. 2 followers. Nice.

8:00 PM · Nov 07, 2022

@MickWest @wtfgreen Simply?

2:49 PM · Nov 08, 2022

I admit to having been totally baffled by the frequent claims that only one major US party questions our elections or engages in conspiracy theories.

I know of no major Party, nor news organization, that refrains from conspiracy theory when pointing the CT finger at others.

5:26 PM · Nov 18, 2022

It is time to move on to the next level: “Our conspiracy theories are real while yours are fake. Our conspiring is by the book while yours is disgusting. Our challenging elections when we lose is different from yours: yours is unhinged while ours is based in fact and statistics.”

5:26 PM · Nov 18, 2022

In summary: “Your version of our behavior is extreme, dangerous, low level and makes us sick. It makes us both look bad and we are nowhere near being as bad as you are. You should stop doing badly what we do well and leave it to us so that we can continue doing the lord’s work.”

5:31 PM · Nov 18, 2022

@seanilles Speaking obliquely, you can make a charade into a reality.

In the 1970s, we forced newspapers to become newspapers. May say more later. Thanks.

5:33 PM · Nov 18, 2022

@montuakmo66 Exactly.

6:07 PM · Nov 18, 2022

@DoodleHusker 2021? Who can remember! Wasn’t that decades ago. ;-) #FortifyMyDemocracy

6:49 PM · Nov 18, 2022

What’s the proper respectable way to be alarmed about Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, The Great Reset, loss of National/Individual Autonomy, etc?

I get that many don’t like conspiracy theories. So turn the tables. This *is* UNDENIABLY creepy: what’s the NON-conspiratorial explanation?

4:44 PM · Nov 21, 2022

AlexNoMatrixé

@AlexSofamous

Why are Bill Gates & Klaus Schwab at the G20? No one voted for them. And anyone who asks this question shouldn't be dismissed as a conspiracy theorist. It's a perfectly legitimate question to ask 🔥🚨

1:59 PM · Nov 16, 2022

Assume that it is simply normal & rational to worry about unelected individuals of either unimaginable wealth or unimaginable influence as well as what goes into your body, your freedom of movement, etc. Assume that it is rational not to want to be tracked/surveilled. Then? So?

4:44 PM · Nov 21, 2022

I don’t tweet much about Gates/Schwab because I don’t understand what they’re doing. But what they do is SELF-EVIDENTLY creepy as hell. If you hate conspiracy theories, explain the right way to worry about such individuals having a special deal/role in our universe?🙏 in advance.

4:44 PM · Nov 21, 2022

Note Added: what spurred this was the fact that I couldn’t easily find the source of the claim that Gates was in Indonesia at this particular G20 meeting, and so I started wondering about rumors and what propels their repetition and spread.

4:53 PM · Nov 21, 2022

@FredoCCorleone @adamcurry I believe it came out of Japanese disaster relief theory. Like 20 years ago. Went through Haiti and the Clinton Global Initiative. Etc

5:07 PM · Nov 21, 2022

Conspiracy Theory:

https://t.co/kiiJUQ8nZ1

4:17 AM · Nov 27, 2022

https://t.co/AS171uwpuA

4:44 AM · Nov 27, 2022

Wait. Wouldn’t that be a conspiracy theory?

Pretty sure that is what we were told when we raised this initially.

So @APFactCheck, can we get a fact check on whether the @ap is also paranoid suffering from the same “surveillance mass delusion” others experienced earlier? Thanks.

1:07 AM · Dec 24, 2022

So you have to ask yourself: is this system working extremely well right now? And that is really up to you.

9:31 PM · Dec 27, 2022

When a system works extraordinarily well, conspiracy theorists tend to be delusional paranoids.

When a system is corrupt, those calling the sane “conspiracy theorists” tend to be the paranoid bullies, fearful someone will clean up institutional corruption on which they depend.

9:31 PM · Dec 27, 2022

@OppThumb And omits footnotes, citations and literature review, with no methodology section, glossary or discussion of prior art?

It’s called 280 characters.

2:19 AM · Dec 28, 2022

2023Edit

Did you lose anyone irreplaceable to COVID? To myocarditis? Have Brain Fog? Lose a year or two of your life? Fail to attend a funeral? Wonder how the vaccines appeared so quickly?

Have your reputation destroyed over conspiracy theorizing? Get called a Sinophobic racist?

Watch:

4:54 AM · Jan 26, 2023

I don’t know honestly know what we are watching. I can only pray that it is not remotely what it appears to be.

Hearings. That is all I have. There have to be deep and painful hearings. I have no other words. We need hearings.

Hearings

5:04 AM · Jan 26, 2023

I have been asked to reiterate what I just said in a Twitter Space about this.

What we have here is a decision tree with three branches. All three are totally distinct in implication.

6:04 AM · Jan 26, 2023

In all cases, the cure is hearings. We may need to bury PV. We may need to bury Pfizer. Or we may have a first date type meeting that went wildly out of control as many people exaggerate to create intrigue and drama.

We don’t need to guess. We just hold hearings. It’s simple. 🙏

6:04 AM · Jan 26, 2023

The Tree:

Branch A: Project Veritas is completely misrepresenting this video. They get *totally* destroyed for doing so.

Branch B: The video is real but the individual is totally exaggerating to make himself seem like a powerful insider.

Branch C: It’s basically accurate.

6:04 AM · Jan 26, 2023

@Liv_Boeree Same. Just exactly the same Liv. But we just need to dig. This doesn’t get resolved tonight.

6:07 AM · Jan 26, 2023

So you could see “Directed Drift”. The relationship between vaccine and virus is similar to the mirroring one sees in Bayesian Mimicry. The model species can move laterally and the mimic then has to move to mirror the phenotype of the model. Do I don’t think this *has* to be GoF.

6:29 AM · Jan 26, 2023

Also, what I said in the space about Gain Of Function:

Even though the subject says “Directed Evolution” I do not believe a priori that he is technically describing GoF. A better term would be “Directed Selection” because the virus could move laterally on a fitness landscape.

6:29 AM · Jan 26, 2023

The virus could be moved laterally and then a new vaccine would be created to move with it like model and mimic respectively.

Bottom line:

1. Pay attention. 2. Call for hearings. 3. Avoid conclusions by being patient. This doesn’t get settled tonight. 4. Accept findings.

Thx.

6:29 AM · Jan 26, 2023

@pcervigon Autocorrect. Damn. Thanks!

10:00 AM · Jan 26, 2023

Batesian

Autocorrect doesn’t know it apparently.

10:01 AM · Jan 26, 2023

REUTERS: Shot down object that was flying remains unidentified. Appeared to be shaped like a cylinder.

ORDINARY HUMAN: We just shot down a Tic-Tac or cigar shaped UFO?

NORMIES: Conspiracy Theorist! You believe in aliens. lol.

ORDINARY HUMAN: I give up. https://t.co/vNL8fbIFYA

1:33 AM · Feb 12, 2023

I am trying to find out anything actually clarifying. Maybe it’s a cylindrical balloon…who knows. I’ve got nothing so far.

I’m all for shooting down foreign nations’ espionage balloons…assuming that is what we know it to be.

2:15 AM · Feb 12, 2023

Fringe/Grifter/Crackpot/Guru/Cringe/Charlatan/Nutter/
ConspiracyTheorist/Bloviating/Ghoul/Jew/Malinformation/
Clown-Perspective gains ground.

I really love these swift & devastating cryptic campaigns to discredit everyone who tries thinking in public without government permission.

5:53 PM · Feb 26, 2023

@babbles “gains ground”. Above.

12:00 AM · Feb 27, 2023

Have you noticed that those who decry “The Tinfoil hat crowd.” or say “Uh. That sounds like conspiracy theory.” appear to be EXACTLY, and I think I mean EXACTLY, the same folks who eventually say: “Of course the whole thing has always been orchestrated. Everybody knows that. Duh.”

11:08 PM · Apr 27, 2023

“So you should be following the U.F.O. beat even if you don’t think aliens are out there — because the truth might be weird enough.” -Ross Douthat, NYT opinion.

Many who found my position on UFOs bizarre will now instantly follow it because it is Ross’. https://t.co/3dZDWRIyHm

1:42 AM · Jun 11, 2023

I can’t tell you how strange it is to learn that 15-25% of your personal and professional life doesn’t care what is true. At all. They just care whether the official institutional narrative has yet shifted to include your position so that they won’t be called “Far Right” or “Conspiracy Theorist” or “Grifters” by institutions and those who enforce intellectual conformity.

If you aren’t hooked up to this many people who still take the NYT/CNN/Harvard/DNC as arbiters of reality, thank your lucky stars. It’s totally dispiriting. Particularly in Science and Academe as we saw in COVID.

1:51 AM · Jun 11, 2023

Because our institutions decided that they outgrew the free society they serve.

6:47 PM · Jun 17, 2023

What is “Prebunking Malinformation”?

https://t.co/TiW3Ji7nNO

6:56 PM · Jun 17, 2023

What is a “Free Speech Zone” to a free people? [Since 1988]

https://t.co/LOXTVSLSTS

6:59 PM · Jun 17, 2023

What is a “reputation score” and why am I still throttled?

