Isaac Newton: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{Tweet |image=Eric profile picture.jpg |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570098837645332486 |name=Eric Weinstein |usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein |username=EricRWeinstein |content=So if #ufotwitter ever wanted to know why I didnāt take #UFO seriously, it was because I thought it was *preposterous* given lack of evidence. And if #ScienceTwitter wants to know why I spun on a dime, itās because it IS linked to the post-Einsteinian physics...") Ā |
m (Text replacement - "|usernameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinsteināµ|username=EricRWeinstein" to "|usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein |username=ericweinstein") Ā |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570098837645332486 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570098837645332486 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=So if #ufotwitter ever wanted to know why I didnāt take [[UAP|#UFO]] seriously, it was because I thought it was *preposterous* given lack of evidence. | |content=So if #ufotwitter ever wanted to know why I didnāt take [[UAP|#UFO]] seriously, it was because I thought it was *preposterous* given lack of evidence. | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570090986969403394 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570090986969403394 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Under [[Isaac Newton|Newton]], we were free to explore the cosmos: 1686-1905. | |content=Under [[Isaac Newton|Newton]], we were free to explore the cosmos: 1686-1905. | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570092276206149632 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570092276206149632 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Iām not going to complicate the basic story with caveats. Thatās the basic plot. Ā | |content=Iām not going to complicate the basic story with caveats. Thatās the basic plot. Ā | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570095403038814215 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570095403038814215 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=But if we can leave to explore the universe by going beyond Einstein, anyone else out there can visit. | |content=But if we can leave to explore the universe by going beyond Einstein, anyone else out there can visit. | ||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570096379405676544 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570096379405676544 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=If life is abundant & weāre not the top of the hierarchy (which is reasonable to me), Iād guess that [[UAP]] would be here if that is possible in Einsteinās successor theories. The absence of [[UAP]] is strong but *inconclusive* proof that [[Einsteinās Prison|Einsteinās restrictions]] persist in all theory. | |content=If life is abundant & weāre not the top of the hierarchy (which is reasonable to me), Iād guess that [[UAP]] would be here if that is possible in Einsteinās successor theories. The absence of [[UAP]] is strong but *inconclusive* proof that [[Einsteinās Prison|Einsteinās restrictions]] persist in all theory. | ||
|timestamp=5:05 PM Ā· Sep 14, 2022 | |timestamp=5:05 PM Ā· Sep 14, 2022 | ||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
|nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570097237136658433 | |nameurl=https://x.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1570097237136658433 | ||
|name=Eric Weinstein | |name=Eric Weinstein | ||
|usernameurl=https://x.com/ | |usernameurl=https://x.com/ericweinstein | ||
|username= | |username=ericweinstein | ||
|content=Hence my interest in [[UAP]]. [[UAP]] from distant worlds would be a strong indication that it is possible to diversify our shared risk which is that all known technological life is dependent on one atmosphere linking our three main existential risks: | |content=Hence my interest in [[UAP]]. [[UAP]] from distant worlds would be a strong indication that it is possible to diversify our shared risk which is that all known technological life is dependent on one atmosphere linking our three main existential risks: | ||
Latest revision as of 22:20, 5 May 2026
Under Newton, we were free to explore the cosmos: 1686-1905.
Einstein then enforced house arrest to our solar system:1905-Now.
@elonmusk then said chemical rockets could get us 2 more spheres w Newtonian laws.
But survival hinges on going *beyond* Einstein, not back to Newton.
Did you really say that, Eric?
Like EVERY civilisation before us, not destroyed by some rival, we are on course to self-destruct long before we become a multi-planetary species.
Your Brother, Bret's, #EvolutionaryLens should reveal this to him, but doesn't seem to have done.
Iām not going to complicate the basic story with caveats. Thatās the basic plot.
Either there is freedom to leave based on new ideas, like GU, or the Einsteinian restrictions will persist.
If they persist; we probably can mildly elongate survival here by decades via wisdom.
If life is abundant & weāre not the top of the hierarchy (which is reasonable to me), Iād guess that UAP would be here if that is possible in Einsteinās successor theories. The absence of UAP is strong but *inconclusive* proof that Einsteinās restrictions persist in all theory.
So if #ufotwitter ever wanted to know why I didnāt take #UFO seriously, it was because I thought it was *preposterous* given lack of evidence.
And if #ScienceTwitter wants to know why I spun on a dime, itās because it IS linked to the post-Einsteinian physics of our survival. š
This article is a stub. You can help us by editing this page and expanding it.