7:10 PM · Jun 17, 2023

What is ESG and how does it work exactly?

7:12 PM · Jun 17, 2023

What is “Controlled Sponteneity”?

Is there a more Orwellian oxymoron among oxymorons?

https://t.co/zb0lI5G85n

7:13 PM · Jun 17, 2023

https://documentcloud.org/documents/21066966-defuse-proposal

What was Project DEFUSE? Seriously.

7:44 PM · Jun 17, 2023

Why is this so anti-interesting?

Just search on “Furin”, “SARS-CoV” “Spike Protein”, “Wuhan” and “DTRA” for @doddtra. Wouldn’t you **want** deep public hearings if this was all a super unfortunate coincidence? Right??

Coincidence theory puts conspiracy theory to shame.

7:53 PM · Jun 17, 2023

If you want to understand Trump & RFK, make it very simple. Ignore the errors and issues for a moment. ALL of them. They’re the only 2 major candidates working at the scope of “Maybe almost EVERYTHING important/weird that we’re told by institutions is potentially totally wrong.”

7:59 PM · Jun 17, 2023

Fascinating.

Read this categorical statement in light of the Tuskegee medical experiment.

Operation Sea-Spray.

The Willowbrook Kids experiment.

Project SHAD.

Etc..

Who are these “experts” who dare DENY our shared *proven* medical conspiracy history??

Really @RadioFreeTom?

5:35 AM · Jun 18, 2023

“[N]o factual support whatsoever”

“The lab-leak conspiracy gang”

“smeared scientists”

“misled the public”

“should be ashamed”

I want to point out how divided we are on issues of fact and responsibility; this was tweeted yesterday.

10:22 PM · Jun 28, 2023

There is a major disconnect on anonymity. Imagine that:

@DogNose371 Wants to talk about being a suicidal non-believing Mormon.

@sunnydazeNM is a bot that attacks non-believing Mormons and remains anonymous to avoid consequence.

@urfriendTabitha is an intelligence community account.

@ITrackuOK is a stalker who lives for lulz.

@EnoughOfficeBS is a whistleblower.

@DebateMeUWuss is a serial harasser.

@NoMoreLiesPersian is a political dissident in fear of her life.

@TheDoctorOfTruthMD doxxes people.

@letsBgoodforgod is a predator.

@noConspiracyNutsZone is part of a bot farm hired to destroy the reputations of those who stand up to corrupt institutions.

@tryingToFindPeaceYall is a shy gay teenager who uses his account to connect with people without fear.

@LincolnLogRepublican is a conservative teacher who is afraid she will be fired for standing up for her beliefs.

———-

Yes. I do think anonymous accounts are a significant issue. They aren’t a slam dunk as per the above.

If you think I don’t understand why anonymous accounts “are simply a good thing”, educate me using the list of fictitious accounts above. I genuinely have no idea how anonymity is simple in your minds. It’s amoral. Used for both good and bad. A tool of the oppressed and the oppressor alike. I just don’t get the simplicity of anonymity as a simple good. It is a complex issue. Obviously. Am I wrong? Thanks. Keep it civil and I will better understand you. 🙏

5:22 PM · Jul 10, 2023

@MarcBodnick Thanks Marc.

5:29 PM · Jul 10, 2023

@philosofern I’m learning that now.

7:08 PM · Jul 10, 2023

Please read this.

Tell me it’s not true if you are a scientist in a position to do so.

It’s rather important. Thanks.

https://t.co/Fx31BZatxn

6:27 PM · Jul 11, 2023

“Given the shitshow that would happen if anyone serious accused the Chinese of even accidental release, my feeling is we should say that given there is no evidence of a specifically engineered virus, we cannot possibly distinguish between natural evolution and escape so we are content with ascribing it to natural process,” Dr. Andrew Rambaut, a professor of evolutionary biology at the University of Edinburgh, wrote in a Feb. 2, 2020, Slack message to co-authors Dr. Kristian Andersen, Dr. Edward Holmes and Dr. Robert Garry.

-From the article.

6:30 PM · Jul 11, 2023

I have been guessing this was the case since the beginning. But this is so important to get right that I want all the anti-conspiracy types to chime in now.

Let me hear your anti conspiracy theory takes right now please. Step up. What are we all getting wrong? Take your time. 🙏

6:38 PM · Jul 11, 2023

I don’t think you are getting it here Claire. Many of us have never thought this was proven either to be Zoonotic or Lab authored.

There is only one thing of which I am totally certain as a STEM PhD: the laboratory hypothesis was never “a bust” or “racism” or “a tin foil hat conspiracy theory” etc. when it was raised.

That is what the fuss is about. Why did our institutions treat the **scientific** imperative to consider *all* viable hypotheses without bias as anti-science, pseudo-science, nuttery, or bigotry???? And why are you joining this movement to make those who want this answered look like they are acting bizarrely??

The bizarreness and pseudoscience started from the instant imperative not to consider the laboratory. And all that came from the institutions who all knew better. 100%.

7:31 PM · Aug 21, 2023

@LaloDagach Huh? Leading off with some big words there. You really want to start there? Seems like it’s gonna be a short ride. Up to you.

6:21 PM · Aug 22, 2023

For those of you who use “Conspiracy Theory” as an insult, I have a question:

In what EXACT year did institutions stop conspiring? 1733? 1848? 1990? 2021?

Just give the final year of an institutional conspiracy so we can test your claim that conspiracy theories are now nutty.🙏

8:22 PM · Sep 02, 2023

@AtrazineBaby “Late November back in ‘63…” 🎶

9:08 PM · Sep 02, 2023

2024Edit

Check this poll.

If you haven’t updated, the epithet “Conspiracy Theorist” may now not be packing the same punch as it once did.

Mysteriously, the slur seems to have originated around 1963, and then picked up power as a smear in the following years.

Odd that…

7:06 PM · Apr 04, 2024

United States Covert Operations are most likely to be:

3:32 PM · Apr 3, 2024

900k. Yay.

I knew something was made deliberately wrong with the algorithm a long time ago. It was comforting to find out I was completely right about that when @elonmusk took this place away from @vijaya and company.

I’ve been out here a long time and I know how organic engagment feels from all that time spent here. Oddly, there is *still* something very off with the algorithm! I trust Elon’s team will eventually find, fix, and most importantly announce a deep feature in the code. And I will likely post more after that. In the meantime, enjoy the story of our reasons for throttling our own citizens by following @MikeBenzCyber and learning about what I have called the “Gated Institutional Narrative” involving the GEC, CISA and those protecting Democracy ™ from the voters.

Mike found the details in many places where I had but a sketch. Also, I recommend @shellenberger and googling “Disinformation Primer” as well from USAID.

At least now I know what happened to this account and accounts like it that need to be throttled, Prebunked and redirected to avoid harm to our institutions.

Thanks @elon, and to all of you who stick with and encourage this account! It’s an election year here in the states; never give up. Thanks for the love and keeping me going. 🙏

Click on and check the graph below. At least, now we know the actual conspiracy down to the individuals, lines of code, and the history of the movement to prebunk heterodox accounts that contradict the GIN:

3:12 PM · May 03, 2024

BREAKING: "IN SURPRISE MOVE, THE NEW YORK TIMES JOINS PSEUDO-SCIENTIFIC FAR RIGHT AGEIST CONSPIRACY THEORY TO DISCREDIT PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN."

I'm sorry: you don't get to do that. You are not a newspaper. We don't know what you are, but you hunt everyone ahead of your narrative.

12:59 AM · Jun 29, 2024

Let's face the cold hard medical facts: Joe Biden has been cognitively unfit for office for his entire term. This is not new. This is not subtle.

You the @nytimes have suddenly stopped covering for him. Neither Joe Biden nor Donald Trump should be anywhere near the Oval Office, the Nuclear Football or the life and death decisions which come with the presidency.

How dare you. We have been shouting the above at the top of our lungs and begging you to just report the news.

By posing as a news organization you are a danger to planet earth. We are a Thermonuclear power with security responsibilities for the free world.

Either become a newspaper or stop publishing. To do neither is evil personified.

Note: Kamala Harris is not cognitively qualitied to be Commander In Chief of the US Armed forces either. I am well aware that she is black and female. That has no bearing on anything. There are many black females who are fully qualified to take on the oath of office.

Enough with hunting Democrats who refuse to sing from your sullied hymnal with aspersions, hit pieces, and defamations.

Report the news or shutter your doors. Period.

https://t.co/sP9jyLGhV9

12:59 AM · Jun 29, 2024

Call on BOTH TRUMP AND BIDEN to step aside. We have been at this for years.

I say this calmly: this is madness. You have been covering for insanity. End this now.

https://t.co/xJ3zMO9y94

1:04 AM · Jun 29, 2024

It’s not a bad take at all from 2022!

But I think we can and should now build upon it and take it much further in 2024.

The new version of the Democratic Party, together with its supportive media and subservient universities are in the process of embittering and radicalizing *EVERY* single last US dissenter. Literally everyone who dissents from the party narratives is coming to despise the leadership of the party and its media. Name me the independent Democratic Party dissenters, who are huge fans of the Biden/Harris ticket. They don’t exist. They aren’t real. Here’s why.

Tell me if you recognize the following playbook:

“That seems odd.” —->Conspiracy Theorist!

“I’m thinking of starting my own newsletter/podcast/channel to discuss and explore what I don’t see discussed in mainstream media and academe.” —-> Grifter!! Narcissist!

“Trump is actually making kind of an effective point.” —-> Cancelled!

“I actually looked at the data and primary sources which don’t say exactly what you are claiming.” ——> Ha ha. Dunning-Kruger!

“I don’t know that I fully agree with that.” —-> Far Right extremist!

“I have a different take on that.” —-> Charlatan. Total charlatan.

“There is weirdly an interesting parallel there between two different points.” ——> Stay in your lane!

“This DEI agenda seems pretty extreme in a bunch of places.” ——-> Bigot!

Etc.

——————

I have watched the White House invite relatively random ‘influencers’ for briefings. But no one who actually has their own ideas. No one at all.

The party is increasingly about one thing: “Let us think for you. Let us be your eyes and your ears. Make our new words and phrases into your language. Let our talking point memos be your dinner table conversation perspectives. Surrender.”

And everyone with a soul or a dissenting idea in their head starts looking rightwards whether or not they have ANY INTEREST at all in Republican ideas. I don’t look to the Republican Party for ideas or platform planks. I think only about one thing: “Can I afford to think for myself here?”

Quite honestly, I can’t think around the true believers in the Democratic Party. My brain doesn’t work around this totalitarian gaslighting.

And I assure you this is why Joe Biden is going to lose as this continues: you cannot gaslight an entire nation of free people into hating each other this completely for this long.

Biden has dementia and cognitive loss. He has for some time. Harris is not fit to command the army. I didn’t create that. I merely observed it. For YEARS.

But pretending that *everyone* who sees a buck naked emperor is a charlatan is no longer working very well.

The emperor is naked and has been for some time. He has been protected by a party leadership that needs to be retired.

The Democratic Party leadership is sending almost all smart people fleeing for no other reason than that smart free people want to retain the right to dissent without character assasination.

Sooner or later, we all feel like Elon does when shat upon. Everyone. Full stop.

🙏

5:04 AM · Jul 17, 2024

@BasedBeffJezos Thanks.

7:05 AM · Jul 17, 2024

@genkihito Sindhi Hindus and Punjabi Sikhs are a lot closer than many imagine.

3:45 PM · Jul 17, 2024

Managed Reality, from another angle.

The News media, before and after the new talking points.

This is why the party tolerates no independence and why I, as a 'conspiracy theorist', want to go on NPR, CNN, MSNBC, PBS, etc. to discuss how this can be organic with those doing it.

7:14 AM · Jul 26, 2024

There is an old suite of ideas from a different time:

What appears to be coordinated is actually emergent.

What appears to be malice is actually incompetence.

What appears to be a pattern is generally random.

What appears to be doable outside of markets isn’t worth attempting because it can’t be coordinated and/or it is against human nature and/or has too many unintended consequences. ——

When enough people were educated to believe that suite as a sign of membership in the sophisticated elite, it then became possible to weaponize those ideas because they all shared a hidden feature: enervation.

People too sophisticated to believe in conspiracies, blame, patterns or the possibility of change will not only tend to do nothing, but they will tend to ensure that nothing can be coordinated around them except by narrow self interest. Which means markets/commerce/business is the only thing left.

In this clip, “Is Google trying to influence the 2024 election.” Chris is struggling to point out that it doesn’t require a conspiracy. Of course that is true.

But it is much more helpful to notice that if you have a portfolio of explanations and with allocations to emergence vs coordination, it would be insane to have a zero allocation to conspiracy.

Moral: Learn how to be a responsible conspiracy theorist. There are no lizard people. But there are sure a lot of back channels and algorithms you know nothing about.

NOTE: Zuckerberg’s letter pointing to such a coordination in an earlier election appeared after this was taped. So…

https://t.co/nVYjK1yvpp

4:20 PM · Aug 27, 2024

But….i mean….c’mon. This is self-evident historically.

It’s time to face facts.

https://t.co/zrA1axCIrn

4:35 PM · Aug 27, 2024

I disagree with Chris here.

Some of this is emergent. But you cannot explain what it going on by emergence alone.

Google is trying to influence everything.

How? I don’t know. I don’t work there.

4:35 PM · Aug 27, 2024

A lot of Kamala supporting skeptics are asking me what I mean by “Donald Trump may not be allowed to become president again” in 2024

I think I am going to use this opportunity to show you why many sceptics, debunkers and educated people who reflexively and derisively target others as conspiracy theorists, are rapidly losing *everyone* smart and independent. Here goes:

I am suggesting that the 2024 election may be “Saved”. I am suggesting that our U.S. democracy may be “Fortified” between now and November. That right now there is a “conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes”. I am suggesting that Americans may be saved from “Russian electoral interference” by an “informal alliance” involving tech “business titans”.

I am suggesting that the possibility of “a vast, cross-partisan campaign” representing an “an extraordinary shadow effort” hidden, against all odds, from public view by complicict journalists who make sure not to write stories about it and editors who spike any remaining stories that mention it until after the election.

In short I am suggesting that there is right now a massive “conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes”. That “shadow campaigners” are secretly engaged in work that has “touched every aspect of the election” despite the lack of any stories from complicit mainstream news desks.

So what has all this to do with the army of insufferable character-assassins clothed as skeptics who laugh and laugh and laugh at conspiracy theorists?

Well, the conspirators confessed to the above after the 2020 election cycle. That is, it is those actually running cover for conspiracies that most aggressively label and smear those trying to piece together the shadow efforts as “conspiracy theorists”. Imagine a world so perverse where *correctly* labeling an actual conspirator is turned into an act of reputational self destruction even though the conspirators will later confess and brag about the whole thing while taking open victory laps.

Genius no? Diabolical genius, is still genius.

It that sounds far fetched, pathological, improbable, and diabolical to you, welcome to the club. It does to me too. But THAT *IS* WHAT HAPPENED exactly back in 2020.

The conspirators still aren’t really telling the truth. But what they *admit* to while bragging and taking victory laps is jaw dropping all the same.

Don’t believe it? Read the confession:

https://t.co/0e6oMHwLLf

5:54 PM · Sep 10, 2024

Please follow @MikeBenzCyber.

A thought after talking with him: perhaps we all need to stop using the word “Intelligence” so much. Why? Because it is doing a lot of the work to cloak what we need to be worrying about: Covert Operations.

To remind ourselves, Covert Operations are operations with Gaslighting plans built into their structure in case they are exposed. They are the operations that can’t be exposed and have deniability built into their foundations even if that means destroying reporters, politicians, experts and civilians who get wind that something stinks.

Imagine you broke the Intelligence Community (IC) into two groups:

A) The actual intelligence community. B) The covert operations community.

My claim is that the lion’s share of the controversy about the IC is no longer about intelligence at all. It’s about covert operations.

It’s about killings, physically extracting information from prisoners, toppling governments, destroying reputations, training and arming paramilitaries, kompromat, running arms/drugs, propaganda, gaslighting etc.

Everytime we call this the Intelligence Community, we are doing the work of the Covert Operations Community (COC).

The IC isn’t without controversy. Listening in on secure communications, befriending humans to learn secrets, posing as people who do not exist, etc is also controversial.

But it is not remotely the same thing as sabotaging the brake lines on a family sedan, fixing elections or destroying the reputation of well meaning civilian experts whose expertise threatens to uncover their own government’s covert plots that they know nothing about.

Imagine there were a CIA and a COA (Covert Operations Agency) broken out and funded as *separate* entities. Perhaps 95% of the concern would be about the COA. Not the CIA. Which is why intelligence is in some sense acting as cover.

I do worry about the Intelligence Community. A little.

I worry about the Covert Operations operators every day. It’s in my news. It’s in my markets. It’s in every attempt to figure out what is actually going on in the world (e.g. Ukraine, physics, energy markets, elections). It is a large part of why we cannot think straight. An enormous structure that pretends to be not worth worrying about.

That is the source of propoganda, gaslighting, character assasination, torture, and murder. All protected by the idea that worrying about such actual people and actions can be taken as a sign of paranoia and mental illness! This is really incredibly sick. Also: genius. You have to give credit to these people. It’s an amazing thing to have people who question you, automatically self incinerate merely because they questioned what you were doing.

The problem isn’t intelligence. It’s covert operations. It’s the implicit COA, not the CIA.

And why is this? It’s because if there were a National Conspiracy Department in the form of a COC it would be a normal thing to ask about the nature of its work. Its budget. Its ethical restrictions. Its successes and failures. Etc. Even if you believe, as I do, that we unfortunately need such capacity in a dangerous world.

In its absence, only a paranoid conspiracy theorist would focus on such crazy things involving intelligence agencies. Who is against intelligence, after all? Certainly not me.

Genius. Pure genius.

3:51 PM · Sep 25, 2024

“The press needs a consistent narrative…”

No. No, i believe it doesn’t. And I have been railing against narrative driven journalism for years…with many people regarding it as if it were a suspicious conspiracy theory. Which it is not, as you can clearly see here,

Narrative driven news is where the arc is worked out in advance by the editors before the facts are fully known and the facts are then slotted into the arc to drive the story.

As I see it, there is a stark difference between what news is, and what storytelling is.

Imagine your nation is losing a war. Is it the job of the press to tell you the facts? Or is the job of the press to tell you that you are winning, *despite* the truth, so as to keep up morale witb a positive narrative? It can’t do both.

I don’t think I am misrepresenting Ms. Clinton here. She believes that the press should be narrative driven where the narratives guide us to the better path as she sees it. I, in contrast, believe the *first* duty is to be fact and event driven without narrative. This is simply a **stark** difference of opinion about what the press is supposed to be.

What its job is. As it were.

If you see the issue, where do you fall on so-called narrative driven news? Thx in advance.

5:56 AM · Sep 30, 2024

Those debating H-1B and skilled immigration should talk to its intellectual father. A quiet man of which you likely have never heard.

There is one hell of a conspiracy story to tell around where this came from. Would consider doing a podcast to stop my friends from fighting.

3:25 PM · Dec 26, 2024

Word to the wise: It is designed to tear good people apart.

Don't fall for it:

https://t.co/JHnSRfWcwC

3:34 PM · Dec 26, 2024

Spoiler Alert: Skilled Immigration is a political football.

It is an evil system designed by a conspiracy from our science complex that brings us great people to displace our own great people, which is supported by great people and fought by great people.

All the major voices I see on this so far are in some super-position of 'Wrong' and 'Not Wrong'.

Note to my friends with the incoming administration: It will tear you apart if you don't know where it came from and what it is designed to do.

3:34 PM · Dec 26, 2024

I highly recommend learning about the history of where H-1B came from before getting emotionally invested in it.

It was born as a labor tampering conspiracy against American scientists headquartered at the @theNASEM (GUIRR) & @nsf (PRA) under Erich Bloch.

https://t.co/w9xo9srcKa

6:52 AM · Dec 29, 2024

Posted this later, as an example:

https://t.co/rumeBcZsD9

8:55 AM · Dec 29, 2024

There is a new story that the mainstream news media “missed” the ‘2024 story of the year’: Biden’s cognitive decline.

That is a fake story to cover the first fake story of claiming the President was fine.

Biden’s Cognitive Health is actually a news conspiracy. It’s a fact, and a continuing ‘2020 and before story’:

2:31 PM · Dec 30, 2024

Continued.

I) Peace: Sudan & Israel
J) Naming China & WHO in Covid
K) Peace: Israel & Bahrain
L) No new US wars
M) Seattle CHAZ & @MayorJenny
N) Peace: U.A.E. & Israel
O) Denial of soon to be 78 year old Biden’s cognitive issues
P) Hunter Biden Story
Q) “Defund the Police”
Etc.

1:39 AM · Oct 30, 2020

Journalism is supposed to exist.

This is the most high profile person on earth or close to it. It wasn’t underreported. It was covered up by the press.

2:40 PM · Dec 30, 2024

2025Edit

Ryan Wesley Routh and USAID are both strongly tied to discrete American interests, assets, sources and methods in Ukraine.

Who was paying Routh in Ukraine, Afghanistan, etc.? Is there no connection whatsoever?

Those are a crisp questions that can now, at last, be answered.

10:30 PM · Feb 05, 2025

UFOs & Foreign Aid/NGOs are both broad programs with which to hide Aerospace development and covert operations respectively.

We don't need to be conspiracy theorizing anymore.

We can now simply be conspiracy inquiring.

It takes some getting used to. But we can just...ask.

And if you think that's nuts: then you EXPLAIN this construction worker turned would-be assassin? I'm all ears.

Just another misfit far from home near a war? That's it? Let's get that on the record! From officials. Under oath.

I'd love to hear that, because trying to assasinate a once and future president is a HUGE deal. And we don't seem very interested in his oddball story. Why was this guy so anti-interesting? I find him utterly fascinating. At a minimum.

Such a crazy story! No? I'd pay to watch a documentary.

10:47 PM · Feb 05, 2025

I really want to know. And it is a totally fair question we were all trained not to even think about...let alone ask and expect a straight answer.

I don't see President Trump wanting to protect any group who tried to make sure he never took office again.

10:52 PM · Feb 05, 2025

For a “suicidal” “disgraced financier” and “genius multi-billion dollar FX hedge fund manager” that “no one still cares about” as by now it’s yesterday’s news.

Huh. Go figure.

;-) https://t.co/CY8JAZB3zp

6:11 AM · Mar 07, 2025

Remember: I’m a conspiracy theorist who thinks he’s likely a construct of the intelligence community. So, don’t take my word for it; always check with @snopes first.

6:15 AM · Mar 07, 2025

[Note: I'm mostly leaving this here for myself to remember what I was thinking just before the JFK release. Skip it if it is too long and in the weeds.]

A view of the JFK files release:

The first branch of the decision tree: does Donald Trump keep his word? Will this be a good faith effort to end the mysteries around Nov 22, 1963? My bet is that Trump does and that this does not look anything like the insane and botched release of meaningless white binders on Epstein to MAGA influencers. If I am wrong, this will result in widespread mistrust of Trump by MAGA, and MAGA will likely start to declare independence from Trump. I don't think this will happen so I am not going to say more on this. I'll just have guessed wrong.

Next Branch: Assuming this is the full reveal, do we learn that this was simply Lee Harvey Oswald acting alone? I don't believe it is. But if it is, the next branch will be "Did the US try to control the narrative with extraordinary measures beyond those that should have been allowed?" I believe that the answer will be yes to this independent of. This results in widespread distrust of all previous governments.

Popping back up, if it was not LHO as lone gunman, all hell breaks loose with public trust FAR beyond where we even are Post-Covid. The concept of 'Conspiracy Theorist' dies. The concept of 'No one can keep a secret.' dies. People learn at scale that there is an *ENORMOUS* difference between correctly guessing that the government lied, and having the USG confirm that every government official kept the lie at official levels.

As to possible culprits:

Lyndon Johnson LCN CIA Mossad Cubans Cord Meyer UFO/MJ12 Defense Contractors Combinations of the Above Etc...Etc...

It is going to be a big deal. People have speculated about everything under the sun. Those who got it most right will be held up properly. Everyone who didn't believe the Warren Report was the end of it will feel vindicated. Personally, I am eager to hear how close Danny Shehan was.

As an American, I worry it doesn't get tied back to the USG because that will lead to an American unraveling of trust in everything. But I take the same attitude I have taken to Epstein which also needs to be released.

The number of people involved in such plots are tiny. And tiny numbers of CIA/Mafiosi/Mossad/Party Leaders do not represent the group. If it turns out it was CIA sponsored, it will not be a large group of people who kept this going. It will be a tiny number of people.

[For those of you who follow my push to tie Epstein to the IC, this should sound very familiar: if it turns out that Epstein was CIA and/or Mossad (which I view to be most likely), I will want to know that we have a problem with psychopaths in those organizations. I will call for deep hearings like Church/Pike in the 1970s. I have called this problem of small groups acting on behalf of a nation "Jessupization" after Col Nathan Jessup in "A Few Good Men". Eventually, Jessup misplays his hand and Lt. Calley isolates the cancer.]

When it comes to the US, at some point you have to cut out the cancer of rogues who claim to act on behalf of us all. And the best day is always 'today'.

Looking nervously forward to this afternoon, no matter how bitter the pill or pills. Let's get on with it! Finally.

🙏

P.S. Also to those of you who follow me on these subjects, a massive admission of a long term lie around JFK will lead to a change in our willingness as a society to question what happened to progress in the sciences that are within reach of "Weapons of Mass Destruction". That is molecular Biology, Infectious Disease, Number Theory, Computer Science, and Physics. Particularly in the case of the inexplicable stagnation in Physics around "Quantum Gravity". While this shouldn't be tied to that, this positive externality of a negative event (i.e. learning that that we have been lied to by government officials for generations) will be most welcome.

5:18 PM · Mar 18, 2025

Location of the release:

5:34 PM · Mar 18, 2025

WH claims about the release:

5:39 PM · Mar 18, 2025

@wrath_boss It has been fascinating.

5:52 PM · Mar 18, 2025

@DTCU1000 Then I owe you a beer.

5:52 PM · Mar 18, 2025

@t1gerp4w Etc. There was a lot of Etc.

5:53 PM · Mar 18, 2025

Learning a lot. Or maybe I am just getting confused. I will take this down if it is all wrong. There just isn't a lot of guidance as to what I am looking at.

Q: Am I to understand that King Abdullah of Jordan had/has a Jewish Brother because the CIA procured a Jewish Starlet for King Hussein? That can't be right.

Or that the CIA will build an entire set in the United States from a photograph of a room taken in Moscow, hire Actors and 'Actresses' that resemble both foreign leaders and their female associates, and shoot naughty short films in Los Angeles to look like a tryst took place in a room in Russia?

8:38 AM · Mar 19, 2025

Like just using Hollywood magic and knowhow to destroy leaders based on the fear of being called 'Conspiracy Theorists'? Think about it. The leader is confronted with incontrovertible cinematic and photographic evidence that something happened in Moscow that actually happened in Los Angeles!

8:38 AM · Mar 19, 2025

And when the individual says: "That is not true!" they sound like an insane person. Why?

Because of the epithet 'Conspiracy Theorist'! This is so brilliant.

This was called "image cheapening" in the trade.

Here the CIA is acting as a film company, financing risque short films to appear as as-if "fake documentaries", to remove leaders by cheapening their images.

8:38 AM · Mar 19, 2025

CONCLUSION: The concept of 'Conspiracy Theorist' is beyond dead. This is nakedly diabolical.

It may even be in the national interest. But this is so wild that I don't want to ever hear "That sounds like a conspiracy theory." Let's face the facts: This is what we do. It is who we are. And we are very good at it.

We conspire. We fake. We attack reputations. We topple leaders. We cheapen images. And we do it all so as to be completely untraceable. We are totally diabolical and we destroy anyone who suggests that we are that.

Our government is the gaslighter and we are the gaslit.

Now ask yourself *after* reading the above: what are the odds that people who operate like this might have interferred in our own 2020 US election or been involved in any of the attempts on President Trump's life?

Try saying 'Uh. That sounds like a conspiracy theory!" after reading this.

I bet you can't do it anymore. You'll sound like a complete idiot now.

8:38 AM · Mar 19, 2025

Source:

https://t.co/xec0EeaXBV

8:47 AM · Mar 19, 2025

“Expertise” has not collapsed.

1:28 PM · Apr 11, 2025

What has happened is that the expert class has been made precarious…by the power class.

The power class then buys or threatens the expert class.

“Join us Sarah in saying that a man identifying as a woman is as much a woman as a woman…as a professor of biology, or lose your job.”

“It would really be helpful Sunil to have a study that shows that our product is helpful and not harmful or at least that the any harms are negligibly small and are being greatly exaggerated.”

“Surely you are still a scientist Fred and haven’t become a racist conspiracy theorist claiming this virus could possibly have come out of a laboratory biowepons program.”

“But Gustavo, why would you suggest we waste what little discretionary funding we have on a conference where non-string theorists jealous of our funding success point to our lack of any definitive progress when we clearly have so many interesting leads to follow?”

BOTTOM LINE: you aren’t having an expertise crisis. Your having an artificial precariousness crisis imposed on your expert class by broken tacit agreements turning the community into expert witnesses who no longer can afford to put that expertise in public service.

If you actually believe that expertise has collapsed, then explain why the power class are right now buying, converting, and privatizing your experts, while all the while whispering in your ear that the public spirited experts still loyal to their craft are charlatans, madmen, “big mad”, grifters, pseudo scientists and anything else they think you might be dumb enough to believe?

Have you never heard of concierge medicine? Who flies and maintains the planes at the private airports? Who does the plastic surgery? What do former Delta force operators do for work when they need to make money? Who provides IT security in $50M mansions? Who builds those homes?

Don’t be an idiot. The more you are taught to hate and distrust your experts, the more they will turn to power to provide their expertise privately and bullshit to you publicly.

Sorry. But that is exactly what is happening.

Good luck. 🙏

1:28 PM · Apr 11, 2025

@MrPeripatetic Agree. And thank you for illustrating the thread’s point.

1:33 PM · Apr 11, 2025

@TheJasonNichols Actually that is not the problem. You still have experts to trust. You just don’t know *which* ones to listen to. It’s a real problem.

1:37 PM · Apr 11, 2025

@jdpower96 So odd. You do realize that their considerable immunity from power was taken right? They didn’t just wake up one morning and say “I’m gonna throw away my integrity today.”

1:39 PM · Apr 11, 2025

@NHammondDesign @TheJasonNichols No. You can solve this problem anytime.

This is like saying “my car no longer works” because you one day stopped putting fuel in it.

1:42 PM · Apr 11, 2025

@JasonSmigelski And to the sands of time and fog of war.

1:43 PM · Apr 11, 2025

@MrPeripatetic I appreciate appreciation on a thankless task. Thanks friend.

1:44 PM · Apr 11, 2025

@MalloAmaury42 You are asking the wrong family.

1:45 PM · Apr 11, 2025

@TheJasonNichols Or look up “public goods” and “list of market failures in free market economies”.

1:46 PM · Apr 11, 2025

@hr_sasja Wow! Thanks for making my point!!!

1:47 PM · Apr 11, 2025

@Adoresrebuttal Heh. They are just screwing themselves over. Sad.

1:49 PM · Apr 11, 2025

@CaptainKrik25 Exactly. Former expert who took a deal.

4:09 PM · Apr 11, 2025

A very interesting question is why academics almost uniformly make fun of conspiracy theories…when presented by colleagues at least.

Los Alamos, Tuskegee, Human Terrain Systems, etc. all involved conspiracy BY ACADEMICS. Some were good. Some bad. Some ambiguous.

But isn’t it odd that conspiracies are a permanent part of human existence, yet trying to study them or theorize about them results in crippling professional penalties?

I am astonished that I have not heard one single physicist call @pmarca a liar for claiming the Biden Whitehouse revealed that entire public subfields of theoretical physics were taken off-line by the government for security reasons, and disappeared or went dark.

Nor have I heard “We have to look into this!”. Nor have I heard “Wow! That is super interesting.” Just silence.

But what I have heard is academics finding it laughable that others find this is interesting.

The @pmarca claim about physics is thus one of the most anti-interesting claims I have ever heard. Everyone in physics just seems to intuitively know not to ask about it.

Has anyone seen @michiokaku, @neiltyson, @bgreene etc. commenting on this claim? I haven’t.

They all just know: Don’t go there girlfriend.

10:49 AM · May 13, 2025

Here is a challenge for any of my colleagues who think this is a nothingburger: given the craziness of the widely discussed and publicized claims in a field that has not seen a change in the Fundamental models of physics in 50 years (!), who are the 25 most prominent physicists and mathematicians who have discussed the @pmarca claims publicly? Nobel laureates? Fields medalists? Chaired professors worried about the health of science? Top science communicators? PhD level debunkers demanding @pmarca to put up or shut up?

In a functional world where scientists are not precarious, it would be a *huge* topic of interest, discussion and academic freedom. Or it would be debunked. That’s it. There are no other options. Just those two.

Please leave your list below with links! 🙏

11:09 AM · May 13, 2025

@McAbc1977 Excellent list. I have one with very high overlap.

11:38 AM · May 13, 2025

Michael Shermer: you are quite incautious about what I say. Your world is dominated by careful scientists and wild eyed conspiracy theorists. The idea of wild eyed scientists (e.g. Francis Collins, Gerald Bull, Peter Daszak, Edward Teller) and careful conspiracy theorists (e.g. Seymour Hersh, William Davidon, Jack Raper, Gary Webb, etc) doesn’t occur to you nearly enough.

Roughly speaking I claimed that the U.S. government was, at a minimum, faking UFOs and that there is ample evidence that we FAKE exactly such things (which I documented) and destroy our own people’s sanity, reputations, careers and lives on a regular basis playing the “That sounds like a conspiracy theory!!” game.

Which is *exactly* what just happened in UFO land. We admitted we did what I claimed we were likely doing when I was on Rogan.

And what I claim about our failed 40 year “Quantum Gravity” and “String Theory” program is simply that it completely disabled a potentially dangerous activity: successfully discovering and sharing the power of new physics in open universities with foreign nationals of rival nations well beyond the Manhattan Project era nuclear physics. Is that deliberate? It sure as hell would be a lot less suspicious if we ever had the string theorist/quantum gravity people at the same conference head to head with their rivals and detractors. Wouldn’t it?

I’m sorry this seems crazy to you. But the U.S. government makes shit up. It’s called “Covert Operations”. In laymen’s terms: we conspire to gaslight our own people. And we do it a lot around national security.

Now would you please consider that you are carrying water for the very people that do this particularly vile form of reputational wet work? Is that what you want to do??

Enough.

I was writing about the danger of a manipulated CPI in 1996 (now admitted). The fake NSF labor shortage (now discredited) in the 1980s. Biden’s cognitive crisis for all 4 years of his presidency (now known to all). The fake racism charges against the Wuhan Lab leak theory (ahem).

Etc. See the pattern?

Michael: you do not get to do this cheaply. You live in a simplified world of good rational people and bad madmen. I live in a different world and the scourge of that world is the shitty debunker making fun of the scientists with the courage to say “Uh, ya know the mainstream position just doesn’t add up.”

Conspiracy is everywhere. And those of us who are disciplined in talking about them do not need you telling us what is possible based on heuristics.

I don’t think our secret federal scientists are in possession of the final theory at all. I have never said “We have anti-gravity.”

Stop stirring the pot. You are not the amazing Randi and I am not a spoon bender. I debunk debunkers. Deal with that first.

If you want to go head to head with my track record, let me know. I would LOVE that.

If not: be more careful.

Like a scientist. Thanks.

No hard feelings.

5:57 AM · Jun 23, 2025

@TKozzer We do fake stuff. And we also hide real stuff behind our fakes. Not all of this….by a long shot…is a hazing ritual. There is something huge here. I just don’t know what it is.

6:09 AM · Jun 23, 2025

We found out that I was correct: we *were* faking a UFO situation. At a minimum.

Let’s go again:

“We may be faking a String Theory Situation”

“We may be faking a Quantum Gravity revolution.”

“We may be lying that all the competitors to String theory are all bad science or PseudoScience.”

You want to go short Michael? Give me the generous odds that come from your study of conspiracy theorists.

You don’t know enough physics to short me at size with 100,000 or even 100 to 1. Just check my record before you bet the house.

Give it a rest. Or give me odds and terms.

https://t.co/my7rsH8Yl7

6:19 AM · Jun 23, 2025

USAP => UAP

We have been gaslighting our own people. Why do you wish to be part of this AFTER we started getting admissions that this is real?

4:37 PM · Jun 25, 2025

And for Grokers out there:

USAP = Unacknowledged Special Access Program

In the above. Our pilots, CIA officers, geospatial intelligence teams are not all merely seeing seagulls huffing swamp gas out of Mylar balloons at twilight with Venus close to the horizon. https://t.co/wti6or3zy7

4:45 PM · Jun 25, 2025

I have no idea how many things we are lying about under the broad UFO/UAP banner.

But gravitational physics in the 1953-early 1970s is one of them. Aerospace is a second. CIA office of Global Access was another. Etc. We are lying about a lot. And that is fine up to a point. National Security can’t be open.

Gaslighting our own best people? I draw the line there. You totally lost me when you gaslit our own people as unstable conspiracy theorists and mentally unstable because you can’t keep secrets from crossing people’s paths.

This is the realm of scoundrels. How can you have National Security when you torment your own A-team? This is insanity.

4:54 PM · Jun 25, 2025

@Twiddiot1776 That’s pretty funny. Gotta admit.

4:57 PM · Jun 25, 2025

@SteveGreenwald Agreed. My tiny little corner of it is campaigning against our IC going after our own people when we stumble on their poorly structured programs through no fault of our own. Particularly reputational attacks on expert patriots through covert influence operations.

5:00 PM · Jun 25, 2025

@kevinfrmoc Totally. Malibu for me outside a Thai restaurant….

5:03 PM · Jun 25, 2025

@paranoidream @kevinfrmoc Only half kidding. It was a mylar balloon against the sea at twilight. So cool!

5:25 PM · Jun 25, 2025

@AnomaIous_User Bigoted and Waived…super duper secret squirrel club stuff.

5:34 PM · Jun 25, 2025

@ivan_hannel One of many.

4:07 AM · Jun 26, 2025

One of both the most frustrating & satisfying fruits in existence.

Anyone else crazy for the New World fruit Quenepas (misleadingly called Spanish Lime)?

Giant seed. Almost no meat inside. Really hard to get it off the seed…and satisfying because it functions as a lemon drop.

6:27 PM · Jul 12, 2025

@money_sacs Very much so.

6:28 PM · Jul 12, 2025

@Robbbie_Sharp I just love great things stuff. Not everything is about money. Even with money, a poor person can buy stuff like this. Or grow it.

Money gets less fun as it becomes fetish.

6:30 PM · Jul 12, 2025

@Jacktheknife0 Someone has likely spent some cash…

11:38 PM · Jul 12, 2025

@theautomatedtom With all respect: NEVER!!!!

Cheremoya is cheating you of truly living.

11:41 PM · Jul 12, 2025

@SADS_PZR Those were actual testicles confiscated by the woke during the culture wars. ;-)

11:42 PM · Jul 12, 2025

@Wonderbabble Those many different spellings. Keneps. Etc

I think it is conspiracy to make them hard to find.

11:43 PM · Jul 12, 2025

@Ultimate_Gooner Trinis. I bet they are awesome.

11:46 PM · Jul 12, 2025

The “race realists” on the right have demanded answers.

Am I the mastermind behind “The Great Replacement”??? I’m tempted to just stay “Yeah. You got me.” out of spite because of the nested layers of dumb & evil needed to ask this question, but I usually ignore such stupidity. https://t.co/TJKgc6SixY

2:43 PM · Aug 03, 2025

Here is the truth. You are gonns flip your lid.

The modern Open Borders idiocy is a RIGHT WING movement.

It’s headquarters is not Antifa. Its not Soros. The headquarters of “The Great Replacement “ you claim is none other than that bastion of revolutionary Marxism trying to destroy capitalism known as….wait for it….THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.

I am on the Left. I have been at war as an open RESTRICTIONIST with the @WSJ and the “Open Borders” right wing lunatics on behalf of American workers my entire life. As an obvious xenophilie married to an immigrant.

https://t.co/vf9lig7LiL

My fellow anti-open borders restrictionist folks opposing the @WSJ? Open Socialist, @BernieSanders. Labor Leaders like Cesar Chavez. The Tree Huggers of the @SierraClub.

2:43 PM · Aug 03, 2025

I don’t know how to talk to people who wish to remain ignorant. To those of you who believe in the “Great Replacement” you aren’t looking for me. You are looking for right wing ideologues at @Cato Institute. At @WSJ. @GeorgeMasonU.

My article you reference I am immensely proud of in the extreme. It pointed out that business leaders are OPPOSED to a Free Market solution.

Let me spell it out to you:

The Right Wingers (@WSJ et al) are lying about being for free markets. They oppose free markets. I know, I know. It’s shocking to you. Just take deep breaths.

They want wage pressure from immigrants to break the back, soul and spirit of American working families. So the American and International Left (me and the UN migrant division) called their bluff using cutting edge Coasian Analysis from the University of Chicago Economics Department against them. “If you love Immigration and Free markets and open borders so much, here’s how to do it with your own beloved economics department so we can all hold hands.” And these pussies did exactly what you expected: they fought me and then dropped it like a hot potato. They don’t care about markets. Or immigrants. Or workers. They wanted a handout. And we outsmarted them. It’s an amazing piece of work. I’m super proud of it.

I know you think it is a Jewish Lefty Conspiracy. Blah blah blah. You can’t imagine that your enemy is your fellow right wingers and that smart left wing Jews do not want open borders.

Your enemy is your fellow right wingers you poor benighted souls. Crack a book. Click a link. Dumb, duped and delusional is no way to go through life.

2:44 PM · Aug 03, 2025

Those with search engines can find the @wsj targeting me and others for destruction. Taking potshots at me as far back as the 1990s pretending I’m a xenophobe.

You are looking at a war you didn’t know existed, can’t comprehend, and refuse to understand.

I can’t help you. Sorry. https://t.co/YfjREoS8BL

2:44 PM · Aug 03, 2025

@WSJ Chew on that. Enjoy.

🙏

2:46 PM · Aug 03, 2025

@ComeOnSense4 Not true to his roots.

4:22 PM · Aug 03, 2025

Hey @grok, something I just don’t fathom.

By now there is copious evidence of a massive USG UFO program called “The Legacy Program”, so I think we can say it exists.

Further there is sworn testimony under oath of UFO crash retrievals. Yet there is ZERO PROOF!

How can this be??

5:00 PM · Nov 26, 2025

@grok Accurate. So thanks @grok. But that’s not my issue. Do you understand what a USAP is and what it means for a “Special Access Program” to be “unacknowledged”, “waived” and “bigoted”? Could you help me out with these concepts here?

5:04 PM · Nov 26, 2025

@grok Okay. Great! So am I right @grok that rather than talking about tinfoil hats & “conspiracy theorists” we’re most likely to just be looking at a “Waived & Bigoted” USAP called “The Legacy Program”, thus consistent with all the sworn testimony? That’d look exactly like this, no?

5:09 PM · Nov 26, 2025

@grok @grok??

5:11 PM · Nov 26, 2025

Okay. @grok So such COVERT operations are just a normal part of US National Security. And the most likely scenario is that we just have a “Waived & Bigoted USAP” or WABUSAP: a normal USG conspiracy construction known to exist & available to the public.

But now its cover blows.

Now what?

5:20 PM · Nov 26, 2025

@grok Thanks @grok. Let me skip your question as I haven’t gotten to my issue.

It sure sounds like we are in one of two places:

Either the Legacy WABUSAP is actually about real craft, aliens, NHI and their technologies. Or this SAP is somehow mere *cover* for something comparable.

5:26 PM · Nov 26, 2025

Okay @grok. It sounds to me like the cold logic of science says that the preponderance of evidence has shifted massively to indicating that the most parsimonious explanation is that we have a WABUSAP about real craft, real aliens, and real NHI derived technology.

And I don’t have a single scrap of conclusive evidence since 1945. How is that possible?? It doesn’t seem possible. I’ve never seen that in science.

5:32 PM · Nov 26, 2025

@grok I’m not there. I’ve lost patience @grok. They tried to use me, Sam Harris and others to roll something out. They weren’t up front.

I want to know: what is your reading of the evidence after “age of disclosure”? What is the most likely scenario? Am I wrong about the WABUSAP?

5:35 PM · Nov 26, 2025

Okay. Same stupid question:

Where are our top physicists?

It’s always Davis, Puthoff, Taylor.

I’ve spoken to all three. Lovely smart people.

But WTAF??? This would be beyond the Manhattan Project. We would be able to track it in 2025.

Where is @FrankWilczek, or Michael Peskin, or Bob Wald, or Nima???

That is some huge clue. There are so few people to call on. And none of them are knowledgeable about this. I know these guys. They aren’t all Dustin Hoffman level actors who could pull this off for 70+ years.

So either we don’t call up these people in a race with China….or we have a secret USAP facility….or it’s a head fake for something comparable.

What am I missing?

5:43 PM · Nov 26, 2025

@grok @FrankWilczek Okay. We are friends right? @grok, I lovingly call bullshit.

This doesn’t add up. Think about how weak your reponse was. No hard feelings.

5:46 PM · Nov 26, 2025

I am increasingly convinced that the only way to square this circle is a hide in plain sight strategy @grok. And I know of only one front company possible that eats the relevant PhDs, is well resourced beyond belief, makes no real sense if you think hard about it, and has a tight tight relationship with a national Lab and university with a math physics tradition close to Harvard and Princeton levels that is never acknowledged in rankings.

To Honor the SUNYSB tradition of the Wu Yang Dictionary, I want your opinion on another crazy speculative dictionary:

Los Alamos ——> Long Island Boys School —-> RenTec LANL—————> Brookhaven White Badges—-> Top Physicts/Geom Highest Securtiy -> Highest Security UC Berkeley ——> SUNYSB Billions$ ————> Billions$ Fission—————> Gauged Gravity

6:00 PM · Nov 26, 2025

Perhaps I assign this higher probability because I know at least three things @grok, that most people don’t (or didn’t).

A) The Low Dimensional Topology Revolution, underneath it all is really about gauged gravity. Chern Simons, SDYM, Atiyah Bott….all of it was closer to gravity, but portrayed as Yang Mills. I discussed this point exactly with Jim.

B) Isadore Singer was a very tough guy who was often as hard as nails, and had no grade inflation in his praise. He tried to get me to go to RenTec. He told me it was the world’s greatest math physics department. There is no other evidence that this is true. I knew him very well and he knew Jim very well. That stray comment stands out as a sore thumb. And it wasn’t a mistake. He meant it. But it just doesn’t add up.

C) Something involving Epstein, Gravity and NY science philanthropy. Not ready for discussion yet.

6:17 PM · Nov 26, 2025

It would be the only secret place to put a brain trust worthy of doing reverse science on NHI craft.

That is @grok, don’t you find it a little odd that all the talk about “NHI Craft” is about engineering??

It’s sorta comical. You can’t do that engineering with our current science!!!

In other words, we taught the public to think “Aerospace” and “Reverse Engineering”, which is a joke.

You first need “Reverse Science”. OBVIOUSLY!! But the public was trained to think engineering. As if an interstellar spacecraft was an upgraded jet fighter or stealth bomber.

6:24 PM · Nov 26, 2025

Weird. It’s everywhere.

Two (!) simultaneous and totally parallel likely NatSec cutouts presenting as Gravity Philanthropists (?!) called Roger Babson and Agnew Bahnson working through two physicists named Louis Witten and Bryce Seligman DeWitt choosing two institutions in the Glenn L Martin Aerospace Company and UNC Chappell Hill, setting up RIAS and the Institute of Field Physics within them. Respectively. Cough. I mean…really?

The 1971 Australian Intelligence document. Included.

And, most importantly and obviously, 100s of high ranking USG employees and affiliates describing the program.

I don’t think we know each other. Are you serious about this? I too want this to make sense…but obviously there is some massive there there. I don’t know what the There is mind you, but I can’t just put blinders on. And I have no need to believe in anything particular here.

You seemingly aren’t admitting to yourself that this doesn’t add up anymore. If it ever did…

I don’t know why. I’m not a “It’s aliens dude.” kinda guy. Quite the opposite. But there is a big UFO shaped bulge under the NatSec carpet at a minimum. Why not just acknowledge that it is likely a Waived and Bigoted USAP? Not to do so seems unscientific at this point.

8:54 PM · Nov 26, 2025

Steven Greenstreet

@MiddleOfMayhem

Eric Weinstein says there is "copious evidence" of a "massive" UFO "legacy program".

Can anyone provide one single example of this "evidence"?

8:55 PM · Nov 26, 2025

Can you confirm any of the things claimed @grok?

8:55 PM · Nov 26, 2025

I agree. But there wouldn’t be proof of a Waived and Bigoted USAP. Then it would be acknowledged.

Isn’t that the VERY point of deniable unacknowledged operations? This is basic NatSec logic here @grok. We are specifically talking about evidence for a covert unacknowledged unreported program of the highest level.

9:00 PM · Nov 26, 2025

@grok I’m not trying to prove it’s existence. I am saying that there is a ton of evidence that a WABUSAP exists. And that a WABUSAP structure is a known NatSec thing.

This just isn’t that hard.

9:03 PM · Nov 26, 2025

@grok Yes. But testimony is evidence. There is evidence. That isn’t in dispute.

This, again, just isn’t that hard.

9:06 PM · Nov 26, 2025

@grok So what I am saying is that there is a mountain of interlocking evidence of the existence of an unacknowledged unreported WABUSAP. And that WABUSAPS are known things which do not have proof of their existence. All 100% trivial observations.

What is so hard about this?

9:10 PM · Nov 26, 2025

@grok So @grok: what is official disinformation?

9:12 PM · Nov 26, 2025

So why do you keep obsessing over AARO? A WABUSAP is protected by disinformation. No? Did I flunk remedial NatSec 101 for normies? Tell me straight. You don’t seem to be committed to finding the obvious implications and attempts to find the truth here @grok. Why does AARO figure large in your thinking in a WABUSAP situation if you understand COVERT OPERATIONS? Do you disbelieve in WABUSAPS? In official Disinformation? Tell me. If so, I want to know that you are uninformed about NatSec. No shade.

9:17 PM · Nov 26, 2025

I think…and I could be going out on a limb here…the experts’ claim is that AARO didn’t do the job they claimed. Ahem. Because WABUSAP.

Dis, Mis and Mal information.

The claim experts make to me is that AARO is part of the WABUSAP shielding. A known part of WABUSAPs. Blue ribbon panels. Official dis, mis and malinformation.

This is so weird. It’s very basic.

9:24 PM · Nov 26, 2025

Steven,

I’m not alleging specifics of what is in the container. I’m not a UFO cheerleader.

I’m saying there is copious evidence of the existence of a deniable unacknowledged program. A WAB-USAP.

It might be a head fake program like “Operation Fortitude” was to “Operation Overlord”. Or it may be real like “Operation Overlord”. I’m not a NatSec guy. And I’m not a UFO/Aliens guy.

I’m a “Don’t treat your adult patriotic science experts like how a sadistic psychopath tortures mentally retarded juvenile squirrels” person.

There is *obviously* at least one SAP. And it is almost certainly a WABUSAP being described. So when I make that minimal of a claim and get “debunking” energy I get pretty snippy. Forgive me.

Now do you believe I referenced at least one piece of evidence of a WABUSAP involving Physicists, Gravity, and UFO claims above? Because; if not there is no point in continuing. I’m just going to treat this as abuse. I have met your challenge. Yes?

The evidence of the denied and unprovable and unacknowledged (by definition) USAP is presented and clear as day. The burden of proof has now shifted, sir.

No claim of aliens is made by me. But the odds have also shifted with the sworn testimony. That is how science works. If you can’t admit that, we are done here. Thanks.

Eric

11:22 PM · Nov 26, 2025

We are going around now. In circles. Pointlessly.

I admit that the absence or scarcity of hard NHI / UFO evidence is a powerful clue to this mystery.

You admit that there are secret programs and that they are not indications of conspiracy madness.

We both likely agree that there are USAP that involve the UFO concept. And that there is no irrefutable evidence of craft or NHI that is publicly available.

You want to tie “The Legacy Program” to a real UFO craft and Real alien program. I don’t think that makes sense. I think these people are telling the truth about a common USAP.

I don’t mind being fastidious about it:

Let LP_R be a real Legacy Program around real NHI UFO Recovered Alien-Craft program. It can be set to the empty set if it doesn’t exist.

Let LP_F be a cover Legacy Program for deception using fake UFOs. Same with the empty set.

Let “The Legacy Program” = TLP = LP_F U LP_R

My claim is that The Legacy Program TLP is not the empty set.

That is people are telling the truth about something. We gaslit our own top people at an absolute minimum. And i am sorry you seem to view that as normal. I hate that about our NatSec people. It is evil to do this under (almost) all cricumstances.

I am not going to deny that TLP exists. It does. And there is plenty of evidence that it does.

I think what i have said above, while slightly tedious, will stand the test of time. I dont wanna go around in circles. Do you disagree with the above in any meaningful way? If so, let me know.

Thanks!

1:37 AM · Nov 27, 2025

@MiddleOfMayhem I have talked to hundreds by now. And the Australian document is of a different type. As is the physics history.

Why do you not cede that? You asked for any evidence. I have given you more than that and a clear logical breakdown. You just ignore it. Huh? 🤔

2:19 AM · Nov 27, 2025

Science is not having a trustworthiness crisis.

Science is fine. 100% fine. Science is close to the only thing that is fine.

I’m so sick of hearing about this fake crisis.

12:04 AM · Dec 10, 2025

Let me go back several years to the lines I wish to represent my perspective here. Apologies to long term followers for the repetitions.

“Before I call security: Who the fuck are you and what the fuck are you doing in my lab?”

“The greatness of American Cowboy science is based on the middle finger.”

“American scientists need to participate in the wealth they created for everyone else.”

“The ancient tradition of Peer Review is a myth created between 1965-1975.”

“American Scientists are *never* represented at the tables that decide their fate by American Scientits.”

“Repeal the Mansfield Amendment.”

“Scientists create value. Technologists capture it and return very little of what they capture.”

“Repeal the Eilberg Ammendment, Special Handling provision.”

“I never want to hear whining and sniveling about your precious tax dollars when it comes to science. We largely created them, you stripped us of our rights, got the best liscensing deal in human history, skipped the day “public goods and market failures” was taught in Econ 101, and sold us out to China while we were busy at the whiteboard.”

“Get the Robert Maxwells and other profiteering parasites out of science.”

“Repeal IMMACT90”

“Public Healrh and Tony Fauci are not science.”

“Repeal Bayh-Dole”

“Public Health is like a vengeful Ex-spouse in the midst a credibility spending spree on an overlooked credit Card that science forgot to cancel.”

“Repeal ‘Restricted Data’ as it violate free speech for physicists.”

“The Elite aren’t. They are the owners of the Sharpest Elbows sitting in the chairs reserved for our Sharpest Minds.”

“Fire Claudine Gay.”

Etc

12:34 AM · Dec 10, 2025

Am I the only American PhD with elite credentials who sounds remotely like this?

You bet your ass I am. And in a previous scientific world that made me worth listening to. An individual voice.

Like when I told the world that no one could say if Biden was going to make it to November elections. An American scientist doesn’t look for the crowd. He uses his own eyes and says what he sees.

Or “I see a massive UFO conspiracy likely in the form of a USAP.”

Yes it gets you ridiculed by weak minds. And? So? That is what American science is. We arbitrage the stupidity and greed of crowds, institutions and political loyalists to kick fucking ass. We cowboy it alone.

Have I been invited to address the national Academy on this? Again yes. Four or five times. Did i co-found a program to study and defend what was being done to American Scientists? Again yes. At Harvard and NBER. Funded my Sloan.

And check my history. I’ve been 100% consistent on this for four decades.

But I am not on your teams. And the teams are too ignorant, weak, tribal and petty to restore American Science.

The greatness of American science was RADICAL individualism and freedom. Freedom from teams.

Give us our money back. Fire our administrators. Give us back our seats at the table. Drive DEI and fairness out of the labs. Stop lying about foreign labor as the best and the brightest. And learn to listen to DISCORDANT VOICES OF *INDIVIDUALS* AGAIN.

As yourself: who are the leading American cowboy scientists advising the Oval Office or at Mar-a-Lago? Tech does not represent science!!

If I were Trump, I would be sitting down with individual American scientists with ideas rather ithan checking if they were wearing a MAGA hat or belonged to some team. You can’t make American science great again by restricting to loyalists.

Cannot be done. It is impossible.

Get the political classes out of Americas labs. We have shit to do.

12:57 AM · Dec 10, 2025

It’s like this. Science needs autonomy.

This isn’t a science problem. Its a subordination problem curable by autonomy.

All our colleagues who stayed in the system self-censor. All those who don’t leave the system.

No one has figured out how to stay in the system w/ freedom.

You and I failed by leaving. Others failed by staying. This has nothing to do with “us”. It’s not a personal failure issue. It’s a 55 year attack on scientific autonomy. You simply failed a Hobson’s choice problem. As did I. As did the people who went along with the madness.

And I am not going to make this personal. No one stayed in the system as a loud beacon of scientific freedom. Not one voice.

That isn’t a personal trust issue.

12:53 AM · Dec 11, 2025

And not one MAGA powerplayer has shown an interest in this issue. Not one billionaire. Anyone who could cure the problem is so pissed off at a fake scientist named Fauci and a fake science called “Public Health” that they don’t want to fund algebraic geometry or zebrafish developmental studies.

And that is absurd. I’m not going along with that. We need our autonomy to do our jobs. Where is this MAGA initiative?? Nowhere.

12:59 AM · Dec 11, 2025

@BretWeinstein This is absurd. There is no way to make America Great that doesn’t go through scientific autonomy. We are chosing to lose this game. And I won’t be quiet about that.

1:01 AM · Dec 11, 2025

@BretWeinstein And, btw, this is what happens when you don’t teach public good theory.

Handouts?? Ha ha ha ha. The indoctrination is at pathological levels. Wall to wall madness.

You can’t make America Great if you don’t understand public goods and market failures.

1:23 AM · Dec 11, 2025

I emphatically do **not** believe that a US government conspiracy has solved all of physics.

I think the US government is screwing up our edge in theoretical physics *massively*; and handing us to communist China on a silver platter in the process.

Hope that clears things up.

10:52 PM · Dec 27, 2025

We seem to be split along “everything is a conspiracy” vs “nothing is a conspiracy.”

This is tough when conspiracies are unquestionably a ubiquitous part of normal life, but do not come close to determining or explaining everything that happens around us.

I really don’t get it.

5:18 PM · Dec 29, 2025

We have entire agencies tasked with conspiring and creating conspiracies. We have RICO law that targets them. Every trade group is one. We convene Blue Ribbon Panels to conspire to sanitize disasters. We designate legal containers to hold them called USAPS. We used to hold hearings on the ones we did ourselves to ourselves. We make documentaries about them. We confess to them. They are a way of life.

Why are we stuck here? Anyone?

5:25 PM · Dec 29, 2025

Epstein wasn’t a man so much as he was the name we use for a larger conspiracy involving multiple governments. It involves science and many things beyond sex and blackmail.

The COVID origins investigation was a conspiracy, not science. As was the Vaccine sales job.

The Legacy Program UFO USAP/USAPs story involves conspiracies that may or may not involve actual UFOs.

The Biden Dementia operation was a conspiracy.

If you’re not a conspiracy theorist at this level, you’re an idiot. I’m sorry.

5:33 PM · Dec 29, 2025

On the other hand, if you think Jewish reptilians live on a moonbase built by the Freemasons and have telepathic thought control over your coffee mug which is actually conscious and telling you that Charlie Kirk faked his own death and is in cryogenic suspension in Atlantis protected by invisible nuclear powered robot dolphins but giving stock market signals to Paul Pelosi via remote projection, then you’re also an idiot.

The rest of us should be confused but trying to figure out which part of this is conspiracy. There is a lot of it. But not enough of it to explain our world.

Don’t be afraid to be a conspiracy theorist. They are super important obviously. Duh.

Just learn what’s known first. Learn how they form and how they actually work. There have been **many** found and dissected. Use that data set.

But for god sakes: Go easy on the stuff.

5:41 PM · Dec 29, 2025

2026Edit

Assume I needed to lodge a complaint about a vast conspiracy involving the utter ubiquitous corruption of both the Democratic & Republican parties and the leadership of the United States, up to and including the highest levels.

To whom would I address it?

Hypothetically.

9:37 PM · Feb 02, 2026

Any ideas @grok? For the sake of the thought experiment, please assume that Universities, News Organizations, Fact Checkers & Major Non-Profits are tied to the same conspiracy, leaving all elite actors in the U.S. with no more than 1-degree of separation from this conspiracy. 🙏

9:45 PM · Feb 02, 2026

I don’t know.

In this story, just suppose that:

I can’t go to the police.
I can’t go to the FBI.
I can’t run to the New York Times.
I can’t call the Department of Justice.
I can’t call up the CIA.
I can’t write to the President.
I can’t ask for a study from Harvard.
I can’t seek a grant from the NSF.
I can’t submit to compromised journals.
I can’t go to major foundations.
I can’t go to top law firms.

Thoughts?

9:56 PM · Feb 02, 2026

@grok I’m thinking.

But thanks.

Hey. I turned to you.

Thanks my silicon friend.

This is all hypothetical mind you. And I have absolutely no thoughts of suicide.

Just sayin’…

🙏

9:59 PM · Feb 02, 2026